Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Control of sludge formation during acidizing through the investigation of acid and oil interactions and emulsion behavior in heavy oils using low salinity water
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 09 April 2026

Control of sludge formation during acidizing through the investigation of acid and oil interactions and emulsion behavior in heavy oils using low salinity water

  • Zakarya Ahmed1,
  • Ali B. M. Ali2,
  • Zarawar Khan3,
  • Pradeep Kumar Singh4,
  • Omar J. AlKhatib5,
  • Karim Kriaa6,
  • Ibrahim Mahariq7,8 &
  • …
  • Mahidzal Dahari9 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 698 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Chemistry
  • Engineering
  • Environmental sciences
  • Materials science

Abstract

Acidizing is widely used to improve well productivity, but contact between hydrochloric acid (HCl) and heavy and polar components of heavy crude oils, including asphaltene molecules, can cause strong emulsions and fluid-fluid sludge that damage the heavy oil reservoir. This study investigates how combining HCl with different smart-water formulations (seawater, diluted seawater, and ion-enriched brines containing Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, and SO₄²⁻) affects the interfacial behavior of heavy oil. In this regard, a novel series of bottle tests was conducted at 80 °C for 48 h, and the resulting oil, emulsion, and interfacial layers were analyzed. Emulsion stability, sludge mass, droplet size, viscosity, interfacial tension (IFT), SARA (saturates, aromatics, resins, asphaltenes) fractions, FTIR (Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy)-ATR (Attenuated total reflection), elemental analysis, and zeta potential were measured to link changes in asphaltene chemistry to the macroscopic oil properties. The results show that acid prepared with deionized water produced the most stable emulsion, the smallest droplets, and the highest sludge mass. Low-salinity and Ca²⁺-rich brines also promoted strong sludge formation, confirming that insufficient ionic strength allows HCl to protonate polar oil components strongly. On the other hand, Mg²⁺- and especially SO₄²⁻-rich brines greatly suppressed sludge formation (about 0.67 g), produced larger droplets, lowered IFT (29.9 mN/m), and kept more polar and heteroatom-rich asphaltenes inside the oil. FTIR-ATR and elemental analyses show that ion-rich brines preserve oxygen- and sulfur-containing functional groups within the oil phase, limiting their migration toward the oil–acid interface. In contrast, low-salinity and calcium-rich systems promote the removal and aggregation of these groups. Zeta potential measurements further support this trend, as sulfate-rich systems develop more negative surface charges and exhibit a reduced tendency for sludge-related damage. Collectively, these observations indicate that sludge formation during acidizing is governed by the ability of brine ionic composition to regulate asphaltene surface activity and interfacial charge balance. Accordingly, ion tuning, particularly through sulfate and magnesium enrichment, stabilizes asphaltenes in the oil phase and suppresses sludge generation even under strongly acidic conditions. Conversely, low-salinity and calcium-dominated fluids intensify acid–oil incompatibility by promoting asphaltene protonation and interfacial precipitation. This mechanistic insight establishes a clear scientific foundation for designing acidizing fluids that minimize formation damage, enabling a transition from empirical approaches to chemistry-driven optimization.

Similar content being viewed by others

Synergistic effects of CTAB and low salinity brines on asphaltene behavior and emulsion stability in clay rich sandstone reservoirs

Article Open access 12 November 2025

Experimental study on the simultaneous effect of smart water and clay particles on the stability of asphaltene molecule and emulsion phase

Article Open access 27 January 2025

Experimental evaluation of alterations in crude oil properties induced by hydrochloric acid, reservoir rock powder, and surfactants

Article Open access 28 October 2025

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Refrences

  1. Rogner, H.-H. An assessment of world hydrocarbon resources. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 22(1), 217–262 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Caineng, Z. et al. Formation, distribution, potential and prediction of global conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon resources. Pet. Explor. Dev. 42(1), 14–28 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Asif, M. & Muneer, T. Energy supply, its demand and security issues for developed and emerging economies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 11 (7), 1388–1413 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Portier, S., André, L. & Vuataz, F.-D. Review on chemical stimulation techniques in oil industry and applications to geothermal systems. Engine, work package 4, 32 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mirkhoshhal, S. M., Mahani, H., Ayatollahi, S. & Shirazi, M. M. Pore-scale insights into sludge formation damage during acid stimulation and its underlying mechanisms. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 196, 107679 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Khamehchi, E., Khaleghi, M. R., Abbasi, A. & Mahdavi Kalatehno, J. Basic Objectives and Concepts of Matrix Acidizing, in Applied Matrix Acidizing of Carbonate Reservoir: Springer, 1–43. (2024).

  7. Li, N. et al. Application status and research progress of shale reservoirs acid treatment technology. Nat. Gas Ind. B 3(2), 165–172 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  8. McLeod, H. O. Matrix acidizing. J. Pet. Technol. 36(12), 2055–2069 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sayed, M., Chang, F. & Luce, T. Chemical Solution Mitigates Stuck Inflow Control Devices (ICDs) in Horizontal Completion, in Offshore Technology Conference, : OTC, p. D031S030R004. (2024).

  10. Kankaria, S., Nasr-El-Din, H. A. & Rimassa, S. Matrix acidizing of carbonate rocks using new mixtures of HCl/methanesulfonic acid, in SPE International Conference on Oilfield Chemistry? : SPE, p. D021S007R007. (2017).

  11. Mahdavi Kalatehno, J. et al. A successful case study of using HCl and viscoelastic diverting acid systems for carbonate matrix acidizing in an oil well with optimized predictive model. J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 15(1), 1. (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Abbasi, A., Malayeri, M. R. & Shirazi, M. M. Stability of spent HCl acid-crude oil emulsion. J. Mol. Liq. 383, 122116 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  13. K. I.-I. I. & Eshiet Production from Unconventional Petroleum Reservoirs: Précis of Stimulation Techniques and Fluid Systems, in Emerging Technologies in Hydraulic Fracturing and Gas Flow Modelling: IntechOpen, (2022).

  14. Mahmoud, M. A., Nasr-El-Din, H. A. & de Wolf, C. A. High-temperature laboratory testing of illitic sandstone outcrop cores with HCl-alternative fluids. SPE Prod. Oper. 30(01), 43–51 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yousufi, M. M., Mohyaldinn Elhaj, M. E. & Dzulkarnain, I. B. A review on use of emulsified acids for matrix acidizing in carbonate reservoirs. ACS Omega 9(10), 11027–11049 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shirazi, M. M., Ayatollahi, S. & Ghotbi, C. Damage evaluation of acid-oil emulsion and asphaltic sludge formation caused by acidizing of asphaltenic oil reservoir. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 174, 880–890 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ramy, C. et al. Advanced delayed acid system for stimulation of ultra-tight carbonate reservoirs: A field study on single-phase, polymer-free delayed acid system performance under extreme sour and high-temperature conditions. Processes 13(8), 2547 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mahdavi, S. & Mousavi Moghadam, A. Critical review of underlying mechanisms of interactions of asphaltenes with oil and aqueous phases in the presence of ions. Energy Fuels. 35 (23), 19211–19247 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kalhori, P., Abbasi, A., Malayeri, M. R. & Shirazi, M. M. Impact of crude oil components on acid sludge formation during well acidizing. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 215, 110698 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mahdavi, M. S., Tajikmansori, A., Saeedi Dehaghani, A. H. & Seyed Mousavi, S. A. H. The synergic effect of brine salinity and dispersed clay particles on water-in-heavy oil emulsion: Insight into asphaltene structure and emulsion stability. SPE J. https://doi.org/10.2118/223598-pa (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Amiri-Ramsheh, B., Sahebalzamani, S., Zabihi, R. & Hemmati-Sarapardeh, A. Predicting asphaltene precipitation during natural depletion of oil reservoirs by integrating SARA fractions with advanced intelligent models. Sci. Rep. 15(1), 26214. (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Thomas, A. W. A review of the literature of emulsions. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 12(2), 177–181 (1920).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kharazi, M. & Saien, J. Mechanism responsible altering in interfacial tension and emulsification of the crude oil-water system with nano Gemini surface active ionic liquids, salts and pH. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 219, 111090 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kilpatrick, P. K. Water-in-crude oil emulsion stabilization: Review and unanswered questions. Energy Fuels 26(7), 4017–4026 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Raya, S. A., Mohd Saaid, I., Abbas Ahmed, A. & Abubakar Umar, A. A critical review of development and demulsification mechanisms of crude oil emulsion in the petroleum industry. J. Petroleum Explor. Prod. Technol. 10 (4), 1711–1728 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ghorbani-Bavariani, M., Rezaei, A., Ahmadi, M., Vatanparast, H. & Hemmati-Sarapardeh, A. Experimental study and geochemical modeling of the effect of asphaltene during smart water flooding in carbonate reservoirs. Sci. Rep. 15(1), 37404. (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rafalscky, L. et al. Composition and stabilization mechanisms of interfacial material in petroleum Emulsions: a systematic review. Fuel 408, 137763 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hou, B., Jia, R., Fu, M., Huang, Y. & Wang, Y. Mechanism of wettability alteration of an oil-wet sandstone surface by a novel cationic gemini surfactant. Energy Fuels. 33 (5), 4062–4069 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yang, F. et al. Asphaltene subfractions responsible for stabilizing water-in-crude oil emulsions. Part 2: Molecular representations and molecular dynamics simulations. Energy Fuels 29(8), 4783–4794 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yang, F. et al. Asphaltene subfractions responsible for stabilizing water-in-crude oil emulsions. Part 1: Interfacial behaviors. Energy Fuels 28(11), 6897–6904 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ganeeva, Y. et al. The composition of acid/oil interface in acid oil emulsions. Pet. Sci. 17, 1345 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hou, B. et al. A novel high temperature tolerant and high salinity resistant gemini surfactant for enhanced oil recovery. J. Mol. Liq. 296, 112114 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hou, B. et al. Wettability alteration of an oil-wet sandstone surface by synergistic adsorption/desorption of cationic/nonionic surfactant mixtures. Energy Fuels. 32 (12), 12462–12468 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  34. O’Neil, B., Maley, D. & Lalchan, C. Prevention of acid-induced asphaltene precipitation: A comparison of anionic vs. cationic surfactants. J. Can. Pet. Technol. 54(01), 49–62 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Poteau, S., Argillier, J. F., Langevin, D., Pincet, F. & Perez, E. Influence of pH on stability and dynamic properties of asphaltenes and other amphiphilic molecules at the oil– water interface. Energy Fuels. 19 (4), 1337–1341 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sun, J. et al. Influencing factors and predictive models of oil–water emulsions: A comprehensive review and future outlook. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1552(1), 94–116 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mansouri, A. T., Mahdavi, M. S. & Dehaghani, A. H. S. Experimental investigation of divalent ions and CTAB effects on heavy oil emulsion stability in carbonate reservoirs. Sci. Rep. 15(1), 43462 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hou, B. et al. Wettability alteration of oil-wet carbonate surface induced by self-dispersing silica nanoparticles: Mechanism and monovalent metal ion’s effect. J. Mol. Liq. 294, 111601 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Macedo, E. A. M. et al. Interfacial stability of acid–crude oil emulsions in matrix acidizing of carbonate reservoirs. ACS. Omega 10(44), 53407–53416 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ismail, I. et al. Formation and stability of W/O emulsions in presence of asphaltene at reservoir thermodynamic conditions. J. Mol. Liq. 299, 112125 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hedayati, E., Mohammadzadeh-Shirazi, M., Abbasi, A. & Malayeri, M. R. Experimental investigation of the acid-oil emulsion stability influenced by operational conditions and oil properties. J. Mol. Liq. 390, 123132 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  42. AlMubarak, T. et al. Investigation of acid-induced emulsion and asphaltene precipitation in low permeability carbonate reservoirs, in SPE Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition, : SPE, pp. SPE-178034-MS. (2015).

  43. Abbasi, A. & Malayeri, M. R. Impact of crude oil properties on stability of HCl-crude oil emulsion using XDLVO theory,. Fuel 338, 127315 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Abbasi, A., Mohammadzadeh-Shirazi, M. & Malayeri, M. R. Functionality of chemical additives and experimental conditions during formation of acid-induced emulsion and sludge. J. Mol. Liq. 398, 124257 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Behera, U. S., Sangwai, J. S., Baskaran, D. & Byun, H.-S. A comprehensive review on low salinity water injection for enhanced oil recovery: Fundamental insights, laboratory and field studies, and economic aspects. Energy Fuels 39(1), 72–103 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Biyouki, A. A. et al. Comprehensive experimental study of multivariable oil–brine–rock interactions: Impact of brine–rock chemistry and crude oil polarity on enhanced oil recovery in carbonate reservoirs,. Sci. Rep. 15(1), 25605 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Bigdeli, A. Wettability alteration or wettability improvement? A fundamental question toward a deeper understanding of low salinity water flooding (LSWF), (2025).

  48. Mumbere, W., Sagala, F., Gupta, U. & Bbosa, D. Reservoir potential unlocked: Synergies between low-salinity water flooding, nanoparticles and surfactants in enhanced oil recovery a review. ACS Omega 10(29), 31216–31261 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mahdavi, M. S. & Dehaghani, A. H. S. Experimental study on the simultaneous effect of smart water and clay particles on the stability of asphaltene molecule and emulsion phase. Sci. Rep. 15(1), 3393. (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Balavi, A., Ayatollahi, S. & Mahani, H. The simultaneous effect of brine salinity and dispersed carbonate particles on asphaltene and emulsion stability. Energy Fuels 37(8), 5827–5840 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Zhou, Q. et al. Synergistic effects of asphaltenes, kaolinite, and water chemistry on oil-water emulsion stability,. Sep. Purif. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2025.133461 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wang, Y. et al. Surfactant induced reservoir wettability alteration: Recent theoretical and experimental advances in enhanced oil recovery. Pet. Sci. 8(4), 463–476 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Cheng, Z. et al. Experimental investigation on the interfacial characteristics of tight oil rocks induced by tuning brine chemistry. ACS Omega 9(28), 30654–30664 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Mahdavi, M. S., Mansouri, A. T. & Dehaghani, A. H. S. Experimental investigation of CTAB modified clay on oil recovery and emulsion behavior in low salinity water flooding. Sci. Rep. 15(1), 21471. (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Taheri-Shakib, J., Esfandiarian, A., Rajabi-Kochi, M., Kazemzadeh, E. & Afkhami Karaei, M. Evaluation of rock and fluid intermolecular interaction between asphaltene and sand minerals using electrochemical, analytical spectroscopy and microscopy techniques. Sci. Rep. 14(1), 670 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Taheri-Shakib, J., Saadati, N., Esfandiarian, A., Hosseini, S. A. & Rajabi-Kochi, M. Characterizing the wax-asphaltene interaction and surface morphology using analytical spectroscopy and microscopy techniques. Journal of Molecular Liquids 302, 112506 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Zojaji, I., Esfandiarian, A. & Taheri-Shakib, J. Toward molecular characterization of asphaltene from different origins under different conditions by means of FT-IR spectroscopy. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 289, 102314 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Sui, Y. et al. Application, progress, and trend of thickened acid fracturing in carbonate rock reservoir development,. Processes 12(10), 2269 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Badizad, M. H. et al. Ion-specific interactions at calcite–brine interfaces: A nano-scale study of the surface charge development and preferential binding of polar hydrocarbons. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 22(48), 27999–28011 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Farhadi, H., Ayatollahi, S. & Fatemi, M. The effect of brine salinity and oil components on dynamic IFT behavior of oil-brine during low salinity water flooding: Diffusion coefficient, EDL establishment time, and IFT reduction rate. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 196, 107862 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wang, G.-D. et al. Structural determinants of asphaltenes behavior: Heteroatom-driven aggregation dynamics and viscosity enhancement in heavy oil systems,. Pet. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2025.07.025 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Joonaki, E., Buckman, J., Burgass, R. & Tohidi, B. Water versus asphaltenes; liquid–liquid and solid–liquid molecular interactions unravel the mechanisms behind an improved oil recovery methodology. Sci. Rep. 9 (1), 11369 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Lashkarbolooki, M. & Ayatollahi, S. Effect of asphaltene and resin on interfacial tension of acidic crude oil/sulfate aqueous solution: Experimental study. Fluid. Phase. Equilibria. 414, 149–155 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Lashkarbolooki, M., Riazi, M., Ayatollahi, S. & Hezave, A. Z. Synergy effects of ions, resin, and asphaltene on interfacial tension of acidic crude oil and low–high salinity brines,. Fuel 165, 75–85 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Lashkarbolooki, M., Riazi, M., Hajibagheri, F. & Ayatollahi, S. Low salinity injection into asphaltenic-carbonate oil reservoir, mechanistical study. J. Mol. Liq. 216, 377–386 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Liu, D. et al. Synergetic effect of resins and asphaltenes on water/oil interfacial properties and emulsion stability. Fuel 252, 581–588 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Shi, Q. et al. Characterization of heteroatom compounds in a crude oil and its saturates, aromatics, resins, and asphaltenes (SARA) and non-basic nitrogen fractions analyzed by negative-ion electrospray ionization Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. Energy Fuels. 24 (4), 2545–2553 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Tajikmansori, A., Dehaghani, A. H. S., Sadeghnejad, S. & Haghighi, M. New insights into effect of the electrostatic properties on the interfacial behavior of asphaltene and resin: An experimental study of molecular structure. J. Mol. Liq. 377, 121526 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Chukwudeme, E. & Hamouda, A. Oil recovery from polar components (asphaltene and SA) treated chalk rocks by low salinity water and water containing SO42 – and Mg2 + at different temperatures. Colloids Surf., A. 336, 1–3 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Ilyin, S. et al. Asphaltenes in heavy crude oil: Designation, precipitation, solutions, and effects on viscosity. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 147, 211–217 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Wang, Q. et al. Microstructure of heavy oil components and mechanism of influence on viscosity of heavy oil. ACS. Omega 8(12), 10980–10990 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Mohammadi, A. & Keradeh, M. P. Exploring the effect of relaxation time, natural surfactant, and potential determining ions (Ca2+, Mg2+, and SO42−) on the dynamic interfacial tension behavior of model oil-brine systems. Heliyon https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29247 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU) for funding this research work (grant number IMSIU-DDRSP2603).

Funding

This work was supported and funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU) (grant number IMSIU-DDRSP2603).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Engineering, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, 11432, Saudi Arabia

    Zakarya Ahmed

  2. Advanced Technical College, University of Warith Al-Anbiyaa, Karbala, Iraq

    Ali B. M. Ali

  3. Department: Surface Well Testing & Evaluation, National Energy Service Reunited Corp.(NESR), Dammam, 31463, Saudi Arabia

    Zarawar Khan

  4. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering & Technology, GLA University, Mathura, 281406, U.P, India

    Pradeep Kumar Singh

  5. Architectural Engineering Department, College of Engineering, UAE University, Al Ain, UAE

    Omar J. AlKhatib

  6. Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, 11432, Saudi Arabia

    Karim Kriaa

  7. University College, Korea University, Seoul, 02481, South Korea

    Ibrahim Mahariq

  8. Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan

    Ibrahim Mahariq

  9. Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia

    Mahidzal Dahari

Authors
  1. Zakarya Ahmed
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ali B. M. Ali
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zarawar Khan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pradeep Kumar Singh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Omar J. AlKhatib
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Karim Kriaa
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ibrahim Mahariq
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mahidzal Dahari
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Z. A: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Funding Acquisition, Writing – Original Draft, Writing – Review & EditingA. B. M. A: Conceptualization, Software, Investigation, Validation, Writing – Original Draft, Writing – Review & EditingZ. K: Formal Analysis, Resources, Validation, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft, Writing – Review & EditingP. K. S: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – Review & EditingO. J. A: Formal Analysis, Resources, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft, Writing – Review & EditingK. K: Methodology, Software, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft, Writing – Review & EditingI. M: Resources, Data Curation, Supervision, Project Administration, Writing – Original Draft, Writing – Review & EditingM. D: Resources, Methodology, Supervision, Project Administration, Writing – Original Draft, Writing – Review & Editing.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ibrahim Mahariq or Mahidzal Dahari.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmed, Z., Ali, A.B.M., Khan, Z. et al. Control of sludge formation during acidizing through the investigation of acid and oil interactions and emulsion behavior in heavy oils using low salinity water. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44381-z

Download citation

  • Received: 21 November 2025

  • Accepted: 11 March 2026

  • Published: 09 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44381-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Acidizing
  • Emulsion stability
  • Asphaltene molecular structure
  • Smart water
  • Heavy oil
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing