Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Comparative analysis of deep learning algorithms for rolling element bearing fault classification under variable loads and speeds
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 11 April 2026

Comparative analysis of deep learning algorithms for rolling element bearing fault classification under variable loads and speeds

  • Pratyush Vishal1,
  • Rohith Nair2,
  • Jonathan Jacob2,
  • Narendiranath Babu T.2 &
  • …
  • M. Pandiyan2 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 263 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Engineering
  • Mathematics and computing

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative study of deep learning methods used to classify roller bearing faults. We obtained experimental vibration data by conducting controlled tests on roller bearings with various faults under different load conditions to simulate real-world industrial conditions. The methodology first evaluates four different time-frequency techniques-STFT, CWT, WPT and CQ-NSGT, establishing CQ-NSGT as the superior method for feature visualization. A novel hybrid transfer learning architecture that integrates pre-trained backbones (EfficientNetB0, MobileNetV2, InceptionV3) with custom residual blocks is proposed. These CNNs are compared to a baseline CNN and a Vision Transformer (ViT). Their performance was rigorously evaluated using fivefold cross-validation and tested against additive white Gaussian noise at Signal-to-Noise Ratios (SNR) of 1 dB, 3 dB, and 5 dB. The EfficientNetB0 hybrid model was able to reach the highest baseline accuracy of 99.83% while also exhibiting excellent robustness-maintaining 98.8% accuracy even at 1 dB SNR. MobileNetV2 is the most computationally efficient model with a training time of only 121.4 s and 0.50 GFLOPS making it perfect for edge deployment. ViT has potential but is less noise stable and lacks the inductive bias of CNNs which is important for this particular application. These results can be used as a guide for trading off accuracy of diagnosis and computational cost in industrial predictive maintenance.

Data availability

The dataset created and handled during the current research is not available publicly due to the limitations set by the institution. Aimed to be shared by the corresponding author only when a reasonable request is made and subject to institutional approval.

References

  1. Xu, F. et al. A Review of bearing failure modes, mechanisms and causes. Eng. Fail. Anal. 152, 107518 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107518

    Google Scholar 

  2. Siddique, M. F., Saleem, F., Umar, M., Kim, C. H. & Kim, J. M. A Hybrid deep learning approach for bearing fault diagnosis using continuous wavelet transform and attention-enhanced spatiotemporal feature extraction. Sensors 25 (9), 2712–2712. (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/s25092712

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li, Y., Gu, X. & Wei, Y. A deep learning-based method for bearing fault diagnosis with few-shot learning. Sensors 24 (23), 7516. (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/s24237516

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hakim, M. et al. Bearing fault diagnosis using lightweight and robust one-dimensional convolution neural network in the frequency domain. Sensors 22 (15), 5793–5793. (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22155793

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang, Y. et al. Attention activation network for bearing fault diagnosis under various noise environments. Sci. Rep. 15 (1), 977 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85275-w

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, Y., Chen, Q. & Wang, R. Bearing fault diagnosis based on vibration envelope spectral characteristics. Appl. Sci. 15 (4), 2240. (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/app15042240

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fu, G., Wei, Q. & Yang, Y. Bearing fault diagnosis with parallel CNN and LSTM. Math. Biosci. Eng. 21 (2), 2385–2406. (2024). https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2024105

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhu, H., Sui, Z., Xu, J. & Lan, Y. Fault diagnosis of mechanical rolling bearings using a convolutional neural network–gated recurrent unit method with envelope analysis and adaptive mean filtering. Processes 12 (12), 2845–2845. (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12122845

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sohaib, M., Kim, C. H. & Kim, J. M. A hybrid feature model and deep-learning-based bearing fault diagnosis. Sensors 17 (12), 2876 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/s17122876

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar, K. K. & Mandava, S. Real-time bearing fault classification of induction motor using enhanced inception ResNet-V2. Appl. Artif. Intell. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2024.2378270

  11. Chennai Viswanathan, P. et al. Deep learning for enhanced fault diagnosis of monoblock centrifugal pumps: Spectrogram-based analysis. Machines 11 (9), 874. (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/machines11090874

    Google Scholar 

  12. Alqunun, K. et al. An efficient bearing fault detection strategy based on a hybrid machine learning technique. Sci. Rep. 15 (1), 18739 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-02439-4

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shen, J., Chowdhury, J., Banerjee, S. & Terejanu, G. Machine fault classification using hamiltonian neural networks. arXiv:2301.02243v1 (2023).

  14. Toma, R. N. et al. A Bearing Fault classification framework based on image encoding techniques and a convolutional neural network under different operating conditions. Sensors 22(13), 4881 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22134881

  15. Tan, M. & Le, Q. V. EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Training. arXiv:2104.00298v3 (2021).

  16. Lokesha, M., Majumder, M., Ramachandran, K. & Raheem, K. Fault diagnosis in gear using wavelet envelope power spectrum. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 3 (8), 156–167 (2011). https://doi.org/10.4314/ijest.v3i8.13

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pandiyan, M. & Babu, T. N. Implementation of MF block in CNN for advanced REB fault diagnosis. Sci. Rep. 15 (1), 18232 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-01780-y

    Google Scholar 

  18. Christoph Bienefeld, F. M., Becker-Dombrowsky, E., Kirchner, E. & Shatri & Investigation of feature engineering methods for domain-knowledge-assisted bearing fault diagnosis. Entropy 25 (9), 1278–1278 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/e25091278

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lundstrom, A. & Mattias, O. N. Factory-Based vibration data for bearing-fault detection. Data 8 (7), 115–115. (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/data8070115

    Google Scholar 

  20. Raj, K. K., Kumar, S., Kumar, R. R. & Andriollo, M. Enhanced Fault detection in bearings using machine learning and raw accelerometer data: a case study using the case western reserve university dataset. Information 15, 259–259. (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/info15050259

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yang, Z. et al. Hybrid CNN-BiLSTM-MHSA model for accurate fault diagnosis of rotor motor bearings. Mathematics 13 (3), 334–334. (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/math13030334

    Google Scholar 

  22. Siddique, M. F., Zaman, W., Umar, M., Kim, J. Y. & Kim, J. M. A hybrid deep learning framework for fault diagnosis in milling machines. Sensors 25 (18), 5866. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25185866 (2025)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zaman, W., Siddique, M. F. & Kim, J. M. Centrifugal pump fault detection with hybrid feature pool and deep learning. In 2023 20th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology (IBCAST), Bhurban, Murree, Pakistan, 1–6 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/IBCAST59916.2023.10712967

  24. Ullah, S., Siddique, M. F. & Kim, J. M. Multi-sensor observer-based residual learning with auto-permutation feature importance for fault diagnosis of multistage centrifugal pumps under variable pressures. Sci. Rep. 15, 45735. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-32726-z (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Muhammad Umar, M. F., Siddique, J. M. & Kim Burst-informed acoustic emission framework for explainable failure diagnosis in milling machines. Eng. Fail. Anal. 185, 1350–6307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.110373 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fallahy, S. & Rezazadeh, N. MARBLE-DA: Masonry analysis with robust, batch-normalised, label-free, explainable domain adaptation for crack detection. J. Build. Eng. 116, 2352–7102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.114673 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Antoni, J. The spectral kurtosis: A useful tool for characterising non-stationary signals. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 20 (2), 282–307 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2004.09.001

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dosovitskiy, A. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929 (2020).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore for providing support and encouragements to complete this research work.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Vellore Institute of Technology. This work was supported and funded by the Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Electrical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India

    Pratyush Vishal

  2. School of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India

    Rohith Nair, Jonathan Jacob, Narendiranath Babu T. & M. Pandiyan

Authors
  1. Pratyush Vishal
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rohith Nair
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jonathan Jacob
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Narendiranath Babu T.
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. Pandiyan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Pratyush Vishal—Simulation, Rohith Nair—Investigation, Jonathan Jacob—literature, Narendiranath Babu T—conceptualization and analysis, Pandiyan M—Methodology.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Narendiranath Babu T..

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vishal, P., Nair, R., Jacob, J. et al. Comparative analysis of deep learning algorithms for rolling element bearing fault classification under variable loads and speeds. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42592-y

Download citation

  • Received: 23 January 2026

  • Accepted: 26 February 2026

  • Published: 11 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42592-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Bearing fault diagnosis
  • Deep learning
  • EfficientNetB0
  • Transfer learning
  • Hybrid architecture
  • CQ-NSGT
  • Vibration analysis
  • Predictive maintenance
  • Condition monitoring
  • Spectrograms
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics