Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
The effects of perceived labor rights protection on job performance in platform flexible employees: The role of career resilience and person–environment fit
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 31 March 2026

The effects of perceived labor rights protection on job performance in platform flexible employees: The role of career resilience and person–environment fit

  • Ruofan Xu1,
  • De’en Hou2,
  • Kunyu Sun3 &
  • …
  • Ziwei Wang4 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 107 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Business and management
  • Psychology
  • Sociology

Abstract

Within the context of labor market transformations driven by the digital economy, the protection of platform flexible employees’ rights has emerged as a critical issue requiring comprehensive analysis. While existing research predominantly focuses on the legal frameworks and institutional structures governing rights protection, there is a significant gap in understanding how perceived labor rights protection influences the job performance of platform flexible employees. Drawing on Self-Determination Theory, this study develops a moderated mediation model to examine the impact of perceived labor rights protection on the job performance of platform flexible employees. It also explores the mediating role of career resilience and the moderating effect of person–environment fit in this relationship. We conducted an empirical analysis using a sample of 521 platform flexible employees in China. The results indicate that career resilience mediates the relationship between perceived labor rights protection and job performance, while person–environment fit moderates this mechanism. This research enriches the theoretical literature on platform flexible employees’ perceptions and job performance, extends the application of SDT to platform-based flexible employment, and offers new insights for enhancing the job performance of platform flexible employees.

Similar content being viewed by others

The effects of psychological capital, work engagement and job autonomy on job performance in platform flexible employees

Article Open access 08 August 2024

The pro-environmental implications of job insecurity: the significant role of prosocial motivation

Article Open access 29 January 2026

Examining the impact of job matching on workers’ non-cognitive skills: insights from China’s labor market

Article Open access 26 December 2024

Data availability

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Zhang, S., Xia, Y., Wang, H. J. & Pan, J. F. The good, the bad: How digital technology shapes welfare for formal and flexible workers?. Econ. Anal. Policy 85, 2007–2029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2025.02.037 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  2. You, C., Qiu, H., Pi, Z. & Yu, M. Sustainable enterprise development in the manufacturing sector: Flexible employment and innovation in China. Sustainability 15(10), 8180. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108180 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Usman, S., Lu, C. & Gao, G. Y. Flexible job-shop scheduling with limited flexible workers using an improved multiobjective discrete teaching-learning based optimization algorithm. Optim. Eng. 25(3), 1237–1270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-023-09842-8 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ran, X. & Zhao, Y. Behind the flexibility: Insufficient occupational injury protection of gig workers in china. Front. Public Health https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1117180 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, S., Li, L. Z. & Coutts, A. National survey of mental health and life satisfaction of gig workers: The role of loneliness and financial precarity. BMJ Open 12(12), e66389. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066389 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wu, P. F., Zheng, R., Zhao, Y. & Li, Y. Happy riders are all alike? Ambivalent subjective experience and mental well‐being of food‐delivery platform workers in China. N. Technol. Work. Employ. 37(3), 425–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12243 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Xu, R. The impact of perceived labor rights protection on job performance of platform flexible workers. (Shandong University of Finance and Economics, 2024).

  8. Mo, Y. Organizational career support, perception of social work development, and career self-management of Chinese social workers: A structural equation modeling. Int. Soc. Work 68(4), 618–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208728251336937 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kritkorn, N. & Can, T. Nonstandard employment and job satisfaction across time in China: Evidence from the Chinese General Social Survey (2006–2012). Work Employ. Soc. 35(3), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017020926365 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wu, Q., Zhang, H., Li, Z. & Liu, K. Labor control in the gig economy: Evidence from Uber in China. J. Ind. Relat. 61(4), 574–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185619854472 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, J. The legal protection for China’s flexible workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front. L. China 16, 79–103. https://doi.org/10.3868/s050-010-021-0005-0 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sun, P., Chen, J. Y. & Rani, U. From flexible labour to ‘sticky labour’: A tracking study of workers in the food-delivery platform economy of China. Work Employ. Soc. 37(2), 412–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170211021570 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bunjak, A., Černe, M. & Popovič, A. Absorbed in technology but digitally overloaded: Interplay effects on gig workers’ burnout and creativity. Inf. Manag. 58(8), 103533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103533 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, T., Liu, Q. & Jiang, D. The influence of flexible employment on workers’ wellbeing: Evidence from Chinese general social survey. Front. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.771598 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wu, T. J., Pan, Q. H., Zhang, K. X. & Zhang, R. X. Flexible working on employees’ quality of work life: The role of locus of control through psychological perspective. Curr. Psychol. 43(43), 33307–33322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06848-y (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chen, Z. Sharing employee: B2B employment model in the era of Coronavirus disease 2019 and implication for human resource management. Front. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.714704 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhu, J., Zhang, B. & Wang, H. The double-edged sword effects of perceived algorithmic control on platform workers’ service performance. Hum. Soc. Sci. Commun. 11(1), 316. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02812-0 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liang, Y., Wu, T. J. & Lin, W. P. Exploring the impact of forced teleworking on counterproductive work behavior: The role of event strength and work-family conflict. Internet Res. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-08-2023-0658 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Parent-Rocheleau, X. & Parker, S. K. Algorithms as work designers: How algorithmic management influences the design of jobs. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 32(3), 100838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100838 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Duan, W., Wu, T. & Liang, Y. Are resources always beneficial? The three-way interaction between slashies’ role stress, self-efficacy and job autonomy. Asia Pac. J. Manag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-025-10027-3 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gagné, M. & Deci, E. L. Self-determination theory and work motivation. J. Organ. Behav. 26(4), 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Weinstein, N. & Ryan, R. M. A self-determination theory approach to understanding stress incursion and responses. Stress Health 27(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.1368 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Can. Psychol. 49(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Van den Broeck, A., Howard, J. L., Van Vaerenbergh, Y., Leroy, H. & Gagné, M. Beyond intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis on self-determination theory’s multidimensional conceptualization of work motivation. Organ. Psychol. Rev. 11(3), 240–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866211006173 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  25. McMahon, M. & Abkhezr, P. Career adaptability and career resilience: A systems perspective. Int. J. Educ. Vocat. Guid. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-025-09739-1 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lyons, S. T., Schweitzer, L. & Ng, E. S. W. Resilience in the modern career. Career Dev. Int. 20(4), 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-02-2015-0024 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mishra, P. & McDonald, K. Career resilience: An integrated review of the empirical literature. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 16(3), 207–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484317719622 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Roth, G., Vansteenkiste, M. & Ryan, R. M. Integrative emotion regulation: Process and development from a self-determination theory perspective. Dev. Psychopathol. 31(3), 945–956. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579419000403 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Martindale, N., Wood, A. J. & Burchell, B. J. What do platform workers in the UK gig economy want?. Br. J. Ind. Relat. 62(3), 542–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12797 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ryan, R. M. et al. We know this much is (meta-analytically) true: A meta-review of meta-analytic findings evaluating self-determination theory. Psychol. Bull. 148(11–12), 813–842. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000385 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gillison, F. B., Rouse, P., Standage, M., Sebire, S. J. & Ryan, R. M. A meta-analysis of techniques to promote motivation for health behaviour change from a self-determination theory perspective. Health Psychol. Rev. 13(1), 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2018.1534071 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Vleugels, W., Verbruggen, M., De Cooman, R. & Billsberry, J. A systematic review of temporal person-environment fit research: Trends, developments, obstacles, and opportunities for future research. J. Organ. Behav. 44(2), 376–398. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2607 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zhou, Y. J., Lai, H. Z., Chen, X. H. & Hu, C. H. Protecting labor rights: Contract design and coordination between brand firms and suppliers. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 320(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.07.025 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Torm, N. & Oehme, M. Social protection and formalization in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review of the literature. World Dev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106662 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gagne, M. et al. Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 1(7), 378–392. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00056-w (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Arora, R. & Rangnekar, S. Relationships between emotional stability, psychosocial mentoring support and career resilience. Eur. J. Psychol. 11(1), 16–33. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v11i1.835 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Luthans, F., Norman, S. M., Avolio, B. J. & Avey, J. B. The mediating role of psychological capital in the supportive organizational climate—employee performance relationship. J. Organ. Behav. 29(2), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.507 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H. & Ryan, R. M. Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 4(Volume 4, 2017), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zhou, Y. F., Chen, S. Z., Deng, X. J., Wang, S. H. & Shi, L. S. Self-efficacy and career resilience: The mediating role of professional identity and work passion in kindergarten teachers. J. Psychol. Afr. 33(2), 165–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2023.2207052 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kong, H. Y. et al. Influence of artificial intelligence (AI) perception on career resilience and informal learning. Tour. Rev. 79(1), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-10-2022-0521 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Teodorovicz, T., Lazzarini, S., Cabral, S. & McGahan, A. M. Investing in general human capital as a relational strategy: Evidence on flexible arrangements with contract workers. Strateg. Manage. J. 45(5), 902–938. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3571 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ehrlich, S. C. & Ternes, N. C. The paradox of “non-union unions”: The risks of extending antitrust immunities without labor law’s protections. Am. Bus. Law J. 62(2), 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/ablj.12258 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Huang, C. L. Judges’ interpretation of laws and labor rights protection: A study of labor contract-related court decisions in China. J. Ind. Relat. 67(1), 130–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856241266881 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Fang, C., Ran, Y., Huan, Z. & Zhao, X. Y. The mediating role of decent work perception in role clarity and job embeddedness among Chinese nurses: A cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02861-z (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Demirarslan, E. I., Yalap, O. & Dag, M. Exploring innovation in healthcare: The mediating role of safety perception between organizational climate and innovative work behavior. Saf. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106943 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wang, R. J. et al. Identifying the personal characteristics of decent work perception for nursing students in China using latent profile analysis. BMC Med. Educ. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05206-7 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ryan, R. M. The developmental line of autonomy in the etiology, dynamics, and treatment of borderline personality disorders. Dev. Psychopathol. 17(4), 987–1006. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579405050467 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ye, C. Z. The new situation of Chinese labor: Changes and challenges in labor relations’-an in-depth analysis of labour relations and labour rights protection. Br. J. Ind. Relat. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12870 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Lobato, J. Legal-conflict constellations. A political approach to the “labour rights-human rights” debate. Hum. Rights Law Rev. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngae020 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ross, B. M. & Barnes, D. M. Self-determination theory with application to employee health settings. Workplace Health Saf. 66(8), 367–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165079917749863 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Slutsky, J., Chin, B., Raye, J. & Creswell, J. D. Mindfulness training improves employee well-being: A randomized controlled trial. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 24(1), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000132 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  52. van Vianen, A. Person-environment fit: A review of its basic tenets. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 5, 75–101. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104702 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Yu, K. & Davis, H. M. Autonomy’s impact on newcomer proactive behaviour and socialization: A needs-supplies fit perspective. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 89(1), 172–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12116 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Greguras, G. J. & Diefendorff, J. M. Different fits satisfy different needs: Linking person-environment fit to employee commitment and performance using self-determination theory. J. Appl. Psychol. 94(2), 465–477. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014068 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Vleugels, W., De Cooman, R., Verbruggen, M. & Solinger, O. Understanding dynamic change in perceptions of person-environment fit: An exploration of competing theoretical perspectives. J. Organ. Behav. 39(9), 1066–1080. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2294 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Chuang, A., Hsu, R. S., Wang, A. C. & Judge, T. A. Does West “fit” with East? In search of a Chinese model of person-environment fit. Acad. Manag. J. 58(2), 480–510. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.1076 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hayes, A. F. An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivar. Behav. Res. 50(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.962683 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Crawford, E. R., LePine, J. A. & Rich, B. L. Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. J. Appl. Psychol. 95(5), 834–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019364 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Brislin, R.W. Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. vol. 2 389–444 (Allyn & Bacon, 1980).

  60. Chen, Z. X., Tsui, A. S. & Farh, J. L. Loyalty to supervisor vs. organizational commitment: Relationships to employee performance in China. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 75(3), 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317902320369749 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y. & Podsakoff, N. P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J. & Zhang, Z. A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. 209–233 (American Psychological Association, 2010).

  63. Baron, R. & Kenny, D. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51, 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B. & Podsakoff, N. P. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  65. He, H. R., Neumark, D. & Weng, Q. Do workers value flexible jobs? A field experiment. J. Labor Econ. 39(3), 709–738. https://doi.org/10.1086/711226 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Li, D. & Schoenherr, T. The institutionalization of sharing economy platforms in China. J. Oper. Manag. 69(5), 764–793. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1253 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Rong, K., Li, B. Y., Peng, W., Zhou, D. & Shi, X. W. Sharing economy platforms: Creating shared value at a business ecosystem level. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120804 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the article editor and reviewers for their thoughtful comments that greatly improved the paper.

Funding

This study was supported by the Shandong Provincial Social Science Planning Project (Grant No. 25CFNJ06).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan, China

    Ruofan Xu

  2. School of Economics and Management, Weifang University, Weifang, China

    De’en Hou

  3. New York Institute of Technology, New York, USA

    Kunyu Sun

  4. CNPC Managers Training Institute, Beijing, China

    Ziwei Wang

Authors
  1. Ruofan Xu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. De’en Hou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kunyu Sun
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ziwei Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

RF: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing—Review & Editing. DE: Formal analysis, Data Curation, Writing—Review & Editing. KY: Validation, Writing—Review & Editing. ZW: Investigation, Visualization. All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to De’en Hou.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

This study strictly adhered to the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the School of Business Administration of Shandong University of Finance and Economics. We confirmed that all participants understand the purpose of our research and provided informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Demographic variables table.

Variable name

Item

Frequency

Percentage (%)

Gender

Male

324

62.19

Female

197

37.81

Age

Under 20 years old

37

7.11

20–30 years old

211

40.50

30–40 years old

157

30.13

40–50 years old

78

14.97

Over 50 years old

38

7.29

Education

Junior high school and below

79

15.16

High school

187

35.89

College/vocational education

163

31.29

Undergraduate

72

13.82

Master degree or above

20

3.84

Total

521

100.0

LR scale.

LR

 

Items

Compensation and benefits

1

I can receive the full payment on time

2

I am able to receive fair compensation that reflects the work I put in

3

I am able to receive social insurance and various benefits, just like traditional employees

4

I can independently select my work tasks, schedule, and methods

Flexible employment system

1

Current laws can protect my various labor rights when engaging in flexible work on digital platforms

2

The existing policies effectively support the labor rights of workers engaged in flexible work on the platform

3

When disputes or losses occur, I have adequate remedies available, and my labor rights can be protected

4

The current policies and laws governing flexible employment are well-established and effectively implemented

Platform algorithms and management rules

1

The platform’s algorithm fairly assigns tasks

2

The platform’s algorithm for wage distribution and commission deductions is fair and reasonable

3

The platform has a reasonable management system, a well-established reward and penalty framework, and a comprehensive dispute resolution mechanism

4

I have signed a formal labor contract with either the platform or the labor dispatch company, clearly establishing the employment relationship

Job security for flexible employment

1

I can feel the support and protection that the platform provides me at work

2

I have a positive working environment

3

I am able to safely engage in flexible platform work while maintaining both my physical and mental health

4

My job offers excellent potential for growth, and this career path has a promising future

5

I am able to receive training related to professional skills and career development

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, R., Hou, D., Sun, K. et al. The effects of perceived labor rights protection on job performance in platform flexible employees: The role of career resilience and person–environment fit. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44150-y

Download citation

  • Received: 07 August 2025

  • Accepted: 10 March 2026

  • Published: 31 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44150-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Platform flexible employees
  • Perceived labor rights protection
  • Career resilience
  • Job performance
  • Person–environment fit
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing