Table 5 Top 10 model performances ranked by robustness.
Feature Set | Model Algorithm | \(R^{2}\) Train | \(R^{2}\) Val | \(R^{2}\) Test | \(R^{2}\) Robustness Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D: HVI + L1 + L2 | XGBoost | 1.0000 | 0.8831 | 0.8375 | 0.8923 |
C: HVI + L2 | RandomForest | 0.9840 | 0.8927 | 0.7932 | 0.8563 |
D: HVI + L1 + L2 | RandomForest | 0.9794 | 0.6723 | 0.7034 | 0.8439 |
D: HVI + L1 + L2 | EBM-GAM | 0.9924 | 0.7631 | 0.8406 | 0.7751 |
C: HVI + L2 | LightGBM | 0.9177 | 0.8413 | 0.6303 | 0.7683 |
B: HVI + L1 | EBM-GAM | 0.9812 | 0.8262 | 0.7864 | 0.7593 |
C: HVI + L2 | EBM-GAM | 0.9938 | 0.8443 | 0.6349 | 0.7427 |
D: HVI + L1 + L2 | LightGBM | 0.9594 | 0.7999 | 0.8613 | 0.7308 |
B: HVI + L1 | RandomForest | 0.9773 | 0.5605 | 0.5667 | 0.7152 |
B: HVI + L1 | XGBoost | 1.0000 | 0.5825 | 0.5590 | 0.7022 |