Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Compound effects of dams and levees reshape Yangtze flood dynamics and reveal substantial risk misestimations from ignoring levees
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 12 March 2026

Compound effects of dams and levees reshape Yangtze flood dynamics and reveal substantial risk misestimations from ignoring levees

  • Shuyuan Xu1,2,
  • Haodong Sun3,
  • Lingyun Zhang6,
  • Juan Han1,
  • Ruikai Pan4,6,
  • Liwen Yang7,
  • Xinghua Xiang1,2 &
  • …
  • Li Tang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2407-87565 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 464 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Climate sciences
  • Environmental sciences
  • Hydrology
  • Natural hazards
  • Water resources

Abstract

Rivers worldwide are facing an escalating risk of devastating floods driven by climate change, despite the extensive regulation of human infrastructures. Previous large-scale analyses of floods have reconstructed global and regional patterns by accounting for reservoir regulation; however, the critical role of levees remains largely ignored. Here, we provide a timely assessment of infrastructure-driven flood dynamics by simulating the joint influence of dams and levees across the Yangtze River Basin during 1980–2019 using the CaMa-Flood model. Results clarify the distinct and complementary roles of these structures: levees rectify peak-flow fidelity (median Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency 0.62 at 32 validated flow stations) while dams primarily enhance low-flow accuracy (median logNSE 0.71). Ignoring levees results in a ~ 15% overestimation of annual maximum inundation area relative to dam-only assessments. Despite parameterization uncertainties, this study provides the first insights highlighting the critical role of integrating levees to accurately simulate regulated river systems and flood risk assessments.

Data availability

The data generated during this study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Code availability

The codes are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Gudmundsson, L. et al. Globally observed trends in mean and extreme river flow attributed to climate change. Science 371, 1159–1162. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba3996 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gou, J. J. et al. Sensitivity analysis-based automatic parameter calibration of the VIC model for streamflow simulations over China. Water Resour. Res. 56(1), e2019WR025968 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Manandhar, B., Cui, S., Wang, L. & Shrestha, S. Urban flood hazard assessment and management practices in South Asia: A review. Land 12(3), 627. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12030627 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lehner, B. et al. High-resolution mapping of the world’s reservoirs and dams for sustainable river-flow management. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 494–502. https://doi.org/10.1890/100125 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shen, Y., Nielsen, K., Revel, M., Liu, D. & Yamazaki, D. Res-CN (Reservoir dataset in China): Hydrometeorological time series and landscape attributes across 3254 Chinese reservoirs. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 15, 2781–2808. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2781-2023 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Coerver, H. M., Rutten, M. M. & van de Giesen, N. C. Deduction of reservoir operating rules for application in global hydrological models. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 22, 831–851. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-831-2018 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shen, Y., Yamazaki, D., Pokhrel, Y. & Zhao, G. Improving global reservoir parameterizations by incorporating flood storage capacity data and satellite observations. Water Resour. Res. 61, e2024WR037620. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR037620 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sabaj Pérez, M. H. Where the Xingu bends and will soon break. Am. Sci. 103(6), 395–403 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Timpe, K. & Kaplan, D. The changing hydrology of a dammed Amazon. Sci. Adv. 3(11), e1700611 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Räsänen, T. A. et al. Observed river discharge changes due to hydropower operations in the upper Mekong Basin. J. Hydrol. 545, 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.12.023 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cochrane, T. A., Arias, M. E. & Piman, T. Historical impact of water infrastructure on water levels of the Mekong River and the Tonle Sap system. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 18(11), 4529–4541 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gao, B., Yang, D. & Yang, H. Impact of the Three Gorges Dam on flow regime in the middle and lower Yangtze River. Quat. Int. 304, 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2012.11.023 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liang, X., Lettenmaier, D. P., Wood, E. F. & Burges, S. J. A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 99(D7), 14415–14428. https://doi.org/10.1029/94JD00483 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S. & Williams, J. R. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment Part I: Model development. JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 34(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Perrin, C., Michel, C. & Andréassian, V. Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation. J. Hydrol. 279(1–4), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00225-7 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shin, S. et al. High-resolution modeling of river-floodplain-reservoir inundation dynamics in the Mekong River Basin. Water Resour. Res. 56(5), e2019WR026449. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026449 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dong, N. et al. Model estimates of China’s terrestrial water storage variation due to reservoir operation. Water Resour. Res. 58(6), e2021WR031787. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR031787 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Boulange, J., Hanasaki, N., Yamazaki, D. & Pokhrel, Y. Role of dams in reducing global flood exposure under climate change. Nat. Commun. 12(1), 417. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20704-0 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pinter, N. One step forward, two steps back on U.S. floodplains. Science 308(5719), 207–208. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1108411 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Czech, W., Radecki-Pawlik, A., Wyżga, B. & Hajdukiewicz, H. Modelling the flooding capacity of a Polish Carpathian river after channelization and levee reconstruction. J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 64(2), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1515/johh-2016-0010 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  21. USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). National Levee Safety Program Interim Report. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (2018). https://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/Civil-Works/Levee-Safety-Program/

  22. Wing, O. E. J. et al. A new automated method for improved flood defense representation in large‐scale hydraulic models. Water Resour. Res. 55(12), 11007–11034. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025957 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Özer, I. E., Rikkert, S. J. H., van Leijen, F. J., Jonkman, S. N., & Hanssen, R. F. Sub-millimeter SAR interferometry for dike monitoring: Doetinchem case study. In Proceedings of the ESA Living Planet Symposium, Milan, Italy. (2019).

  24. Sofia, G., Fontana, G. D., Ronchi, C. & Dallamura, F. Flood dynamics in urban areas: Data and modeling. J. Hydrol. 517, 428–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.052 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Do, H. X. et al. Mapping the world’s river levees: A hyper‐resolution levee database based on digital elevation models. Geophys. Res. Lett. 52(11), e2024GL114121. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL114121 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Di Baldassarre, G. et al. An interdisciplinary assessment of private sector engagement in flood risk management in Europe. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 22(10), 5629–5646. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5629-2018 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Moftakhari, H. R., AghaKouchak, A., Sanders, B. F., Wood, R. R. & Matthew, R. A. Linking statistical and hydrodynamic modeling for compound flood hazard assessment in tidal channels and estuaries. Adv. Water Resour. 128, 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.04.009 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gharari, S. et al. A flexible framework for simulating the water balance of lakes and reservoirs from local to global scales: MizuRoute‐Lake. Water Resour. Res. 60(5), e2022WR032400. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR032400 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hanazaki, R., Yamazaki, D. & Yoshimura, K. Development of a reservoir flood control scheme for global flood models. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 14(4), e2021MS002944. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002944 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhao, G. et al. Developing a levee module for global flood modeling with a reach‐level parameterization approach. Water Resour. Res. 61(8), e2024WR039790. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR039790 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Li, X., Zhang, Q. & Xu, C. Spatiotemporal evolution of 1998 extreme flood event in the Yangtze River Basin based on hydrological modeling. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 53, 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101832 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yamazaki, D., Kanae, S., Kim, H. & Oki, T. A physically based description of floodplain inundation dynamics in a global river routing model. Water Resour. Res. 47(4), W04501. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009726 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zhou, X., Yamazaki, D., Zhao, G., Yoshimura, K. & Hirabayashi, Y. Benchmark framework for global river models. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 16(3), e2024MS004379. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024MS004379 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bates, P. D., Horritt, M. S. & Fewtrell, T. J. A simple inertial formulation of the shallow water equations for efficient two-dimensional flood inundation modelling. J. Hydrol. 387(1–2), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.027 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gao, H. Global reservoir surface area dataset (GRSAD) (Version 1.0). Texas Data Repository. (2020) https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/DF80WG.

  36. Yigzaw, W. et al. Global reservoir geometry database. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1322884 (2018).

  37. Shin, S., Pokhrel, Y. & Miguez-Macho, G. High-resolution modeling of reservoir release and storage dynamics at the continental scale. Water Resour. Res. 55(1), 787–810. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023025 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Arnold, J. G., Moriasi, D. N., Gassman, P. W., Abbaspour, K. C., White, M. J., Srinivasan, R., ... & Jha, M. K. (2012). SWAT: Model use, calibration, and validation. Transactions of the ASABE. 55(4), 1491–1508.

  39. Warren, I. R. & Bach, H. MIKE 21: a modelling system for estuaries, coastal waters and seas. Environ. Softw. 7(4), 229–240 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Shustikova, I., Domeneghetti, A., Neal, J. C., Bates, P. & Castellarin, A. Comparing 2D capabilities of HEC-RAS and LISFLOOD-FP on complex topography. Hydrol. Sci. J. 64(14), 1769–1782 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tang, R., Dai, Z., Mei, X. & Lou, Y. Joint impacts of dams and floodplain on the rainfall-induced extreme flood in the Changjiang (Yangtze) River. J. Hydrol. 627, Article 130428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130428 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Program of Shanxi Province (Grant numbers [202303021211196])(X.S.), the Teaching Reform and Innovation Project of Higher Education Institutions in Shanxi Province in 2024 (No. J20241550) (X.S.), the Key Laboratory of Transparent Mine Geology and Digital Twin Technology, National Mine Safety Administration Open Topics (No.SYSKT-2025-6)( P.R.), the Research Program of Northwest Institute of Eco-environment Resources of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Project No. HF2025-R&D-722)(Y.L.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geology and Surveying Engineering, Shanxi Institute of Energy, Jinzhong, 030600, China

    Shuyuan Xu, Juan Han & Xinghua Xiang

  2. Geological Environments and Disaster Prevention and Reduction Research Center, Shanxi Institute of Energy, Jinzhong, 030600, China

    Shuyuan Xu & Xinghua Xiang

  3. Shanxi Provincial Geological Prospecting Bureau, Taiyuan, 030001, China

    Haodong Sun

  4. Key Laboratory of Transparent Mine Geology and Digital Twin Technology, National Mine Safety Administration, Beijing, 100039, China

    Ruikai Pan

  5. Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430000, China

    Li Tang

  6. Department of Mining Engineering, Shanxi Institute of Energy, Jinzhong, 030600, China

    Lingyun Zhang & Ruikai Pan

  7. Department of Economics, Shanxi Institute of Energy, Jinzhong, 030600, China

    Liwen Yang

Authors
  1. Shuyuan Xu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Haodong Sun
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lingyun Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Juan Han
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ruikai Pan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Liwen Yang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xinghua Xiang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Li Tang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.X. and L.T. collected and analyzed the research data and wrote the original draft. S.X., H.S. and L.T. designed and applied the models of the research, H.S. generated the figures in the main manuscript. L.Z., J.H., R.P., L.Y. and X.X. contributed to data collection and manuscript revision. L.T. supervised the project. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Tang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, S., Sun, H., Zhang, L. et al. Compound effects of dams and levees reshape Yangtze flood dynamics and reveal substantial risk misestimations from ignoring levees. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41694-x

Download citation

  • Received: 09 December 2025

  • Accepted: 23 February 2026

  • Published: 12 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41694-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Dams
  • Levees
  • Flood risk
  • Compound effects
  • Hydrodynamic modeling
  • Hydrological alteration
  • Flood inundation
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene