Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Molecular characterization of emerging bacterial communities associated with honey bees
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 05 April 2026

Molecular characterization of emerging bacterial communities associated with honey bees

  • Shazia Amin1 na1,
  • Shakir Ullah1,
  • Nasreen Nasreen1,
  • Ioannis A. Giantsis3,
  • Maria V. Alvanou3,
  • Sadaf Niaz1,
  • Turki M. Dawoud4 na1,
  • Esmael M. Alyami6,7,
  • Youssouf Ali Younous5 &
  • …
  • Adil Khan2 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 761 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Ecology
  • Microbiology
  • Zoology

Abstract

Honey bees are vital pollinators essential for ecosystems and global agriculture, but their populations are declining due to pressures caused by pests. This study reports the presence of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus terrae, and Pseudomonas spp. in four different honey bee species in Pakistan for the first time, uncovering a previously neglected aspect of honey bee microbiology. From January 2023 to June 2024; 1190 honey bees were collected from four districts in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and they were identified. Molecular screening based on PCR targeting the microbial 16 S rDNA resulted in the detection of potential bacterial pathogens across different districts. In Buner, K. pneumoniae and E. coli were detected in Apis mellifera and Apis cerana individuals while Apis florea was positive only for K. pneumoniae. In Swat, Pseudomonas spp. was identified in A. mellifera, Apis dorsata and A. florea, while in A. cerana no pathogen was detected. In Lower Dir, A. mellifera and A. florea were positive for Pseudomonas spp., and A. cerana for K. pneumoniae, with A. dorsata being pathogen-free. In Malakand, K. pneumoniae and E. coli was found in A. mellifera and A. cerana, while A. florea harbored only Pseudomonas spp., and A. dorsata had no pathogens. Finally, P. terrae was detected exclusively in A. mellifera from Buner and Swat. Morphological analysis revealed significant interspecies variation, with A. dorsata exhibiting the largest values in tongue length (4.27 ± 0.21 mm), forewing size (12.8 ± 0.19 mm), and the highest cubital index (2.71 ± 0.04 mm). A. mellifera was classified in second place, followed by A cerana and A. florea, which characterized by the lowest measurement values. In the present study significant bacterial pathogens were identified representing emerging threat to honey bees in Pakistan while data regarding their phenotypic characterization and phylogenetic position were provided for the first time in the region.

Similar content being viewed by others

Ecological and social factors influence interspecific pathogens occurrence among bees

Article Open access 01 March 2024

Formulation and evaluation of therapeutic antimicrobial citrus and Manuka honey creams with aloe vera, mint essential oil, and Indian costus

Article Open access 03 March 2025

First report on isolation and characterization of Bacillus Sp. associated with honey bee brood disease

Article Open access 29 April 2025

Data availability

Sequences are submitted to GenBank with the accession numbers given by GenBank are as followed: Escherichia coli (PQ223672, PQ223673), Proteus terrae (PQ223674), Klebsiella pneumoniae HB4 (PQ223670, PQ223671), and Pseudomonas spp. (PQ223667, PQ223668, PQ223669).

References

  1. Papa, G. et al. The honey bee Apis mellifera: An insect at the interface between human and ecosystem health. Biology 11(2), 233 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Klein, A. M. et al. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 274(1608), 303–313 (2007).

  3. Vallianatos, E. The Annihilation of Honeybees. CounterPunch (2024).

  4. Bianco, M., Cooper, J. & Fournier, M. Honey bee population decline in Michigan: Causes, consequences, and responses to protect the state’s agriculture and food system. Mich. J. Public. Affairs 11, 4–26 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goulson, D., Nicholls, E., Botías, C. & Rotheray, E. L. Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers. Science 347(6229), 1255957 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Potts, S. G. et al. Declines of managed honey bees and beekeepers in Europe. J. Apic. Res. 49(1), 15–22 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alberoni, D., Gaggìa, F., Baffoni, L. & Di Gioia, D. Beneficial microorganisms for honey bees: problems and progresses. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 100, 9469–9482 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Genersch, E. Honey bee pathology: current threats to honey bees and beekeeping. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 87, 87–97 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Engel, P. et al. The bee microbiome: impact on bee health and model for evolution and ecology of host-microbe interactions. MBio 7(2), 10–108. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nowak, A., Szczuka, D., Górczyńska, A., Motyl, I. & Kręgiel, D. Characterization of Apis mellifera gastrointestinal microbiota and lactic acid bacteria for honeybee protection—A review. Cells 10(3), 701 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dickel, F. et al. The oral vaccination with Paenibacillus larvae bacterin can decrease susceptibility to American Foulbrood infection in honey bees—A safety and efficacy study. Front. Vet. Sci. 9, 946237 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Erban, T. et al. Honeybee (Apis mellifera)-associated bacterial community affected by American foulbrood: detection of Paenibacillus larvae via microbiome analysis. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 5084 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grundmann, C. O., Guzman, J., Vilcinskas, A. & Pupo, M. T. The insect microbiome is a vast source of bioactive small molecules. Nat. Prod. Rep. 41(6), 935–967 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  14. McElhany, K. 16S rRNA-Based Tag Pyrosequencing of Complex Food and Wastewater Environments: Microbial Diversity and Dynamics (Texas A & M University, 2012).

  15. Patrick, B. Smarcs vs Serratia: Characterising Novel Phages to Combat Serratia marcescens (La Trobe, 2021).

  16. Ahmad, T., Shah, G. M., Farid, A., Partap, U. & Ahmad, S. Impact of apiculture on the household income of rural poor in mountains of Chitral District in Pakistan. J. Soc. Sci. COES RJ JSS. 6(3), 518–531 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nikolaenko, S. A. Analysis of methods for the prevention and treatment of bacterial diseases of bees in Russia. Emerge Ind. Environ. Saf. 1, 98–100 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nwankwo, C. M., Ezekoye, C. C. & Igbokwe, S. O. Phytochemical screening and antimicrobial activity of apiary honey produced by honey bee (Apis mellifera) on clinical strains of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Candida albicans. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 13(23) (2014).

  19. Polykretis, P. et al. Evidence of immunocompetence reduction induced by cadmium exposure in honey bees (Apis mellifera). Environ. Pollut. 218, 826–834 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chechyotkina, U. E., Evteeva, N. I., Rechkin, A. I. & Radaev, A. A. Enterobacterium as part of the microflora of the digestive system of honey bees in different seasons. NI Lobachevsky Bull. Nizhny Novgorod University 2–2 (2011).

  21. Galatiuk, O., Romanishina, T., Lakhman, A., Zastulka, O. & Balkanska, R. Isolation and identification of Klebsiella aerogenes from bee colonies in bee dysbiosis. Thai J. Vet. Med. 50 (3), 353–361 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Abdurehman Damissie, A. & Abdurahman Musa, K. Isolation, assessments of risk factors, and antimicrobial susceptibility test of Klebsiella from gut of bee in and around Haramaya university bee farm, East Hararghe, Oromia regional state, Ethiopia. Vet. Med. Int. 2022(1), 9460543 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Corby-Harris, V., Maes, P. & Anderson, K. E. The bacterial communities associated with honey bee (Apis mellifera) foragers. PLoS One 9(4), e95056 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  24. De Fernandez, G. et al. The gut microbiome of solitary bees is mainly affected by pathogen assemblage and partially by land use. Environ. Microbiome 18(1), 38 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mundo, M. A. et al. Diversity, antimicrobial production, and seasonal variation of honey bee microbiota isolated from the honey stomachs of the domestic honey bee, Apis mellifera. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 6, 931363 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Amin, S. et al. Mohammed. First report on isolation and characterization of Bacillus Sp. associated with honey bee brood disease. Sci. Rep. 15(1), 14994 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tsadila, C., Amoroso, C. & Mossialos, D. Microbial diversity in bee species and bee products: Pseudomonads contribution to bee well-being and the biological activity exerted by honey bee products: A narrative review. Diversity 15(10), 1088 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sbaghdi, T. et al. The response of the honey bee gut microbiota to nosema ceranae is modulated by the probiotic pediococcus acidilactici and the neonicotinoid thiamethoxam. Microorganisms 12(1), 192 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Al-Ghamdi, A., Khan, K. A., Ansari, M. J., Almasaudi, S. B. & Al-Kahtani, S. Effect of gut bacterial isolates from Apis mellifera jemenitica on Paenibacillus larvae infected bee larvae. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 25(2), 383–387 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Beaurepaire, A. et al. Diversity and global distribution of viruses of the western honey bee, Apis mellifera. Insects 11(4), 239 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Brutscher, L. M., McMenamin, Alexander, J. & Flenniken, M. L. The buzz about honey bee viruses. PLoS Pathog. 12(8), e1005757 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chen, G., Wang, Shuai, Jia, Shuo, Feng, Ye, H., Fuliang, Chen, Y. & Zheng, H. A new strain of virus discovered in China specific to the parasitic mite Varroa destructor poses a potential threat to honey bees. Viruses 13(4), 679 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kitnya, N., Brockmann, A. & Otis, G. W. Taxonomic revision and identification keys for the giant honey bees. Front. Bee Sci. 2, 1379952 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ruttner, F. Biogeography and Taxonomy of Honeybees (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013).

  35. Youngseob Yu, Lee C., Kim J., Hwang S. Group-specifi c primer and probe sets to detect methanogeniccommunities using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 89(6), 670–679 (2005).

  36. Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35(6), 1547–1549 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hoang, D. T., Chernomor, O., Von Haeseler, A., Minh, B. Q. & Vinh, L. S. UFBoot2: Improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35(2), 518–522 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Abou-Shaara, H. F. Wing venation characters of honey bees. J. Apic. 28(2), 79–86 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Dar, S. A. & Ahmad, S. B. Morphometric variations and expression of body colour pattern of honeybee, Apis cerana F. in Kashmir (2017).

  40. DeGrandi-Hoffman, G., Chambers, M., Hooper, Judith, E. & Schneider, S. S. Description of an intermorph between a worker and queen in African honey bees Apis mellifera scutellata (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 97(6), 1299–1305 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kiatoko, N. et al. Body size as a proxy of probing time and visitation rates on cucumber by two African stingless bees increase fruit quality and seed quantity. Sci. Hort. 309, 111671 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Reddy, P. V., Verghese, A. & Rajan, V. V. Potential impact of climate change on honeybees (Apis spp.) and their pollination services. Pest Manag. Hortic. Ecosyst. 18(2), 121–127 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Saini, S., Chaudhary, O. P. & Anoosha, V. Relationship of population size and extraction frequency with honey production in Apis mellifera colonies. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 6(3), 1374–1377 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Fakrudin, B. et al. Genetic diversity of Apis dorsata and Apis laboriosa. In Role of Giant Honeybees in Natural and Agricultural Systems 62–77 (CRC Press, 2023).

  45. Fasasi, K. A. Aspects of the Biology of Apis mellifera Adansonii (1758) (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Apoidea) with Emphasis on Honey and Beeswax Production (University of Lagos, 2008).

  46. Nagaraja, N. Biology of Asian giant honeybee, Apis dorsata Fabricius (Hymenoptera: Apidae). In: Role of Giant Honeybees in Natural and Agricultural Systems 15–26 (CRC Press, 2023).

  47. Weihmann, F., Hoetzl, T. & Kastberger, G. Training for defense? From stochastic traits to synchrony in giant honey bees (Apis dorsata). Insects 3(3), 833–856 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Abdel-Qader, I. A. & Al-Saad, L. A. First record and morphology study of red dwarf honey bees Apis florea Fabricius (1787) in Basra Province. Al Qadisiyah J. Agric. Sci. 12(2), 79–86 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Dyer, F. C. & Seeley, T. D. Interspecific comparisons of endothermy in honey-bees (Apis): Deviations from the expected size-related patterns. J. Exp. Biol. 127(1), 1–26 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Moritz, R. F. A., Haddad, Nizar, Bataieneh, Ahmed, Shalmon, B. & Hefetz, A. Invasion of the dwarf honeybee Apis florea into the near East. Biol. Invasions 12, 1093–1099 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Katuwal, D. R. & Pokhrel, A. Comparative study of Apis cerena and Apis mellifera. J. Agric. For. Res. 2(3) (2023).

  52. Nouvian, M., Reinhard, J. & Giurfa, M. The defensive response of the honeybee Apis mellifera. J. Exp. Biol. 219(22), 3505–3517 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Woyke, J. Differences in body colour expression between European and Asian honeybees. In Paper Presented at the Proceeding of Fourth Asian Apicultural Association International Conference (1998).

  54. GHANSHYAMBHAI, SHARMA VISHALKUMAR. MORPHOMETRIC STUDIES, MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION AND DESIGNING OF BEEHIVE FOR HONEYBEE IN SAURASHTRA REGION. (2023).

  55. Haldhar, S. M., Singh, K. I., Gupta, M. K. & Devi, A. S. Morphometric analysis on different species of honeybees in NEH region of India. J. Agric. Ecol. 12, 62–73 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Siraj, M., Yaqoob, M., Ayoub, L., Bhat, B. A., Sheikh, M. A. & Irshad, S. S. Comparative morphometric studies of European honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) at different altitudes of Kashmir Region, India. Int. J. Environ. Clim. Change 12(11), 3507–3523 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Gana, B. Comparative Studies on the Ecology, Morphometric, and Honey Composition of Apis Mellifera L.(Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Kwara State, North-Central Nigeria (Kwara State University (Nigeria), 2018).

  58. Yu, L. et al. Morphological characteristics and microsatellite DNA genetic diversity of Nigeria African honey bee, Anhui Apis mellifera and their hybrid generation II. Acta Ecol. Sin. 32(11), 3555–3564 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Niem, N. V. & Trung, L. Q. Morphological comparison of three Asian native honey bees (Apis cerana, A. dorsata, A. florea) in northern Vietnam and Thailand. Biotropia (1999).

  60. Dukku, U. H. Evaluation of morphometric characters of honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) populations in Nigeria. PeerJ PrePrints 4, e1680v1681 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Cao, L. F. et al. Multivariate morphometric analyses of the giant honey bees, Apis dorsata F. and Apis laboriosa F. in China. J. Apic. Res. 51(3), 245–251 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Bidisha, R. & Basavarajappa, S. Fore and hind wings morphometry of Apis dorsata worker honeybees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) of geographically distinct areas of southern Karnataka, India. Int. J. Curr. Adv. Res. 7, 12025–12029 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Masrat, S. Morphometric studies of European honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) at different altitudes in Kashmir (SKUAST Kashmir, 2019).

  64. Makhmoor, H. D. & Ahmad, H. Biometric studies on four species of honey bees in Jammu region, India. Indian Bee J. 60(3), 141–142 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Bouzeraa, H., Achou, M., Sellami, H. & Slotani, N. Study of the morphometric diversity of the population of honeybees (Apis mellifera) in the North-East Algeria. Eur. J. Exp. Biol. 6(6), 6–12 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Eswarappa, G., Kuberappa, G. C., Roopa, A. N., Jagadish, K. S. & Vazhacharickal, P. J. Pollination potentiality of different species of honey bees in increasing productivity of Chow-Chow (Sechium edule (Jacq) SW): An overview (2001).

  67. Wang, H., Wu, Z., Zhao, J. & Wu, J. Nectar feeding by a honey bee’s hairy tongue: morphology, dynamics, and energy-saving strategies. Insects 12(9), 762 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Boyacioglu, D., Samanci, A. E., Tanugur & Samanci, T. Future prospects of propolis, bee pollen, royal jelly, and bee venom. In Bee Products and Their Applications in the Food and Pharmaceutical Industries 411–440 (Elsevier, 2022).

  69. Waykar, B. & Alqadhi, Y. A. Beekeeping and bee products; boon for human health and wealth. Indian J. Pharm. Biol. Res. 4(3), 20 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Celis-Diez, J. L. et al. Wild floral visitors are more important than honeybees as pollinators of avocado crops. Agronomy 13(7), 1722 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Parveen, N. et al. Honey bee pathogenesis posing threat to its global population: A short review. Proc. Indian Natl. Sci. Acad. 88(1), 11–32. (2022).

  72. Prata, J. C. & Martins da Costa, P. Honeybees and the one health approach. Environments 11(8), 161 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Di Prisco, G. et al. A mutualistic symbiosis between a parasitic mite and a pathogenic virus undermines honey bee immunity and health. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113(12), 3203–3208 (2016).

  74. Harwood, Gyan, P. & Dolezal, A. G. Pesticide–virus interactions in honey bees: Challenges and opportunities for understanding drivers of bee declines. Viruses 12(5), 566 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Gätschenberger, H., Azzami, Klara, Tautz, J. & Beier, H. Antibacterial immune competence of honey bees (Apis mellifera) is adapted to different life stages and environmental risks. PLoS One, 8(6), e66415. (2013).

  76. Lakhman, A. R., Galatіuk, O., Ye, Romanіshіna, T. А. & Behas, V. L. Antagonistic effect of Bacillus subtilis isolated and identified from different honey species against Klebsiella pneumoniae bee pathogens. Ukr. J. Vet. Agric. Sci. 4(3), 48–53 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Gnat, S., Łagowski, D., Nowakiewicz, A. & Dyląg, M. A global view on fungal infections in humans and animals: Opportunistic infections and microsporidioses. J. Appl. Microbiol. 131(5), 2095–2113 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Kibuchi, M. J. Klebsiella Pneumoniae Prevalence, Antibiotic Susceptibility and Social Demographic Factors Among Patients With Nosocomial Infections in Kiambu County, Kenya (Kenyatta University, 2021).

  79. Snowdon, J. A. & Cliver, D. O. Microorganisms in honey. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 31(1–3), 1–26 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Östervald, F. The effect of diet on the cintestinal microbiome during overwintering in Apis mellifera Buckfast living in Sweden (2024).

  81. Drzewiecka, D. Significance and roles of Proteus spp. bacteria in natural environments. Microb. Ecol. 72(4), 741–758 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Papadopoulou-Karabela, K., Iliadis, N., Liakos, V. & Bourdzy-Hatzopoulou, E. Experimental infection of honeybees by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Apidologie 23(5), 393–397 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  83. de Paula, G. T., Menezes, C., Pupo, M. T. & Rosa, C. A. Stingless bees and microbial interactions. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 44, 41–47 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Manirajan, B. A. et al. Diversity, specificity, co-occurrence and hub taxa of the bacterial–fungal pollen microbiome. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 94 (8), fiy112 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research and Graduate Studies at King Khalid University for funding this work through the Large Research Project under grant number RGP2/715/46.

Funding

This work is financially supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research and Graduate Studies at King Khalid University for funding this work through the Large Research Project under grant number RGP2/715/46.

Author information

Author notes
  1. Shazia Amin and Turki M. Dawoud contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, 23200, Pakistan

    Shazia Amin, Shakir Ullah, Nasreen Nasreen & Sadaf Niaz

  2. Department of Zoology, Bacha Khan University Charsadda, Charsadda, 24420, Pakistan

    Adil Khan

  3. Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54621, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Ioannis A. Giantsis & Maria V. Alvanou

  4. Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, P. O. BOX 2455, 11451, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Turki M. Dawoud

  5. Evangelical College, BP 1200, N’Djamena, Chad

    Youssouf Ali Younous

  6. Department of Biology, College of Science, King Khalid University, PO Box 960, 61421, Abha, Asir, Saudi Arabia

    Esmael M. Alyami

  7. Health And Medical Research Centre (HMRC), King Khalid University, 61413, Abha, Saudi Arabia

    Esmael M. Alyami

Authors
  1. Shazia Amin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shakir Ullah
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nasreen Nasreen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ioannis A. Giantsis
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Maria V. Alvanou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sadaf Niaz
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Turki M. Dawoud
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Esmael M. Alyami
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Youssouf Ali Younous
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Adil Khan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Author Contributions: Shazia Amin: Methodology, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft. Shakir Ullah: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Validation. Nasreen Nasreen: Methodology, Formal Analysis, Data curation, Validation. Ioannis A. Giantsis: Writing – review & editing, Validation. Maria V. Alavanou, Esmael M. Alyami, and Youssouf Ali Younous: Data curation, Software, Formal Analysis, Writing – original draft. Sadaf Niaz: Investigation, Validation, Resources. Adil Khan, and Turki M. Dawoud: Conceptualization, Supervision, Project administration.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Youssouf Ali Younous or Adil Khan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The Institutional Research Ethics Committee of Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan Pakistan approved the study. Notably, all animal experimentation was conducted in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, and guidelines, prioritizing animal welfare and minimizing any potential harm.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amin, S., Ullah, S., Nasreen, N. et al. Molecular characterization of emerging bacterial communities associated with honey bees. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42610-z

Download citation

  • Received: 08 August 2025

  • Accepted: 26 February 2026

  • Published: 05 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42610-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Honey bees
  • Bacterial pathogens
  • Apis sp.
  • Pakistan
  • Monitoring
  • Escherichia
  • Klebsiella
  • Proteus
  • Pseudomonas
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology