Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
A proof of concept study on the diagnostic utility of in vivo expressed mycobacterial transcripts in tuberculous pleuritis
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 07 March 2026

A proof of concept study on the diagnostic utility of in vivo expressed mycobacterial transcripts in tuberculous pleuritis

  • Prabhdeep Kaur1 na1,
  • Sumedha Sharma1 na1,
  • Sudhanshu Abhishek1,
  • Ashutosh N. Aggarwal2,
  • Khushpreet Kaur1,
  • Rakesh Yadav3,
  • Sunil Sethi3,
  • Amanjit Bal4 &
  • …
  • Indu Verma1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 602 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Infectious-disease diagnostics
  • Microbiology

Abstract

Tuberculous pleuritis (TBP) is the second most common extra-pulmonary manifestation of tuberculosis. Histopathology using pleural biopsy is the most sensitive diagnostic procedure for TBP. Since biopsy acquisition is invasive, better biomarkers for diagnosis using pleural fluid are needed. The current study was designed to identify mycobacterial RNA biomarkers in TBP and to assess their diagnostic utility in pleural fluid. 261 TBP suspects were recruited for the study. 45 suspects were excluded and remaining (n = 216) were divided into TBP (n = 54) and non-TBP (n = 162) groups based on composite reference standard (CRS). Whole genome microarray was carried using M.tb RNA from pleural biopsies of TBP patients. The data was validated using qRT-PCR and the diagnostic utility of top two highly expressed genes was evaluated in pleural fluid, using qualitative real time RT-PCR. 1856 genes were differentially expressed in microarray with 1365 upregulated and 491 downregulated genes. The diagnostic utility of transcripts corresponding to two genes, Rv1586c and Rv2819c was assessed post microarray validation. The presence of either of two genes led to pleural TB identification with 79.6% sensitivity and 93.28% specificity. Thus, the transcripts of genes Rv1586c and Rv2819c holds potential for development of RNA based diagnostic assay for TBP using pleural fluid.

Data availability

The gene expression data obtained in the current study has been submitted to Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) vide accession no. GSE231472. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi? acc=GSE231472.

References

  1. WHO. Global TB report 2021. (Accessed Dec 2021) http://www.who.int (WHO, 2021).

  2. Cascio, C., Kaul, V., Dhooria, S., Agrawal, A. & Chaddha, U. Diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusions: A review. Respir Med. 188, 106607 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bielsa, S., Acosta, C., Pardina, M., Civit, C. & Porcel, J. M. Tuberculous pleural effusion: Clinical characteristics of 320 patients. Arch. Bronconeumol. (Engl Ed). 55, 17–22 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, Z. et al. Diagnostic value and safety of medical thoracoscopy in tuberculous pleural effusion. Respir Med. 109, 1188–1192 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ruan, S. et al. Revisiting tuberculous pleurisy: pleural fluid characteristics and diagnostic yield of mycobacterial culture in an endemic area. Thorax 67, 822–827 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bibby, A. & Maskell, N. Pleural biopsies in undiagnosed pleural effusions; Abrams vs image-guided vs thoracoscopic biopsies. Curr. Opin. Pulm Med. 22, 392–398 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Porcel, J. Tuberculous pleural effusion. Lung 187, 263–270 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Trajman, A. & Luiz, R. McNemar chi2 test revisited: comparing sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic examinations. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 68, 77–80 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aggarwal, A. N. et al. Unstimulated pleural fluid interferon gamma for diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 59, 2112–2132 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Meldau, R. et al. Same-Day Tools, including Xpert Ultra and IRISA-TB, for rapid diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis: a prospective observational study. J. Clin. Microbiol. 57, e00614–e00619 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, G. et al. Accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for the diagnosis of pleural TB in a multicenter cohort study. Chest 157, 268–275 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gao, S. et al. Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra enhanced tuberculous pleurisy diagnosis for patients with unexplained exudative pleural effusion who underwent a pleural biopsy via thoracoscopy: A prospective cohort study. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 106, 370–375 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Theron, G. et al. Xpert MTB/RIF results in patients with previous tuberculosis: can we distinguish true from false positive results? Clin. infect. Dis. 62, 995–1001 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sharma, S. et al. Transcriptome analysis of mycobacteria in sputum samples of pulmonary tuberculosis patients. PLoS One. 12, e0173508 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Abhishek, S. et al. Transcriptional profile of mycobacterium tuberculosis in an in vitro model of intraocular tuberculosis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 8, 1–20 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schnappinger, D. et al. Transcriptional adaptation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis within macrophages: Insights into the phagosomal environment. J. Exp. Med. 198, 693–704 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rachman, H. et al. Unique transcriptome signature of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in pulmonary tuberculosis. Infect. Immun. 74, 1233–1242 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lew, J., Kapopoulou, A., Jones, L. & Cole, S. TubercuList–10 years after. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 91, 1–7 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Karp, P. D. et al. The BioCyc collection of microbial genomes and metabolic pathways. Brief. Bioinform. 20, 1085–1093 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gogia & Gupta, P. Diagnosing pleural tuberculosis is simple, yet not so simple! Curr. Med. Res. Pract. 14, 137–139 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ryndak, M., Singh, K., Peng, Z. & Laal, S. Transcriptional profile of mycobacterium tuberculosis replicating in type II alveolar epithelial cells. PLoS One. 10, e0123745 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Garton, N. J. et al. Cytological and transcript analyses reveal fat and lazy persister-like bacilli in tuberculous sputum. PLoS Med. 5, e75 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Warsinske, H., Vashisht, R. & Khatri, P. Host-response-based gene signatures for tuberculosis diagnosis: A systematic comparison of 16 signatures. PLoS Med. 16, e1002786 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hoang, L. et al. Transcriptomic signatures for diagnosing tuberculosis in clinical practice: a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 21, 366–375 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Morey, J., Ryan, J. & Van Dolah, F. Microarray validation: Factors influencing correlation between oligonucleotide microarrays and real-time PCR. Biol. Proced. Online. 8, 175–193 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bayés-Genis, A. et al. Prognostic value of circulating microRNAs on heart failure-related morbidity and mortality in two large diverse cohorts of general heart failure patients. Eur. J. Hear. Fail. 20, 67–75 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bustin, S., Coward, A., Sadler, G., Teare, L. & Nolan, T. CoV2-ID, a MIQE-compliant sub-20-min 5-plex RT-PCR assay targeting SARS-CoV-2 for the diagnosis of COVID-19. Sci. Rep. 10, 22214 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lusiba, J. et al. Evaluation of Cepheid’s Xpert MTB/Rif test on pleural fluid in the diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis in a high prevalence HIV/TB setting. PLoS One. 9, e102702 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Denkinger, C. et al. Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Respir J. 44, 435–446 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Aggarwal, A. N. et al. Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra versus Xpert MTB/RIF for diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion: A systematic review and comparative meta-analysis. PLoS One. 17, e0268483 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Arend, S. M. & van Soolingen, D. Performance of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra: a matter of dead or alive. Lancet Infect. Dis. 18, 8–10 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Brennan, M. J. The enigmatic PE/PPE multigene family of mycobacteria and tuberculosis vaccination. Infect. Immun. 85, e00969–e00916 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Akhter, Y., Ehebauer, M., Mukhopadhyay, S. & Hasnain, S. The PE/PPE multigene family codes for virulence factors and is a possible source of mycobacterial antigenic variation. Perhaps more? Biochimie. 94, 110–116 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Muñoz-Elías, E. & McKinney, J. Mycobacterium tuberculosis isocitrate lyases 1 and 2 are jointly required for in vivo growth and virulence. Nat. Med. 11, 638–644 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gago, G., Diacovich, L. & Gramajo, H. Lipid metabolism and its implication in mycobacteria-host interaction. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 41, 36–42 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wilburn, K., Fieweger, R. & VanderVen, B. Cholesterol and fatty acids grease the wheels of Mycobacterium tuberculosis pathogenesis. Pathog Dis. 76, fty021 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kantardjieff, K. et al. Structure of pyrR (Rv1379) from Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a persistence gene and protein drug target. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 61, 355–364 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rosenberg, A., Sinai, L., Smith, Y. & Ben-Yehuda, S. Dynamic expression of the translational machinery during Bacillus subtilis life cycle at a single cell level. PLoS One. 7, e41921 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wang, G. et al. Accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for the diagnosis of pleural TB in a multicenter cohort study. Chest 157, 268–275 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Meldau, R. et al. Same-Day Tools, including Xpert Ultra and IRISA-TB, for rapid diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis: A prospective observational study. J. Clin. Microbiol. 57, e00614–e00619 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kaur, K. et al. Metabolic switching and cell wall remodelling of Mycobacterium tuberculosis during bone tuberculosis. J. Infect. 86, 134–146 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sharma, S., Aggarwal, A. N., Kaur, P., Yadav, R., Sethi, S. & Verma, I. In-vivo expressed mycobacterial transcripts as diagnostic targets for pulmonary tuberculosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 144, 102431 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Livak, K. & Schmittgen, T. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25, 402–408 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Laurell, H. et al. Correction of RT-qPCR data for genomic DNA-derived signals with ValidPrime. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e51 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The current research was funded by Department of Biotechnology, New Delhi, India vide Grant No. TB.BT/PR20863/MED/30/1889/2017.

Author information

Author notes
  1. Prabhdeep Kaur and Sumedha Sharma contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biochemistry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

    Prabhdeep Kaur, Sumedha Sharma, Sudhanshu Abhishek, Khushpreet Kaur & Indu Verma

  2. Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

    Ashutosh N. Aggarwal

  3. Department of Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

    Rakesh Yadav & Sunil Sethi

  4. Department of Histopathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

    Amanjit Bal

Authors
  1. Prabhdeep Kaur
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sumedha Sharma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sudhanshu Abhishek
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ashutosh N. Aggarwal
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Khushpreet Kaur
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rakesh Yadav
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sunil Sethi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Amanjit Bal
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Indu Verma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: PK, SS, IV; Methodology: PK, SS and IV; Investigation: PK, SA, KK; Data Curation: PK, SS, ANA, RY, SSethi, AB; Formal Analysis: PK, SS, ANA and IV; Funding Acquisition: IV Project Supervision: IV Visualization: PK, SS, ANA, IV; Writing (Original Draft): PK; Writing (Review And Editing): SS and IV.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Indu Verma.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download DOCX )

Supplementary Material 2 (download DOCX )

Supplementary Material 3 (download DOCX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaur, P., Sharma, S., Abhishek, S. et al. A proof of concept study on the diagnostic utility of in vivo expressed mycobacterial transcripts in tuberculous pleuritis. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42637-2

Download citation

  • Received: 14 June 2025

  • Accepted: 26 February 2026

  • Published: 07 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42637-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Tuberculosis (TB)
  • Tuberculous pleuritis (TBP)
  • Potential biomarkers for TB pleuritis
  • Molecular assay
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology