Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
First positronium lifetime imaging using 52Mn and 55Co with a plastic-scintillator-based PET scanner
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 20 March 2026

First positronium lifetime imaging using 52Mn and 55Co with a plastic-scintillator-based PET scanner

  • Manish Das1,2,9,
  • Sushil Sharma1,2,
  • Ermias Yitayew Beyene1,2,
  • Aleksander Bilewicz6,
  • Jarosław Choiński3,
  • Neha Chug1,2,
  • Catalina Curceanu4,
  • Eryk Czerwiński1,2,
  • Jakub Hajduga5,
  • Sharareh Jalali1,2,
  • Krzysztof Kacprzak1,2,
  • Tevfik Kaplanoglu1,2,
  • Łukasz Kapłon1,2,
  • Kamila Kasperska1,2,
  • Aleksander Khreptak1,2,
  • Grzegorz Korcyl1,2,
  • Tomasz Kozik1,2,
  • Karol Kubat1,2,
  • Deepak Kumar1,2,
  • Sumit Kumar Kundu1,2,
  • Anoop Kunimmal Venadan1,2,
  • Edward Lisowski7,
  • Filip Lisowski7,
  • Justyna Medrala-Sowa1,2,
  • Simbarashe Moyo1,2,
  • Wiktor Mryka1,2,
  • Szymon Niedźwiecki1,2,
  • Anand Pandey1,2,
  • Piyush Pandey1,2,
  • Szymon Parzych1,2,
  • Alessio Porcelli1,2,4,10,
  • Bartłomiej Rachwał5,
  • Martin Rädler1,2,
  • Narendra Rathod8,
  • Noman Razzaq6,
  • Axel Rominger8,
  • Kuangyu Shi8,
  • Magdalena Skurzok1,2,
  • Maciej Słotwiński1,2,
  • Anna Stolarz3,
  • Tomasz Szumlak5,
  • Pooja Tanty1,2,
  • Keyvan Tayefi Ardebili1,2,
  • Satyam Tiwari1,2,
  • Kavya Valsan Eliyan1,2,
  • Rafał Walczak6,
  • Ewa Ł. Stepień1,2 na1 &
  • …
  • Paweł Moskal1,2 na1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 852 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Chemistry
  • Materials science
  • Physics

Abstract

This study demonstrates the applicability of \(^{52}\)Mn and \(^{55}\)Co radionuclides for positronium imaging. Positronium Lifetime Imaging (PLI) extends positron emission tomography by using the lifetime of positronium atoms as a probe of tissue molecular architecture. However, its practical use requires \(\beta ^{+}\) emitters that also provide an additional prompt \(\gamma\) ray to mark the positron creation time. In this work, we report the first PLI measurements performed with \(^{52}\)Mn and \(^{55}\)Co using the modular J-PET. Four samples were studied in each experiment: two Certified Reference Materials (polycarbonate and fused silica) and two human tissues (cardiac myxoma and adipose). The selection of PLI events was based on the registration of two 511 keV annihilation photons and one prompt gamma in triple coincidence. From the resulting lifetime spectra we extracted the mean ortho-positronium lifetime \(\tau _{\text {oPs}}\) and the mean positron lifetime \(\Delta T_{\text {mean}}\) for each sample. The measured values of \(\tau _{\text {oPs}}\) in polycarbonate using both isotopes matches well with the certified reference values. Furthermore, \(^{55}\)Co reproduced identical results for fused-silica measurements at their respective uncertainty levels. In contrast, measurements with \(^{52}\)Mn in fused silica show a minor deviation, which could be caused by the Parafilm spacer. In myxoma and adipose tissue, the reduced \(\tau _{\text {oPs}}\) values are mainly linked to the long storage history of the samples rather than to the choice of isotope. Comparing peak-to-background ratios and spectral purity, \(^{55}\)Co provides cleaner PLI data under the same experimental conditions. Although \(^{52}\)Mn offers a longer half-life and a multi gamma cascade enhancing \(\beta ^{+}\) + \(\gamma\) coincidences, but at the expense of higher background. In this study, we demonstrate that the applied selection criteria on the data measured with the modular J-PET can be used for PLI studies even with radionuclides with complex decay patterns.

Data availability

The datasets collected in the experiment and analyzed during the current study are available under restricted access due to the large data volume. Direct access to the data can be arranged on request by contacting the corresponding author.

References

  1. Phelps, M. E. PET: The merging of biology and imaging into molecular imaging. J. Nucl. Med. 41, 661–681.https://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/41/4/661.full.pdf (2000).

  2. Alavi, A., Werner, T. J., Stępień, E. Ł & Moskal, P. Unparalleled and revolutionary impact of PET imaging on research and day to day practice of medicine. Bio-Algorithms Med-Syst. 17, 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1515/bams-2021-0186 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Moskal, P. Positronium imaging. In 2019 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC). 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1109/NSS/MIC42101.2019.9059856 (2019).

  4. Moskal, P. et al. Positronium imaging: History, current status, and future perspectives. IEEE Trans. Radiat. Plasma Med. Sci. 9, 981–1001. https://doi.org/10.1109/trpms.2025.3583554 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Moskal, P. et al. Performance assessment of the 2\(\gamma\) positronium imaging with the total-body PET scanners. EJNMMI Phys. 7, 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-020-00307-w (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Moskal, P. et al. Feasibility study of the positronium imaging with the J-PET tomograph. Phys. Med. Biol. 64, 055017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aafe20 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Moskal, P. et al. Positronium imaging with the novel multiphoton PET scanner. Sci. Adv. 7, eabh4394. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abh4394 (2021).

  8. Moskal, P. et al. Positronium image of the human brain in vivo. Sci. Adv. 10, eadp2840. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adp2840. https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.adp2840 (2024).

  9. Bass, S., Mariazzi, S., Moskal, P. & Stepien, E. Positronium physics and biomedical applications. Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 021002. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.95.021002 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ahn, T. et al. Hierarchical nature of nanoscale porosity in bone revealed by positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy. ACS Nano 15, 4321. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c07478 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jean, Y. et al. Applications of slow positrons to cancer research: Search for selectivity of positron annihilation to skin cancer. Appl. Surf. Sci. 252, 3166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.08.101 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, H., van Horn, J. & Jean, Y. Applications of positron annihilation spectroscopy to life science. Defect Diffus. Forum 331, 275. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.331.275 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jasińska, B. et al. Human tissues investigation using pals technique. Acta Phys. Polon. B 48, 1737. https://doi.org/10.5506/APhysPolB.48.1737 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zgardzińska, B. et al. Studies on healthy and neoplastic tissues using positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy and focused histopathological imaging. Sci. Rep. 10, 11890. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68727-3 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Karimi, H., Moskal, P., Zak, A. & Stepien, E. 3D melanoma spheroid model for the development of positronium biomarker. Sci. Rep. 13, 1648. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34571-4 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moskal, P. et al. Developing a novel positronium biomarker for cardiac myxoma imaging. EJNMMI Phys. 10, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-023-00543-w (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moyo, S., Moskal, P. & Stępień, E. Ł. Feasibility study of positronium application for blood clots structural characteristics. Bio-Algorithms Med-Syst. 18, 163–167. https://doi.org/10.2478/bioal-2022-0087 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jean, Y. C., Mallon, P. E. & Schrader, D. M. (eds.) Principles and applications of positron and positronium chemistry. In Advanced Series in Physical Chemistry. Vol. 12 (World Scientific, 2003).

  19. Shibuya, K., Saito, H., Nishikido, F., Takahashi, M. & Yamaya, T. Oxygen sensing ability of positronium atom for tumor hypoxia imaging. Commun. Phys. 3, 173. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-020-00440-z (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stepanov, P. S. et al. Interaction of positronium with dissolved oxygen in liquids. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22, 5123. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9cp06105c (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gidley, D. W., Peng, H.-G. & Vallery, R. S. Positron annihilation as a method to characterize porous materials. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 36, 49–79. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.matsci.36.111904.135144 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Moskal, P. & Stepien, E. Positronium as a biomarker of hypoxia. Bio-Algorithms Med-Syst. 17, 311. https://doi.org/10.1515/bams-2021-0189 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Huang, B., Wang, Z., Zeng, X., Goldan, A. H. & Qi, J. Fast high-resolution lifetime image reconstruction for positron lifetime tomography. Commun. Phys. 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-025-02100-6 (2025).

  24. Steinberger, W. M. et al. Positronium lifetime validation measurements using a long-axial field-of-view positron emission tomography scanner. EJNMMI Phys. 11, 76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-024-00678-4 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mercolli, L. et al. In Vivo Positronium Lifetime Measurements with a Long Axial Field-of-View PET/CT. medRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.19.24315509. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/10/22/2024.10.19.24315509.full.pdf (2024).

  26. Prenosil, G. A. et al. Performance characteristics of the biograph vision Quadra PET/CT system with a long axial field of view using the NEMA NU 2–2018 standard. J. Nucl. Med. 63, 476. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.261972 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dai, B. et al. Performance evaluation of the PennPET explorer with expanded axial coverage. Phys. Med. Biol. 68, 095007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/acc722 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Huang, B., Dai, B., Li, E. J., Karp, J. S. & Qi, J. High-resolution positronium lifetime imaging on the PennPET explorer. In 2024 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium (NSS), Medical Imaging Conference (MIC) and Room Temperature Semiconductor Detector Conference (RTSD). 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/NSS/MIC/RTSD57108.2024.10656096 (2024).

  29. Karp, J. S. et al. PennPET explorer: Design and preliminary performance of a whole-body imager. J. Nucl. Med. 61, 136–143. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.229997. https://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/61/1/136.full.pdf (2020).

  30. Huang, B. et al. High-resolution positronium lifetime tomography at clinical activity levels on the PennPET explorer. J. Nucl. Med. 66, 1464–1470. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.125.270130 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Samanta, S., Sun, X., Li, H. & Li, Y. Feasibility study of positronium imaging using the NeuroEXPLORER (NX) brain PET scanner. In IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Medical Imaging Conference and International Symposium on Room-Temperature Semiconductor Detectors (NSS MIC RTSD). Vol. 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/nssmicrtsd49126.2023.10338538 (IEEE, 2023).

  32. Takyu, S. et al. Quantification of radicals in aqueous solution by positronium lifetime: An experiment using a clinical PET scanner. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 63, 086003. https://doi.org/10.35848/1347-4065/ad679a (2024).

  33. Takyu, S. et al. Positronium lifetime measurement using a clinical PET system for tumor hypoxia identification. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Acceler. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip. 1065, 169514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2024.169514 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mercolli, L. et al. Phantom imaging demonstration of positronium lifetime with a long axial field-of-view PET/CT and 124I. EJNMMI Phys. 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-025-00790-z (2025).

  35. Das, M. et al. Estimating the efficiency and purity for detecting annihilation and prompt photons for positronium imaging with J-PET using toy Monte Carlo simulation. Bio-Algorithms Med-Syst. 19, 87–95. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.1938 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sitarz, M., Cussonneau, J.-P., Matulewicz, T. & F., H. Radionuclide candidates for for \(\beta ^+\)\(\gamma\) coincidence PET: An overview. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes 155, 108898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2019.108898 (2020).

  37. Triffitt, J. T. & Neuman, W. F. The uptake of sodium-22 by bone and certain soft tissues. Calcif. Tissue Res. 6, 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02196185 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kubat, K., Kapłon, Ł, Moskal, P. & Stępień, E. Calibration of PALS system with CRM materials for biomedical studies. Bio-Algorithms Med-Syst. 20, 35–39. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.9091 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Moskal, P. et al. Testing CPT symmetry in ortho-positronium decays with positronium annihilation tomography. Nat. Commun. 12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25905-9 (2021).

  40. Moskal, P. et al. Nonmaximal entanglement of photons from positron-electron annihilation demonstrated using a plastic PET scanner. Sci. Adv. 11, eads3046. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.ads3046. https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.ads3046 (2025).

  41. Moskal, P. et al. Discrete symmetries tested at 10\(-\)4 precision using linear polarization of photons from positronium annihilations. Nat. Commun. 15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-44340-6 (2024).

  42. Mercolli, L. et al. In vivo voxel-wise positronium lifetime imaging of thyroid cancer using clinically routine I-124 PET/CT. EANM Innov. 100017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eanmi.2025.100017 (2025).

  43. Moskal, P. & Stępień, E. Ł. Prospects and clinical perspectives of total-body PET imaging using plastic scintillators. PET Clin. 15, 439–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpet.2020.06.009 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Durán, M. T. et al. Half-life measurement of 44Sc and 44mSc. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes 190, 110507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110507 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Das, M. et al. First positronium imaging using 44Sc with the J-PET scanner: A case study on the NEMA-image quality phantom. In IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences. 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/trpms.2025.3621554 (2025).

  46. Mercolli, L. et al. First positronium lifetime imaging with scandium-44 on a long axial field-of-view PET/CT. Front. Nucl. Med. 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnume.2025.1648621 (2025).

  47. Moskal, P., Stępień, E. & Khreptak, A. A vision to increase the availability of PET diagnostics in low- and medium-income countries by combining a low-cost modular J-PET tomograph with the 44Ti/44Sc generator. Bio-Algorithms Med-Syst. 20, 55–62. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.9273 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Tayefi Ardebili, F. & Moskal, P. Assessing the spatial resolution of the modular J-PET scanner using the maximum-likelihood expectation-maximization (MLEM) algorithm. Bio-Algorithms Med-Syst. 20, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.8095 (2024).

  49. Wooten, A. L., Lewis, B. C. & Lapi, S. E. Cross-sections for (p, x) reactions on natural chromium for the production of 52, 52m, 54Mn radioisotopes. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes 96, 154–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.12.001 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Valdovinos, H. et al. Cyclotron production and radiochemical separation of 55Co and 58mCo from 54Fe, 58Ni and 57Fe targets. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes 130, 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.09.005 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Barrett, K. E., Houson, H. A., Lin, W., Lapi, S. E. & Engle, J. W. Production, purification, and applications of a potential theranostic pair: Cobalt-55 and Cobalt-58m. Diagnostics 11, 1235. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11071235 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kubat, K. et al. First ex-vivo positronium imaging of tissues with modular J-PET scanner using \(^{44}\)Sc radionuclide. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.07580 (2026).

  53. Das, M. et al. Development of correction techniques for the J-PET scanner. Bio-Algorithms Med-Syst. 20, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.9362 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Korcyl, G. et al. Evaluation of single-chip, real-time tomographic data processing on FPGA SOC devices. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 37, 2526–2535. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2018.2837741 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Korcyl, G. et al. Trigger-less and reconfigurable data acquisition system for positron emission tomography. Bio-Algorithms Med-Syst. 10, 37–40. https://doi.org/10.1515/bams-2013-0115 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Moskal, P. et al. Test of a single module of the J-PET scanner based on plastic scintillators. Nucl. Instr. Method A 764, 317–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2014.07.052. arxiv:1407.7395 (2014).

  57. Niedźwiecki, S. et al. J-PET: A new technology for the whole-body PET imaging. Acta Phys. Polon. B 48, 1567. https://doi.org/10.5506/APhysPolB.48.1567 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Pałka, M. et al. A novel method based solely on field programmable gate array (FPGA) units enabling measurement of time and charge of analog signals in positron emission tomography (PET). Bio-Algorithms Med-Syst. 10, 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1515/bams-2013-0104 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Sharma, S. et al. Estimating relationship between the time over threshold and energy loss by photons in plastic scintillators used in the J-PET scanner. EJNMMI Phys. 7, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-020-00306-x (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Dulski, K. et al. Analysis procedure of the positronium lifetime spectra for the J-PET detector. Acta Phys. Polon. A 132, 1637–1640. https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.132.1637 (2017).

  61. Dulski, K. et al. Commissioning of the J-PET detector in view of the positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy. Hyperfine Interact. 239, 40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10751-018-1517-z (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Dulski, K. PALS avalanche - A new PAL spectra analysis software. Acta Phys. Polon. A 137, 167–170. https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.137.167 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Ito, K. et al. Interlaboratory comparison of positron annihilation lifetime measurements for synthetic fused silica and polycarbonate. J. Appl. Phys. 104, 026102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2957074 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Likhithaswamy, H. R. et al. Assessing the quality of long-term stored tissues in formalin and in paraffin-embedded blocks for histopathological analysis. J. Microsc. Ultrastruct. 10, 23–29. https://doi.org/10.4103/jmau.jmau_53_20 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Moyo, S. et al. Fresh paraformaldehyde preserves thrombus biochemistry - Infrared spectroscopy and secondary ion mass spectrometry investigation of pulmonary artery thrombi. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.17.688840. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2025/12/08/2025.11.17.688840.full.pdf (2025).

  66. Braad, P. E. N., Hansen, S. B., Thisgaard, H. & Høilund-Carlsen, P. F. Pet imaging with the non-pure positron emitters: 55Co, 86Y and 124I. Phys. Med. Biol. 60, 3479. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/60/9/3479 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Nayak, T. K. & Brechbiel, M. W. Radioimmunoimaging with longer-lived positron-emitting radionuclides: Potentials and challenges. Bioconjug. Chem. 20, 825–841. https://doi.org/10.1021/bc800299f (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Dam, J. H., Olsen, B. B., Baun, C., Høilund-Carlsen, P. F. & Thisgaard, H. A PSMA ligand labeled with Cobalt-55 for PET imaging of prostate cancer. Mol. Imaging Biol. 19, 915–922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-017-1121-7 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Houson, H. A. et al. Pet imaging of the neurotensin targeting peptide NOTA-NT-20.3 using Cobalt-55, Copper-64 and Gallium-68. Pharmaceutics 14, 2724. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14122724 (2022).

  70. Stevens, H. et al. 55Cobalt (Co) as a PET-tracer in stroke, compared with blood flow, oxygen metabolism, blood volume and gadolinium-MRI. J. Neurol. Sci. 171, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-510x(99)00229-4 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Zou, S. J. et al. Quantitative imaging of \(^{55}\text{Co}\) and \(^{18}\text{ F }\)-labeled tracers in a single “multiplexed” pet imaging session. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2411.08237 (2024).

  72. Zou, S. J. et al. Quantitative imaging of 55CO and 18F-labeled tracers in a single “multiplexed” pet imaging session. In 2025 IEEE 22nd International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI). 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/isbi60581.2025.10980731 (IEEE, 2025).

  73. Graves, S. A. et al. Novel preparation methods of 52Mn for ImmunoPET imaging. Bioconjug. Chem. 26, 2118–2124. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00414 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Saar, G. et al. Anatomy, functionality, and neuronal connectivity with manganese radiotracers for positron emission tomography. Mol. Imaging Biol. 20, 562–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-018-1162-6 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Zhou, I. Y. et al. Positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging pharmacokinetics, in vivo biodistribution, and whole-body elimination of Mn-PyC3A. Investig. Radiol. 56, 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1097/rli.0000000000000736 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Lewis, C. M. et al. 52Mn production for PET/MRI tracking of human stem cells expressing divalent metal transporter 1 (DMT1). Theranostics 5, 227–239. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.10185 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Vanasschen, C., Brandt, M., Ermert, J. & Coenen, H. H. Radiolabelling with isotopic mixtures of52g/55Mn(\(<\)scp\(>\)ii\(<\)/scp\(>\)) as a straight route to stable manganese complexes for bimodal PET/MR imaging. Dalton Trans. 45, 1315–1321. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5dt04270d (2016).

  78. Hernandez, R. et al. Radiomanganese PET detects changes in functional \(\beta\)-cell mass in mouse models of diabetes. Diabetes 66, 2163–2174. https://doi.org/10.2337/db16-1285 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Jensen, A. I. et al. Remote-loading of liposomes with manganese-52 and in vivo evaluation of the stabilities of 52Mn-DOTA and 64Cu-DOTA using radiolabelled liposomes and PET imaging. J. Control. Release 269, 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.11.006 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  80. De Nardo, L., Ferro-Flores, G., Bolzati, C., Esposito, J. & Meléndez-Alafort, L. Radiation effective dose assessment of [51Mn]- and [52Mn]-chloride. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes 153, 108805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2019.108805 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Napieczynska, H. et al. Imaging neuronal pathways with 52Mn PET: Toxicity evaluation in rats. NeuroImage 158, 112–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.058 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Kim, D. et al. Improvement of double photon emission Compton imaging using angular and polarization correlations in cascade photons. J. Instrum. 18, C05012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/18/05/c05012 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Shimazoe, K., Uenomachi, M. & Takahashi, H. Imaging and sensing of pH and chemical state with nuclear-spin-correlated cascade gamma rays via radioactive tracer. Commun. Phys. 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-022-00801-w (2022).

  84. Uenomachi, M., Shimazoe, K. & Takahashi, H. A double photon coincidence detection method for medical gamma-ray imaging. Bio-Algorithms Med-Syst. 18, 120–126. https://doi.org/10.2478/bioal-2022-0080 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Shimazoe, K. & Uenomachi, M. Multi-molecule imaging and inter-molecular imaging in nuclear medicine. Bio-Algorithms Med-Syst. 18, 127–134. https://doi.org/10.2478/bioal-2022-0081 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Moskal, P. et al. Simulating NEMA characteristics of the modular total-body J-PET scanner - An economic total-body PET from plastic scintillators. Phys. Med. Biol. 66, 175015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ac16bd (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Spencer, B. A. et al. Performance evaluation of the uEXPLORER total-body PET/CT scanner based on NEMA NU 2–2018 with additional tests to characterize PET scanners with a long axial field of view. J. Nucl. Med. 61, 861. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.250597 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Li, G. et al. Performance evaluation of the uMI panorama PET/CT system in accordance with the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2–2018 standard. J. Nucl. Med. 65, 652–658. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.265929 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Huang, B. & Qi, J. High-resolution positronium lifetime tomography by the method of moments. Phys. Med. Biol. 69, 24NT01. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad9543 (2024).

  90. Huang, H.-H. et al. A statistical reconstruction algorithm for positronium lifetime imaging using time-of-flight positron emission tomography. IEEE Trans. Radiat. Plasma Med. Sci. 9, 478–486. https://doi.org/10.1109/trpms.2025.3531225 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Huang, B. et al. SPLIT: Statistical positronium lifetime image reconstruction via time-thresholding. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 43, 2148–2158. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2024.3357659 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Berens, L., Hsu, I., Chen, C.-T., Halpern, H. & Kao, C.-M. An analytic, moment-based method to estimate orthopositronium lifetimes in positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy measurements. Bio-Algorithms Med-Syst. 20, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.9141 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Qi, J. & Huang, B. Positronium lifetime image reconstruction for TOF PET. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 41, 2848. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2022.3174561 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Chen, Z., An, L., Kao, C.-M. & Huang, H.-H. The properties of the positronium lifetime image reconstruction based on maximum likelihood estimation. Bio-Algorithms Med-Syst. 19, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.1807 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Shopa, R. & Dulski, K. Positronium imaging in J-PET with an iterative activity reconstruction and a multi-stage fitting algorithm. Bio-Algorithms Med-Syst. 19, 54–63. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.1826 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Chen, Z., Kao, C.-M., Huang, H.-H. & An, L. Enhanced positronium lifetime imaging through two-component reconstruction in time-of-flight positron emission tomography. Front. Phys. 12, 1429344. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2024.1429344 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the technical support of Andrzej Heczko, Marcin Kajetanowicz, Dr. Piotr Kapusta, Wojciech Migdał, and Adam Mucha. We would like to thank Dr. Grzegorz Grudzień for providing access to myxoma and adipose samples. We acknowledge the support of Claire Deville and Kristina Søborg Pedersen from the Technical University of Denmark. We acknowledge support from the National Science Centre of Poland through grants MAESTRO no. 2021/42/A/ST2/00423 (P.M.), OPUS no. 2021/43/B/ST2/02150 (P.M.), OPUS24+LAP no. 2022/47/I/NZ7/03112 (E.Ł.S.) and SONATA no. 2023/50/E/ST2/00574 (S.S.), the Ministry of Science and Higher Education through grant no. IAL/SP/596235/2023 (P.M.), the SciMat and qLife Priority Research Areas budget under the program Excellence Initiative – Research University at Jagiellonian University (P.M. and E.Ł.S.), the Research Support Module as part of the Excellence Initiative – Research University program at Jagiellonian University (M.D.), European Union within the Horizon Europe Framework Programme (ERC Advanced Grant POSITRONIUM no. 101199807) and PRISMAP via Project_1729020993_aniX3. We also acknowledge Polish high-performance computing infrastructure PLGrid (HPC Center: ACK Cyfronet AGH) for providing computer facilities and support within computational grant no. PLG/2024/017688 and PLG/2025/018762.

Funding

This study is supported by the National Science Centre of Poland through grants MAESTRO no. 2021/42/A/ST2/00423 (P.M.), OPUS no. 2021/43/B/ST2/02150 (P.M.), OPUS24+LAP no. 2022/47/I/NZ7/03112 (E.Ł.S.) and SONATA no. 2023/50/E/ST2/00574 (S.S.), the Ministry of Science and Higher Education through grant no. IAL/SP/596235/2023 (P.M.) and SPUB/SP/627733/2025 (E.Ł.S.), the SciMat and qLife Priority Research Areas budget under the program Excellence Initiative – Research University at Jagiellonian University (P.M. and E.Ł.S.), the Research Support Module as part of the Excellence Initiative – Research University program at Jagiellonian University (M.D.), European Union within the Horizon Europe Framework Programme (ERC Advanced Grant POSITRONIUM no. 101199807) and PRISMAP via Project_1729020993_aniX3. We also acknowledge Polish high-performance computing infrastructure PLGrid (HPC Center: ACK Cyfronet AGH) for providing computer facilities and support within computational grant no. PLG/2024/017688 and PLG/2025/018762.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors jointly supervised this work: Ewa Ł. Stepień and Paweł Moskal.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Physics, Astronomy and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, S. Łojasiewicza 11, 30-348, Krakow, Poland

    Manish Das, Sushil Sharma, Ermias Yitayew Beyene, Neha Chug, Eryk Czerwiński, Sharareh Jalali, Krzysztof Kacprzak, Tevfik Kaplanoglu, Łukasz Kapłon, Kamila Kasperska, Aleksander Khreptak, Grzegorz Korcyl, Tomasz Kozik, Karol Kubat, Deepak Kumar, Sumit Kumar Kundu, Anoop Kunimmal Venadan, Justyna Medrala-Sowa, Simbarashe Moyo, Wiktor Mryka, Szymon Niedźwiecki, Anand Pandey, Piyush Pandey, Szymon Parzych, Alessio Porcelli, Martin Rädler, Magdalena Skurzok, Maciej Słotwiński, Pooja Tanty, Keyvan Tayefi Ardebili, Satyam Tiwari, Kavya Valsan Eliyan, Ewa Ł. Stepień & Paweł Moskal

  2. Center for Theranostics, Jagiellonian University, Kopernika 40, 31-501, Krakow, Poland

    Manish Das, Sushil Sharma, Ermias Yitayew Beyene, Neha Chug, Eryk Czerwiński, Sharareh Jalali, Krzysztof Kacprzak, Tevfik Kaplanoglu, Łukasz Kapłon, Kamila Kasperska, Aleksander Khreptak, Grzegorz Korcyl, Tomasz Kozik, Karol Kubat, Deepak Kumar, Sumit Kumar Kundu, Anoop Kunimmal Venadan, Justyna Medrala-Sowa, Simbarashe Moyo, Wiktor Mryka, Szymon Niedźwiecki, Anand Pandey, Piyush Pandey, Szymon Parzych, Alessio Porcelli, Martin Rädler, Magdalena Skurzok, Maciej Słotwiński, Pooja Tanty, Keyvan Tayefi Ardebili, Satyam Tiwari, Kavya Valsan Eliyan, Ewa Ł. Stepień & Paweł Moskal

  3. Heavy Ion Laboratory, University of Warsaw, 00-927, Warsaw, Poland

    Jarosław Choiński & Anna Stolarz

  4. Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, INFN, Via E. Fermi 40, 00044, Frascati, Italy

    Catalina Curceanu & Alessio Porcelli

  5. AGH University of Krakow, 30-059, Kraków, Poland

    Jakub Hajduga, Bartłomiej Rachwał & Tomasz Szumlak

  6. Center of Nuclear Chemistry and Radiochemistry, Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology, 03-195, Warsaw, Poland

    Aleksander Bilewicz, Noman Razzaq & Rafał Walczak

  7. Cracow University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Al. Jana Pawła II 37, 31-864, Kraków, Poland

    Edward Lisowski & Filip Lisowski

  8. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland

    Narendra Rathod, Axel Rominger & Kuangyu Shi

  9. Doctoral School of Exact and Natural Sciences, Jagiellonian University, S. Łojasiewicza 11, 30-348, Kraków, Poland

    Manish Das

  10. Center of Astronomical Research, Technology, Education, and Outreach, University of Antofagasta, Avda. U. de Antofagasta 02800, 1240000, Antofagasta, Chile

    Alessio Porcelli

Authors
  1. Manish Das
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sushil Sharma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ermias Yitayew Beyene
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aleksander Bilewicz
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jarosław Choiński
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Neha Chug
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Catalina Curceanu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Eryk Czerwiński
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jakub Hajduga
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Sharareh Jalali
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Krzysztof Kacprzak
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Tevfik Kaplanoglu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Łukasz Kapłon
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Kamila Kasperska
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Aleksander Khreptak
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Grzegorz Korcyl
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Tomasz Kozik
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Karol Kubat
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Deepak Kumar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Sumit Kumar Kundu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Anoop Kunimmal Venadan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Edward Lisowski
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Filip Lisowski
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Justyna Medrala-Sowa
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Simbarashe Moyo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  26. Wiktor Mryka
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  27. Szymon Niedźwiecki
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  28. Anand Pandey
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  29. Piyush Pandey
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  30. Szymon Parzych
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  31. Alessio Porcelli
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  32. Bartłomiej Rachwał
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  33. Martin Rädler
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  34. Narendra Rathod
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  35. Noman Razzaq
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  36. Axel Rominger
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  37. Kuangyu Shi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  38. Magdalena Skurzok
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  39. Maciej Słotwiński
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  40. Anna Stolarz
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  41. Tomasz Szumlak
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  42. Pooja Tanty
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  43. Keyvan Tayefi Ardebili
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  44. Satyam Tiwari
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  45. Kavya Valsan Eliyan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  46. Rafał Walczak
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  47. Ewa Ł. Stepień
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  48. Paweł Moskal
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The J-PET scanner, the techniques of the experiment, and this study were conceived by P.M. The data analysis was conducted by M.D. Signal selection criteria were developed by M.D, P.M. and S.S., applied by M.D., and verified by S.S. The samples were prepared by K. Kubat. J.C., N.Razzaq, R.W. and A.B. designed and carried out the irradiation and processing of the \(^{54}\)Fe targets. Authors M.D., S.S., E.Y.B., A.B., J.C., N.C., C.C., E.C., J.H., S.J., K.Kacprzak, T.K., Ł.K., K. Kasperska, A.K., G.K., T.K., K. Kubat, D.K., S.K.K, A.K.V., E.L., F.L., J.M., S.M., W.M., S.N., A.P., P.P., S.P., A.P., B.R., M.R., N. Rathod, N. Razzaq, A.R., K.S., M. Skurzok, M. Słotwiński, A.S., T. S., P.T., K.T.A., S.T., K. V. E., R.W., E.Ł.S, and P.M. participated in the construction, commissioning, and operation of the experimental setup, as well as in the data-taking campaign and data interpretation. K.Kacprzak took part in developing the J-PET analysis and simulation framework. M.Skurzok and K.Kacprzak performed the timing calibration of the detector. E.C. developed and operated short- and long-term data archiving systems and the computer center of J-PET. S.S. established the relation between energy loss and TOT and the dependence of detection efficiency on energy deposition. P.M. and E.Ł.S conceptualized the study, secured the main financing and supervised the whole project. The results were interpreted by P.M., E.Ł.S, S.S., and M.D. The manuscript was prepared by P.M., E.Ł.S, S.S., and M.D. and was then edited and approved by all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sushil Sharma or Paweł Moskal.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests with the work reported in this paper: Paweł Moskal is an inventor on a patent related to this work. [Patent nos.: (Poland) PL 227658, (Europe) EP 3039453, and (United States) US 9,851,456], filed (Poland) 30 August 2013, (Europe) 29 August 2014, and (United States) 29 August 2014; published (Poland) 23 January 2018, (Europe) 29 April 2020, and (United States) 26 December 2017. Other authors declare that they have no known conflicts of interest in terms of competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have an influence or are relevant to the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Das, M., Sharma, S., Beyene, E.Y. et al. First positronium lifetime imaging using 52Mn and 55Co with a plastic-scintillator-based PET scanner. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43965-z

Download citation

  • Received: 16 December 2025

  • Accepted: 09 March 2026

  • Published: 20 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43965-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • PLI
  • Positronium
  • J-PET
Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Gamma-ray technologies and applications

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing