Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Syninclusions reveal “ant mosaic” in the Eocene amber forest
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 23 March 2026

Syninclusions reveal “ant mosaic” in the Eocene amber forest

  • Dmitry M. Zharkov  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1204-13041,
  • Dmitry A. Dubovikoff  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0931-62771,
  • Vadim M. Khaitov  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5567-85541,2 &
  • …
  • Evgeny V. Abakumov  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5248-90181 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 851 Accesses

  • 3 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Ecology
  • Evolution

Abstract

Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) are key ecosystem engineers in modern terrestrial environments, where their communities are structured by competition, niche partitioning, and dominance hierarchies. Whether such complex organisation existed deep in geological time remains unclear due to the rarity of direct fossil evidence for species co-occurrence. Here, we analyze eusyninclusions — fossilized assemblages comprising several ant species preserved together within individual pieces of Baltic amber from the late Eocene (~ 34–38 Ma). Among 3246 fossil ant specimens examined, we identify 110 eusyninclusions. Eocene ant assemblages show a strong prevalence of negative co-occurrence patterns, indicating non-random, competitively structured communities consistent with a deep-time ant mosaic. Two dominant species, †Ctenobethylus goepperti (Mayr, 1868) and †Lasius schiefferdeckeri Mayr, 1868, anchor distinct interaction clusters reflecting divergent ecological strategies. †C. goepperti exhibits low interspecific co-occurrence and high dominance, consistent with a territorial arboreal lifestyle, whereas †L. schiefferdeckeri displays frequent associations and a broader ecological tolerance, indicating a eurytopic subordinate role. Our results provide the first empirical evidence that ant mosaic–like community organisation was already established in the Eocene. These results highlight the deep evolutionary roots of ant community organisation and underscore the importance of preserving habitat structural complexity in the face of modern global warming.

Data availability

The empirical data and codes for the study are uploaded in Zenodo and can be accessed https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18379116.

References

  1. Hallmann, C. A. et al. More than 75% decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas. PLoS ONE. 12 (10), e0185809 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Seibold, S. et al. Arthropod decline in grasslands and forests is associated with landscape-level drivers. Nature 574, 671–674 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kiessling, W., Smith, J. A. & Raja, N. B. Improving the relevance of paleontology to climate change policy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 120 (7) e2201926119 (2023).

  4. Kaufman, D., Masson-Delmotte, V. & Opinion Distribute paleoscience information across the next Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports. Clim. Past. 20, 2587–2594 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Allen, K. J., Gouramanis, C. & Sauchyn, D. Paleo-data is policy relevant: How do we better incorporate it in policy and decision making? Global Planet. Change. 246, 104707 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dimitrijević, D., Santodomingo, N. & Kiessling, W. Reef refugia in the aftermath of past episodes of global warming. Coral Reefs. 43, 1431–1442 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Reddin, C. J. et al. Marine species and assemblage change foreshadowed by their thermal bias over Early Jurassic warming. Nat. Commun. 16, 1370 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Weiss, A. M. et al. Shallow-marine, benthic ecosystems show compositional shifts in response to the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM) on the Adriatic Carbonate Platform. Paleoceanogr Paleoclimatol. 40, e2024PA005039 (2025).

  9. Inglis, G. N. et al. Global mean surface temperature and climate sensitivity of the early Eocene Climatic Optimum (EECO), Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM), and latest Paleocene. Clim. Past. 16 (5), 1953–1968 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Weitschat, W. & Wichard, W. Chapter 6. Baltic Amber. In Biodiversity of Fossils in Amber from the Major World Deposits (ed. Penney, D.), 80–115 (2010).

  11. Dlussky, G. M. & Rasnitsyn, A. P. Paleontological record and stages of ant evolution. [In Russian]. Usp Sovrem Biol. 127, 118–134 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Blüthgen, N. & Stork, N. E. Ant mosaics in a tropical rainforest in Australia and elsewhere: a critical review. Austral Ecol. 32, 93–104 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Janda, M. & Konecna, M. Canopy assemblages of ants in a New Guinea rain forest. J. Trop. Ecol. 27, 83–91 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mottl, O. et al. Inter-specific aggression generates ant mosaics in canopies of primary tropical rainforest. Oikos 130, 1088–1099 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Griffiths, H. M. Ants are the major agents of resource removal from tropical rainforests. Anim. Ecol. 87 (1), 293–300 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lapolla, J. S., Dlussky, G. M. & Perrichot, V. Ants and the fossil record. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 58, 609–630 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Coty, D. et al. The first ant-termite syninclusion in amber with CT-scan analysis of taphonomy. PLoS One. 9, e104410 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Barden, P., Perrichot, V. & Wang, B. Specialized Predation Drives Aberrant Morphological Integration and Diversity in the Earliest Ants. Curr. Biol. 30, 3818–3824 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Peñalver, E. et al. Ticks parasitised feathered dinosaurs as revealed by Cretaceous amber assemblages. Nat. Commun. 8, 1924 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Belokobylskij, S. A. et al. Braconid parasitoids of ants (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Euphorinae, Neoneurini) from Baltic amber with a discussion of records of fossil larvae parasitizing ant workers. J. Hymenopt Res. 84, 29–43 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  21. LaPolla, J. S. Ancient trophophoresy: a fossil Acropyga from Dominican amber. T Am. Entomol. Soc. 131, 21–28 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Archibald, S. B. & Farrell, B. D. Wheeler’s dilemma. Acta Zool. Cracov. (Fossil Insects Suppl). 46, 17–23 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zharkov, D. M. & Dubovikoff, D. A. New eusyninclusions of ants in European Late Eocene ambers in a view of palaeoecological data. Euroasian Entomol. J. 23, 247–251 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Solórzano-Kraemer, M. M. et al. Necrophagy by insects in Oculudentavis and other lizard body fossils preserved in Cretaceous amber. Sci. Rep. 13, 2907 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Griffith, D. M., Veech, J. A. & Marsh, C. J. Probabilistic species co-occurrence analysis in R. J. Stat. Softw. 69, 1–17 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Baroni Urbani, C. & De Andrade, M. L. The ant tribe Dacetini: limits and constituent genera, with descriptions of new species (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Ann. Mus. Civ. Stor Nat. G Doria. 99, 1–191 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Richter, A. et al. Wonderfully weird: the head anatomy of the armadillo ant, Tatuidris tatusia (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Agroecomyrmecinae), with evolutionary implications. Myrmecol News. 33, 35–75 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Boudinot, B. E., Borowiec, M. L. & Prebus, M. M. Phylogeny, evolution, and classification of the ant genus Lasius, the tribe Lasiini and the subfamily Formicinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Syst. Entomol. 47, 113–151 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wheeler, W. M. The ants of the Baltic Amber. Schriften der Physikalisch-Ökonomischen Gesellschaft zu Königsberg. 55, 1–142 (1915).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Borowiec, L. & Salata, S. A monographic review of ants of Greece (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Vol. 1. Introduction and review of all subfamilies except the subfamily Myrmicinae. Part 1: text. Natural History Monographs of the Upper Silesian Museum. 1, 1–297. (2022).

  31. Barden, P. & Grimaldi, D. Adaptive radiation in socially advanced stem-group ants from the Cretaceous. Curr. Biol. 26, 515–521 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Perrichot, V., Wang, B. & Barden, P. New remarkable hell ants (Formicidae: Haidomyrmecinae stat. nov.) from mid-Cretaceous amber of northern Myanmar. Cretac. Res. 109, 104381 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jouault, C. & Condamine, F. L. Legendre & F. Perrichot V. The Angiosperm Terrestrial Revolution buffered ants against extinction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 121(13), e2317795121. (2024).

  34. Brandão, C. R. F., Diniz, J. L. M. & Tomotake, E. M. Thaumatomyrmex strips millipedes for prey: a novel predatory behaviour in ants, and the first case of sympatry in the genus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insectes Soc. 38, 335–344 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zharkov, D., Dubovikoff, D. & Abakumov, E. Beauty or the Beast? A puzzling modification of the clypeus and mandibles on the Eocene ant. Insects 16, 794 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Dlussky, G. M. Genera of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Baltic amber. Paleontol. J. 31, 616–627 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  37. AntWeb Version 8.114., accessed 28 November ; (2025). https://www.antweb.org

  38. Csárdi, G. et al. igraph: Network analysis and visualization in R. R package version 2.1.3, (2025). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=igraph

Download references

Acknowledgements

We used Perplexity AI as a tool for generating the background image in Figure 4.

Funding

This work was supported by Saint Petersburg State University, Project No. 132392751.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. St. Petersburg State University, 7/9 Universitetskaya nab, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia

    Dmitry M. Zharkov, Dmitry A. Dubovikoff, Vadim M. Khaitov & Evgeny V. Abakumov

  2. Kandalaksha State Nature Reserve, Lineynaya 35, Kandalaksha, 184042, Russia

    Vadim M. Khaitov

Authors
  1. Dmitry M. Zharkov
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dmitry A. Dubovikoff
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vadim M. Khaitov
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Evgeny V. Abakumov
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: D.M.Z., D.A.D., V.M.K., E.V.A. Methodology: D.M.Z., D.A.D., V.M.K. Software: D.M.Z., V.M.K. Validation: D.M.Z., D.A.D., V.M.K., E.V.A. Formal analysis: D.M.Z., D.A.D. Investigation: D.M.Z., D.A.D., V.M.K., E.V.A. Data curation: D.M.Z., D.A.D. Writing— original draft: D.M.Z., D.A.D., V.M.K. Writing—review and editing: D.M.Z., D.A.D., V.M.K., E.V.A. Visualization: D.M.Z., D.A.D., V.M.K. Supervision: D.A.D., E.V.A. Project administration: D.M.Z., D.A.D., E.V.A.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dmitry M. Zharkov or Evgeny V. Abakumov.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zharkov, D.M., Dubovikoff, D.A., Khaitov, V.M. et al. Syninclusions reveal “ant mosaic” in the Eocene amber forest. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44622-1

Download citation

  • Received: 06 February 2026

  • Accepted: 12 March 2026

  • Published: 23 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44622-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene