Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Sympatric Lepus spp. in the central Italian Alps host significantly different gut microbiotas
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 04 April 2026

Sympatric Lepus spp. in the central Italian Alps host significantly different gut microbiotas

  • Lara Marinangeli  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0007-1579-41481,2,
  • Barbara Crestanello  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1610-86921,
  • Nadine Praeg  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1531-85433,
  • Theresa Rzehak  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0002-6270-47353,
  • Julia Seeber  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0189-73774,5,
  • Paul Illmer  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3368-30153,
  • Francesco Nonnis Marzano  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5764-35152,
  • Heidi C. Hauffe  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3098-89641,6 na1 &
  • …
  • Giulio Galla  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4573-08971 na1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Ecology
  • Microbiology

Abstract

The mountain hare (Lepus timidus) is an arctic-alpine species with relictual populations in the Italian Alps, typically occurring at elevations above 2000 m a.s.l. This species is threatened by habitat loss and fragmentation, and declining snow cover due to climate warming. Moreover, as treelines shift upward, the European brown hare (L. europaeus) is expanding its distribution into areas previously dominated by the mountain hare, potentially leading to resource competition, and loss of local adaptation through hybridization and inter-specific gene flow. In particular, the consequences of sympatry on diversity and composition of prokaryote and fungal communities of the gut microbiota, which are critical to individual health, are currently unknown. Here, we compared the gut microbiota of these two hare species in an area of overlap in the central Alps by analysing fresh faecal pellets collected from Val Mazia/Matschertal, Italy along an elevational gradient (1000 to 2500 m a.s.l.). For the first time, we describe the prokaryote diversity and composition of L. timidus, and the fungal gut communities (mycobiota) of both Lepus species. Species identity was confirmed for 95 samples via mtDNA barcoding, while gut microbiota richness and composition were investigated using amplicon sequencing, targeting the V3-V4 region of the prokaryote 16S rRNA gene and fungal ITS2 regions. Distinct prokaryote and fungal communities were observed for each species, even where their distributions overlap, indicating differences in their functional diversity. Interestingly, for both Lepus species, elevation influenced fungal but not prokaryote diversity. Therefore, sympatry appears to have had minimal impact on gut microbiota composition of either species thus far. Given the expected upward range shift of L. europaeus under climate warming and its continued restocking for hunting, our findings provide an important baseline for assessing the health and adaptability of L. timidus as well as the effectiveness of conservation efforts aimed at protecting this species. However, expanding this research to other areas of sympatry will be essential to understand if gut microbiota composition is indicative of L. timidus conservation status across its range.

Similar content being viewed by others

Early-life gut microbiota differentiation in sympatric wild raptors

Article Open access 04 April 2026

High-altitude mountaineering induces adaptive gut microbiome shifts associated with dietary intake and performance markers

Article Open access 27 October 2025

Profound taxonomic and functional gut microbiota alterations associated with trichuriasis: cross-country and country-specific patterns

Article Open access 21 January 2026

Data availability

Sanger sequences have been deposited at NCBI GenBank with accession numbers PX122685—PX122779. Sanger sequences of the mitochondrial D-loop generated in our study were made available to the editor and reviewers with the uploaded file: Submission2992130.txt.gz. The raw amplicon-sequencing data has been deposited at NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the BioProject ID PRJNA1304890. Reviewers can access BioProject and associated SRA metadata at [https://dataview.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/object/PRJNA1304890?reviewer=rsuoanlfj6uo274kij1dik96rn].

References

  1. Lenoir, J., Gégout, J. C., Marquet, P. A., de Ruffray, P. & Brisse, H. A significant upward shift in plant species optimum elevation during the 20th century. Science 320, 1768–1771 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Harsch, M. A., Hulme, P. E., McGlone, M. S. & Duncan, R. P. Are treelines advancing? A global meta-analysis of treeline response to climate warming. Ecol. Lett. 12, 1040–1049 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Noce, S., Cipriano, C. & Santini, M. Altitudinal shifting of major forest tree species in Italian mountains under climate change. Front. For. Glob. Change 6, 1250651. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1250651 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hickling, R., Roy, D. B., Hill, J. K., Fox, R. & Thomas, C. D. The distributions of a wide range of taxonomic groups are expanding polewards. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 450–455 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Popy, S., Bordignon, L. & Prodon, R. A weak upward elevational shift in the distributions of breeding birds in the Italian Alps. J. Biogeogr. 37, 57–67 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Büntgen, U. et al. Elevational range shifts in four mountain ungulate species from the Swiss Alps. Ecosphere 8, e01761. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1761 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schai-Braun, S. C., Jenny, H., Ruf, T. & Hackländer, K. Temperature increase and frost decrease driving upslope elevational range shifts in Alpine grouse and hares. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 6602–6614 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rehnus, M. Der Schneehase in den Alpen: Ein Überlebenskünstler mit ungewisser Zukunft. Bristol-Stiftung, Zürich; Haupt, Bern (2013).

  9. Stokes, A. W. et al. Altitude, latitude and climate zone as determinants of mountain hare (Lepus timidus) coat colour change. Ecol. Evol. 13, e10548. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10548 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sliwinski, K. et al. Habitat requirements of the European brown hare (Lepus europaeus Pallas 1778) in an intensively used agriculture region (Lower Saxony, Germany). BMC Ecol. 19, 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-019-0247-7 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Levänen, R., Thulin, C.-G., Spong, G. & Pohjoismäki, J. L. O. Widespread introgression of L. timidus genes into Fennoscandian brown hare populations. PLoS ONE 13, e0191790. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191790 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jansson, G. & Pehrson, Å. The recent expansion of the brown hare (Lepus europaeus) in Sweden with possible implications to the mountain hare (L. timidus). Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 53, 125–130 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  13. La Morgia, V. et al. Global warming is promoting the rapid invasion of the L. timidus range by the European hare in the Alps. Biodivers. Conserv. 32, 3875–3891 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Edwards, J. E. et al. Domesticated equine species and their derived hybrids differ in their fecal microbiota. Anim. Microbiome 2, 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-020-00027-7 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wei, L. et al. Hybridization altered the gut microbiota of pigs. Front. Microbiol. 14, 1177947. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1177947 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rowland, I. et al. Gut microbiota functions: Metabolism of nutrients and other food components. Eur. J. Nutr. 57, 1–24 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sittipo, P. et al. The function of gut microbiota in immune-related neurological disorders: A review. J. Neuroinflammation 19, 154. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-022-02510-1 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kasarello, K., Cudnoch-Jędrzejewska, A. & Czarzasta, K. Communication of gut microbiota and brain via immune and neuroendocrine signaling. Front. Microbiol. 14, 1118529. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1118529 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Moeller, A. H. et al. Experimental evidence for adaptation to species-specific gut microbiota in house mice. mSphere 4, e00387-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00387-19 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hauffe, H. C. & Barelli, C. Conserve the germs: The gut microbiota and adaptive potential. Conserv. Genet. 20, 19–27 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rojas, C. A., Ramírez-Barahona, S., Holekamp, K. E. & Theis, K. R. Host phylogeny and host ecology structure the mammalian gut microbiota at different taxonomic scales. Anim. Microbiome 3, 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-021-00094-4 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Neha, S. A., Hanson, J. D., Wilkinson, J. E., Bradley, R. D. & Phillips, C. D. Impacts of host phylogeny, diet, and geography on the gut microbiome of rodents. PLoS ONE 20, e0316101. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316101 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Barelli, C. et al. The gut microbiota communities of wild arboreal and ground-feeding tropical primates are affected differently by habitat disturbance. mSystems 5, e00061-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00061-20 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Amato, K. R. et al. The gut microbiota appears to compensate for seasonal diet variation in the wild black howler monkey (Alouatta pigra). Microb. Ecol. 69, 434–443 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stalder, G. L. et al. Gut microbiota of the European brown hare (Lepus europaeus). Sci. Rep. 9, 2738. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39638-9 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang, L., Zhan, H., Xu, W., Yan, S. & Ng, S. C. The role of gut mycobiome in health and diseases. Therap. Adv. Gastroenterol. 14, 17562848211047130. https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848211047130 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zandonai, A. et al. Six years of high-resolution climatic data collected along an elevation gradient in the Italian Alps. Sci. Data 11, 751. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03580-x (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hilpold, A. et al. Decline of rare and specialist species across multiple taxonomic groups after grassland intensification and abandonment. Biodivers. Conserv. 27, 3729–3744 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Praeg, N., Pauli, H. & Illmer, P. Microbial diversity in bulk and rhizosphere soil of Ranunculus glacialis along a high-alpine altitudinal gradient. Front. Microbiol. 10, 1429. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01429 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Galla, G. et al. Mock community as an in situ positive control for amplicon sequencing of microbiotas from the same ecosystem. Sci. Rep. 13, 4056. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30916-1 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wilkinson, G. S. & Chapman, A. M. Length and sequence variation in evening bat D-loop mtDNA. Genetics 128, 607–617 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Melo-Ferreira, J. et al. The rise and fall of Lepus timidus during Pleistocene glaciations: Expansion and retreat with hybridization in the Iberian Peninsula. Mol. Ecol. 16, 605–618 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pecchioli, E. Variabilità e struttura genetica in Lepus timidus: aspetti micro e macrogeografici, filogenetici e adattativi (Unpublished PhD thesis, Università degli Studi di Ferrara) (2010).

  34. Zachos, F. E., Ben Slimen, H., Hackländer, K., Giacometti, M. & Suchentrunk, F. Regional genetic in situ differentiation despite phylogenetic heterogeneity in Alpine Lepus timidus. J. Zool. 282, 47–53 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1547–1549 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Klindworth, A. et al. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e1 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Walters, W. et al. Improved prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene (V4 and V4-5) and fungal internal transcribed spacer marker gene primers for microbial community surveys. mSystems 1, e00009-15. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00009-15 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ihrmark, K. et al. New primers to amplify the fungal ITS2 region – Evaluation by 454-sequencing of artificial and natural communities. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 82, 666–677 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  39. White, T. J., Bruns, T., Lee, S. & Taylor, J. Amplification and Direct Sequencing of Fungal Ribosomal RNA Genes for Phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications (eds Innis, M. A. et al.) 315–322 (Academic Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nilsson, R. H. et al. The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi: Handling dark taxa and parallel taxonomic classifications. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D259–D264 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bodenhofer, U., Bonatesta, E., Horejs-Kainrath, C. & Hochreiter, S. Msa: An R package for multiple sequence alignment. Bioinformatics 31, 3997–3999 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Schliep, K. P. Phangorn: Phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 27, 592–593 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Davis, N. M., Proctor, D. M., Holmes, S. P., Relman, D. A. & Callahan, B. J. Simple statistical identification and removal of contaminant sequences in marker-gene and metagenomics data. Microbiome 6, 226. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0605-2 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  46. McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. Phyloseq: An R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE 8, e61217. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061217 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Liu, C., Cui, Y., Li, X. & Yao, M. microeco: An R package for data mining in microbial community ecology. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 97, fiaa255 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer-Verlag, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Neuwirth, E. RColorBrewer: ColorBrewer Palettes. R package version 1.1-3, Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RColorBrewer (2022).

  50. Garnier, S. et al. viridis(Lite)—Colorblind-Friendly Color Maps for R. R package version 0.6.5. Available at: https://sjmgarnier.github.io/viridis/ (2024).

  51. Segata, N. et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 12, R60. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.6–4, Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan (2022).

  53. Douglas, G. M. et al. PICRUSt2 for prediction of metagenome functions. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 685–688 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Metsalu, T. & Vilo, J. ClustVis: A web tool for visualizing clustering of multivariate data using Principal Component Analysis and heatmap. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, W566–W570 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  55. The GIMP Development Team. GIMP (Version 2.10.18) [Computer software]. https://www.gimp.org (2020).

  56. Tuddenham, S. & Sears, C. L. The intestinal microbiome and health. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 28, 464–470 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Zhan, G. et al. Abnormal gut microbiota composition contributes to cognitive dysfunction in SAMP8 mice. Aging 10, 1257–1267. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.101464 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Martínez-Haro, M., Triadó-Margarit, X., Mateo, R., Viñuela, J. A. & Casamayor, E. O. Taxonomic and functional fingerprints in the gut microbiota of Iberian hare populations (Lepus granatensis) inhabiting areas with organic and conventional farming. Environ. Pollut. 369, 125862 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Stothart, M. R. et al. Population dynamics and the microbiome in a wild boreal mammal: The snowshoe hare cycle and impacts of diet, season and predation risk. Mol. Ecol. 34, e17629. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.17629 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Cao, Z. et al. Comparison and association of winter diets and gut microbiota using trnL and 16S rRNA gene sequencing for three herbivores in Taohongling, China. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 53, e03041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03041 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Koskella, B. & Bergelson, J. The study of host–microbiome (co)evolution across levels of selection. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 375, 20190604 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Bock, A. Lepus europaeus (Lagomorpha: Leporidae). Mamm. Species 52, 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1093/mspecies/seaa010 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Angerbjörn, A. & Flux, J. E. C. Lepus timidus. Mamm. Species 495, 1–11 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Ley, R. E. et al. Evolution of mammals and their gut microbes. Science 320, 1647–1651 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Knowles, S. C. L., Eccles, R. M. & Baltrūnaitė, L. Species identity dominates over environment in shaping the microbiota of small mammals. Ecol. Lett. 22, 826–837 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Anders, J. L. et al. Comparing the gut microbiome along the gastrointestinal tract of three sympatric species of wild rodents. Sci. Rep. 11, 19929. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99379-6 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Reichlin, T., Klansek, E. & Hackländer, K. Diet selection by hares (Lepus europaeus) in arable land and its implications for habitat management. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 52, 109–118 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Schai-Braun, S. C. et al. The European hare (Lepus europaeus): A picky herbivore searching for plant parts rich in fat. PLoS ONE 10, e0134278. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134278 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Schai-Braun, S. C. et al. Diet niches of the Alpine Lepus timidus (Lepus timidus varronis) and European hare (Lepus europaeus) living in coexistence in the Alps. Mamm. Biol. 105, 139–145 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  70. David, L. A. et al. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature 505, 559–563 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Carmody, R. N. et al. Diet dominates host genotype in shaping the murine gut microbiota. Cell Host Microbe 17, 72–84 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Alessandri, G., Rizzo, S. M., Ossiprandi, M. C., van Sinderen, D. & Ventura, M. Creating an atlas to visualize the biodiversity of the mammalian gut microbiota. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 73, 28–33 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Zoetendal, E. G. & de Vos, W. M. Effect of diet on the intestinal microbiota and its activity. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 30, 189–195 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Sommer, F. et al. The gut microbiota modulates energy metabolism in the hibernating brown bear Ursus arctos. Cell Rep. 14, 1655–1661 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Xu, Z. et al. Cold-induced lipid dynamics and transcriptional programs in white adipose tissue. BMC Biol. 17, 74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-019-0693-x (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Vázquez-Baeza, Y. et al. Dog and human inflammatory bowel disease rely on overlapping yet distinct dysbiosis networks. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16177 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Lupp, C. et al. Host-mediated inflammation disrupts the intestinal microbiota and promotes the overgrowth of Enterobacteriaceae. Cell Host Microbe 2, 119–129 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Shin, N. R., Whon, T. W. & Bae, J.-W. Proteobacteria: Microbial signature of dysbiosis in gut microbiota. Trends Biotechnol. 33, 496–503 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Praeg, N. et al. The role of land management and elevation in shaping soil microbial communities: Insights from the Central European Alps. Soil Biol. Biochem. 150, 107951 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Mouhamadou, B. et al. Differences in fungal communities associated to Festuca paniculata roots in subalpine grasslands. Fungal Divers. 47, 55–63 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Irwin, N. A., Twynstra, C. S., Mathur, V. & Keeling, P. J. The molecular phylogeny of Chionaster nivalis reveals a novel order of psychrophilic and globally distributed Tremellomycetes (Fungi, Basidiomycota). PLoS ONE 16, e0247594. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247594 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Stoppiello, G. A. et al. Seasonality is the main determinant of microbial diversity associated to snow/ice around Concordia station on the Antarctic polar plateau. Biology 12, 1193. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12091193 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Kurtzman, C. P., Fell, J. W. & Boekhout, T. The Yeasts: A Taxonomic Study. Fifth Edition (2011).

  84. Olsen, L., Thum, E. & Rohner, N. Lipid metabolism in adaptation to extreme nutritional challenges. Dev. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2021.02.024 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Bauer, R., Begerow, D. & Oberwinkler, F. Ustilaginomycotina: The true smut fungi. Tree of Life Web Project Available at: http://tolweb.org/Ustilaginomycotina/20530/2008.01.23 (2006).

  86. Murphy, M. A., Waits, L. E. & Kendall, K. C. Quantitative evaluation of fecal drying methods for brown bear DNA analysis. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 28, 951–957 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Elyasigorji, Z., Izadpanah, M., Hadi, F. & Zare, M. Mitochondrial genes as strong molecular markers for species identification. Nucleus 66, 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13237-022-00393-4 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Thulin, C.-G., Stone, J., Tegelström, H. & Walker, C. W. Species assignment and hybrid identification among Scandinavian hares Lepus europaeus and L. timidus. Wildl. Biol. 12, 29–38 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Schai-Braun, S. C., Schwienbacher, S., Smith, S. & Hackländer, K. Coexistence of European hares and Alpine mountain hares in the Alps: What drives the occurrence and frequency of their hybrids?. J. Zool. 320(1), 15–25 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Wang, J. et al. Analysis of intestinal microbiota in hybrid house mice reveals evolutionary divergence in a vertebrate hologenome. Nat. Commun. 6, 6440. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7440 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Huggett, M. J. et al. Gut microbial communities of hybridising pygmy angelfishes reflect species boundaries. Commun. Biol. 6, 542 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Wei, L. et al. Hybridization alters red deer gut microbiome and metabolites. Front. Microbiol. 15, 1387957 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Suzuki, T. A., Martins, F. M. & Nachman, M. W. Altitudinal variation of the gut microbiota in wild house mice. Mol. Ecol. 28, 2378 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Li, H., Zhou, R., Zhu, J., Huang, X. & Qu, J. Environmental filtering increases with elevation for the assembly of gut microbiota in wild pikas. Microb. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13450 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Wang, X. et al. High-altitude drives the convergent evolution of alpha diversity and indicator microbiota in the gut microbiomes of ungulates. Front. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.953234 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Zhao, J. et al. Diet and high altitude strongly drive convergent adaptation of gut microbiota in wild macaques, humans, and dogs to high altitude environments. Front. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1067240 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Perrotti, A. G. & van Asperen, E. Dung fungi as a proxy for megaherbivores: Opportunities and limitations for archaeological applications. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 28, 93–104 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  98. Tang, X. et al. Stochastic processes derive gut fungi community assembly of plateau pikas (Ochotona curzoniae) along altitudinal gradients across warm and cold seasons. J. Fungi. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9101032 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  99. Auchtung, T. A. et al. Investigating colonization of the healthy adult gastrointestinal tract by fungi. mSphere https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00092-18 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  100. Suhr, M. J. & Hallen-Adams, H. E. The human gut mycobiome: Pitfalls and potentials—A mycologist’s perspective. Mycologia 107, 1057–1073 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  101. Li, J. et al. Pattern and drivers of soil fungal community along elevation gradient in the Abies georgei forests of Segila mountains, Southeast Tibet. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 39, e02446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02291 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  102. Vélez-Martínez, G. A. et al. Soil bacteria and fungi communities are shaped by elevation influences in Colombian forest and páramo natural ecosystems. Int. Microbiol. 27, 377–391 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  103. Dean, R. et al. The top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 13, 414–430 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  104. Rodriguez, R. J., White, J. F. Jr., Arnold, A. E. & Redman, R. S. Fungal endophytes: Diversity and functional roles. New Phytol. 182, 314–330 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  105. Semchenko, M. et al. Fungal diversity regulates plant-soil feedbacks in temperate grassland. Sci. Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4578 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  106. Grieneisen, L. E. et al. Genes, geology and germs: Gut microbiota across a primate hybrid zone are explained by site soil properties, not host species. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 286, 20190431 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  107. Banerjee, S. & van der Heijden, M. G. A. Soil microbiomes and one health. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 21, 6–20 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Fondazione E. Mach for access to facilities, and the staff of the Sequencing and Genotyping Platform for their outstanding support.

Funding

The EUREGIO project: MICROVALU—Evaluating microbiodiversity in alpine pastures (Project ID: IPN94), awarded to PI, JS and HCH, was funded by the “Euregio Tirolo-Alto Adige-Trentino” Interregional Project Network. This study was also partially carried out with funding to HCH at the Fondazione E. Mach (Project BIOALPEC) under the National Biodiversity Future Centre (NBFC) Project (code CN_00000033, Concession Decree No. 1034 of 17 June 2022 adopted by the Italian Ministry of University and Research, CUPD43C22001280006), funded under the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP), Mission 4 Component 2 Investment 1.4—Call for tender No. 3138 of 16 December 2021, rectified by Decree n.3175 of 18 December 2021 of Italian Ministry of University and Research funded by the European Union—NextGenerationEU. This manuscript reflects only the authors’ views and opinions, neither the European Union nor the European Commission can be considered responsible for them.

Author information

Author notes
  1. Heidi C. Hauffe and Giulio Galla contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Conservation Genomics Research Unit, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, S. Michele all’Adige, Italy

    Lara Marinangeli, Barbara Crestanello, Heidi C. Hauffe & Giulio Galla

  2. Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parma, Italy

    Lara Marinangeli & Francesco Nonnis Marzano

  3. Department of Microbiology, Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

    Nadine Praeg, Theresa Rzehak & Paul Illmer

  4. Institute for Alpine Environment, EURAC Research, Bozen, Italy

    Julia Seeber

  5. Department of Ecology, Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

    Julia Seeber

  6. National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), Palermo, Italy

    Heidi C. Hauffe

Authors
  1. Lara Marinangeli
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Barbara Crestanello
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nadine Praeg
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Theresa Rzehak
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Julia Seeber
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Paul Illmer
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Francesco Nonnis Marzano
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Heidi C. Hauffe
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Giulio Galla
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

B.C., H.C.H., and G.G. conducted the sampling. L.M., B.C. and G.G. completed the laboratory analyses. Data analyses were provided by L.M. and G.G., with support from N.P., T.R., J.S., P.I. and F.N.M.; L.M., H.C.H. and G.G. drafted the manuscript. All authors edited and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heidi C. Hauffe.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Material 2 (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marinangeli, L., Crestanello, B., Praeg, N. et al. Sympatric Lepus spp. in the central Italian Alps host significantly different gut microbiotas. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44592-4

Download citation

  • Received: 14 August 2025

  • Accepted: 12 March 2026

  • Published: 04 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44592-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Lepus europaeus
  • Lepus timidus
  • Metataxonomy
  • mtDNA
  • 16S rRNA gene
  • ITS2
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology