Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
A bearing fault diagnosis method for complex system based on improved extended belief rule base
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 24 March 2026

A bearing fault diagnosis method for complex system based on improved extended belief rule base

  • XingChi Yan1 na1,
  • Ning Li1 na1,
  • ShuYin Nan1,
  • Yan Yu1 &
  • …
  • Run Dai1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 410 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Engineering
  • Mathematics and computing

Abstract

In the field of vibration monitoring for rotating machinery, high-precision bearing fault diagnosis faces challenges due to imbalanced measurement data and noise interference from complex environments. To address these issues, this paper proposes a bearing fault diagnosis method based on an ensemble undersampling extended belief rule base (EBRB-EU), aiming to improve the reliability and accuracy of equipment condition assessment. Specifically, to overcome the limitation of using Euclidean distance in EBRB, which fails to effectively capture the differences in the probability distribution of vibration signals, the paper introduces the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence to replace the Euclidean distance, providing a more accurate measure of the match between samples and rule antecedent attributes. An ensemble undersampling strategy is then employed to calibrate the training set, reducing the impact of majority class samples on model training. Subsequently, the data is divided into multiple subsets, and a set of parallel sub-EBRB models is constructed. The differential evolution algorithm is used to optimize the parameters of each sub-model, minimizing evaluation bias. Finally, an ensemble voting mechanism is applied to integrate the diagnostic results, enhancing the accuracy of fault state identification. Experimental results demonstrate that the KL divergence-based EBRB-EU model outperforms the Euclidean distance-based EBRB method on multiple datasets, effectively alleviates the data imbalance issue, and exhibits strong resistance to interference.

Data availability

Data will be made available on request.

References

  1. Dai, X. & Gao, Z. From model, signal to knowledge: A data-driven perspective of fault detection and diagnosis[J]. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inf. 9 (4), 2226–2238. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2013.2243743 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou, J., Ren, J. & He, C. Improved medical waste plasma gasification modelling based on implicit knowledge-guided interpretable machine learning[J]. Waste Manage. (New York NY). 188, 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2024.07.035 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li, T. et al. A hierarchical object oriented Bayesian network-based fault diagnosis method for building energy systems[J]. Appl. Energy. 306, 118088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118088 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dou, D. et al. A rule-based intelligent method for fault diagnosis of rotating machinery[J]. Knowl. Based Syst. 36, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2012.05.013 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ge, Z. et al. A knowledge-driven graph convolutional network for abnormal electrocardiogram diagnosis[J]. Knowl. Based Syst. 296, 111906doi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2024.111906 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, Y., Shen, F. & Ye, L. A knowledge-refined hybrid graph model for quality prediction of industrial processes[J]. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 139, 109711doi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109711 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guo, L. et al. A knowledge-driven spatial-temporal graph neural network for quality-related fault detection[J]. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 184, 1512–1524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2024.02.070 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, L. & Zhao, W. An ensemble deep learning network based on 2D convolutional neural network and 1D LSTM with self-attention for bearing fault diagnosis[J]. Appl. Soft Comput. 172, 112889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2025.112889 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zheng, B. et al. An unsupervised transfer learning method based on SOCNN and FBNN and its application on bearing fault diagnosis[J]. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 208, 111047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.111047 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cui, L. et al. A self-attention based contrastive learning method for bearing fault diagnosis[J]. Expert Syst. Appl. 238, 121645doi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121645 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cui, L. et al. A novel adaptive generalized domain data fusion-driven kernel sparse representation classification method for intelligent bearing fault diagnosis[J]. Expert Syst. Appl. 247, 123225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123225 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Xiang, Q. et al. ISONet: Reforming 1DCNN for aero-engine system inter-shaft bearing fault diagnosis via input spatial over-parameterization[J]. Expert Syst. Appl. 277, 127248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127248 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kulevome, D. K. B. et al. Effective time-series data augmentation with analytic wavelets for bearing fault diagnosis[J]. Expert Syst. Appl. 249, 123536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123536 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kumar, P. et al. Multi-size wide kernel convolutional neural network for bearing fault diagnosis[J]. Adv. Eng. Softw. 198, 103799doi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2024.103799 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, Z. et al. Few-shot fault diagnosis for machinery using multi-scale perception multi-level feature fusion image quadrant entropy. Adv. Eng. Inform. 63, 102972doi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2024.102972 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, Z. et al. Multi-modal multi-scale multi-level fusion quadrant entropy for mechanical fault diagnosis. Expert Syst. Appl. 281, 127715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127715 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, Z. et al. A generalized fault diagnosis framework for rotating machinery based on phase entropy. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 256, 110745doi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110745 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Li, J. et al. Cross-domain adaptation fault diagnosis with maximum classifier discrepancy and deep feature alignment under variable working conditions[J]. IEEE Trans. Reliab. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2025.3551155 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yao, R. et al. Parallel convolutional transfer network for bearing fault diagnosis under varying operation states[J]. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2024.3480212 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Deng, W., Guan, H. & Zhao, H. Parameterized Iterative Time-Frequency-Multisqueezing Transform for Bearing Fault Diagnosis[J]. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2025.3561399 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Deng, W. et al. Robust dual-model collaborative broad learning system for classification under label noise environments[J]. IEEE Internet Things J. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2025.3545741 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, J. et al. Source-free domain adaptation for cross-domain remaining useful life prediction: A distributed federated learning perspective[J]. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 112271 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2026.112271 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, J. et al. Remaining useful life prediction based on self-attention mechanism-sequential variational autoencoder: From a semi-supervised perspective. Adv. Eng. Inform. 71, 104242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2025.104242 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, J. et al. A transferable topology-aware graph pooling network for remaining useful life prediction under cross-domain conditions[J]. IEEE Trans. Reliab. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2025.3643102 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yang, Q. et al. Hybrid data-driven and model-informed online tool wear detection in milling machines[J]. J. Manuf. Syst. 63, 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.04.001 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shen, S. et al. A physics-informed deep learning approach for bearing fault detection[J]. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 103, 104295doi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104295 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Li, H. et al. An interpretable waveform segmentation model for bearing fault diagnosis[J]. Adv. Eng. Inform. 61, 102480doi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2024.102480 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Liao, J. X. et al. Classifier-guided neural blind deconvolution: A physics-informed denoising module for bearing fault diagnosis under noisy conditions[J]. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 222, 111750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111750 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Russell, M. & Wang, P. Physics-informed deep learning for signal compression and reconstruction of big data in industrial condition monitoring[J]. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 168, 108709doi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108709 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lee, S. et al. Revolution and peak discrepancy-based domain alignment method for bearing fault diagnosis under very low-speed conditions[J]. Expert Syst. Appl. 251, 124084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124084 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Qin, Y. et al. Inverse physics–informed neural networks for digital twin–based bearing fault diagnosis under imbalanced samples[J]. Knowl. Based Syst. 292, 111641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2024.111641 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yang, J. B. & Xu, D. L. Evidential reasoning rule for evidence combination[J]. Artif. Intell. 205, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2013.09.003 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zimmermann, H. J. Fuzzy set theory[J]. Wiley Interdiscip Rev. Comput. Stat. 2 (3), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.82 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cheng, X. et al. A model for flywheel fault diagnosis based on fuzzy fault tree analysis and belief rule base[J]. Machines 10 (2), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines10020073 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yin, X. et al. A new interpretable belief rule base model with step-length convergence strategy for aerospace relay health state assessment[J]. Sci. Rep. 13 (1), 14066. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41305-z (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kong, G. et al. A belief rule-based decision support system for clinical risk assessment of cardiac chest pain[J]. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 219 (3), 564–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.10.044 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Deng, Q. et al. A new health state assessment method for complex systems based on approximate belief rule base with attribute reliability[J]. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3490701 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Liu, J. et al. A novel belief rule base representation, generation and its inference methodology[J]. Knowl. Based Syst. 53, 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.08.019 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Li, J. et al. A novel classification method based on an online extended belief rule base with a human-in-the-loop strategy[J]. Appl. Intell. 55 (7), 586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-025-06434-0 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hou, B. et al. Multi-output extended belief rule-base system and its parameter learning schemes[J]. Appl. Soft Comput. 170, 112687doi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112687 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yang, L. H. et al. A micro-extended belief rule-based system for big data multiclass classification problems[J]. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybernetics: Syst. 51 (1), 420–440. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2018.2872843 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Fu, Y. G. et al. EBRB cascade classifier for imbalanced data via rule weight updating[J]. Knowl. Based Syst. 223, 107010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107010 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ran, X. et al. A novel fuzzy system-based genetic algorithm for trajectory segment generation in urban global positioning system[J]. J. Adv. Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2025.06.007 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Dong, Y. et al. An interpretable multiscale lifting wavelet contrast network for planetary gearbox fault diagnosis with small samples[J]. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 251, 110404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110404 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zheng, X. et al. A novel empirical reconstruction Gauss decomposition method and its application in gear fault diagnosis[J]. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 210, 111174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111174 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zhang, Y. et al. Multi-modal data cross-domain fusion network for gearbox fault diagnosis under variable operating conditions[J]. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 133, 108236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108236 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported in part by Key Laboratory of Equipment Data Security and Guarantee Technology, Ministry of Education under Grant No.GDZB2024050100, in part by the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province under Grant No. PL2024G009, in part by the Basic Research Support Program for Outstanding Young Teachers in Provincial Undergraduate Universities of Heilongjiang Province under Grant No. YQJH2024116, in part by Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation under Grant No. ZR2023QF010, in part by National Science Foundation of China Grant No. 72471067.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: XingChi Yan and Ning Li.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Harbin Normal University, Harbin, 150025, China

    XingChi Yan, Ning Li, ShuYin Nan, Yan Yu & Run Dai

Authors
  1. XingChi Yan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ning Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. ShuYin Nan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yan Yu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Run Dai
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

**XingChi Yan** : Writing – original draft, Software, Methodology, Formal analysis, Data curation.**Ning Li** : Writing – original draft, Methodology, Investigation. **ShuYin Nan** : Conceptualization, Investigation. **Yan Yu** : Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Resources. **Run Dai** : Investigation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Yu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, X., Li, N., Nan, S. et al. A bearing fault diagnosis method for complex system based on improved extended belief rule base. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44629-8

Download citation

  • Received: 07 December 2025

  • Accepted: 12 March 2026

  • Published: 24 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44629-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Class imbalance
  • Bearing fault diagnosis
  • Extended belief rule base
  • Kullback-Leibler
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics