Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Study on the effects of hydrological connectivity on the dispersal and driving factors of macroinvertebrate communities
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 02 March 2026

Study on the effects of hydrological connectivity on the dispersal and driving factors of macroinvertebrate communities

  • Yuhang Zhang1,2,3,4,
  • Baohang Zhang2,3,4,
  • Hongtao Wang1,
  • Zhe Liu5,
  • Min Zhang2,3,4,
  • Haiping Zhang2,3,4 &
  • …
  • Xiaodong Qu2,3,4 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 763 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Ecology
  • Environmental sciences

Abstract

Dispersal is crucial for the distribution of macroinvertebrate populations and communities. However, research on the dispersal of macroinvertebrates after dam demolition remains limited. Studying the impact processes and driving factors of dam demolition on the dispersal capacity of macroinvertebrate communities can help in the development of effective strategies for river ecosystem restoration and biodiversity conservation. Therefore, this study conducted continuous monthly surveys, monitoring drifting macroinvertebrates in the Jiuchong River of Shennongjia National Park from 2022 and 2023 (before and after dam removal), and analyzed the impact process and driving mechanism of cascade dam removal on the dispersal of macroinvertebrates. The results showed that before dam removal, there were significant differences in the community composition of drifting macroinvertebrates between the reference and impaired sites, indicating the significant cumulative effects of multiple dam barriers. After dam removal, the proportional representation of Hydropsychidae and Heptageniidae significantly decreased, while the proportions of Chironomidae and Ephemerellidae markedly increased. The dominant taxa shifted from Heptageniidae to Ephemerellidae, and the numbers of taxa and individuals approached those of the reference sites, indicating that dam removal has a significant ecological restoration effect on rivers. After dam removal, strong dispersers increased, whereas weak dispersers decreased. Additionally, at most sites, the dispersal capacity metric (DCMc) of the impaired sites was higher than before dam removal. Temporal variation patterns showed significant changes before and after dam removal, and in the initial stage after removal, the DCMc at each site increased with the increase in the number of “fugitive species,” those with strong dispersal capacity but weak competition capacity in the initial stage. Piecewise structural equation models revealed that Flow-Velocity and Flow-CPOM (coarse particulate organic matter) were positive feedback paths that affected DCMc, whereas Flow-Width and Flow-FPOM (fine particulate organic matter) were negative feedback paths. Our findings provide foundational support for the study of future freshwater ecosystem communities and biodiversity maintenance mechanisms as well as a scientific basis for the protection and management of cascade dams.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Xu, Z., Gu, X. & Liu, L. Investigation and assessment on river health of Weihe River Basin. Water Resour Prot. 34, 1–7 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Revenga, C., Campbell, I., Abell, R., De Villiers, P. & Bryer, M. Prospects for monitoring freshwater ecosystems towards the 2010 targets. Philos. Trans. R Soc. B Biol. Sci. 360, 397–413 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xenopoulos, M. A. et al. Scenarios of freshwater fish extinctions from climate change and water withdrawal. Glob Chang. Biol. 11, 1–8 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wirth, C., Lichstein, J. W., Dushoff, J., Chen, A. & Chapin, F. S. White spruce meets black spruce: dispersal, postfire establishment, and growth in a warming climate. Ecol. Monogr. 78, 489–505 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beisner, B. E., Peres-Neto, P. R., Lindström, E. S., Barnett, A. & Longhi, M. L. The role of environmental and spatial processes in structuring lake communities from bacteria to fish. Ecology 87, 2985–2991 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Heino, J. Does dispersal ability affect the relative importance of environmental control and spatial structuring of littoral macroinvertebrate communities? Oecologia 171, 971–980 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clobert, J., Baguette, M., Benton, T. G. & Bullock, J. M. Dispersal Ecology and Evolution (Oxford University Press, 2012).

  8. Thompson, R. & Townsend, C. A truce with neutral theory: local deterministic factors, species traits and dispersal limitation together determine patterns of diversity in stream invertebrates. J. Anim. Ecol. 75, 476–484 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Flinn, K. M., Gouhier, T. C., Lechowicz, M. J. & Waterway, M. J. The role of dispersal in shaping plant community composition of wetlands within an old-growth forest. J. Ecol. 98, 1292–1299 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lindström, E. S. & Östman, Ö. The importance of dispersal for bacterial community composition and functioning. Plos One. 6, e25883 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pépino, M., Rodríguez, M. A. & Magnan, P. Fish dispersal in fragmented landscapes: a modeling framework for quantifying the permeability of structural barriers. Ecol. Appl. 22, 1435–1445 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Radinger, J. & Wolter, C. Patterns and predictors of fish dispersal in rivers. Fish. Fish. 15, 456–473 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stoll, S., Sundermann, A., Lorenz, A. W., Kail, J. & Haase, P. Small and impoverished regional species pools constrain colonization of restored river reaches by fishes. Freshw. Biol. 58, 664–674 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ward, J. V. & Stanford, J. A. The serial discontinuity concept of lotic ecosystems. Dyn Lotic Ecosyst 29–42 (1983).

  15. Ding, L., Chen, L., Ding, C. & Tao, J. Global trends in dam removal and related research: a systematic review based on associated datasets and bibliometric analysis. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 29, 1–12 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schiermeier, Q. Europe is demolishing its dams to restore ecosystems. Nature 557, 290–291 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  17. River, A. American Rivers Dam Removal Database. figshare (2019).

  18. China.org.cn. The water conservancy department has done these things in 2020, many of which are closely related to your life. http://www.mwr.gov.cn/zw/zdhyxx/202204/t20220406_1568230.html( (2022).

  19. Noda, K., Hamada, J., Kimura, M. & Oki, K. Debates over dam removal in Japan. Water Environ. J. 32, 446–452 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Peng, H., Liu, D. & Tian, B. The status quo analysis of dam removal in the world. China Rural Water Hydropower. 5, 130–135 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gao, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, H. & Zhang, Z. Status of decommissioned dam removal and review of research progress on its effects. J. Water Resour. Water Eng. 29, 134–139 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schmidt-Kloiber, A. & Hering, D. www.freshwaterecology.info-An online tool that unifies, standardises and codifies more than 20,000 European freshwater organisms and their ecological preferences. Ecol. Indic. 53, 271–282 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Furse, M. et al. The STAR project: context, objectives and approaches. Hydrobiologia 566, 3–29 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mackay, R. J. Colonization by lotic macroinvertebrates: a review of processes and patterns. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49, 617–628 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Allan, J. D. & Drift. In Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Waters 221–237 (Chapman and Hall, 1995).

  26. Waters, T. F. The drift of stream insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 17, 253–272 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lowe, R. L. Phytobenthic ecology and regulated streams. In The Ecology of Regulated Streams (eds Ward, J. V. & Stanford, J. A.) 25–34 (Plenum Press, 1979).

  28. Hay, C. H., Franti, T. G., Marx, D. B., Peters, E. J. & Hesse, L. W. Macroinvertebrate drift density in relation to abiotic factors in the Missouri River. Hydrobiologia 598, 175–189 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Crisp, D. T. & Robson, S. Some effects of discharge upon the transport of animals and peat in a north Pennine headwater stream. J. Appl. Ecol. 16, 721–736 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Perry, S. A. & Perry, W. B. Effects of experimental flow regulation on invertebrate drift and stranding in the Flathead and Kootenai Rivers, Montana, USA. Hydrobiologia 134, 171–182 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Brittain, J. E. & Eikeland, T. J. Invertebrate drift: A review. Hydrobiologia 166, 77–93 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Irvine, J. R. Effects of successive flow perturbations on stream invertebrates. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 42, 1922–1927 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gore, J. A., Nestler, J. M. & Layzer, J. B. Instream flow predictions and management options for biota affected by peaking power hydroelectric operations. Regul. Rivers Res. Manage. 3, 35–48 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Walton, O. E. Active entry of stream benthic macro invertebrates into the water column. Hydrobiologia 74, 129–139 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wiggins, G. B. Larvae of the North American Caddisfly Genera (Trichoptera) 2nd edn (University of Toronto, 1996).

  36. Morse, J. C., Yang, L. & Tian, L. Aquatic Insects of China Useful for Monitoring Water Quality (Hohai University, 1994).

  37. Zhou, C. F. A taxonomic Study on Mayflies from Mainland China (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) (Nankai University, 2002).

  38. Environmental Protection Administration of China. Aquatic Monitoring Manual (Southeast University, 1993).

  39. Bis, B., Usseglio-Polatera, P. & Species Traits Analysis. Standardization of River Classifications: Framework Method for Calibrating Different Biological Survey Results Against Ecological Quality Classifications to be Developed for the Water Framework Directive http://www.eu-star.at/pdf/Deliverable_N2.pdf (2004).

  40. Li, F., Sundermann, A., Stoll, S. & Haase, P. A newly developed dispersal metric indicates the succession of benthic invertebrates in restored rivers. Sci. Total Environ. 53, 1570–1578 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Poff, N. L. et al. Functional trait niches of North American lotic insects: traits-based ecological applications in light of phylogenetic relationships. J. N Am. Benthol Soc. 25, 730–755 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Usseglio-Polatera, P., Bournaud, M., Richoux, P. & Tachet, H. Biological and ecological traits of benthic freshwater macroinvertebrates: relationships and definition of groups with similar traits. Freshw. Biol. 43, 175–205 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tachet, H., Richoux, P., Bournaud, M. & Usseglio-Polatera, P. Invertebres d’Eau Douce: Systematique, Biologie, Ecologie (CNRS editions, 2002).

  44. Brinkhurst, R. O. Guide to the freshwater aquatic microdrile of North America. Can. Spec. Publ Fish. Aquat. Sci. 6, 78–79 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lampitt, R. S., Wishner, K. F., Turley, C. M. & Angel, M. V. Marine snow studies in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean: Distribution, composition and role as a food source for migrating plankton. Mar. Biol. 116, 689–702 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Anderson, J. C. & Gerbing, D. W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol. Bull. 103, 411 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Lefcheck, J. S. PIECEWISESEM: Piecewise structural equation modelling in r for ecology, evolution, and systematics. Methods Ecol. Evo. 7, 573–579 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Velinsky, D. J., Bushaw-Newton, K. L., Kreeger, D. A. & Johnson, T. E. Effects of small dam removal on stream chemistry in southeastern Pennsylvania. J. N Am. Benthol Soc. 25, 569–582 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mundahl, N. D. & Hunt, A. M. Recovery of stream invertebrates after catastrophic flooding in southeastern Minnesota, USA. J. Freshw. Ecol. 26, 445–457 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Smith, A. J., Baldigo, B. P., Duffy, B. T., George, S. D. & Dresser, B. Resilience of benthic macroinvertebrates to extreme floods in a Catskill Mountain river, New York, USA: Implications for water quality monitoring and assessment. Ecol. Indic. 104, 107–115 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Schmidt-Traub, G. National climate and biodiversity strategies are hamstrung by a lack of maps. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1325–1327 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Poff, N. L. & Ward, J. V. Herbivory under different flow regimes: a field experiment and test of a model with a benthic stream insect. Oikos 71, 179–188 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Imbert, J. B. & Perry, J. A. Drift and benthic invertebrate responses to stepwise and abrupt increases in non-scouring flow. Hydrobiologia 436, 191–208 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Robinson, C. T., Aebischer, S. & Uehlinger, U. Immediate and habitat-specific responses of macroinvertebrates to sequential, experimental floods. J. N Am. Benthol Soc. 23, 853–867 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Robinson, C. T., Uehlinger, U. & Monaghan, M. T. Stream ecosystem response to multiple experimental floods from a reservoir. River Res. Appl. 20, 359–377 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Jakob, C., Robinson, C. T. & Uehlinger, U. Longitudinal effects of experimental floods on stream benthos downstream from a large dam. Aquat. Sci. 65, 223–231 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Fuller, R. L. et al. Impact of regulated releases on periphyton and macroinvertebrate communities: The dynamic relationship between hydrology and geomorphology in frequently flooded rivers. River Res. Appl. 27, 630–645 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Gafner, K. & Robinson, C. T. Nutrient enrichment influences the responses of stream macroinvertebrates to disturbance. J. N Am. Benthol Soc. 26, 92–102 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Fahrig, L. Non-optimal animal movement in human-altered landscapes. Funct. Ecol. 21, 1003–1015 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kindlmann, P. & Burel, F. Connectivity measures: a review. Landsc. Ecol. 23, 879–890 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Flory, E. A. & Milner, A. M. Benthic invertebrate community structure is influenced by forest succession after clearcut logging in southeastern Alaska. Freshw. Biol. 44, 465–480 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Minakawa, N. & Gara, R. I. Effects of chum salmon redd excavation on benthic com-munities in a stream in the Pacific Northwest. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 132, 598–604 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Horn, H. S. & MacArthur, R. H. Competition among fugitive species in a harlequin environment. Ecology 53, 749–752 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Milner, A. M., Robertson, A. L., Monaghan, K. A., Veal, A. J. & Flory, E. A. Colonization and development of an Alaskan stream community over 28 years. Front. Ecol. Environ. 6, 413–419 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Downes, B. J. & Lake, P. S. Different colonization patterns of two closely related stream insects (Austrosimulium spp.) following disturbance. Freshw. Biol. 26, 295–306 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Heino, J. et al. Integrating dispersal proxies in ecological and environmental research in the freshwater realm. Environ. Rev. 25, 334–349 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Matias, M. G., Mouquet, N. & Chase, J. M. Dispersal stochasticity mediates species richness in source-sink metacommunities. Oikos 122, 395–402 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Gonzalez, A. & Metacommunities Spatial Community Ecology. ELS (2009).

  69. Gourdin, E. et al. Sources and export of particle-borne organic matter during a monsoon flood in a catchment of northern Laos. BG 12, 1073–1089 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Jochner, M., Turowski, J. M., Badoux, A., Stoffel, M. & Rickli, C. The role of log jams and exceptional flood events in mobilizing coarse particulate organic matter in a steep headwater stream. Earth Surf. Dynam. 3, 311–320 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Flecker, A. S. The effects of predation and detritus on the structure of a stream insect community: a field test. Oecologia 64, 300–305 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Reice, S. R. Effects of detritus loading and fish predation on leafpack breakdown and benthic macroinvertebrates in a woodland stream. J. N Am. Benthol Soc. 10, 42–56 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Lancaster, J. & Downes, B. J. Population densities and density-area relationships in a community with advective dispersal and variable mosaics of resource patches. Oecologia 176, 985–996 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Lindström, E. S. & Langenheder, S. Local and regional factors influencing bacterial community assembly. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 4, 1–9 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Havel, J. E. & Shurin, J. B. Mechanisms, effects, and scales of dispersal in freshwater zooplankton. Limnol. Oceanogr. 49(4part2), 1229–1238 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Supported by State Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Water Security(Project No.SKL2025RCPY07)and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2024YFC3212600).

Funding

This work has received financial support by State Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Water Security(Project No.SKL2025RCPY07)and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2024YFC3212600).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Yellow River Conservancy Technical University, Kaifeng, 475004, China

    Yuhang Zhang & Hongtao Wang

  2. State Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Water Security, Beijing, 100038, China

    Yuhang Zhang, Baohang Zhang, Min Zhang, Haiping Zhang & Xiaodong Qu

  3. Key Laboratory of Water Safety for Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region of Ministry of Water Resources, Beijing, 100038, China

    Yuhang Zhang, Baohang Zhang, Min Zhang, Haiping Zhang & Xiaodong Qu

  4. Department of Water Ecology and Environment, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing, 100038, China

    Yuhang Zhang, Baohang Zhang, Min Zhang, Haiping Zhang & Xiaodong Qu

  5. Hebei Water Conservancy Engineering Bureau Group Limited, Shijiazhuang, 050021, China

    Zhe Liu

Authors
  1. Yuhang Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Baohang Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hongtao Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhe Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Min Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Haiping Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xiaodong Qu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Yuhang Zhang: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing - original draft. Baohang Zhang: Writing - review & editing. Hongtao Wang: Writing - review & editing. Zhe Liu: Writing - review & editing. Min Zhang: Project administration, Funding acquisition, Writing-review & editing. Haiping Zhang: Project administration, Writing-review & editing. Xiaodong Qu: Conceptualization, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing-review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaodong Qu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Official permits were granted to confirm that our team was authorized to conduct research in Shennongjia National Park.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Zhang, B., Wang, H. et al. Study on the effects of hydrological connectivity on the dispersal and driving factors of macroinvertebrate communities. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41441-2

Download citation

  • Received: 02 September 2025

  • Accepted: 19 February 2026

  • Published: 02 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41441-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Macroinvertebrates
  • Dispersal capacity
  • Drift behavior
  • Dam removal
  • Hydrological connectivity
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene