Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
The first limb-sparing use of histotripsy for canine osteosarcoma
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 23 March 2026

The first limb-sparing use of histotripsy for canine osteosarcoma

  • Elliana R. Vickers1,2,
  • Lauren N. Ruger1,
  • Alayna N. Hay2,
  • Ny T. C. Luong2,
  • John S. Kett3,
  • Summer Vander Kooi4,
  • Sheryl L. Coutermarsh-Ott5,
  • Gregory B. Daniel6,
  • Timothy J. Ziemlewicz7,
  • Steven B. Soliman8,
  • Gunjan B. Malhotra8,
  • Adam D. Maxwell1,
  • Eli Vlaisavljevich1 &
  • …
  • Joanne Tuohy2,6 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 735 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cancer
  • Diseases
  • Medical research
  • Oncology

Abstract

Osteosarcoma (OS) is a devastating primary bone cancer in dogs and humans. Histotripsy is a non-invasive ablation technique that mechanically destroys targeted tumor with focused ultrasound and has shown promise in treating small portions of canine OS followed by limb amputation. This study represents the first use of histotripsy to treat large volumes of canine OS, using fractionated treatments, without subsequent surgical resection. Our objective was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of treating large volumes of OS, following clinical outcomes after histotripsy. 9 dogs with suspected OS were treated with 1–5 histotripsy ablations, depending on tumor size, fractionated over 3 to 17 days. Pain, quality of life, and gait were followed over time, and MRI was used for pre-treatment planning and post-treatment monitoring. All dogs tolerated fractionated histotripsy treatments well, and the ablation zone was visible as a non-enhancing area on MRI matching the targeted location. There was a significant reduction in tumor contrast enhancement after completion of all histotripsy treatments and at the end of follow-up. Across all dogs with follow-up, there was a significant increase in pressure on the tumor-bearing limb during walking at the end of follow-up as compared to pre-treatment, indicating decreased pain. 4/6 dogs with follow-up showed a clinically significant decrease in pain. This study shows the promise of histotripsy as a non-invasive limb-sparing treatment for OS and advances the use of fractionated histotripsy treatments to ablate large and complicated tumors.

Data availability

The data presented in this study are available within the main manuscript and supplementary information files. Any additional data not explicitly detailed in the manuscript or supplementary files are available upon reasonable request by reaching out to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Mirabello, L., Troisi, R. J. & Savage, S. A. Osteosarcoma incidence and survival rates from 1973 to 2004: Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Cancer 115, 1531–1543 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Simpson, S., Rizvanov, A. A., Jeyapalan, J. N., de Brot, S. & Rutland, C. S. Canine osteosarcoma in comparative oncology: Molecular mechanisms through to treatment discovery. Front. Vet. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.965391 (2022).

  3. Gardner, H. L. et al. Canine osteosarcoma genome sequencing identifies recurrent mutations in DMD and the histone methyltransferase gene SETD2. Commun. Biol. 2, 1–13 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anfinsen, K. P., Grotmol, T., Bruland, O. S. & Jonasdottir, T. J. Breed-specific incidence rates of canine primary bone tumors: A population based survey of dogs in Norway. Can. J. Vet. Res. 75, 209–215 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anfinsen, K. P. et al. Age-period-cohort analysis of primary bone cancer incidence rates in the United States (1976–2005). Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 20, 1770–1777 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tarone, L. et al. Improving osteosarcoma treatment: Comparative oncology in action. Life 12, 2099 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Farooque, K. et al. Outcome, complications, and survival of sarcomas of the extremities treated with mega prostheses: A comprehensive analysis of 115 cases in a cancer-dedicated hospital. Cureus 16, e71749 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shah, A. et al. Failure modes in orthopedic oncologic reconstructive surgery: A review of imaging findings and failure rates. Curr. Oncol. 31, 6245–6266 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eralp, L., Rozburch, S. R. & Civan, M. Advancing pediatric bone sarcoma care: Navigating complications and innovating solutions in limb salvage and reconstruction-why, when, and how to treat limb length inequalities. Acta Orthop. Traumatol. Turc. 58, 142–148 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Smolle, M. A. et al. Complications, mobility, and quality of life in ankle sarcoma patients: Any difference in limb salvage versus amputation?. Bone Joint J. 103-B, 553–561 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Qureshi, M. K., Ghaffar, A., Tak, S. & Khaled, A. Limb salvage versus amputation: A review of the current evidence. Cureus 12, e10092 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hay, A. N. et al. A review of the development of histotripsy for extremity tumor ablation with a canine comparative oncology model to inform human treatments. Int. J. Hyperthermia 40, 2274802 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ruger, L. N. et al. Histotripsy ablation of spontaneously occurring canine bone tumors. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 70, 331–342 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ruger, L. N. et al. Characterizing the ablative effects of histotripsy for osteosarcoma: In vivo study in dogs. Cancers (Basel) 15, 741 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ruger, L. N. et al. Mechanical high-intensity focused ultrasound (histotripsy) in dogs with spontaneously occurring soft tissue sarcomas. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 70, 768–779 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Xu, Z., Hall, T. L., Vlaisavljevich, E. & Lee, F. T. Histotripsy: The first noninvasive, non-ionizing, non-thermal ablation technique based on ultrasound. Int. J. Hyperthermia 38, 561–575 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vidal-Jove, J. et al. First-in-man histotripsy of hepatic tumors: The THERESA trial, a feasibility study. Int. J. Hyperthermia 39, 1115–1123 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yeo, S. Y., Bratke, G. & Grüll, H. High intensity focused ultrasound for treatment of bone malignancies—20 years of history. Cancers 15, 108 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chen, W. et al. Primary bone malignancy: Effective treatment with high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation. Radiology 255, 967–978 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cazzato, R. L. et al. Complications following percutaneous image-guided radiofrequency ablation of bone tumors: A 10-year dual-center experience. Radiology 296, 227–235 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cazzato, R. L. et al. Percutaneous microwave ablation of bone tumors: A systematic review. Eur. Radiol. 31, 3530–3541 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vlaisavljevich, E. et al. Effects of tissue mechanical properties on susceptibility to histotripsy-induced tissue damage. Phys. Med. Biol. 59, 253 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vlaisavljevich, E. et al. Non-invasive ultrasound liver ablation using histotripsy: Chronic study in an in vivo rodent model. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 42, 1890–1902 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vlaisavljevich, E. Image-guided non-invasive ultrasound liver ablation using histotripsy: Feasibility study in an in vivo porcine codel. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 39, 1398–1409 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Styn, N. R., Wheat, J. C., Hall, T. L. & Roberts, W. W. Histotripsy of VX-2 tumor implanted in a renal rabbit model. J. Endourol. 24, 1145–1150 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Arnold, L. et al. Histotripsy ablation of bone tumors: Feasibility study in excised canine osteosarcoma tumors. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 47, 3435–3446 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vickers, E. R. et al. MRI for the Assessment of Histotripsy Ablation in a Canine Osteosarcoma Comparative Oncology Model. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 52, 216–226 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Catania, V. E. et al. Tumor lysis syndrome in an extraskeletal osteosarcoma: A case report and review of the literature. J. Med. Case Rep. 11, 79 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lehner, S. G., Gould, J. E., Saad, W. E. A. & Brown, D. B. Tumor lysis syndrome after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR 185, 1307–1309 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Adeyinka, A., Kaur, A. & Bashir, K. Tumor lysis syndrome. In StatPearls (StatPearls Publishing)(2025).

  31. LeBlanc, A. K. et al. Veterinary Cooperative Oncology Group-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (VCOG-CTCAE v2) following investigational therapy in dogs and cats. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 19, 311–352 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Giuffrida, M. A., Brown, D. C., Ellenberg, S. S. & Farrar, J. T. Development and psychometric testing of the Canine Owner-Reported Quality of Life questionnaire, an instrument designed to measure quality of life in dogs with cancer. JAVMA 252, 1073–1083 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Brown, D. C., Boston, R., Coyne, J. C. & Farrar, J. T. A novel approach to the use of animals in studies of pain: Validation of the Canine Brief Pain Inventory in canine bone cancer. Pain Med. 10, 133–142 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Brown, D. C., Bell, M. & Rhodes, L. Power of treatment success definitions when the Canine Brief Pain Inventory is used to evaluate carprofen treatment for the control of pain and inflammation in dogs with osteoarthritis. Am. J. Vet. Res. 74, 1467–1473 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yildirim, O., Al Khatalin, M., Kargin, O. A. & Camurdan, V. B. MRI for evaluation of preoperative chemotherapy in osteosarcoma. Radiography (Lond). 28, 593–604 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mendiratta-Lala, M. et al. The #HOPE4LIVER single-arm pivotal trial for histotripsy of primary and metastatic liver tumors. Radiology 312, e233051 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Guadalupi, M., Crovace, A. M., Monopoli Forleo, D., Staffieri, F. & Lacitignola, L. Pressure-sensitive walkway system for evaluation of lameness in dogs affected by unilateral cranial cruciate ligament rupture treated with porous tibial tuberosity advancement. Vet. Sci. 10, 696 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Oosterlinck, M. et al. Accuracy of pressure plate kinetic asymmetry indices and their correlation with visual gait assessment scores in lame and nonlame dogs. Am. J. Vet. Res. 72, 820–825 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Selvarajah, G. T. & Kirpensteijn, J. Prognostic and predictive biomarkers of canine osteosarcoma. Vet. J. 185, 28–35 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Spodnick, G. J. et al. Prognosis for dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma treated by amputation alone: 162 cases (1978–1988). JAVMA 200, 995–999 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Selvarajah, G. T. et al. Gene expression profiling of canine osteosarcoma reveals genes associated with short and long survival times. Mol. Cancer 8, 72 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Fenger, J. M., London, C. A. & Kisseberth, W. C. Canine osteosarcoma: A naturally occurring disease to inform pediatric oncology. ILAR J. 55, 69–85 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the following team members for their contributions to this clinical trial: Courtney Snead and Mindy Quigley, Clinical Research Office; Christy Barry, Clinical Business Office; Valerie Vaught, Radiology; and the Teaching and Research Animal Care Support Services at Virginia Tech. The authors would also thank Julianna Diodato, Triniti Antony Baskar, and Basem Huneidi from Virginia Tech for their contributions. The authors would especially like to thank all owners and dogs that participated in this trial.

Funding

This work was funded in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health (National Cancer Institute, 1R01CA289288-01; National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, 1R21EB030182-01), the Focused Ultrasound Foundation, and the Veterinary Memorial Fund. Author E.R.V. was supported by a Ruth L. Kirschstein Predoctoral Individual National Research Service Award from the National Cancer Institute (1F31CA294976-01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA

    Elliana R. Vickers, Lauren N. Ruger, Adam D. Maxwell & Eli Vlaisavljevich

  2. Virginia Tech Animal Cancer Care and Research Center, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Roanoke, VA, USA

    Elliana R. Vickers, Alayna N. Hay, Ny T. C. Luong & Joanne Tuohy

  3. Doctor of Veterinary Medicine Program, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA

    John S. Kett

  4. School of Animal Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA

    Summer Vander Kooi

  5. Department of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA

    Sheryl L. Coutermarsh-Ott

  6. Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA

    Gregory B. Daniel & Joanne Tuohy

  7. Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA

    Timothy J. Ziemlewicz

  8. Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan/Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Steven B. Soliman & Gunjan B. Malhotra

Authors
  1. Elliana R. Vickers
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lauren N. Ruger
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alayna N. Hay
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ny T. C. Luong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. John S. Kett
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Summer Vander Kooi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sheryl L. Coutermarsh-Ott
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Gregory B. Daniel
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Timothy J. Ziemlewicz
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Steven B. Soliman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Gunjan B. Malhotra
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Adam D. Maxwell
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Eli Vlaisavljevich
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Joanne Tuohy
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

E.R.V. and L.N.R. planned and executed treatment of canine patients. E.R.V. drafted the manuscript text and figures, with assistance from L.N.R. and A.N.H. E.R.V., J.S.K., and S.V.K. performed MRI quantitative segmentation analysis. G.B.D., T.J.Z., S.B.S., and G.B.M. performed MRI qualitative radiological analysis. E.V. and J.T. conceived the study. E.V., A.M., and L.N.R. provided engineering oversight and support. J.T. provided patient care as lead veterinarian. All authors reviewed, contributed to, and approved of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joanne Tuohy.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Author L.N.R. has an ongoing consulting relationship with Theraclion. Author E.V. has an ongoing research partnership and financial relationship with HistoSonics and is a co-founder of Sound Blade Medical. Author T.J.Z. has ongoing consulting and financial relationships with Ethicon and HistoSonics, as well as a consulting relationship with Elephas. No other authors have a conflict of interest to report.

Ethics approval

All applicable international, national, and institutional protocols for the care and use of animals were followed. All animal experiments were performed according to IACUC and ARRIVE guidelines.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download DOCX )

Supplementary Material 2

Supplementary Material 3

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vickers, E.R., Ruger, L.N., Hay, A.N. et al. The first limb-sparing use of histotripsy for canine osteosarcoma. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42319-z

Download citation

  • Received: 07 October 2025

  • Accepted: 25 February 2026

  • Published: 23 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42319-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Osteosarcoma
  • Canine
  • Focused ultrasound
  • Fractionated
  • Histotripsy
  • Ablation
Supplementary Material 2Supplementary Material 3
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer