Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Prognostic value of the fibrosis-4 index for predicting in-hospital mortality in sepsis patients: evidence from MIMIC-IV and eICU databases
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 07 March 2026

Prognostic value of the fibrosis-4 index for predicting in-hospital mortality in sepsis patients: evidence from MIMIC-IV and eICU databases

  • Xiangli Kong1 na1,
  • Bin Jiang1 na1,
  • Cuiping Xu1,
  • Xiaohong Zhou1 &
  • …
  • Feifei He1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 974 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biomarkers
  • Diseases
  • Medical research
  • Risk factors

Abstract

Sepsis-induced hepatic dysfunction contributes significantly to poor clinical outcomes. Although the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index is established for assessing chronic liver fibrosis, its utility as a prognostic marker for acute sepsis mortality—particularly in patients without pre-existing liver disease—remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the predictive value of FIB-4 in sepsis using two large, multi-center databases.We conducted a multicenter retrospective study using two large critical care databases: MIMIC-IV (n = 13,983) and eICU (n = 9,976). Sepsis was defined based on established clinical criteria. Missing values were handled using multiple imputation to preserve data integrity. The optimal FIB-4 cutoff points were determined via outcome-based stratification (1.25). Patients were categorized into high and low FIB-4 groups accordingly. We applied restricted cubic spline (RCS) modeling to evaluate nonlinear trends, followed by weighted Cox regression to determine independent associations with in-hospital mortality. Kaplan–Meier survival curves assessed time-to-event differences, while subgroup analyses, ROC curves, and sensitivity analyses explored effect consistency and underlying biological pathways. Across 23,959 sepsis patients from the MIMIC-IV and eICU databases, elevated FIB-4 levels were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (P < 0.001). An FIB-4 index > 1.25 served as an independent risk factor for mortality (adjusted HRs: 1.38–1.55) and outperformed traditional SOFA and APACHE scores in prognostic discrimination. Kaplan–Meier curves showed significantly reduced survival in the high FIB-4 group. Importantly, sensitivity analyses excluding patients with known liver disease, suspected MASLD, or cardiac admissions confirmed the robustness of these findings. The FIB-4 index serves as a robust, independent prognostic marker for in-hospital mortality in sepsis patients, outperforming traditional scores such as SOFA and APACHE II in predictive accuracy. Crucially, its prognostic value persists even after excluding patients with pre-existing liver disease or acute cardiogenic hepatic congestion, suggesting it reflects broader sepsis-induced physiological derangements rather than solely baseline hepatic fibrosis. Given its simplicity and reliance on routinely available laboratory parameters, FIB-4 offers a practical, accessible tool for early risk stratification in the intensive care setting.

Similar content being viewed by others

Non-invasive scoring systems of liver fibrosis predict prognosis in the cohort with myocardial infarction

Article Open access 21 July 2025

Artificial intelligence outperforms standard blood-based scores in identifying liver fibrosis patients in primary care

Article Open access 21 February 2022

Predictive model of risk factors for 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis or sepsis-associated delirium based on the MIMIC-IV database

Article Open access 13 August 2024

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

References

  1. Li, A. et al. Epidemiology, management, and outcomes of sepsis in ICUs among countries of differing national wealth across Asia. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 206(9), 1107–1116 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. La Via, L. et al. The global burden of sepsis and septic shock. Epidemiologia (Basel) 5(3), 456–478 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dong, R. et al. Temporal trends of sepsis-related mortality in China, 2006–2020: a population-based study. Ann Intensive Care. 13(1), 71 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dronamraju, S. et al. Comparison of PIRO, APACHE IV, and SOFA scores in predicting outcome in patients with sepsis admitted to intensive care unit: A two-year cross-sectional study at rural teaching hospital. Indian J. Crit. Care Med. 26(10), 1099–1105 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Xu, X. L. et al. The role of fibrosis index FIB-4 in predicting liver fibrosis stage and clinical prognosis: A diagnostic or screening tool?. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 121(2), 454–466 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mirijello, A. et al. The Fibrosis-4 index predicts all-cause mortality in a cohort of patients at high cardiovascular risk partly through glomerular filtration rate reduction. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 35(1), 103768 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Karagiannakis, D. S. et al. Elevated FIB-4 is associated with higher rates of cardiovascular disease and extrahepatic cancer history in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Biomedicines https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12040823 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gaggini, M. et al. FIB-4 index and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte-ratio as death predictor in Coronary Artery Disease patients. Biomedicines https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11010076 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bielecka-Dabrowa A, Sakowicz A, Banach M, Slot M. An Elevated FIB-4 Score is associated with the severity of heart failure. European Heart Journal. 2024;45(Supplement_1).

  10. Schleicher, E. M. et al. A higher FIB-4 index is associated with an increased incidence of renal failure in the general population. Hepatol. Commun. 6(12), 3505–3514 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Albayrak, T. & Yuksel, B. Prognostic value of fibrosis 4 (FIB-4) index in sepsis patients. J. Pers. Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14050531 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson, A. E. W. et al. MIMIC-IV, a freely accessible electronic health record dataset. Sci Data. 10(1), 1 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zheng, R. et al. Association between triglyceride-glucose index and in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis: Analysis of the MIMIC-IV database. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 22(1), 307 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Singer, M. et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 315(8), 801–810 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hu, W. et al. Identification of indications for albumin administration in septic patients with liver cirrhosis. Crit Care. 27(1), 300 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kamada, Y. et al. SWOT analysis of noninvasive tests for diagnosing NAFLD with severe fibrosis: an expert review by the JANIT Forum. J Gastroenterol. 58(2), 79–97 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vallet-Pichard, A. et al. FIB-4: An inexpensive and accurate marker of fibrosis in HCV infection. Comparison with liver biopsy and Fibrotest. Hepatology 46(1), 32–36 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, Z., Ho, K. M. & Hong, Y. Machine learning for the prediction of volume responsiveness in patients with oliguric acute kidney injury in critical care. Crit Care. 23(1), 112 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Barichello, T., Generoso, J. S., Singer, M. & Dal-Pizzol, F. Biomarkers for sepsis: more than just fever and leukocytosis-a narrative review. Crit Care. 26(1), 14 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schreiner, A. D. et al. Advanced liver fibrosis and the metabolic syndrome in a primary care setting. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 37(8), e3452 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sumida, Y. et al. FIB-4 first in the diagnostic algorithm of Metabolic-Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease in the era of the global Metabodemic. Life https://doi.org/10.3390/life11020143 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shi, Y. et al. Association between liver fibrosis and the in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy. BMC Infect Dis. 24(1), 1136 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rungta, S., Kumari, S., Deep, A., Verma, K. & Swaroop, S. APRI and FIB-4 performance to assess liver fibrosis against predefined Fibroscan values in chronic hepatitis C virus infection. J Family Med Prim Care. 10(11), 4082–4088 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Xu, X., Yang, T., An, J., Li, B. & Dou, Z. Liver injury in sepsis: manifestations, mechanisms and emerging therapeutic strategies. Front Immunol. 16, 1575554 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chen, J. W. et al. Sepsis-associated liver injury: Mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets. World J Gastroenterol. 30(42), 4518–4522 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Beyer, D. et al. The liver in sepsis: molecular mechanism of liver failure and their potential for clinical translation. Mol Med. 28(1), 84 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, T. et al. Relationship between coagulopathy score and survival in critically ill patients with liver cirrhosis and sepsis: A retrospective study. BMC Infect. Dis. 25(1), 418 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Liu, S. et al. Lactate and lactylation in sepsis: A comprehensive review. J. Inflamm. Res. 17, 4405–4417 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Anderko, R. R. et al. Sepsis with liver dysfunction and coagulopathy predicts an inflammatory pattern of macrophage activation. Intensive Care Med Exp. 10(1), 6 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sun, Z. et al. Potential biomarker for diagnosis and therapy of sepsis: Lactylation. Immun. Inflamm. Dis. 11(10), e1042 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work did not receive any funding.

Author information

Author notes
  1. Xiangli Kong and Bin Jiang have contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Qingdao Hiser Hospital Affiliated of Qingdao University (Qingdao Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital), No. 4, Renmin Road, Shibei District, Qingdao, 266000, Shandong Province, China

    Xiangli Kong, Bin Jiang, Cuiping Xu, Xiaohong Zhou & Feifei He

Authors
  1. Xiangli Kong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bin Jiang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cuiping Xu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiaohong Zhou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Feifei He
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

**Xiangli Kong** : Methodology, Investigation, Data curation, Software, Writing—original draft. **Bin Jiang** and **Cuiping Xu** : Formal analysis, Software, Data curation. **Xiaohong Zhou** : Data curation, Methodology, Investigation. **Feifei He:** Conceptualization, Validation, Supervision, Writing—review & editing.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiaohong Zhou or Feifei He.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download ZIP )

Supplementary Material 2 (download DOCX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kong, X., Jiang, B., Xu, C. et al. Prognostic value of the fibrosis-4 index for predicting in-hospital mortality in sepsis patients: evidence from MIMIC-IV and eICU databases. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42522-y

Download citation

  • Received: 07 November 2025

  • Accepted: 26 February 2026

  • Published: 07 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42522-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Sepsis
  • FIB-4
  • In-Hospital mortality
  • Prognostic biomarker
  • MIMIC-Ⅳ
  • eICU
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research