Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Pioneering oil and nitrogen interfacial tension using evolutionarily optimized gradient boosting machine
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 11 March 2026

Pioneering oil and nitrogen interfacial tension using evolutionarily optimized gradient boosting machine

  • Mohammad Abushuhel1,
  • Hessan Mohammad2,3,
  • Raghavendra Rao P S4,
  • Abinash Mahapatro5,
  • A Karthikeyan6,
  • Harjot Singh Gill7,
  • Yashwant Singh Bisht8,
  • Prakhar Tomar9 &
  • …
  • Hojjat Abbasi10 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 487 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Energy science and technology
  • Engineering
  • Mathematics and computing

Abstract

Accurate prediction of oil–nitrogen interfacial tension (IFT) is critical for designing efficient enhanced oil recovery (EOR) strategies. Traditional empirical correlations often lack generalizability and demand detailed compositional data, motivating the need for robust machine learning frameworks. In this study, Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) models were developed and optimized using four metaheuristic algorithms including Artificial Bee Colony (ABC), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Coupled Simulated Annealing (CSA), and Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) to predict equilibrium IFT under varying pressures, temperatures, and API gravities. A curated dataset of 148 experimental measurements was validated through outlier detection and evaluated using five-fold cross-validation to ensure generalization. Model performance was assessed using R2, mean squared error (MSE), and average absolute relative error percentage (AARE%). Comparative results demonstrate that the ABC-optimized GBM achieved the highest test R2 and competitive error metrics, outperforming other optimization strategies in predictive reliability. SHAP analysis further confirmed pressure and temperature as the dominant factors influencing IFT, with API gravity exerting a secondary effect. The findings not only establish the ABC-GBM framework as a powerful predictive tool but also reinforce the physical plausibility of the results, offering practical guidance for process optimization in nitrogen-based EOR applications.

Data availability

Data will be available on request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Mohammadi, M. H., Kulakhmetovna, Y. A. & Joia, R. An overview of oil recovery techniques: from primary to enhanced oil recovery methods. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Biotechnol. 3 (1), 291–301 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ozowe, W., Daramola, G. O. & Ekemezie, I. O. Innovative approaches in enhanced oil recovery: A focus on gas injection synergies with other EOR methods. Magna Scientia Adv. Res. Reviews. 11 (1), 311–324 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Abdulsada, J. A. et al. A mini-review of water-alternating-CO2 injection process and derivations for enhanced oil recovery and CO2 storage in subsurface reservoirs. Petroleum, (2025).

  4. Asare, K., Ejike, C. & Okere, C. J. Numerical evaluation of multi-well cyclic gas injection technique for enhanced oil recovery in composite tight oil reservoirs. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 50 (7), 5037–5054 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  5. da Silva Medeiros, D. C. C. et al. Biochar-enhanced removal of naphthenic acids from oil sands process water: Influence of feedstock and chemical activation. Energy Environ. Sustain. 1 (2), 100028 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cao, C. et al. A review of CO2 storage in view of safety and cost-effectiveness. Energies 13 (3), 600 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jia, Y. et al. Evaluating Nitrogen Gas Injection Performance for Enhanced Oil Recovery in Fractured Basement Complex Reservoirs: Experiments and Modeling Approaches. Processes 13 (2), 326 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tileuberdi, N. et al. Optimizing oil recovery by low-pressure nitrogen injection: an experiment case study 25, 1189 (ES Materials & Manufacturing, 2024).

  9. Luo, J. Y. et al. Optimized Nitrogen Foam Flooding System for Enhanced Oil Recovery: Development and Field Test in Mu146 Block Medium-High Permeability Reservoir, China. Energies 18 (5), 1183 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gholamzadeh, Y., Hemmati-Sarapardeh, A. & Sharifi, M. Interfacial tension reduction using nitrogen graphene quantum dots with various precursors, molar ratios, and synthesis durations for enhanced oil recovery. Sci. Rep. 14 (1), 31863 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, C. et al. Characterization and optimization of oil–gas interfacial tension during CO2/N2 injection in heavy oil reservoirs: Experimental study and regression model. Pet. Sci., (2025).

  12. Gajbhiye, R. Impact of gas composition, pressure, and temperature on interfacial Tension dynamics in CO₂-Enhanced oil recovery. Sci. Rep. 15 (1), 3821 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Li, X. et al. A thermo-stable polymeric surfactant for enhanced heavy oil recovery via hot water chemical flooding. Langmuir 41 (43), 29180–29195 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dai, Q. et al. Carbon-pricing optimization framework for oilfield carbon dioxide-water alternation with economic and environmental gains. Energy. Conv. Manag. 348, 120613 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Berger Bioucas, F. E., Koller, T. M. & Fröba, A. P. Effective thermal conductivity of nanofluids containing silicon dioxide, titanium dioxide, copper oxide, polystyrene, or polymethylmethacrylate nanoparticles dispersed in water, ethylene glycol, or glycerol. Int. J. Thermophys. 46 (2), 27 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Koreh, P. et al. Interfacial performance of cationic, anionic and non-ionic surfactants; effect of different characteristics of crude oil. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 218, 110960 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ramezani, M., Lashkarbolooki, M. & Abedini, R. Experimental investigation of different characteristics of crude oil on the interfacial activity of anionic, cationic and nonionic surfactants mixtures. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 214, 110485 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jia, H. et al. Mechanism studies on the application of the mixed cationic/anionic surfactant systems to enhance oil recovery. Fuel 258, 116156 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shen, J. et al. Estimation of nitrogen-crude oil interfacial tension: Application of hybrid machine learning algorithms, 104056 (Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 2025).

  20. Obaidur Rab, S. et al. Machine learning-based estimation of crude oil-nitrogen interfacial tension. Sci. Rep. 15 (1), 1037 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Xie, M., Zhang, M. & Jin, Z. Machine learning-based interfacial tension equations for (H2 + CO2)-water/brine systems over a wide range of temperature and pressure. Langmuir 40 (10), 5369–5377 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nsiah Turkson, J. et al. Harnessing Ensemble Learning Techniques for Accurate Interfacial Tension Estimation in Aqueous CO2 Systems. SPE. (2024).

  23. Fan, J. et al. Enhanced Prediction of CO2–Brine Interfacial Tension at Varying Temperature Using a Multibranch-Structure-Based Neural Network Approach. Langmuir 41 (3), 1587–1600 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rezaei, F. et al. On the evaluation of interfacial tension (IFT) of CO2–paraffin system for enhanced oil recovery process: comparison of empirical correlations, soft computing approaches, and parachor model. Energies 14 (11), 3045 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Karami, M., Behnamnia, M. & Monfared, A. D. From Empirical to Intelligent: ML-Enhanced Parachor Modeling of Gas (H2, CO2, CH4, and N2)–Water Interfacial Tension for Applications in Energy Storage and Carbon Sequestration. Results in Engineering, 107554 (2025).

  26. Alatefi, S. et al. Explainable advanced modelling of interfacial tension in H2–CO2–CH4–brine systems for sustainable subsurface storage in saline aquifer. J. Contam. Hydrol. 104827, p (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ren, D. et al. Harmonizing physical and deep learning modeling: A computationally efficient and interpretable approach for property prediction. Scripta Mater. 255, 116350 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wang, C. et al. Sequential construction of stable nitrogen–oxygen compounds using high-throughput quantum mechanical calculations and customized machine learning model. J. Mater. Chem. A, (2025).

  29. Alatefi, S. et al. Accurate prediction of water activity in ionic liquid-based aqueous ternary solutions using advanced explainable artificial intelligence frameworks. Chem. Eng. Sci. 318, 122218 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zheng, M. et al. Optimization of microcrack control and performance in deepwater well cementing with microencapsulated phase change materials. Geoenergy Sci. Eng. 214220 (2025).

  31. Zheng, W. et al. GEP-DNN4Mol: automatic chemical molecular design based on deep neural networks and gene expression programming. Health Inform. Sci. Syst. 13 (1), 31 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bakary, K., Mouhamadou, D. & Seydou, T. Contribution Based on Neurons Networks for the Prediction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in a Handling Port. Asian J. Water Environ. Pollut. 21 (6), 261–269 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Alatefi, S. et al. Advancing hydrogen storage: Explainable machine learning models for predicting hydrogen uptake in metal-organic frameworks. Results Eng. 107304 (2025).

  34. Wang, Y. et al. A Data Augmentation Method for Establishing a Relationship Model Between Composition and Viscoelastic Properties of Asphalt Binder (IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2025).

  35. Qian, Y. et al. Enhanced Protein Secondary Structure Prediction Through Multi-View Multi-Feature Evolutionary Deep Fusion Method (IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, 2025).

  36. Hemmati-Sarapardeh, A. et al. Experimental determination of equilibrium interfacial tension for nitrogen-crude oil during the gas injection process: the role of temperature, pressure, and composition. J. Chem. Eng. Data. 59 (11), 3461–3469 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bayat, M. et al. Investigation of gas injection flooding performance as enhanced oil recovery method. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 29, 37–45 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Awari-Yusuf, I. O. Measurement of crude oil interfacial tension to determine minimum miscibility in carbon dioxide and nitrogen [MS thesis]. Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada. (2013).

  39. Heidary, S., Dehghan, A. A. & Zamanzadeh, S. M. A comparative study of the carbon dioxide and nitrogen minimum miscibility pressure determinations for an Iranian light oil sample. Energy Sour. Part A Recover. Utilization Environ. Eff. 38 (15), 2217–2224 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bahralolom, I. M. & Orr, F. M. Solubility and extraction in multiple-contact miscible displacements: comparison of N2 and CO2 flow visualization experiments. SPE. Reserv. Eng. 3 (01), 213–219 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lu, T. et al. Flow behavior of N2 huff and puff process for enhanced oil recovery in tight oil reservoirs. Sci. Rep. 7 (1), 15695 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rofatto, V. F. et al. A Monte Carlo-based outlier diagnosis method for sensitivity analysis. Remote Sens. 12 (5), 860 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tama, B. A. & Rhee, K. H. An in-depth experimental study of anomaly detection using gradient boosted machine. Neural Comput. Appl. 31 (4), 955–965 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Yang, F. Clustering by Gaussian Mixture Model and Light Gradient Boosting Machine. (2024).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al- Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan

    Mohammad Abushuhel

  2. Department of Computers Techniques Engineering, College of Technical Engineering, The Islamic University, Najaf, Iraq

    Hessan Mohammad

  3. Department of Computers Techniques Engineering, College of Technical Engineering, The Islamic University of Al Diwaniyah, Al Diwaniyah, Iraq

    Hessan Mohammad

  4. Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology, JAIN (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, India

    Raghavendra Rao P S

  5. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Siksha ’O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, 751030, Odisha, India

    Abinash Mahapatro

  6. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

    A Karthikeyan

  7. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, India

    Harjot Singh Gill

  8. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Uttaranchal Institute of Technology, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, 248007, Uttarakhand, India

    Yashwant Singh Bisht

  9. Centre for Research Impact & Outcome, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, 140401, Punjab, India

    Prakhar Tomar

  10. Chemistry Department, Herat University, Herat, Afghanistan

    Hojjat Abbasi

Authors
  1. Mohammad Abushuhel
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hessan Mohammad
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Raghavendra Rao P S
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Abinash Mahapatro
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A Karthikeyan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Harjot Singh Gill
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yashwant Singh Bisht
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Prakhar Tomar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hojjat Abbasi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to this paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hojjat Abbasi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abushuhel, M., Mohammad, H., Rao P S, R. et al. Pioneering oil and nitrogen interfacial tension using evolutionarily optimized gradient boosting machine. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43758-4

Download citation

  • Received: 30 December 2025

  • Accepted: 06 March 2026

  • Published: 11 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43758-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Interfacial tension
  • Data analysis
  • Optimization
  • Prediction
  • Enhanced oil recovery
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics