Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Molecular simulation of pore size effect on CH4 adsorption characteristics in anthracite
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 04 March 2026

Molecular simulation of pore size effect on CH4 adsorption characteristics in anthracite

  • Yang Bai1,2,
  • Leilei Yang1,
  • Biao Hu1,3,
  • Hang Long1,2,
  • Yibo Zhang1,
  • Aidong Li1 &
  • …
  • Boyang Geng1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 591 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Energy science and technology
  • Engineering
  • Environmental sciences

Abstract

Under the background of deep coal mining and low-carbon energy transformation, it is significant to study the gas adsorption mechanism and pore size regulation of coal to ensure the safe and efficient development of coalbed methane and promote the goal of Carbon Neutrality. Based on the GCMC method, a full pore size model of 0.4–200 nm is systematically constructed, and the adsorption behavior of CH4 in coal under different pressure conditions is simulated and analyzed, revealing the influence mechanism of pore size on adsorption characteristics. The results show that the micropore region (0.4–1.8 nm) is dominated by the coupling of potential fields on both sides of the pore wall, and the adsorption phase density is close to that of liquid methane, which conforms to D-A model. The mesoporous region (3–30 nm) shows multi-layer adsorption under the action of a single pore wall, and Langmuir model has the best fitting effect. The adsorption behavior of the macroporous region (50–200 nm) is close to that of free gas, which is more in line with BET multi-layer adsorption theory. By establishing the quantitative function relationship between the adsorption parameters such as V0(d), VL(d) and Vm(d) and the pore size, a comprehensive adsorption model suitable for the full pore size range was constructed. It was found that the adsorption phase density decreased in three stages as the pore size increased (micropores decreased by 40%, mesopores decreased by 63%). The model can accurately characterize the adsorption behavior of CH4 with full pore size, and the error is less than 6%. This error verifies the reliability of the constructed comprehensive adsorption model in predicting CH4 adsorption behavior in cross-scale pores, indicating that the model can effectively integrate the multi-adsorption mechanism dominated by micropore filling, mesoporous surface adsorption and macroporous multi-layer adsorption, which provides an important theoretical basis and prediction tool for accurate evaluation of coalbed methane reserves and optimization of development schemes.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article(and its supplementary information files).

References

  1. Rezk, M. G. et al. Understanding gas capillary entrapment in sandstone and carbonate aquifer rocks: Impact of gas type and pore structure. Fuel 374, 132414 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang, Z. et al. Investigation of Permeability Stress Induced Damage Evolution of Shallow and Deep Coal Reservoirs in the Junggar Basin, China: Z. Wang et al 1–28 (Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2025).

  3. Guo, F. et al. Adsorption, structure, and dynamics of DNA in montmorillonite and montmorillonite–humic acid: a molecular-level insight. Langmuir 41 (16), 10424–10433 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Thommes, M. et al. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 87 (9-10), 1051–1069 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zeng, F. et al. Gas transport study in the confined microfractures of coal reservoirs. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 68, 102920 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hu, Z. et al. Hydrogen storage potential of coals: Experimental characterization across different ranks. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 193, 152404 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Langmuir, I. The constitution and fundamental properties of solids and liquids. Part I. Solids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 38 (11), 2221–2295 (1916).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Marbán, G. BET adsorption reaction model based on the pseudo steady-state hypothesis for describing the kinetics of adsorption in liquid phase. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 467, 170–179 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dubinin, M. M. & Astakhov, V. A. Development of the concepts of volume filling of micropores in the adsorption of gases and vapors by microporous adsorbents-Communication 2. Div. Chem. Sci. 20 (1), 8–12 (1971). Bulletin of the Academy of Sciences of the USSRGeneral bases of the theory of adsorption of gases and vapors on zeolites.

  10. Feng, K. et al. Multifractal characterization of methane adsorption in Coal Pores. Langmuir 41 (22), 14548–14559 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, L. M. et al. Pore structure characteristics of high-rank coal adsorption and its influence on methane adsorption capacity. Ind. Mine Autom. 50 (07), 147–155 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Charoensuppanimit, P. et al. Modeling the temperature dependence of supercritical gas adsorption on activated carbons, coals and shales. Int. J. Coal Geol. 138, 113–126 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Seyfi, M. M., Parisa, N. & Farshad, V. Kinetic studies of structure-H hydrate using a Langmuir adsorption model: Effects of methyl cyclohexane and methyl cyclopentane as large-molecule guest substances on methane hydrate. J. Mol. Liq. 343, 117213 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gao, J. et al. The adsorption model of the adsorption process of CH4 on coal and its thermodynamic characteristics. Colloids Surf., A. 632, 127766 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ramesh, A. et al. Supercapacitor and room temperature H, CO2 and CH4 gas storage characteristics of commercial nanoporous activated carbon. J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 152, 109969 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou, S. et al. A modified BET equation to investigate supercritical methane adsorption mechanisms in shale. Mar. Pet. Geol. 105, 284–292 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wu, J. K. et al. High-efficient boil-off gas storage using low-temperature activated carbon adsorption. Gas Sci. Eng., 205765. (2025).

  18. Liu, H. et al. New insight into CH4 adsorption mechanism in coal based on modeling analysis of different adsorption theories. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 12 (4), 113174 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Peng, W. et al. Study on Evaluation of the virtual saturated vapor pressure model and prediction of adsorbed gas content in deep coalbed methane. Processes 12 (9), 1837 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hu, B. et al. New insights into the CH4 adsorption capacity of coal based on microscopic pore properties. Fuel 262, 116675 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Song, D. et al. Heterogeneous development of micropores in medium-high rank coal and its relationship with adsorption capacity. Int. J. Coal Geol. 226, 103497 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Li, Z. et al. Multi-scale pore fractal characteristics of differently ranked coal and its impact on gas adsorption. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 33 (4), 389–401 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li, Z. et al. Full-scale pore structure characterization of different rank coals and its impact on gas adsorption capacity: A theoretical model and experimental study. Energy 277, 127621 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Li, Q. et al. Investigation on the methane adsorption capacity in coals: Considerations from nanopores by multifractal analysis. Energy Fuels. 35 (8), 6633–6643 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li, Q. et al. CH4 adsorption capacity of coalbed methane reservoirs induced by microscopic differences in pore structure. Unconv. Resour. 4, 100097 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yang, R. et al. Effects of nanopore structure heterogeneity of coal samples on adsorption ability and porosity-permeability variation. Energy Fuels. 37 (4), 2721–2734 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tao, Y. R., Zhang, G. H. & Xu, H. J. Grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) study on adsorption performance of metal organic frameworks (MOFs) for carbon capture. Sustainable Mater. Technol. 32, e00383 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Li, S. G. et al. Molecular simulation of adsorption of gas in coal slit model under the action of liquid nitrogen. Fuel 255, 115775 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yin, T. et al. A new constructed macromolecule-pore structure of anthracite and its related gas adsorption: A molecular simulation study. Int. J. Coal Geol. 220, 103415 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Long, H. et al. Adsorption and diffusion characteristics of CH4, CO2, and N2 in micropores and mesopores of bituminous coal: Molecular dynamics. Fuel 292, 120268 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Metropolis, N. & Ulam, S. The Monte Carlo method. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 44 (247), 335–341 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Stefanov, S. K. On the basic concepts of the direct simulation Monte Carlo method. Phys. Fluids. 31 (6), 067104 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Heng, J. et al. Controlled sequential Monte Carlo. Annals Stat. 48 (5), 2904–2929 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jia, J. et al. Molecular structure characterization analysis and molecular model construction of anthracite. Plos one. 17 (9), e0275108 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sun, H., Ren, P. & Fried, J. R. The COMPASS force field: parameterization and validation for phosphazenes. Comput. Theor. Polym. Sci. 8 (1–2), 229–246 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Savin, A. V. & Mazo, M. A. The COMPASS force field: Validation for carbon nanoribbons. Phys. E: Low-dimensional Syst. Nanostruct. 118, 113937 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lopez-Echeverry, J. S., Reif-Acherman, S. & Araujo-Lopez, E. Peng-Robinson equation of state: 40 years through cubics. Fluid. Phase. Equilibria. 447, 39–71 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang, J. et al. Effects of nano-pore and macromolecule structure of coal samples on energy parameters variation during methane adsorption under different temperature and pressure. Fuel 289, 119804 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hu, H. et al. Small-molecule gas sorption and diffusion in coal: Molecular simulation. Energy 35 (7), 2939–2944 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Balbuena, P. B. & Gubbins, K. E. The effect of pore geometry on adsorption behavior. Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 87, 41–50 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Chen, G. et al. Keys to linking GCMC simulations and shale gas adsorption experiments. Fuel 199, 14–21 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Brenner, M. & Subrahmanyan, M. G. A simple formula to compute the implied standard deviation. Financial Anal. J. 44 (5), 80–88 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Research and Development of China (No.2023YFC3009002), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.52204237), Young Talent Fund of Association for Science and Technology of Shaanxi Province (No.20240458) . The use of the Materials Studio software package, which was supported by the College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering of Xi’an University of Science and Technology, is gratefully acknowledged.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Research and Development of China (No.2023YFC3009002), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.52204237), Young Talent Fund of Association for Science and Technology of Shaanxi Province (No.20240458).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, 58, Yanta Mid. Rd, Xi’an, 710054, Shaanxi, PR China

    Yang Bai, Leilei Yang, Biao Hu, Hang Long, Yibo Zhang, Aidong Li & Boyang Geng

  2. Western Engineering Research Center of Mine Gas Intelligent Extraction, Xi ’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an, 710054, Shaanxi, PR China

    Yang Bai & Hang Long

  3. Western Engineering Research Center of Mine Gas Intelligent Drainage for Coal Industry, Xi’an, 710054, Shaanxi, PR China

    Biao Hu

Authors
  1. Yang Bai
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leilei Yang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Biao Hu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hang Long
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yibo Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Aidong Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Boyang Geng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y.B. and L.Y. wrote the main manuscript text and prepared Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14. All the authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Bai.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bai, Y., Yang, L., Hu, B. et al. Molecular simulation of pore size effect on CH4 adsorption characteristics in anthracite. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41355-z

Download citation

  • Received: 16 January 2026

  • Accepted: 19 February 2026

  • Published: 04 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41355-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Coalbed methane
  • Full pore sizes
  • Grand canonical Monte Carlo method
  • Isothermal adsorption model
  • Molecular simulation
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing