Table 1 Analysis of laboratory-prepared mixtures of SOF and MIR using different divisors by the proposed spectrophotometric ratio method.

From: Integrating Artificial intelligence within sustainable smart analytical chemistry for analyzing the divisor impact on UV-spectrophotometric efficiency of solifenacin and mirabegron combination

No.

Concentration

(µg/mL)

Method

Constant center method

Unified constant subtraction

divisor

Normalized divisor

MIR 3.00 µg/mL

MIR 8.00 µg/mL

MIR 14.00 µg/mL

Extracted MIR

Ratio

SOF

MIR

SOF

MIR

SOF

MIR

SOF

MIR

SOF

MIR

SOF: MIR

1

2.8:14.0a

1:5

98.73

98.02

112.56

99.35

97.58

97.82

99.88

99.20

99.73

99.74

2

5.6:14.0

2:5

89.69

101.61

124.83

100.58

101.79

98.84

98.91

99.61

99.48

99.15

3

7.0:7.0

1:1

97.10

100.53

112.30

101.97

104.47

100.12

99.56

99.66

99.86

100.15

4

14.0:7.0

2:1

97.86

99.71

106.84

101.35

101.77

99.51

99.86

99.05

99.93

100.17

5

3.5:14.0

1:4

88.20

100.58

138.89

102.12

107.56

100.38

99.42

99.75

100.11

100.30

Laboratory Prepared mixturesMean % b± SD

94.32±

4.96

100.09± 1.34

119.09

±12.88

101.00

±1.14

102.63±

3.69

99.33

±1.04

99.52±0.40

 99.46±

0.31

99.82

±0.24

99.92

± 0.47

Average Bias %c

5.68

0.09

19.09

1.00

2.63

0.67

0.48

0.54

0.18

0.08

Average RSD% d

5.26

0.74

10.82

1.12

3.60

1.24

0.40

0.69

0.37

0.32

Robustness (±0.1 nm ) RSD % e

6.40

1.16

9.23

0.92

2.91

1.01

1.00

0.75

0.39

0.36

Cumulative Validation Score (CVS) f

17.34

1.99

39.14

3.04

9.14

2.92

1.88

1.98

0.94

0.76