Abstract
To investigate the coronal and sagittal radiological characteristics of patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) with sciatic scoliosis, to establish a new typing system, and to assess the difference in efficacy between percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Patients with LDH with sciatic scoliosis who underwent surgical treatment in our hospital from January 2023 to December 2024 were retrospectively analyzed, and the clinical data of the patients were collected. According to the different surgical methods, they were divided into PELD group and TLIF group. Radiological parameters were measured on the basis of full spine frontal and lateral radiographs. Coronal radiological characteristics were evaluated by using Chunde Li typing, sagittal radiological characteristics were evaluated by using LL and SVA, and scoliosis resolution rate was used to evaluate the resolution of scoliosis in patients. A total of 137 patients were included, including 25 patients with coronal type 1 A, 86 patients with type 1B, and 26 patients with type 2. Four sagittal types were identified by sagittal LL and SVA. Among them, 39 patients (28.5%) showed reduced lumbar lordosis but maintained balance in the sagittal position, 40 patients (29.2%) showed lumbar lordosis maintained and a combination of sagittal imbalance, and 27 patients (19.7%) showed lumbar kyphosis with sagittal imbalance. The TLIF group had higher operation time, bleeding, and postoperative hospitalization days than the PELD group. At one week after surgery, both groups achieved satisfactory clinical outcomes, and in patients with sagittal type III and type IV, the scoliosis resolution rate of scoliosis was higher in the TLIF group than in the PELD group. Patients with sciatic scoliosis often have a combination of reduced sagittal lumbar lordosis, sagittal imbalance, and lumbar kyphosis. PELD and TLIF can achieve good surgical efficacy and coronal and sagittal orthopedic results in sciatic scoliosis. The TLIF group had a longer operation time, more bleeding, and more postoperative hospitalization days. For patients with combined sagittal imbalance, the short-term coronal orthopedic results of TLIF were better than those of PELD.
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Diebo, B. G. et al. Adult spinal deformity. Lancet 394(10193), 160–172 (2019).
Kim, R., Kim, R. H. & Kim, C. H. The incidence and risk factors for lumbar or sciatic scoliosis in lumbar disc herniation and the outcomes after percutaneous endoscopic discectomy. Pain Physician 18(6), 555–64 (2015).
Wang, L., Li, C., Wang, L., Qi, L. & Liu, X. Sciatica-related spinal imbalance in lumbar disc herniation patients: Radiological characteristics and recovery following endoscopic discectomy. J. Pain Res. 15, 13–22 (2022).
Suk, K. S., Lee, H. M., Moon, S. H. & Kim, N. H. Lumbosacral scoliotic list by lumbar disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(6), 667–71 (2001).
Zhao, Y. et al. Characteristics of sciatic scoliotic list in lumbar disc herniation. Glob. Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682221126123 (2022).
Imae, S. & Miki, J. Surgical procedure and indication of microendoscopic discectomy. No Shinkei Geka. 53 (1), 78–85 (2025).
Hao, J. et al. Clinical outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy (UBE) compared with conventional open lumbar discectomy with 3D microscope (OLDM) assisted. Medicine (Baltimore) 104(6), e41440 (2025).
Zhang, H. & Gao, J. Clinical comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for L4/5 and L5/S1 dual-level disc herniation. Sci. Rep. 15 (1), 7323 (2025).
Harms, J. & Rolinger, H. A one-stager procedure in operative treatment of spondylolistheses: Dorsal traction-reposition and anterior fusion (author’s transl). Z. Orthop. Ihre Grenzgeb. 120(3), 343–347 (1982).
An, B. et al. Clinical efficacy and complications of MIS-TLIF and TLIF in the treatment of upper lumbar disc herniation: a comparative study. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 19(1), 317 (2024).
Li, H. et al. Surgical strategy for lumbar disc herniation based on the MSU classification: Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A 5-year retrospective study. Orthop. Surg. 16 (8), 1963–1973 (2024).
Arunakul, R., Anumas, S., Pattharanitima, P., Susrivaraput, C. & Pholsawatchai, W. Unilateral biportal endoscopic versus microscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: A retrospective study. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 19(1), 326 (2024).
Zaidat, B. et al. Bibliometric patent review of minimally invasive spine surgery. Clin. Spine Surg. 38 (1), 26–33 (2025).
Paturu, M. R. et al. The role of minimally invasive surgery in spinal trauma: A review of techniques, outcomes, and limitations. Neurosurgery 96 (3S), S129–S138 (2025).
Gong, S. et al. Clinical outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy for the treatment of disc herniation: A 3-Year retrospective study. Ann. Ital. Chir. 95 (3), 353–363 (2024).
Li, B. et al. Correlation between disc imaging observations and clinical efficacy after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: A 1-Year follow-up study. Orthop. Surg. 16 (4), 851–863 (2024).
Attiah, M. et al. Natural history of the aging spine: A cross-sectional analysis of spinopelvic parameters in the asymptomatic population. J. Neurosurg. Spine. 32 (1), 63–68 (2020).
Mohanty, S. et al. Do adult spinal deformity patients who achieve and maintain PI-LL < 10 have better patient-reported and clinical outcomes compared to patients with PI-LL ≥ 10? A propensity score-matched analysis. Spine Deform. 12 (1), 209–219 (2024).
Ishihara, M. et al. Conditions for achieving postoperative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis < 10° in circumferential minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity. J. Clin. Med. 11 (6), 1586 (2022).
Seyedhoseinpoor, T., Sanjari, M. A., Taghipour, M., Dadgoo, M. & Mousavi, S. J. Spinopelvic malalignment correlates to lumbar instability and lumbar musculature in chronic low back pain-an exploratory study. Sci. Rep. 14 (1), 31974 (2024).
Guo, J. et al. Characteristics of the paravertebral muscle in adult degenerative scoliosis with PI-LL match or mismatch and risk factors for PI-LL mismatch. Front. Surg. 10, 1111024 (2023).
Zhang, Y. et al. Sciatic scoliosis evolution after lumbar discectomy: A comparison between adolescents and young adults. Pain Physician. 22 (5), E457–E465 (2019).
Zhang, H., Gao, J., Xie, Q. & Zhang, M. Comparison of 7 surgical interventions for recurrent lumbar disc herniation: A network meta-analysis and systematic review. PLoS One. 20 (3), e0309343 (2025).
Nazwar, T. A., Bal’afif, F., Wardhana, D. W. & Panjaitan, C. A comparative study of transforaminal and interlaminar approaches in percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for L5-S1 disc Herniation: Systematic review. J. Clin. Neurosci. 133, 111022 (2025).
Qian, J., Lv, X., Luo, Y., Liu, Y. & Jiang, W. Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation linked with posterior ring apophysis separation: A retrospective study. World Neurosurg. 193, 957–963 (2025).
Pluemvitayaporn, T. et al. Characteristics of sciatic scoliosis in lumbar disc herniation and comparative radiographic outcomes after treatment with full-endoscopic interlaminar discectomy. Asian J. Endosc. Surg. 18(1), e70026 (2025).
Tu, Z., Wang, B. & Li, L. Early experience of full-endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for adolescent lumbar disc herniation with sciatic scoliosis. Pain Physician 21(1), E63–E70 (2018).
Patel, A. A., Srivatsa, S., Davison, M. A. & Steinmetz, M. P. Posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: Recent advances in technique and technology. Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am. 36(1), 11–20 (2025).
Steinle, A. M. et al. Comparing patient-reported outcomes, complications, readmissions, and revisions in posterior lumbar fusion with, versus without, an interbody device. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 49(4), 232–238 (2024).
Liu, C. et al. Biomechanical assessment of different transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion constructs in normal and osteoporotic condition: A finite element analysis. Spine J. 24(6), 1121–1131 (2024).
Orr, D. et al. Expandable interbody cages for lumbar spinal fusion: A systematic review. Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.01.013 (2025).
Hiyama, A., Katoh, H., Sakai, D., Sato, M. & Watanabe, M. The analysis of preoperative Roussouly classification on pain scores and radiological data in lateral lumbar interbody fusion for patients with lumbar degenerative disease. World Neurosurg. 175, e380–e390 (2023).
Takeda, K. et al. Influence of slippage reduction and correction of lumbosacral kyphosis by single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion on spinal alignment in patients with dysplastic spondylolisthesis. Spine Deform. 12(6), 1761–1772 (2024).
Nishizawa, M. et al. Morphological features of lower lumbar degenerative kyphosis. Eur. Spine J. 33(12), 4591–4597 (2024).
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JTY, XYX, and QD developed the research questions and scope of the study. JTY and XYX conducted preoperative and postoperative data screening, and data charting. XYX drafted the manuscript and prepared tables, and figures with JTY’s contribution. WBS developed the literature search strategies in collaboration with the other authors. JTY, HLG, WBS, and DQ contributed to the organization, analysis, and interpretation of the results. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, J., Xie, X., Sheng, W. et al. Radiological characteristics in coronal and sagittal planes and short-term postoperative outcomes in patients with lumbar disc herniation accompanied by sciatic scoliosis. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43074-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43074-x
