Table 1 Summary of algorithms, strengths, and challenges in wind turbines fault detection.
Authors | Algorithm | Strength | Challenges |
|---|---|---|---|
Rizk et al. (2024)11 | Hyperspectral imaging + 3D Convolutional Neural Networks (3D CNN) | Captures spatial and spectral features; high accuracy | High-dimensional data processing; requires hyperspectral imaging equipment |
Roelofs et al. (2024)12 | Transfer learning with autoencoders | leverages pre-trained models for generalization across turbine types | Dependence on quality of pre-trained models |
Letzgus et al. (2024)13 | Explainable AI framework for power curve modeling | Enhance transparency and robustness | Complexity in developing explainable models |
Song et al. (2025)14 | Self-Attention Mechanism and LSTM | High accuracy and generalization ability | Depends on the quality, volume, and labeling of SCADA data |
Asy’Ari et al. (2025)15 | Bispectrum image analysis and CNN, CNN-LSTM, CNN-BiLSTM | Effectively capturing the gearbox failures. | Hybrid models are complex to implement and tune. |
Ma et al. (2025)16 | Hybrid 1D CNN-BiLSTM-AdaBoost | Leverage data from multiple sources | Without careful tuning, overfitting may occur |
Wang et al. (2025)17 | FCNet-5 | High diagnostic accuracy and enhances reliability by incorporating multiple sensor | Struggles to differentiate between fault types with minute variations. |
Lee et al. (2025)18 | PDCNN + AEPSO-XGBoost Framework | Incorporates physical knowledge and addresses the issue of class imbalance in SCADA datasets | Computationally intensive and could have a risk of overfitting with noisy data |
Dai et al. (2024)19 | DFD-kNN | Computational efficiency due to the reduced data redundancy | Parameter sensitivity and dependency on historical data |
Guo et al. (2021)20 | Hierarchical framework: Haar-AdaBoost for region detection + CNN for classification | Efficient detection and classification of damage types | Complexity in multi-step processing |
Zhu et al. (2022)21 | LSTM + Fuzzy Synthesis + Transfer Learning for gearbox operational state prediction | Effective fault detection using SCADA data | Requires extensive SCADA data |
Jia et al. (2024)22 | AQUADA-Seg | Enhanced segmentation by integrating thermal and optical data | requires synchronized multi-modal data |
Davis et al. (2024)23 | YOLO and Mask R-CNN | Real-time object detection | Trade-off between accuracy and speed |
Zhang et al. (2024)24 | LSTM-AVAGMM | Root cause analysis and incremental training | Complexity of hybrid model |
Sun et al. (2023)25 | Spatial-temporal multi-learner neural network | Handles imbalanced SCADA data | requires careful learner selection |
Liu et al. (2024)26 | STGNN | Models spatial and temporal dependencies | Graph construction complexity |
Ran et al. (2022)27 | AFB-YOLO | Better localization accuracy | Requires careful tuning |
Bielecki et al. (2021)28 | Unsupervised real-time monitoring with ART-2 neural network + Gaussian mixture models | No need for prior training data | Potential sensitivity to noise - method may have false alarms |
Sheiati et al. (2024)29 | Siamese CNN for blade identification + deep learning segmentation | Supports blade tracking over time | Segmentation accuracy affects tracking |
Lin et al. (2024)30 | Random forest for feature selection + LSTM for early fault prediction | Effective time series analysis | Needs extensive historical data |
Silva et al. (2025)31 | Image processing on audible noise spectrograms | Early fault detection via abnormal noise | Noise variability - requires good noise data quality |
Manshadi et al. (2022)32 | Offshore hybrid system power prediction | Predicts net power effectively | data availability |
Jamil et al. (2022)33 | Deep boosted transfer learning gearbox malfunction ID | Improves learning across conditions | Transfer learning challenges |
Ahmed et al. (2023)34 | Deep autoencoder on vibration signals for anomaly detection | Early fault detection without manual engineering | Needs vibration data |
Kang et al.35 | Adam-optimized CNN-LSTM | High diagnostic accuracy for gearbox faults through adaptive optimization. | Computational complexity and limited to controlled environments |
Zhang et al.36 | CNN-LSTM cascade model | Early fault detection using SCADA temperature data | Limited by low-frequency data. |
Qi et al.37 | CNN-LSTM vibration-based fault detection | High accuracy on vibration-signal-based bearing fault detection | Relies on clean, high-quality data and is computationally intensive. |
Maldonado-Correa et al.38 | Anomaly Transformer and TranAD, | Use self-attention mechanisms to capturing long-range dependencies and complex temporal patterns | Computational limits; only up to 18 variables could be processed due to resource constraints |
Raju et al.39 | HARO | High prediction accuracy and effective feature selection using Lasso regression | Computational complexity and dependency on high quality data |
Dwivedi et al. (2024)40 | Attention-based Vision Transformers (ViT) on drone images | attention mechanism improves focus on relevant features | Large data requirements and computationally intensive |
Qiao et al.41 | 1DCNN with Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning | Meta-learning enables rapid adaptation | Experimental validation is limited to one wind farm |
Wang et al.42 | SL-GPN | Addresses real-world challenges like small-sample and label error problems | high computational complexity |