Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Mechanism of coal mass fracture expansion under drilling and pressure relief
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 26 March 2026

Mechanism of coal mass fracture expansion under drilling and pressure relief

  • Kun Liu1,
  • Yang Liu1,
  • Cai-Ping Lu1,
  • Lu-Hao Zhou1,
  • Qi-Xiang Zhou2 &
  • …
  • Chao Wang3 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 261 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Energy science and technology
  • Engineering
  • Solid Earth sciences

Abstract

To clarify the nonlinear transformation of coal from elastic energy storage to macroscopic fracture under borehole unloading, this study develops a multistage loading–unloading experimental system, incorporates acoustic emission monitoring, and utilises techniques such as moment tensor inversion, time–frequency analysis, and stress field inversion to examine the fracture propagation mechanisms and stress response characteristics of coal. The experimental findings indicate that borehole unloading causes local stress disturbances, which significantly influenced the fracture propagation paths and failure modes, thereby governing the macro-damage evolution process. The three-stage source mechanism analysis reveals that shear failure predominates throughout, while tensile failure notably increases during the secondary loading stage, indicating stage-dependent restructuring of stress distributions within the coal. Stress field inversion results reveal that in the initial loading stage, the maximum principal stress aligns southwest–northeast. During the secondary loading stage, the stress field shifts to a southeast–northwest inclined shear-dominated configuration, promoting shear-tension coupled fracturing. Borehole diameter affects fracturing behaviour: a 10 mm-diameter borehole initiates local high-energy events that inhibit crack propagation, whereas a 12-mm-diameter borehole enables energy cascade release and chain-like destruction. Time–frequency analysis shows that shear fractures mainly concentrate at 80–90 kHz with short-term energy aggregation; tensile fractures occur at 40–50 kHz, displaying mid-frequency expansion characteristics; and compression fractures are characterised by continuous low-frequency outputs at 10–20 kHz. Through theoretical analysis, a borehole pressure relief coal elastic–plastic damage model was developed to elucidate the control mechanisms of lateral pressure coefficient, borehole diameter, and stress level on the evolution of the plastic zone. This study enhances the understanding of crack propagation mechanisms in coal subjected to drilling-induced pressure relief in mines.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Li, T., Cai, M. F. & Cai, M. A review of mining-induced seismicity in China. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 44, 1149–1171 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang, C. G., Canbulat, I., Hebblewhite, B. & Ward, C. R. Assessing coal burst phenomena in mining and insights into directions for future research. Int. J. Coal Geol. 179, 28–44 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liu, X. F. et al. Time effect of water injection on the mechanical properties of coal and its application in rockburst prevention in mining. Energies 10, 1783 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang, S. C., Li, Y. Y., Shen, B. T., Sun, X. Z. & Gao, L. Q. Effective evaluation of pressure relief drilling for reducing rock bursts and its application in underground coal mines. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 114, 7–16 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yin, Y. C. et al. Experimental study and evaluation on the weakening of bursting liability of coal with boreholes. Eng. Fail. Anal. 155, 107754 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fu, Y. K. et al. Mechanical properties and energy evolutions of burst‑prone coal samples with holes and fillings. Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol. 11, 40 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, L. et al. Relief mechanism of segmented hole reaming and stress distribution characteristics of drilling holes in deep coal mine. Processes 10, 1566 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jiang, Z. H., Zhang, J. C., Yue, L. J. & Li, D. H. Coordinated control of pressure relief and energy absorption support of deep mining roadway. Phys. Fluids 37, 047138 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yao, J. P. et al. Segmented enlarged-diameter borehole destressing mechanism and its influence on anchorage support system. Energy Sci. Eng. 8, 2831–2840 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Du, S. Y. et al. Study on the response characteristics of roadway borehole pressure relief surrounding rock under strike-slip high-stress distribution. Eng. Fail. Anal. 156, 107808 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hao, Z. et al. Pressure-relief mechanism and application of large-diameter boreholes in coal seams with rockburst hazard. Geofluids 2021, 5469999 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shi, Q. W., Mishra, B., Wang, S. W. & Xu, G. In situ assessment of the effectiveness of an undisturbed single driving entry’s relief borehole in coal burst-prone seam. Min. Metall. Explor. 38, 2443–2452 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wu, H., Zhao, G. Y. & Liang, W. Z. Investigation of cracking behavior and mechanism of sandstone specimens with a hole under compression. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 163, 105084 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  14. He, Z. C., Gong, F. Q. & Gao, M. Z. Experimental study on the mechanical behavior of high‑stress rocks during real‑time drilling. Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol. 12, 37 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, K. et al. Influence of intermittent artificial crack density on shear fracturing and fractal behavior of rock bridges: Experimental and numerical studies. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 53, 553–568 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, Y. T., Zhou, X. P. & Shou, Y. D. The modeling of crack propagation and coalescence in rocks under uniaxial compression using the novel conjugated bond-based peridynamics. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 128–129, 614–643 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao, Y. S., Gao, Y. T. & Wu, S. C. Influence of different concealment conditions of parallel double flaws on mechanical properties and failure characteristics of brittle rock under uniaxial compression. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 109, 102751 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, Y. X., Zhang, H., Lin, H., Zhao, Y. L. & Liu, Y. Fracture behaviour of central-flawed rock plate under uniaxial compression. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 106, 102503 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xu, W. J. & Khan, K. U. J. Multi-scale mechanical behaviors of rock mass based on synthetic rock mass. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 84, 130 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shen, B. T., Stephansson, O., Einstein, H. H. & Ghahreman, B. Coalescence of fractures under shear stresses in experiments. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 100, 5975–5990 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bobet, A. & Einstein, H. H. Fracture coalescence in rock-type materials under uniaxial and biaxial compression. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 35, 863–888 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Guo, T. F., Zhang, Q., Liu, K. W., Chang, X. & Zou, L. S. Co-effects of parallel flaws and interface characteristics on the fracture behavior of rock-concrete composite specimens. J. Build. Eng. 97, 110920 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shang, J., West, L. J., Hencher, S. R. & Zhao, Z. Tensile strength of large-scale incipient rock joints: A laboratory investigation. Acta Geotech. 13, 869–886 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kutter, H. K. & Fairhurst, C. On the fracture process in blasting. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 8, 181–202 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bobet, A. The initiation of secondary cracks in compression. Eng. Fract. Mech. 66, 187–219 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rossmanith, H. P., Knasmillner, R. E., Daehnke, A. & Mishnaevsky, L. Jr. Wave propagation, damage evolution, and dynamic fracture extension. Part II. Blasting. Mater. Sci. 32, 403–410 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yang, R. S., Ding, C. X., Li, Y. L., Yang, L. Y. & Zhao, Y. Crack propagation behavior in slit charge blasting under high static stress conditions. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 119, 117–123 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wang, K. et al. Numerical study on damage response and failure mechanism of gas-containing coal-rock combination under confining pressure effect. Fuel 349, 128683 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Liu, Y. et al. Failure and instability characteristics of coal-rock parting-coal structures with rough discontinuities. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 55, 7063–7080 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Liu, S. et al. Numerical simulation of mesomechanical properties of limestone containing dissolved hole and persistent joint. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 122, 103572 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chen, M. et al. Experimental investigation on pressure relief mechanism of specimens with prefabricated reaming boreholes. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 56, 2949–2966 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chen, Y., Li, P. F., Xu, C. B., Chen, M. & Yang, J. Y. Failure characteristics and pressure relief effectiveness of non-persistent jointed rock mass with holes. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 134, 104733 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Liu, D. Q. et al. Effect of borehole pressure relief on rockburst: Insights from borehole cooperative deformation mechanism. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 58, 2295–2317 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang, Y. J. et al. Study on the influence of drilling parameters on the mechanical properties and pressure relief effect of coal rock. Processes 13, 993 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jing, G., Zhao, Y. X., Wang, H., Montanari, P. M. & Lacidogna, G. Study of coal and magnetite collapse process and precursor based on acoustic emission flicker noise spectroscopy. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 57, 8545–8562 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Di, Y. Y. et al. Predicting microseismic, acoustic emission and electromagnetic radiation data using neural networks. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 16, 616–629 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Feng, J. Q. et al. Intelligent recognition of electromagnetic radiation precursory signals of rock fracture based on random forest-adaptive boosting. Phys. Fluids 37, 046609 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Liu, X. Y. et al. Evolution of deformation failure and energy of siltite and significant shear fracture structure under cyclic loading. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 57, 7835–7860 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Liu, Z. L., Xie, S. L., Yin, Y. J. & Su, T. Fractal characterization and pore evolution in coal under tri-axial cyclic loading-unloading: Insights from low-field NMR imaging and analysis. Fractal Fract. 9, 93 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lockner, D. The role of acoustic emission in the study of rock fracture. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 30, 883–899 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Shkuratnik, V. L., Filimonov, Y. L. & Kuchurin, S. V. Regularities of acoustic emission in coal samples under triaxial compression. J. Min. Sci. 41, 44–52 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Moradian, Z., Einstein, H. H. & Ballivy, G. Detection of cracking levels in brittle rocks by parametric analysis of the acoustic emission signals. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 49, 785–800 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Song, M. Y. et al. Characterization and correlation of rock fracture-induced electrical resistance and acoustic emission. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 56, 6437–6457 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Li, Q. G. et al. Acoustic emission response mechanism of hydraulic fracturing in different coal and rock: A laboratory study. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 55, 4657–4672 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang, W. et al. Study on crack propagation mechanism and acoustic-thermal sensitivity analysis of pre-cracked weakly cemented rock. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 133, 104619 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Qian, R. P. et al. Experimental investigation of mechanical characteristics and cracking behaviors of coal specimens with various fissure angles and water-bearing states. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 120, 103406 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Dai, J. J., Liu, J. F., Zhou, L. L. & He, X. Crack pattern recognition based on acoustic emission waveform features. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 56, 1063–1076 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lacidogna, G., Piana, G. & Carpinteri, A. Damage monitoring of three-point bending concrete specimens by acoustic emission and resonant frequency analysis. Eng. Fract. Mech. 210, 203–211 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Lan, M., Tang, Y., Ma, J. & Liu, Z. X. Cooperative acoustic emission locating with velocity tomography in true triaxial experiment. Eng. Fract. Mech. 292, 109633 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Zhu, G. A. et al. Experimental study of rock burst in coal samples under overstress and true-triaxial unloading through passive velocity tomography. Saf. Sci. 117, 388–403 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kong, Y., Li, M., Chen, W. M., Liu, N. & Kang, B. Q. Moment-tensor inversion and decomposition for cracks in thin plates. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 34, 352–359 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Liu, J. P. et al. Moment tensor analysis of acoustic emission for cracking mechanisms in rock with a pre-cut circular hole under uniaxial compression. Eng. Fract. Mech. 135, 206–218 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Davi, R., Vavrycuk, V., Charalampidou, E. M. & Kwiatek, G. Network sensor calibration for retrieving accurate moment tensors of acoustic emissions. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 62, 59–67 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sedlak, P. et al. New automatic localization technique of acoustic emission signals in thin metal plates. Ultrasonics 49(2), 254–262 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Li, X. & Dong, L. An efficient closed-form solution for acoustic emission source location in three-dimensional structures. AIP Adv. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4866170 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  56. White J E. Underground sound: Application of seismic waves[J]. 2000.

  57. Feignier, B. & Young, R. P. Moment tensor inversion of induced microseisnmic events: Evidence of non‐shear failures in the− 4< M<− 2 moment magnitude range. Geophys. Res. Lett. 19(14), 1503–1506 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Stockwell, R. G., Mansinha, L. & Lowe, R. P. Localization of the complex spectrum: The S transform. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 44(4), 998–1001 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Vavryčuk, V. Iterative joint inversion for stress and fault orientations from focal mechanisms. Geophys. J. Int. 199(1), 69–77 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Xu, Z. Elastic Mechanics (Higher Education Press, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Deng, C., Zheng, Y. & Zhu, J. Formula of intermediate principal stress at yield of Mohr-Coulomb material under plane strain condition. Rock Soil Mech. 29(2), 5 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully wish to acknowledge the collaborative funding support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52104102).

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52104102).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Deep Coal Resource Mining (Ministry of Education), School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, 221116, People’s Republic of China

    Kun Liu, Yang Liu, Cai-Ping Lu & Lu-Hao Zhou

  2. Xiaoyun Coal Mine, Jining Energy Group, Jining, Shandong, 272000, People’s Republic of China

    Qi-Xiang Zhou

  3. Yankuang Energy Group Co., Ltd., Zoucheng, 273500, People’s Republic of China

    Chao Wang

Authors
  1. Kun Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yang Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cai-Ping Lu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lu-Hao Zhou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qi-Xiang Zhou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chao Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Kun Liu was responsible for data curation, software development, visualization, and writing of the original draft. Yang Liu contributed to funding acquisition, methodology development, resource provision, and writing – review and editing. Cai-Ping Lu performed formal analysis, supervision, and validation. Lu-Hao Zhou contributed to the conceptualization of the study. Qi-Xiang Zhou conducted the investigation, and Chao Wang was responsible for project administration.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Liu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, K., Liu, Y., Lu, CP. et al. Mechanism of coal mass fracture expansion under drilling and pressure relief. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44731-x

Download citation

  • Received: 09 October 2025

  • Accepted: 13 March 2026

  • Published: 26 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44731-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Drilling pressure relief
  • Fracture propagation
  • Tensor inversion
  • Stress field inversion
  • Theoretical analysis
  • Time–frequency analysis
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing