Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Evaluating the efficacy of delafloxacin and combination therapy against Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms: insights into activity in acidic environments
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 10 April 2026

Evaluating the efficacy of delafloxacin and combination therapy against Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms: insights into activity in acidic environments

  • Ana Paula de Andrade1,
  • Paula Hansen Suss1,
  • Jaqueline Pilon de Meneses2,
  • Gabriel Burato Ortis1 &
  • …
  • Felipe Francisco Tuon1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1051 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Diseases
  • Microbiology

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a major contributor to biofilm-associated infections, which complicate the treatment of chronic conditions like osteomyelitis and prosthetic infections. This study aimed to evaluate the activity of delafloxacin, a novel fluoroquinolone, against biofilm-forming S. aureus strains, including methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive isolates. Delafloxacin’s efficacy was compared with traditional antibiotics (vancomycin, linezolid, doxycycline, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, and rifampicin) using minimal inhibitory concentration assays, including testing at different pH levels to simulate acidic biofilm conditions. Synergistic interactions were assessed using the checkerboard method. Biofilm eradication was tested through minimal biofilm eradication concentration assays, biomass quantification, and cell viability. The results showed that all isolates were susceptible to vancomycin and linezolid, with varying levels of resistance to other antibiotics. Delafloxacin demonstrated potent activity, with MIC reductions observed in acidic conditions. Biofilm eradication tests revealed limited success in eradicating biofilms at breakpoint concentrations. However, rifampicin in combination with delafloxacin significantly reduced biofilm biomass in some isolates. No significant changes in cell viability were noted across treatments. This study highlights delafloxacin’s potential against biofilm-associated infections, particularly in acidic environments. Despite the challenges in biofilm eradication, delafloxacin combined with rifampicin shows promise for improved treatment strategies.

Similar content being viewed by others

Enzymes-enhanced antibiotic therapy reduces biofilms to undetectable levels in an implant-associated infection model

Article Open access 16 January 2026

Antibiotic treatment can exacerbate biofilm-associated infection by promoting quorum cheater development

Article Open access 18 May 2023

In vitro additive effects of dalbavancin and rifampicin against biofilm of Staphylococcus aureus

Article Open access 06 December 2021

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are available under request.

References

  1. Pedroni, M. A. et al. Different concentrations of vancomycin with gentamicin loaded PMMA to inhibit biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus and their implications. J. Orthop. Sci. 29(1), 334–340 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Soni, J. F. et al. Evaluation of silver nanoparticle-impregnated PMMA loaded with vancomycin or gentamicin against bacterial biofilm formation. Injury 54(Suppl 6), 110649 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Telles, J. P., Cieslinski, J. & Tuon, F. F. Daptomycin to bone and joint infections and prosthesis joint infections: A systematic review. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 23(3), 191–196 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Haidar, R., Der Boghossian, A. & Atiyeh, B. Duration of post-surgical antibiotics in chronic osteomyelitis: Empiric or evidence-based?. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 14(9), e752–e758 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tuon, F. F. et al. Antimicrobial treatment of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Antibiotics https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12010087 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tuon, F. F., Dantas, L. R., Suss, P. H. & Tasca Ribeiro, V. S. Pathogenesis of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm: A review. Pathogens https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11030300 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Koch, J. A. et al. Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms have a high tolerance to antibiotics in periprosthetic joint infection. Life https://doi.org/10.3390/life10110253 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yee, R. et al. Eradication of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm infection by persister drug combination. Antibiotics (Basel) https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11101278 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brinkman, C. L., Schmidt-Malan, S. M., Mandrekar, J. N. & Patel, R. Rifampin-based combination therapy is active in foreign-body osteomyelitis after prior rifampin monotherapy. Antimicrob. Agent. Chemother. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01822-16 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mandell, J. B. et al. Large variations in clinical antibiotic activity against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms of periprosthetic joint infection isolates. J. Orthop. Res. 37(7), 1604–1609 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Melendez-Carmona, M. A. et al. Strain-to-strain variability among Staphylococcus aureus causing prosthetic joint infection drives heterogeneity in response to levofloxacin and rifampicin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 77(12), 3265–3269 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Melendez-Carmona, M. A., Munoz-Gallego, I., Viedma, E., Lora-Tamayo, J. & Chaves, F. Intraosteoblastic activity of levofloxacin and rifampin alone and in combination against clinical isolates of meticillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus causing prosthetic joint infection. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 54(3), 356–360 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lora-Tamayo, J. et al. Short- versus long-duration levofloxacin plus rifampicin for acute staphylococcal prosthetic joint infection managed with implant retention: A randomised clinical trial. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agent. 48(3), 310–316 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Turban, A., Guerin, F., Dinh, A. & Cattoir, V. Updated review on clinically-relevant properties of delafloxacin. Antibiotics https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12081241 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bauer, J., Siala, W., Tulkens, P. M. & Van Bambeke, F. A combined pharmacodynamic quantitative and qualitative model reveals the potent activity of daptomycin and delafloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Antimicrob. Agent. Chemother. 57(6), 2726–2737 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lemaire, S., Tulkens, P. M. & Van Bambeke, F. Contrasting effects of acidic pH on the extracellular and intracellular activities of the anti-gram-positive fluoroquinolones moxifloxacin and delafloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agent. Chemother. 55(2), 649–658 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  17. CLSI Clinical laboratory standard insitute - M07 - A10 - Methods for dilution antimicrobial suceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically (2015).

  18. EUCAST Clinical breakpoint. European Committee on antimicrobial susceptibility testing version 11 (2021).

  19. Orhan, G., Bayram, A., Zer, Y. & Balci, I. Synergy tests by E test and checkerboard methods of antimicrobial combinations against Brucella melitensis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43(1), 140–143 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chaiben, V. et al. A carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii outbreak associated with a polymyxin shortage during the COVID pandemic: An in vitro and biofilm analysis of synergy between meropenem, gentamicin and sulbactam. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 77(6), 1676–1684 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chadwick, E. G., Shulman, S. T. & Yogev, R. Correlation of antibiotic synergy in vitro and in vivo: Use of an animal model of neutropenic gram-negative sepsis. J. Infect. Dis. 154(4), 670–675 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rodrigues, C. F. & Henriques, M. Liposomal and Deoxycholate Amphotericin B formulations: Effectiveness against biofilm infections of Candida spp. Pathogens 6(4), 62 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Traba, C. & Liang, J. F. Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms to reactive discharge gases. Biofouling 27(7), 763–772 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Christensen, G. D. et al. Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: A quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. J. Clin. Microbiol. 22(6), 996–1006 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cieslinski, J. et al. Direct detection of microorganisms in sonicated orthopedic devices after in vitro biofilm production and different processing conditions. Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol. 31(6), 1113–1120 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  26. da Rocha, L. et al. Evaluation of Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans biofilms adherence to PEEK and titanium-alloy prosthetic spine devices. Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol. 32(5), 981–989 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mendonca, J. R., Dantas, L. R. & Tuon, F. F. Activity of multipurpose contact lens solutions against Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens and Candida albicans biofilms. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 43(5), 1092–1099 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sikdar, R. & Elias, M. H. Evidence for complex interplay between quorum sensing and antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiol. Spectr. 10(6), e0126922 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ranjbar, R. & Farahani, A. Study of genetic diversity, biofilm formation, and detection of carbapenemase, MBL, ESBL, and tetracycline resistance genes in multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from burn wound infections in Iran. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 8, 172 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ueda, N. et al. Sonication of extracted implants improves microbial detection in patients with orthopedic implant-associated infections. J. Arthroplasty 34(6), 1189–1196 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Valour, F. et al. Antimicrobial activity against intraosteoblastic Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 59(4), 2029–2036 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lora-Tamayo, J. et al. High doses of daptomycin (10 mg/kg/d) plus rifampin for the treatment of staphylococcal prosthetic joint infection managed with implant retention: A comparative study. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 80(1), 66–71 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Molina-Manso, D. et al. In vitro susceptibility to antibiotics of staphylococci in biofilms isolated from orthopaedic infections. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 41(6), 521–523 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Seaton, R. A. et al. Daptomycin use in patients with osteomyelitis: A preliminary report from the EU-CORE(SM) database. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 68(7), 1642–1649 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Thompson, J. M. et al. Oral-only linezolid-rifampin is highly effective compared with other antibiotics for periprosthetic joint infection: Study of a mouse model. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 99(8), 656–665 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Herrera, S., Sorli, L. & Horcajada, J. P. High-dose daptomycin together with rifampin as salvage therapy for prosthetic joint infections. Med Clin (Barc) 149(5), 223–224 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Boudjemaa, R. et al. New insight into daptomycin bioavailability and localization in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms by dynamic fluorescence imaging. Antimicrob. Agent. Chemother. 60(8), 4983–4990 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Stein, C. et al. Should daptomycin-rifampin combinations for MSSA/MRSA isolates be avoided because of antagonism?. Infection 44(4), 499–504 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Saleh-Mghir, A., Muller-Serieys, C., Dinh, A., Massias, L. & Cremieux, A. C. Adjunctive rifampin is crucial to optimizing daptomycin efficacy against rabbit prosthetic joint infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agent. Chemother. 55(10), 4589–4593 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Saravolatz, L. D., Pawlak, J. M. & Wegner, C. Delafloxacin activity against Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility or resistance to methicillin, vancomycin, daptomycin or linezolid. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 75(9), 2605–2608 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cruz, J. A. W. et al. Brazilian private health system: History, scenarios, and trends. BMC Health Serv. Res. 22(1), 49 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Loesch, G. H. et al. Cost minimization analysis of outpatient parenteral/oral antibiotic therapy at a trauma hospital: Public health system. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 42(12), 1445–1450 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Coustilleres, F. et al. Clinical, bacteriological, and genetic characterization of bone and joint infections involving linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis: A retrospective multicenter study in French reference centers. Microbiol. Spectr. 11(3), e0419022 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Gomez-Zorrilla, S., Sendra, E. & Horcajada, J. P. A profile of delafloxacin in the treatment of adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Expert Rev. Clin. Pharmacol. 15(6), 671–688 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Fan, K. C. et al. In vitro susceptibilities of methicillin-susceptible and resistant staphylococci to traditional antibiotics compared to a novel fluoroquinolone. J. Ophthalmic Inflamm. Infect. 10(1), 9 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Fernandez-Grajera, M., Pacha-Olivenza, M. A., Fernandez-Calderon, M. C., Gonzalez-Martin, M. L. & Gallardo-Moreno, A. M. Dynamic adhesive behavior and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus on polylactic acid surfaces in diabetic environments. Materials https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17133349 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Rios, E., Perez, M., Sanz, J. C., Delgado-Iribarren, A. & Rodriguez-Avial, I. Efficacy of delafloxacin alone and in combination with cefotaxime against cefotaxime non-susceptible invasive isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Rev. Esp. Quimioter. 37(2), 158–162 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Siala, W. et al. Comparison of the antibiotic activities of daptomycin, vancomycin, and the investigational fluoroquinolone delafloxacin against biofilms from Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58(11), 6385–6397 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Vareschi, S., Jaut, V., Vijay, S., Allen, R. J. & Schreiber, F. Antimicrobial efflux and biofilms: An interplay leading to emergent resistance evolution. Trends Microbiol. 33(9), 1018–1032 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Roy, R., Tiwari, M., Donelli, G. & Tiwari, V. Strategies for combating bacterial biofilms: A focus on anti-biofilm agents and their mechanisms of action. Virulence 9(1), 522–554 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Gasparetto, J., Bressianini Jurkonis, L., Ramos Dantas, L., Hansen Suss, P. & Francisco Tuon, F. Low-cost antiseptic-impregnated tracheostomy tube for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria: In vitro and pilot study in humans. Rev. Argent. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2024.05.004 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by EUROFARMA and The APC was funded by EUROFARMA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Rua Imaculada Conceição, 1155, Curitiba, PR, 80215-901, Brazil

    Ana Paula de Andrade, Paula Hansen Suss, Gabriel Burato Ortis & Felipe Francisco Tuon

  2. Medical Affairs Eurofarma, São Paulo, SP, 04581-060, Brazil

    Jaqueline Pilon de Meneses

Authors
  1. Ana Paula de Andrade
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paula Hansen Suss
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jaqueline Pilon de Meneses
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gabriel Burato Ortis
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Felipe Francisco Tuon
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, F.T. and J.M.; methodology, A.A. and G.O.; formal analysis, F.T. and P.S. ; investigation, A.A.; resources, J.M.; writing—original draft preparation, F.T.; writing—review and editing, F.T.; visualization, J.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felipe Francisco Tuon.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

All authors received financial support by Eurofarma to develop this study. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results. EUROFARMA has supported the manuscript.

Ethics

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (61738422.7.0000.0020) and informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information. (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Andrade, A.P., Suss, P.H., de Meneses, J.P. et al. Evaluating the efficacy of delafloxacin and combination therapy against Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms: insights into activity in acidic environments. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43963-1

Download citation

  • Received: 15 December 2025

  • Accepted: 09 March 2026

  • Published: 10 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43963-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Staphylococcus aureus
  • Biofilm
  • Delafloxacin
  • Rifampicin
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology