Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Investigation of finite element simulation-based bond-slip effect for seismically vulnerable school reinforced concrete building frame
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 09 March 2026

Investigation of finite element simulation-based bond-slip effect for seismically vulnerable school reinforced concrete building frame

  • Haewon Kang1,
  • Kihak Lee2,
  • Suenghun Shin3,
  • Jongyeol Woo3 &
  • …
  • Jiuk Shin1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 679 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Engineering
  • Materials science

Abstract

Recent earthquakes have induced significant damage on reinforced concrete (RC) school buildings due to seismically deficient details, which can cause bonding failure between steel reinforcements and surrounding concrete due to low confinements. To mitigate the failure mechanism, a proper modeling method to capture the bond-slip effects is needed. This study aims to investigate hysteresis behavior of finite element (FE) models with three bonding modeling approaches (perfect, linear-elastic and nonlinear-inelastic bonding models) for a seismically vulnerable RC school building frame. The models were developed through three-step processes: (1) column model; (2) beam-column joint model; and (3) frame model. To quantify the simulation variation of bond-slip effects for key parameters of hysteresis curves (effective stiffness, maximum strength, and energy dissipation), the simulated responses were compared to the experimental results measured from quasi-static cyclic loading tests in each modeling process. While the perfect bonding model used by structural engineers overestimated all key parameters (e.g., 53.7% in energy dissipation) of the hysteresis curves, the nonlinear-inelastic bonding models reproduced the most accurate hysteresis behavior (less than 5.0%). Based on this investigation, uses of improper bonding models can exaggerate the seismic performance of the seismically vulnerable RC frames.

Similar content being viewed by others

Displacement-based seismic fragility assessment of a high-rise reinforced concrete building

Article Open access 03 November 2025

Simplified model for pre-code RC column exposed to fire followed by earthquake

Article Open access 28 May 2022

Probabilistic evaluation of combination rules for seismic response prediction of horizontally curved RC bridges under varying earthquake incidence angles

Article Open access 07 July 2025

Data availability

Data available on request.

References

  1. O’Reilly, G. J., Perrone, D., Fox, M., Monteiro, R. & Filiatrault, A. Seismic assessment and loss estimation of existing school buildings in Italy. Eng. Struct. 168, 142–62 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wu, C. et al. 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering: Innovation Practice Safety. (2008).

  3. Lu, X., Ye, L., Ma, Y. & Tang, D. Lessons from the collapse of typical RC frames in Xuankou School during the Great Wenchuan Earthquake. Adv. Struct. Eng. 15, 139–153 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lee, C. et al. Comparative analysis of structural damage potentials observed in the 9.12 Gyeongju and 11.15 Pohang Earthquakes. J. Earthq. Eng. Soc. Korea 22, 175–84 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ahmad, N., Shahzad, A., Ali, Q., Rizwan, M. & Khan, A. N. Seismic fragility functions for code compliant and non-compliant RC SMRF structures in Pakistan. Bull. Earthquake Eng. 16, 4675–703 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ahmad, N. et al. Seismic performance assessment of non-compliant SMRF-reinforced concrete frame: Shake-table test study. J. Earthquake Eng. 23, 444–62 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Khan, M. S., Basit, A. & Khan, U. Seismic upgrade of deficient RC frames using different configurations of eccentric steel braces. Asian J. Civ. Eng. 22, 461–75 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Khan, M. S. Seismic performance of deficient RC frames retrofitted with SMA-reinforced ECC column jacketing. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00529-6 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Khan, M. S. & Rizwan, M. Seismic fragility and loss assessment of standard/sub-standard RC frames of Pakistan retrofitted with steel bracing schemes. Bull. Earthquake Eng. 22, 4581–608 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Khan, M. S. & Alluqmani, A. E. Seismic performance evaluation of RC frames strengthened with eccentric steel braces and column jackets. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 8, 92 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Khan, M. S. & Rizwan, M. Fragility and vulnerability assessment of code-conforming and non-conforming RC Bridge piers retrofitted with ECC jackets. J. Build. Rehabil. 10, 107 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shin, J. et al. Dynamic response of a full-scale reinforced concrete building frame retrofitted with FRP column jackets. Eng. Struct. 125, 244–253 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shin, J., Stewart, L. K., Yang, C. S. & Scott, D. W. Implementation of bond-slip performance models in the analyses of non-ductile reinforced concrete frames under dynamic loads. J. Earthquake Eng. 24, 129–154 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hwang, K. R. & Lee, H. S. Seismic Damage to RC Low-rise Building Structures Having Irregularities at the Ground Story During the 15 November 2017 Pohang, Korea, Earthquake. J. Earthq. Eng. Soc. Korea. 22, 103–111 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Acun, B. & Sucuoglu, H. Performance of Reinforced Concrete Columns Designed for Flexure under Severe Displacement Cycles. ACI Struct. J. 107, 364–371 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ohtaki, T. An experimental study on scale effects in shear failure of reinforced concrete columns. 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. (2000).

  17. An, X. & Maekawa, K. Shear resistance and ductility of RC columns after yield of main reinforcement. Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshu https://doi.org/10.2208/jscej.1998.585_233 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dabiri, H., Kaviani, A. & Kheyroddin, A. Influence of reinforcement on the performance of non-seismically detailed RC beam-column joints. J. Build. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101333 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shin, J., Jeon, J. S. & Wright, T. R. Full-Scale Shaker Testing of Non-Ductile RC Frame Structure Retrofitted Using High-Strength Near Surface Mounted Rebars and Carbon FRP Sheets. J. Earthq. Eng. Soc. Korea. 23, 43–54 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lowes, L. N. & Altoontash, A. Modeling Reinforced-Concrete Beam-Column Joints Subjected to Cyclic Loading. J. Struct. Eng. 129, 1686–1697 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sharma, A., Eligehausen, R. & Reddy, G. R. A new model to simulate joint shear behavior of poorly detailed beam–column connections in RC structures under seismic loads, Part I: Exterior joints. Eng. Struct. 33, 1034–1051 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Khan, M. S., Basit, A. & Ahmad, N. A simplified model for inelastic seismic analysis of RC frame have shear hinge in beam-column joints. Structures 29, 771–84 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  23. De Risi, M. T., Ricci, P. & Verderame, G. M. Modelling exterior unreinforced beam-column joints in seismic analysis of non‐ductile RC frames. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 46, 899–923 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  24. López, C. N., Rojas, F. & Massone, L. M. Membrane fiber element for reinforced concrete walls-the benefits of macro and micro modeling approaches. Eng. Struct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113819 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chu, Y. & Kim, T. Collapse mechanism of ordinary RC shear wall-frame buildings considering shear failure mode. J. Earthq. Eng. Soc. Korea 25, 1–9 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hassan, W. M. & Moehle, J. P. A Cyclic nonlinear macro model for numerical simulation of beam-column joints in existing concrete buildings.

  27. Kwak, H. G. & Filippou, F. Finite element analysis of reinforced concrete structures under monotonic loads. (1990).

  28. Amirkhani, S. & Lezgynazargah, M. Nonlinear finite element analysis of reinforced concrete columns: Evaluation of different modeling approaches for considering stirrup confinement effects. Struct. Concr. 23, 2820–36 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao, M. Z., Lehman, D. E. & Roeder, C. W. Modeling recommendations for RC and CFST sections in LS-Dyna including bond slip. Eng. Struct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111612 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lucchini, A., Franchin, P. & Kunnath, S. Failure simulation of shear-critical RC columns with non‐ductile detailing under lateral load. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 46, 855–74 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Xing, C., Koutromanos, I., Leon, R. & Moharrami, M. Computational simulation of RC beam-to-column connections under earthquake loading. (2018).

  32. Domizio, M., Ambrosini, D. & Curadelli, O. Nonlinear dynamic numerical analysis of a RC frame subjected to seismic loading. Eng. Struct. 138, 410–424 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Paudel, S. & Bhusal, B. Investigation of modelling approaches for non-linear analysis of reinforced concrete frames. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. Rev. https://doi.org/10.25103/jestr.142.09 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bhusal, B., Paudel, S., Tanapornraweekit, G., Maskey, P. N. & Tangtermsirikul, S. Seismic performance evaluation and strengthening of RC beam-column joints adopted in Nepal. Structures (Oxford) 57, 105205 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ministry of Education (MOE). School Building Standard Drawing (National School 80-92-Ga) (1980).

  36. Kim, J. C., Shin, S. H. & Oh, S. H. Damage investigation of pilotis structures and analysis of damage causes by Pohang earthquake. J. Archit. Inst. Korea Struct. Constr. 35, 3–10 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kang, D., Hwang, H., Shin, S., Choi, I. & Shin, J. An experimental study of reinforced concrete school frame structure with seismically-deficient details under static cyclic loading. J. Earthq. Eng. Soc. Korea 29, 135–141 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kang, D. et al. Effectiveness of an external steel frame retrofit system for nonductile reinforced concrete school buildings. Eng. Struct. (under review).

  39. LSTC Co. LS-DYNA Keyword User’s Manual (LSTC Co., 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mo, Y. L. & Wang, S. J. Seismic behavior of RC columns with various tie configurations. J. Struct. Eng. 126, 1122–30 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Shin, J. Multi-hazard performance criteria for non-ductile reinforced concrete frame buildings retrofitted with an FRP column jacketing system. (2017).

  42. Kim, Y., Lee, K. & Shin, J. Ductility and residual strength-based blast resistance evaluation of RC columns with various structural details. Structures 77, 109179 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC). LS-DYNA Keyword User’s Manual: Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC), (2014).

  44. Schwer, L. The Winfrith concrete model: Beauty or beast? Insights into Winfrith concrete model. 23–24. (2011).

  45. Crawford, J. E., Wu, Y., Magallanes, J. M. & Choi, H. J. The importance of shear-dilatancy behaviors in RC columns. Int. J. Prot. Struct. 4, 341–77 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC). LS-DYNA Keyword User’s Manual, Volume 1 (Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC), 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Peng, Q., Wu, H., Jia, P. C., Ma, L. L. & Fang, Q. Numerical studies on rebar-concrete interactions of RC members under impact and explosion. Structures 47, 63–80 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  48. fib-federation internationale du beton. fib model code for concrete structures 2010 (John Wiley & Sons, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. (2000).

  50. Li, B., Tran, C. T. N. & Pan, T. C. Experimental and numerical investigations on the seismic behavior of lightly reinforced concrete beam-column joints. J. Struct. Eng. 135, 1007–18 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Shi, Y., Li, Z. X. & Hao, H. Bond slip modelling and its effect on numerical analysis of blast-induced responses of RC columns. Struct. Eng. Mech. 32, 251–67 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Asgarpoor, M., Gharavi, A. & Epackachi, S. Investigation of various concrete materials to simulate seismic response of RC structures. Struct. (Oxford). 29, 1322–1351 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Tao, Y. et al. Hybrid simulation testing and energy framework for performance-based assessment of structures under earthquake-fire sequential hazards. J. Build. Eng. 106, 112614 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Tao, Y. et al. A wavelet packet deep learning model for energy-based structural collapse assessment under earthquake-fire scenarios: Framework and hybrid simulation. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 222, 111784 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Tao, Y., Xu, Z., Wei, Y., Miao, C. & Ji, B. Energy-based damage assessment method for masonry walls under seismic and fire loads. Eng. Struct. 322, 119152 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Tao, Y. et al. Integrating deep learning into an energy framework for rapid regional damage assessment and fragility analysis under mainshock-aftershock sequences. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 54, 1678–97 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Xu, Z. et al. Performance enhancement of damaged RC structures with viscoelastic dampers: Damage assessment and optimal placement. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 177, 108362 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. RS-2024-00348713).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Architectural Engineering, Gyeongsang National University (GNU), Jinju- daero, Jinju-Si, 52828, Gyeongsangnam-do, South Korea

    Haewon Kang & Jiuk Shin

  2. Department of Architecture Engineering, Sejong University, 209 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin- gu, Seoul, 05006, South Korea

    Kihak Lee

  3. Hill Engineering Co., Ltd., 244 Jugam-ro, Sasang-gu, Busan, 47005, South Korea

    Suenghun Shin & Jongyeol Woo

Authors
  1. Haewon Kang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kihak Lee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Suenghun Shin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jongyeol Woo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jiuk Shin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.K., K.L. and J.S. wrote the main manuscript text, S.S. and J.W. measured data. H.K., K.L., and J.S. developed and validated models, H.K., S.S. and J.S. prepared figures, and J.S. and K.L. reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiuk Shin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kang, H., Lee, K., Shin, S. et al. Investigation of finite element simulation-based bond-slip effect for seismically vulnerable school reinforced concrete building frame. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43419-6

Download citation

  • Received: 09 July 2025

  • Accepted: 04 March 2026

  • Published: 09 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43419-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Reinforced concrete (RC) frame
  • Seismically deficient detail
  • Bond-slip effects
  • Finite element (FE) model
  • Perfect bonding model
  • Nonlinear-inelastic bonding model
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing