Table 6 Results of the presented system for two scenarios after (999 s).
From: Scenario based traffic optimization in Egypt performance gains through simulation modeling
Simulation time (999 s) | Scenario 1 | Scenario 2 |
|---|---|---|
Trip Information | ||
Average (Depart delay(sec)) | 6.02 | 5.54 |
Average (Arrival (sec)) | 234.71 | 189.43 |
Average (Duration (sec)) | 414.19 | 349.25 |
Average (Waiting time) | 139.90 | 100.90 |
Average (Time loss (sec)) | 178.18 | 126.55 |
Average (Co_abs) | 155.37 | 152.26 |
Average (Co2_abs) | 2794.72 | 2745.63 |
Average (HC_abs | 0.87 | 0.76 |
Average NOx_abs) | 1.92 | 1.23 |
Average (PMx_abs) | 0.89 | 0.70 |
Average (Fuel_abs) | 1200.36 | 875.78 |
Average noise | 59.92 | 56.86 |
Queue Output | ||
Queuing time | 128.30 | 117.64 |
queueing_length | 19.88 | 17.44 |
queueing_length _experimental | 17.78 | 14.91 |
Summary | ||
Loaded vehicles | 1739 | 1739 |
Inserted vehicles | 762 | 817 |
Running vehicles | 500 | 500 |
Waiting vehicles | 971 | 916 |
Ended vehicles | 262 | 317 |
Arrived vehicles | 262 | 317 |
Mean waiting time | 47.01 | 33.21 |
