Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Probabilistic operational management of a renewable-based microgrid considering uncertainties using the self-adaptive gravitational search algorithm
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 05 March 2026

Probabilistic operational management of a renewable-based microgrid considering uncertainties using the self-adaptive gravitational search algorithm

  • Emad M. Ahmed1,
  • Zaki A. Zaki1,
  • Mehrdad Ahmadi Kamarposhti2,
  • El Manaa Barhoumi3 &
  • …
  • Ilhami Colak4 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 646 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Energy science and technology
  • Engineering

Abstract

Increasing uncertainties in electricity prices, load demand, and renewable energy generation pose significant challenges for optimal microgrid operation in deregulated electricity markets. This paper proposes a self-adaptive Gravitational Search Algorithm (SGSA), which enhances the standard GSA by incorporating a self-adaptive mutation operator with two movement strategies to mitigate premature convergence and improve solution quality. To model uncertainties in load demand, market prices, and renewable outputs, the 2 m-Point Estimation Method (PEM) is employed as a computationally efficient alternative to conventional stochastic approaches. The proposed SGSA-PEM framework is applied to a low-voltage microgrid consisting of microturbines, phosphoric acid fuel cells, photovoltaic units, wind turbines, and battery storage. Simulation results indicate that the integration of battery storage reduces the total generation cost by up to 49.7%, while renewable energy penetration increases by approximately 10% during peak demand periods. Furthermore, comparative analysis shows that SGSA achieves lower operating costs and converges about 25% faster than standard GSA and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). The results confirm that the proposed framework provides a computationally efficient and robust solution for probabilistic microgrid energy management under uncertainty.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

DER:

Distributed Energy Resources (microturbines, fuel cells, photovoltaic units, wind turbines, and battery storage)

MGCC:

Microgrid Central Controller (distributed generation and load management controller)

SGSA:

Self-Adaptive Gravitational Search Algorithm (the modified GSA that implements adaptive mutation strategies)

PEM:

2 m-Point Estimation Method (type used for model uncertainties in load, prices, and renewable outputs)

GSA:

Gravitational Search Algorithm, a metaheuristic optimization methodology based on Newtonian Gravity

PSO:

Particle Swarm Optimization (a heuristic optimization algorithm)

OPF:

Optimal Power Flow (a method for microgrid power dispatch)

FESS:

Flywheel Energy Storage System (used for load support mode in islanded)

Mean_k, t:

Mean position for all particles in dimension t at iteration k in SGSA

Gl_k, t:

Global best position in dimension t at iteration k in SGSA

α:

The learning rate for probability updates in SGSA, set to 0.142

Prb1, Prb2:

Probabilities of mutating with mutation strategies 1 and 2 in SGSA

Accum1, Accum2:

Accumulators for the probabilities used to update the mutation strategy using strategy 1 and strategy 2, respectively in SGSA

PDG :

The power output from the distributed generators (including but not limited to microturbines, PV, and wind turbines)

Ctotal :

The total generation cost of the microgrid, expressed in (€)

Rpen :

The renewable percentage penetration (%)

µX :

Mean of the input random variable X in PEM (e.g., load demand, market price)

σX :

Standard deviation of the input random variable X in PEM

ξX, i :

Location of the i-th concentration point in PEM for variable X

wX, i :

Weight of the i-th concentration point in PEM for variable X

Z:

Output random variable in PEM (e.g., total cost, power output)

E[Zk]:

k-th moment of the output random variable Z in PEM

References

  1. Liang, H. & Zhuang, W. Stochastic modeling and optimization in a microgrid: a survey, Energies. 7(4), 2027–2050 (2014).

  2. Bayindir, R., Hossain, E., Kabalci, E. & Perez, R. A comprehensive study on microgrid technology. Int. J. Renew. Energy Res. (IJRER). 4 (4), 1094–1107 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ackermann, T., Andersson, G. & Söder, L. Distributed generation: A definition. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 57 (3), 195–204 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Østergaard, P. A. Reviewing optimisation criteria for energy systems analyses of renewable energy integration. Energy. 34(9), 1236–1245 (2009).

  5. Fadlullah, Z. M., Elbouchikhi, E. & Benbouzid, M. Microgrids energy management systems: a critical review on methods, solutions, and prospects. Appl. Energy. 282, 116060 (2020).

  6. Gao, Y. et al. A bi-level hybrid game framework for stochastic robust optimization in multi-integrated energy microgrids. Sustain. Energy Grids Netw, vol. 44, p.102024. (2025).

  7. Li, S., Bai, H., Yao, R., Wang, Y. & Liu, T. Causes identification and sources localization method for multistage voltage sag under the influence of high penetration of renewable energy sources. Available at SSRN 5333972.

  8. Liang, J., Wu, S. & Lu, T. Portfolio selection and optimal planning for hydrogen energy storage systems composed of heterogeneous electrolyzer and fuel cell technologies in industrial park multi-energy systems. Appl. Energy. 403, 127001. (2026).

  9. Baradar, M. On the efficiency and accuracy of simulation methods for optimal power system operation: convex optimization models for power system analysis, optimal utilization of vsc-type dc wind farm grids and facts devices. PhD diss., KTH Royal Institute of Technology, (2015).

  10. Niknam, T., Golestaneh, F. & Malekpour, A. Probabilistic energy and operation management of a microgrid containing wind/photovoltaic/fuel cell generation and energy storage devices based on point estimate method and self-adaptive gravitational search algorithm. Energy. 43(1), 427–437 (2012).

  11. Pantos, M. Stochastic optimal charging of electric-drive vehicles with renewable energy. Energy. 36(11), 6567–6576 (2011).

  12. Choudhry, M. A. & Khan, H. Power loss reduction in radial distribution system with multiple distributed energy resources through efficient islanding detection. Energy. 35(12), 4843–4861 (2010).

  13. Afzali, P., Hosseini, S. A. & Peyghami, S. A comprehensive review on uncertainty and risk modeling techniques and their applications in power systems. Appl. Sci. 14(24), 12042 (2024).

  14. Cabrera-Tobar, A., Massi Pavan, A., Petrone, G. & Spagnuolo, G. A review of the optimization and control techniques in the presence of uncertainties for the energy management of microgrids. Energies. 15(23), 9114 (2022).

  15. Harr, E. Probabilistic estimates for multivariate analysis. Appl. Math. Model. 13 (5), 313–318 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rashedi, E., Nezamabadi-pour, H. & Saryazdi, S. GSA: a gravitational search algorithm. Inf. Sci. 179, 2232–2248 (2009).

  17. Formato, R. A. Central force optimization: a new meta-heuristic with applications in applied electromagnetics. Progress Electromagnet. Res. 77, 425–491 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gao, K. et al. A review of optimization of microgrid operation. Energies 14(10), 2842 (2021).

  19. Tsikalakis, A. G. & Hatziargyriou, N. D. Centralized control for optimizing microgrids operation. In 2011 IEEE power and energy society general meeting (pp. 1–8). IEEE. (2011).

  20. Chedid, R., Sawwas, A. & Fares, D. Optimal design of a university campus micro-grid operating under unreliable grid considering PV and battery storage. Energy 200, 117510 (2020).

  21. Kharrich, M. et al. Optimization based on movable damped wave algorithm for design of photovoltaic/wind/diesel/biomass/battery hybrid energy systems. Energy Rep. 8, pp488–499 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dayalan, S. & Rathinam, R. Energy management of a microgrid using demand response strategy including renewable uncertainties. Int. J. Emerg. Electr. Power Syst. 23 (2), 159–174 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dai, S. et al. Optimal energy management of multi-energy multi-microgrid networks using mountain gazelle optimizer for cost and emission reduction. Energy 329, 136640 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Akter, A. et al. A review on microgrid optimization with meta-heuristic techniques: Scopes, trends and recommendation. Energy Strategy Rev. 51, 101298 (2024).

  25. Dali, M., Belhadj, J. & Roboam, X. Hybrid solar–wind system with battery storage operating in grid-connected and standalone mode: Control and energy management – experimental investigation. Energy. 35(6), 2587–2595 (2010).

  26. Moghaddam, A., Seifi, A., Niknam, T. & Pahlavani, M. R. Multi-objective operation management of a renewable microgrid with back-up micro-turbine/fuel cell/battery hybrid power source. Energy. 36(11), 6490–6507 (2011).

  27. Rosenblueth, E. Point estimates for probability moments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 72, 3812–3814 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hong, H. P. An efficient point estimate method for probabilistic analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 59, 261–267 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Meng, Q., Hussain, S., He, Y., Lu, J. & Guerrero, J. M. Multi-timescale stochastic optimization for enhanced dispatching and operational efficiency of electric vehicle photovoltaic charging stations. Int. J. Electric. Power Energy Syst. 172, 111096 (2025).

  30. Zhou, Y. et al. A data-and-model-driven acceleration approach for large-scale network-constrained unit commitment problem with uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, vol. 16, pp. 2299-2311 (2025).

  31. Zheng, J., Zhai, L., Tao, M., Tang, W. & Li, Z. Low-carbon economic dispatch in integrated energy systems: a set-based interval optimization with decision support under uncertainties. Prot. Control Mod. Power Syst. 11 (1), 68–87 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Malekpour, A. R. & Niknam, T. A probabilistic multi-objective daily Volt/Var control at distribution networks including renewable energy sources. Energy. 36(5), 3477–3488 (2011).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research at Jouf University under grant No. (DGSSR-2025-02-01318).

Funding

This work was funded by the Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research at Jouf University under Grant No. (DGSSR-2025-02-01318).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Jouf University, Sakaka, 72388, Saudi Arabia

    Emad M. Ahmed & Zaki A. Zaki

  2. Department of Electrical Engineering, Jo.C., Islamic Azad University, Jouybar, Iran

    Mehrdad Ahmadi Kamarposhti

  3. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, Dhofar University, Salalah, Oman

    El Manaa Barhoumi

  4. Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Istinye University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Ilhami Colak

Authors
  1. Emad M. Ahmed
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zaki A. Zaki
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mehrdad Ahmadi Kamarposhti
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. El Manaa Barhoumi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ilhami Colak
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Emad M. Ahmed: conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, writing – review & editing, visualization. Zaki A. Zaki: conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, writing – review & editing, visualization. Mehrdad Ahmadi Kamarposhti: conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, writing – original draft, writing – review & editing, visualization, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition. El Manaa Barhoumi: conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, writing – review & editing, visualization. Ilhami Colak: conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, writing – review & editing, visualization. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zaki A. Zaki or Mehrdad Ahmadi Kamarposhti.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmed, E.M., Zaki, Z.A., Kamarposhti, M.A. et al. Probabilistic operational management of a renewable-based microgrid considering uncertainties using the self-adaptive gravitational search algorithm. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42839-8

Download citation

  • Received: 03 August 2025

  • Accepted: 27 February 2026

  • Published: 05 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42839-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Microgrid energy management
  • Self-adaptive gravitational search algorithm (SGSA)
  • Uncertainty modeling
  • Point estimation method (PEM)
  • Battery storage
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing