Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
A study on the efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation as an adjunctive therapy for treating depressive episodes
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 13 March 2026

A study on the efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation as an adjunctive therapy for treating depressive episodes

  • Linlin Wang1 na1,
  • Sijia Zhang2 na1,
  • Yiyun Liu1,
  • Deqiang Li3,
  • Guoqiang Tian4,
  • Xujuan Li1 na1 &
  • …
  • Yufeng Li5 na1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 939 Accesses

  • 8 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Depression
  • Psychiatric disorders

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) as an adjunctive therapy for depressive episodes. This study recruited 46 participants aged 18–65 from January 2022 to December 2023 who were diagnosed with depression according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition. They were randomly divided into two groups to receive different treatments, including FMT combined with medication group (test group, n = 23) and the medication-only group (control group, n = 23). Assessments were performed before and two weeks after treatment. Ten predominant gut microbiota species were analyzed, and the Hamilton’s Depression Scale-24(HAMD-24) was used to evaluate depressive symptoms. Adverse events related to treatment were assessed using an adverse event scale and laboratory tests. The main evaluation indicators included the reduction rate of HAMD-24 scores, treatment efficacy rate, and changes in the indicators of the ten predominant intestinal bacteria before and after transplantation. Safety assessment indicators included adverse events, blood routine, biochemistry, electrocardiogram, immunological parameters (immunoglobulins and complement), hypersensitive C-reactive protein(hs-CRP), thyroid function, and glycated hemoglobin. The rank-sum test was performed to compare differences in microbiota before and after FMT treatment. The relationship between gut microbiota and depression severity was examined by means of correlation analysis. The baseline HAMD-24 scores showed no significant difference between the test and control groups (P > 0.05). After two weeks treatment, the reduction in HAMD-24 scores (P = 0.048) and the HAMD-24 reduction rate (P = 0.016) were significantly higher in the test group than control group (P < 0.05). Following FMT treatment, Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Butyricicoccus levels significantly increased compared to baseline (P < 0.05). Linear discriminant analysis(LDA) revealed a significant post-treatment increase in Enterococcus relative abundance (P = 0.02). In the test group, baseline-enriched Clostridium prausnitzii (P = 0.040), Butyricicoccus (P = 0.029), and Eubacterium rectale (P = 0.004) showed significant negative correlations with HAMD-24 scores, whereas post-treatment Enterococcus was correlated with HAMD-24 scores (P = 0.030). Adverse event incidence was 28.6% in the test group and 30% in the control group, with no significant difference (P = 0.928). Reported discomforts during FMT treatment—nausea, vomiting, and nasopharyngeal discomfort—were mild and self-resolving, with no serious adverse events observed. The administration of FMT as an adjunctive therapy demonstrates superior improvement in depressive symptoms and is deemed safe with no apparent adverse reactions. There was no change in the composition of gut microbiota structure before and after FMT in patients with depression. Enterococcus showed a significant relative abundance increase in the gut after FMT. The post-treatment Enterococcus was correlated with HAMD-24 scores.

Data availability

Data is provided within the manuscript or supplementary information files.

References

  1. COVID-19 Mental Disorders Collaborators. Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet 398, 1700–1712 (2021).

  2. World Health Organization. World Mental Health Report: Transforming Mental Health for All (WHO, 2022).

  3. GBD 2019 Mental Disorders Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Psychiatry. 9, 137–150 (2022).

  4. Schildkraut, J. J. The catecholamine hypothesis of affective disorders: a review of supporting evidence. Am. J. Psychiatry. 122, 509–522 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Coppen, A. The biochemistry of affective disorders. Br. J. Psychiatry. 113, 1237–1264 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rush, A. J. et al. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report. Am. J. Psychiatry. 163, 1905–1917 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cipriani, A. et al. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet 391, 1357–1366 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Krishnan, V. & Nestler, E. J. The molecular neurobiology of depression. Nature 455, 894–902 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bercik, P. The microbiota-gut-brain axis: learning from intestinal bacteria? Gut 60, 288–289 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carabotti, M., Scirocco, A., Maselli, M. A. & Severi, C. The gut-brain axis: interactions between enteric microbiota, central and enteric nervous systems. Annals Gastroenterol. 28, 203–209 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Socała, K. et al. The role of microbiota-gut-brain axis in neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders. Pharmacol. Res. 172, 105840 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zheng, P. et al. Gut microbial signatures can discriminate unipolar from bipolar depression. Adv. Sci. (Weinh). 7, 1902862 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Valles-Colomer, M. et al. The neuroactive potential of the human gut microbiota in quality of life and depression. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 623–632 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ghosh, S., Whitley, C. S., Haribabu, B. & Jala, V. R. Regulation of intestinal barrier function by microbial metabolites. Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 11, 1463–1482 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li, N. et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation from chronic unpredictable mild stress mice donors affects anxiety-like and depression-like behavior in recipient mice via the gut microbiota-inflammation-brain axis. Stress 22, 592–602 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, S. et al. Gut microbiota regulates depression-like behavior in rats through the neuroendocrine-immune-mitochondrial pathway. Neuropsychiatr Dis. Treat. 16, 859–869 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Slyepchenko, A. et al. Gut microbiota, bacterial translocation, and interactions with diet: pathophysiological links between major depressive disorder and non-communicable medical comorbidities. Psychother. Psychosom. 86, 31–46 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Caspani, G., Kennedy, S., Foster, J. A. & Swann, J. Gut microbial metabolites in depression: understanding the biochemical mechanisms. Microb. Cell. 6, 454–481 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Młynarska, E. et al. The role of the microbiome-brain-gut axis in the pathogenesis of depressive disorder. Nutrients 14, 1921 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sun, W., Zhang, J. & Mao, Q. Advances in clinical practice of fecal microbiota transplantation. Chin. J. Microecol.. 29, 1197–1203 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Surawicz, C. M. et al. Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Clostridium difficile infections. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 108, 478–499 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Debast, S. B., Bauer, M. P., Kuijper, E. J. & European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: update of the treatment guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 20 (Suppl 2), 1–26 (2014).

  23. Sinyor, M., Schaffer, A. & Levitt, A. The sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D) trial: a review. Can. J. Psychiatry. 55, 126–135 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Trivedi, M. H. et al. Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: implications for clinical practice. Am. J. Psychiatry. 163, 28–40 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rush, A. J. et al. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report. Am. J. Psychiatry. 163, 1905–1917 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cipriani, A. et al. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ. 16, 420–429 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tian, Y. Y. & Jia, X. F. Advantages and pathogenicity of Enterococci. Lab. Med. 38, 1101–1105 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wang, Y. et al. Effects of combined live bifidobacterium, lactobacillus enterococcus and bacillus cereus tablets on post-stroke depression and serum inflammatory factorse. Discov. Med. 35, 312–320 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jang, H. M. et al. Enterococcus faecium and Pediococcus acidilactici deteriorate Enterobacteriaceae-induced depression and colitis in mice. Sci. Rep. 12, 9389 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Knuesel, T. & Mohajeri, M. H. The role of the gut microbiota in the development and progression of major depressive and bipolar disorde r. Nutrients 14, 37 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fisher, K. & Phillips, C. The ecology, epidemiology and virulence of Enterococcus. Microbiol. Read. 155, 1749–1757 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mohamed, J. A. & Huang, D. B. Biofilm formation by enterococci. J. Med. Microbiol. 56, 1581–1588 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Steck, N. et al. Enterococcus faecalis metalloprotease compromises epithelial barrier and contributes to intestinal inflammation. Gastroenterology 141, 959–971 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bäumler, A. J. & Sperandio, V. Interactions between the microbiota and pathogenic bacteria in the gut. Nature 535, 85–93 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Vancamelbeke, M. & Vermeire, S. The intestinal barrier: a fundamental role in health and disease. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 11, 821–834 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Moylan, S., Maes, M., Wray, N. R. & Berk, M. The neuroprogressive nature of major depressive disorder: pathways to disease evolution and resistance, and therapeutic implications. Mol. Psychiatry 18, 595–606 (2013).

  37. Miller, A. H. & Raison, C. L. The role of inflammation in depression: from evolutionary imperative to modern treatment target. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 16, 22–34 (2016).

  38. D’Mello, C. et al. Probiotics improve inflammation-associated sickness behavior by altering communication between the peripheral immune system and the brain. J. Neurosci. 35, 10821–10830 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bruce-Keller, A. J. et al. Obese-type gut microbiota induce neurobehavioral changes in the absence of obesity. Biol. Psychiatry. 77, 607–615 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Martín, R. et al. Faecalibacterium: a bacterial genus with promising human health applications. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 47, 039 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang, W. et al. Clostridium butyricum RH2 alleviates chronic foot shock stress-induced behavioral deficits in rats via PAI-1. Front. Pharmacol. 13, 845221 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hu, X. et al. Changes of gut microbiota reflect the severity of major depressive disorder: a cross sectional study. Transl. Psychiatry 13, 137 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Liu, L. et al. Gut microbiota and its metabolites in depression: from pathogenesis to treatment. EBioMedicine 90, 104527 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Xiao, W. et al. The microbiota-gut-brain axis participates in chronic cerebral hypoperfusion by disrupting the metabolism of short-chain fatty acids. Microbiome 10, 62 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  45. van de Wouw M., et al. Short-chain fatty acids: microbial metabolites that alleviate stress-induced brain-gut axisalterations. J. Physiol. 96, 4923-4944 (2018)

  46. Xu Z., et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation from healthy donors reduced alcohol-induced anxiety anddepression in an animal model of chronic alcohol exposure. Chin J. Physiol. 61, 360–371 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Cai, T., Shi, X., Yuan, L. Z., Tang, D. & Wang, F. Fecal microbiota transplantation in an elderly patient with mental depression. Int. Psychogeriatr. 31, 1525–1526 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Chinna Meyyappan, A., Forth, E., Wallace, C. J. K. & Milev, R. Effect of fecal microbiota transplant on symptoms of psychiatric disorders: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. 20, 299 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Cooke, N. C. A. et al. The safety and efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation in a population with bipolar disorder during depressive episodes: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 7, 142 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Evrensel, A. & Tarhan, K. N. Emerging role of Gut-microbiota-brain axis in depression and therapeutic implication. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry. 106, 110138 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Hinton, R. A case report looking at the effects of faecal microbiota transplantation in a patient with bipolar disorder. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry. 54, 649–650 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Dinan, T. G., Stanton, C. & Cryan, J. F. Psychobiotics: a novel class of psychotropic. Biol. Psychiatry. 74, 720–726 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wallace, C. J. K. & Milev, R. The effects of probiotics on depressive symptoms in humans: a systematic review. Ann. Gen. Psychiatry. 16, 14 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Huang, R., Wang, K. & Hu, J. Effect of probiotics on depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutrients 8, 483 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wang, H., Lee, I. S., Braun, C. & Enck, P. Effect of probiotics on central nervous system functions in animals and humans: a systematic review. J. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 22, 589–605 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sudo, N. et al. Postnatal microbial colonization programs the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system for stress response in mice. J. Physiol. 558, 263–275 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Akkasheh, G. et al. Clinical and metabolic response to probiotic administration in patients with major depressive disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Nutrition 32, 315–320 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Romijn, A. R., Rucklidge, J. J., Kuijer, R. G. & Frampton, C. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of Lactobacillus helveticus and Bifidobacterium longum for the symptoms of depression. Aust. N Z. J. Psychiatry. 51, 810–821 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Tillmann, S., Abildgaard, A., Winther, G. & Wegener, G. Altered fecal microbiota composition in the Flinders sensitive line rat model of depression. Psychopharmacol. (Berl). 236, 1445–1457 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Chen, J. J. et al. Sex differences in gut microbiota in patients with major depressive disorder. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 14, 647–655 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Rao, J. et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation ameliorates stress-induced depression-like behaviors associated with the inhibition of glial and NLRP3 inflammasome in rat brain. J. Psychiatr Res. 137, 147–157 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Rao, J. et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation ameliorates gut microbiota imbalance and intestinal barrier damage in rats with stress-induced depressive-like behavior. Eur. J. Neurosci. 53, 3598–3611 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Cammarota, G. et al. European consensus conference on faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice. Gut 66, 569–580 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Chinese Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Chinese expert consensus on standardized methodology and clinical application of fecal microbiota transplantation. Chin. J. Dig. Med. Imag. 23, S5–S13 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge and thank all the participants in this study and all the members of the team.

Funding

This research was funded by Traditional Chinese Medicine Scientific Research Fund Project (A) (2022ZA150,2025ZL480).

Author information

Author notes
  1. Linlin Wangand Sijia Zhang contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Shulan International Medical College, Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou, 310022, People’s Republic of China

    Linlin Wang, Yiyun Liu & Xujuan Li

  2. Longyou County Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.272 Taiping Road, Longyou County, Quzhou City, 324499, Zhejiang, China

    Sijia Zhang

  3. Department of Integrated Internal Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003, China

    Deqiang Li

  4. The Seventh People’s Hospital of Shaoxing, Zhejiang Province,1234 Shengli West Road, Shaoxing City, 312000, Zhejiang, China

    Guoqiang Tian

  5. Department of Psychological Clinic, Qingdao Hospital, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences (Qingdao Municipal Hospital), No.1 Jiaozhou Road, Shibei District, Qingdao, 266033, China

    Yufeng Li

Authors
  1. Linlin Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sijia Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yiyun Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Deqiang Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Guoqiang Tian
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xujuan Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yufeng Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Linlin Wang, Sijia Zhang, Xujuan Li and Guoqiang Tian designed the study. Linlin Wang, Sijia Zhang and Yiyun Liu completed the experiment and data collection. Linlin Wang, Sijia Zhang and Deqiang Li contributed to data statistics. Linlin Wang and Sijia Zhang wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Xujuan Li and Yufeng Li reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xujuan Li or Yufeng Li.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

The study adhered to the ethical standards established by the Ethics Committee of Shulan Hospital (Ethics Number: KY2024024), and it was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All subjects provided written informed consent prior to participation.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download DOCX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, L., Zhang, S., Liu, Y. et al. A study on the efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation as an adjunctive therapy for treating depressive episodes. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41801-y

Download citation

  • Received: 13 May 2025

  • Accepted: 23 February 2026

  • Published: 13 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41801-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Fecal microbiota transplantation
  • Depressive episodes
  • Efficacy
  • Safety
  • Gut microbe
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing