Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Povidone iodine demonstrates strong efficacy in reducing Candida biofilm in an in vitro fungal prosthetic infection
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 11 March 2026

Povidone iodine demonstrates strong efficacy in reducing Candida biofilm in an in vitro fungal prosthetic infection

  • Jae-Young Hong1,
  • Yong Gyun Moon1,
  • Soo Kyung Choi1,
  • Hyoung Tae Kim2 &
  • …
  • Suenghwan Jo1,2 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 755 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Medical research
  • Microbiology

Abstract

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) caused by fungi is rare but can lead to devastating outcomes. However, the best treatment for fungal PJI has not been established. This study aims to identify the optimal surgical irrigation solution to reduce the bioburden of Candida biofilm from prosthetic surfaces. Candida albicans biofilm was cultured on titanium screw caps and treated for 3 min and 10 min using five clinically used irrigation solutions: Normal Saline, Fluconazole solution (2000 µg/mL), Nystatin solution (5000 IU/mL), Chlorhexidine (0.05%), Povidone Iodine (0.35%), and Povidone Iodine (10%). The biofilm on the screw caps was quantified by counting colony-forming units after sonication to assess the effectiveness of the irrigation solutions. Irrigation with normal saline resulted in 5.9 ± 1.6 × 104 CFU/mL of Candida albicans per titanium screw cap. As compared to the normal saline, the most effective irrigation solution at 3 min was PI 10%, achieving over a 2-log reduction in CFU/ml. Other chemical irrigation solutions resulted in approximately a 1-log reduction. Extending the irrigation time to 10 min led to a further reduction in biofilm, with PI 0.35% and PI 10% achieving remarked removal. These findings suggest that PI 10% is the most effective irrigation solution for treating Candida-induced PJI when applied for 3 min. However, its efficacy is time dependent, and prolonged irrigation can achieve clinical significance even at lower concentrations.

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The raw SEM images and experimental datasets (including Excel files) supporting the findings of this study can be accessed upon request.

References

  1. Gonzalez, M. R., Bedi, A. D. S., Karczewski, D. & Lozano-Calderon, S. A. Treatment and Outcomes of Fungal Prosthetic Joint Infections: A Systematic Review of 225 Cases. J. Arthroplast. 38, 2464–2471e2461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2023.05.003 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yilmaz, M. K., Celik, N., Tarabichi, S., Abbaszadeh, A. & Parvizi, J. Evidence-based Approach for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection. Hip Pelvis. 36, 161–167. https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2024.36.3.161 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tsui, C., Kong, E. F. & Jabra-Rizk, M. A. Pathogenesis of Candida albicans biofilm. Pathogens Disease. 74 https://doi.org/10.1093/femspd/ftw018 (2016).

  4. Costa-De-Oliveira, S. & Rodrigues, A. G. Candida albicans Antifungal Resistance and Tolerance in Bloodstream Infections: The Triad Yeast-Host-Antifungal. Microorganisms 8, 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020154 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Paluch, E., Szperlik, J., Lamch, Ł., Wilk, K. A. & Obłąk, E. Biofilm eradication and antifungal mechanism of action against Candida albicans of cationic dicephalic surfactants with a labile linker. Sci. Rep. 11, 8896 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ruder, J. A. & Springer, B. D. Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Using Antimicrobials: Dilute Povidone-Iodine Lavage. J. Bone Jt. Infect. 2, 10–14. https://doi.org/10.7150/jbji.16448 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shaffer, A. et al. Perioperative prophylaxis for surgical site infections in pediatric spinal surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J. Neurosurg. Pediatr. 31, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.9.PEDS22316 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Iannotti, F. et al. Prevention of Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI): A Clinical Practice Protocol in High-Risk Patients. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 5 https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed5040186 (2020).

  9. Premkumar, A., Nishtala, S., Nguyen, J., Bostrom, M. & Carli, A. Comparing the efficacy of irrigation solutions on staphylococcal biofilm formed on arthroplasty surfaces. J. Arthroplasty. 36, S26–S32 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chalmers, B. P. et al. Accuracy of Predictive Algorithms in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infections Treated With Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention (DAIR). J. Arthroplast. 36, 2558–2566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.039 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Siddiqi, A. et al. What Is the Optimal Irrigation Solution in the Management of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Infections? J. Arthroplast. 36, 3570–3583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.05.032 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brown, T. S. et al. Periprosthetic Joint Infection With Fungal Pathogens. J. Arthroplast. 33, 2605–2612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.003 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shang, G., Zhao, S., Yang, S. & Li, J. The heavy burden and treatment challenges of fungal periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review of 489 joints. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 25 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07616-6 (2024).

  14. O’Donnell, J. A. et al. Efficacy of common antiseptic solutions against clinically relevant microorganisms in biofilm. Bone Joint J. 103-B, 908–915. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.103b5.Bjj-2020-1245.R2 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Christopher, Z., Deckey, D., Pollock, J. & Spangehl, M. Antiseptic Irrigation Solutions Used in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Critical Analysis Review. JBJS Reviews. 10 https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.21.00225 (2022).

  16. dos Giro, A. et al. The molecular mechanism of Nystatin action is dependent on membrane biophysical properties and lipid composition. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19 https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CP05353C (2017).

  17. Suchodolski, J., Muraszko, J., Bernat, P. & Krasowska, A. Lactate Like Fluconazole Reduces Ergosterol Content in the Plasma Membrane and Synergistically Kills Candida albicans. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22105219 (2021).

  18. Zhang, H. et al. Synergistic effect of chlorhexidine and azoles on candida biofilm on titanium surface. J. Med. Mycol. 33, 101417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycmed.2023.101417 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  19. George, J., Klika, A. K. & Higuera, C. A. Use of Chlorhexidine Preparations in Total Joint Arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Infect. 2, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.7150/jbji.16934 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Roscetto, E. et al. Antiseptics’ concentration, combination, and exposure time on bacterial and fungal biofilm eradication. Arthroplasty Today 28, 101468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2024.101468 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lepelletier, D., Maillard, J. Y., Pozzetto, B. & Simon, A. Povidone iodine properties, mechanisms of action, and role in infection control and staphylococcus aureus decolonization. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 64, e00682-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00682-20 (2020).

  22. Liu, J. et al. A Comparison of In-vitro Staphylococcus aureus Growth on Rough and Smooth Titanium Surfaces. Hip Pelvis. 37, 197–204. https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2025.37.3.197 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zore, G., Abdulghani, M., Kazi, R., Shelar, A. & Patil, R. Proteomic dataset of Candida albicans (ATCC 10231) Biofilm. BMC Res. Notes. 16 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-023-06436-6 (2023).

  24. ATCC. Mycology culture guide, https://www.atcc.org/resources/culture-guides/mycology-culture-guide (2022).

  25. Pierce, C. G. et al. A simple and reproducible 96-well plate-based method for the formation of fungal biofilms and its application to antifungal susceptibility testing. Nat. Protoc. 3, 1494–1500. https://doi.org/10.1038/nport.2008.141 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chandra, J., Mukherjee, P. K. & Ghannoum, M. A. In vitro growth and analysis of Candida biofilms. Nat. Protoc. 3, 1909–1924. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.192 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Relucenti, M. et al. Microscopy Methods for Biofilm Imaging: Focus on SEM and VP-SEM Pros and Cons. Biology (Basel). 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10010051 (2021).

  28. Nenoff, P., Krüger, C., Neumeister, C., Schwantes, U. & Koch, D. In vitro susceptibility testing of yeasts to nystatin – low minimum inhibitory concentrations suggest no indication of in vitro resistance of Candida albicans, Candida species or non-Candida yeast species to nystatin. Clin. Med. Investigations. 1 https://doi.org/10.15761/cmi.1000116 (2016).

  29. Christopher, Z., Tran, C., Vernon, B. & Spangehl, M. What Is the Duration of Irrigation? An In Vitro Study of the Minimum Exposure Time to Eradicate Bacteria With Irrigation Solutions. J. Arthroplast. 37 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.10.013 (2021).

  30. Kim, K. S. et al. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of the cell death process in Candida albicans treated by antifungal agents. PLoS One. 6, e28176 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jo, S. et al. The Infected Polypropylene Mesh: When Does Biofilm Form and Which Antiseptic Solution Most Effectively Removes It? J. Arthroplast. 39, 294–S299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.04.081 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Siddiqi, A., Abdo, Z. E., Springer, B. D. & Chen, A. F. Pursuit of the ideal antiseptic irrigation solution in the management of periprosthetic joint infections. J. Bone Joint Infect. 6, 189–198. https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-189-2021 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Charoenwisetsin, S., Jiranantarat, V., Hirunyachoke, P. & Udomkiat, P. Effect of intraoperative cold solution irrigation to reduce postoperative pain in knee osteoarthritis patients who underwent unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 25 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07732-3 (2024).

  34. Poilvache, H. et al. Synergistic Effects of Pulsed Lavage and Antimicrobial Therapy Against Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms in an in-vitro Model. Front. Med. 7 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.00527 (2020).

  35. Marzucco, A. et al. Evaluation of Biofilm Production and Antifungal Susceptibility to Fluconazole in Clinical Isolates of Candida spp. in Both Planktonic and Biofilm Form. Microorganisms 12, 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12010153 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Liu, J. X., Werner, J., Kirsch, T., Zuckerman, J. D. & Virk, M. S. Cytotoxicity evaluation of chlorhexidine gluconate on human fibroblasts, myoblasts, and osteoblasts. J. Bone Joint Infect. 3, 165–172. https://doi.org/10.7150/jbji.26355 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (RS-2023-00217471) and by a research fund from Chosun University Hospital, 2025.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, South Korea

    Jae-Young Hong, Yong Gyun Moon, Soo Kyung Choi & Suenghwan Jo

  2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju, South Korea

    Hyoung Tae Kim & Suenghwan Jo

Authors
  1. Jae-Young Hong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yong Gyun Moon
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Soo Kyung Choi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hyoung Tae Kim
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Suenghwan Jo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.H. and Y.M. performed the experiments, collected, analyzed, and interpreted the data, and wrote the manuscript. S.C. supervised the experiments and provided technical guidance. H.K. contributed to manuscript writing and provided clinical insights. S.J. conceptualized the study, interpreted the data, acquired the funding, and revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suenghwan Jo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download DOCX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hong, JY., Moon, Y.G., Choi, S.K. et al. Povidone iodine demonstrates strong efficacy in reducing Candida biofilm in an in vitro fungal prosthetic infection. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42366-6

Download citation

  • Received: 03 March 2025

  • Accepted: 25 February 2026

  • Published: 11 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42366-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology