Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Comprehensive evaluation of milk biomarkers as indicators of intramammary infection in dairy goats across lactation
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 19 March 2026

Comprehensive evaluation of milk biomarkers as indicators of intramammary infection in dairy goats across lactation

  • Maria Filippa Addis1,2,
  • Federica Santandrea1,
  • Sara Fusar Poli1,
  • Matteo Mezzetti3,
  • Martina Penati1,
  • Laura Filippone Pavesi1,
  • Andrea Minuti3,
  • Marta Maria Vignati1,
  • Valerio Bronzo1,2,
  • Paolo Moroni1,2 &
  • …
  • Renata Piccinini1,2 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 439 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Bacteriology
  • Infectious-disease diagnostics
  • Microbiology

Abstract

We evaluated the milk biomarkers cathelicidin (Cath), haptoglobin (Hp), milk serum amyloid A (M-SAA), N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAGase), lysozyme (LZ), and the half-udder milk somatic cell count (H-SCC), for their potential association with intramammary infections (IMI) in dairy goats across lactation stages. Half-udder milk from 105 goats was collected during early (39 ± 13 days in milk, DIM), mid (136 ± 12 DIM), and late (269 ± 12 DIM) lactation stages and analyzed for bacteriological culture (BC), H-SCC, and potential biomarker reactivity. Predictive performance was evaluated with BC as the outcome, and Dairy Herd Improvement records provided contextual production data. Cath positivity, assessed by western blot, showed the strongest association with positive BC in early lactation and performed well also in mid-lactation. A dynamic H-SCC threshold was reliably correlated with positive BC in early and mid-lactation. Hp positivity, assessed by Western blot, was associated with BC in mid-lactation, while NAGase, assessed by enzymatic assay, showed no consistent association. M-SAA, assessed by ELISA, suffered technical limitations due to a lack of dilution linearity, and LZ, assessed by enzymatic assay, showed no association with BC. Our data suggest stage-dependent associations and support further validation of Cath, Hp, and SCC as potential components of combined diagnostic panels, particularly in early and mid-lactation. However, a semi-quantitative Western blot assessment for Cath and Hp, as well as technical limitations for M-SAA, warrant cautious interpretation and further analytical validation.

Data availability

The data used for this study can be provided by the corresponding author (MFA) upon request.

References

  1. Stuhr, T. & Aulrich, K. Intramammary infections in dairy goats: Recent knowledge and indicators for detection of subclinical mastitis. Landbauforsch. Volkenrode 60, 267–280 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mavrogianni, V. S., Menzies, P. I., Fragkou, I. A. & Fthenakis, G. C. Principles of mastitis treatment in sheep and goats. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 27, 115–120 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Giagu, A., Penati, M., Traini, S., Dore, S. & Addis, M. F. Milk proteins as mastitis markers in dairy ruminants - A systematic review. Vet. Res. Commun. 46, 329–351 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Souza, F. N. et al. Somatic cell count in small ruminants: Friend or foe?. Small Rumin Res. 107, 65–75 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Paape, M. J., Poutrel, B., Contreras, A., Marco, J. C. & Capuco, A. V. Milk somatic cells and lactation in small ruminants. J. Dairy Sci. 84, E237–E244 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bergonier, D., De Crémoux, R., Rupp, R., Lagriffoul, G. & Berthelot, X. Mastitis of dairy small ruminants. Vet. Res. 34, 689–716 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Persson, Y., Larsen, T. & Nyman, A.-K. Variation in udder health indicators at different stages of lactation in goats with no udder infection. Small Rumin. Res. 116, 51–56 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rosa, N. M., Penati, M., Fusar-Poli, S., Addis, M. F. & Tola, S. Species identification by MALDI-TOF MS and gap PCR-RFLP of non-aureus Staphylococcus, Mammaliicoccus, and Streptococcus spp. associated with sheep and goat mastitis. Vet. Res. 53, 84 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Arteche-Villasol, N., Fernández, M., Gutiérrez-Expósito, D. & Pérez, V. Pathology of the mammary gland in sheep and goats. J. Comp. Pathol. 193, 37–49 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gelasakis, A. I., Mavrogianni, V. S., Petridis, I. G., Vasileiou, N. G. C. & Fthenakis, G. C. Mastitis in sheep - The last 10 years and the future of research. Vet. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.07.009 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chakraborty, S. et al. Technological interventions and advances in the diagnosis of intramammary infections in animals with emphasis on bovine population-a review. Vet. Quat. 39, 76–94 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zanetti, M. The role of cathelicidins in the innate host defenses of mammals. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 7, 179–196 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eckersall, P. D. Chapter 5 - Proteins, Proteomics, and the Dysproteinemias. In Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals (Sixth Edition) (eds Kaneko, J. J. et al.) 117–155 (Academic Press, 2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-370491-7.00005-2.

  14. Mudaliar, M. et al. Mastitomics, the integrated omics of bovine milk in an experimental model of Streptococcus uberis mastitis: 2 Label-free relative quantitative proteomics. Mol BioSyst 12, 2748–2761 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thomas, F. C. et al. The major acute phase proteins of bovine milk in a commercial dairy herd. BMC Vet. Res. 11, 207 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pisanu, S. et al. Impact of Staphylococcus aureus infection on the late lactation goat milk proteome: New perspectives for monitoring and understanding mastitis in dairy goats. J. Proteomics 221, (2020).

  17. Brenaut, P. et al. Contribution of mammary epithelial cells to the immune response during early stages of a bacterial infection to Staphylococcus aureus. Vet. Res. 45, 16 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Grönlund, U., Hultén, C., Eckersall, P. D., Hogarth, C. & Persson Waller, K. Haptoglobin and serum amyloid A in milk and serum during acute and chronic experimentally induced Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. J. Dairy Res. 70, 379–86 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Larson, M. A., Weber, A., Weber, A. T. & McDonald, T. L. Differential expression and secretion of bovine serum amyloid A3 (SAA3) by mammary epithelial cells stimulated with prolactin or lipopolysaccharide. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 107, 255–64 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Akerstedt, M., Persson Waller, K. & Sternesjö, A. Haptoglobin and serum amyloid A in relation to the somatic cell count in quarter, cow composite and bulk tank milk samples. J. Dairy Res. 74, 198–203 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wollowski, L. et al. The value of the biomarkers cathelicidin, milk amyloid A, and haptoglobin to diagnose and classify clinical and subclinical mastitis. J. Dairy Sci. 104, 2106–2122 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kitchen, B. J., Middleton, G. & Salmon, M. Bovine milk N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase and its significance in the detection of abnormal udder secretions. J. Dairy Res. 45, 15–20 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Leitner, G. et al. Effect of subclinical intramammary infection on somatic cell counts, NAGase activity and gross composition of goats’ milk. J. Dairy Res. 71, 311–315 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stuhr, T., Aulrich, K., Barth, K., Knappstein, K. & Larsen, T. Influence of udder infection status on milk enzyme activities and somatic cell count throughout early lactation in goats. Small Rumin. Res. 111, 139–146 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Moroni, P., Pisoni, G., Ruffo, G., Cortinovis, I. & Casazza, G. Study of intramammary infections in dairy goats from mountainous regions in Italy. N. Z. Vet. J. 53, 375–376 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Contreras, A. et al. Mastitis in small ruminants. Small Rumin. Res. 68, 145–153 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Addis, M. F. et al. Relationship between milk cathelicidin abundance and microbiologic culture in clinical mastitis. J. Dairy Sci. 100, 2944–2953 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Smolenski, G. A. et al. The abundance of milk cathelicidin proteins during bovine mastitis. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 143, 125–130 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Puggioni, G. M. G. et al. Relationship of late lactation milk somatic cell count and cathelicidin with intramammary infection in small ruminants. Pathogens https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9010037 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Albenzio, M. et al. Immune competence of the mammary gland as affected by somatic cell and pathogenic bacteria in ewes with subclinical mastitis. J. Dairy Sci. 95, 3877–87 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ceciliani, F., Ceron, J. J., Eckersall, P. D. & Sauerwein, H. Acute phase proteins in ruminants. J. Proteomics 75, 4207–4231 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cubeddu, T. et al. Cathelicidin production and release by mammary epithelial cells during infectious mastitis. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 189, 66–70 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fatafta, H., Khaled, M., Kav, B., Olubiyi, O. O. & Strodel, B. A brief history of amyloid aggregation simulations. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 14, e1703 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Desidera, F., Skeie, S. B., Devold, T. G., Inglingstad, R. A. & Porcellato, D. Fluctuations in somatic cell count and their impact on individual goat milk quality throughout lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 108, 152–163 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Adkins, P. R. F. et al. Laboratory Handbook on Bovine Mastitis. (National Mastitis Council, New Prague) (2017).

  36. Cross, C. L. & Wayne, D. L. Biostatistics: A Foundation for Analysis in the Health Sciences. (Wiley and Sons, Ltd) (1999).

  37. Pisanu, S. et al. Proteomic changes in the milk of water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) with subclinical mastitis due to intramammary infection by Staphylococcus aureus and by non-aureus staphylococci. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–14 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Addis, M. F. et al. Evaluation of milk cathelicidin for detection of dairy sheep mastitis. J. Dairy Sci. 99, 6446–6456 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Dilda, F. et al. Distribution of acute phase proteins in the bovine forestomachs and abomasum. Vet. J. 192, 101–105 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Littell, R. C., Henry, P. R. & Ammerman, C. B. Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. J. Anim. Sci. 76, 1216–1231 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Çorbacıoğlu, ŞK. & Aksel, G. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in diagnostic accuracy studies: A guide to interpreting the area under the curve value. Turk. J. Emerg. Med. 23, 195–198 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. Cristina Lecchi and Prof. Fabrizio Ceciliani for providing the anti-bovine Hp antibodies.

Funding

The research was supported by personal funds of M.F.A. and R.P. The authors acknowledge the support of the APC central fund of the University of Milan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences (DIVAS), University of Milan, Lodi, Italy

    Maria Filippa Addis, Federica Santandrea, Sara Fusar Poli, Martina Penati, Laura Filippone Pavesi, Marta Maria Vignati, Valerio Bronzo, Paolo Moroni & Renata Piccinini

  2. Laboratorio di Malattie Infettive degli Animali (MiLab), University of Milan, Lodi, Italy

    Maria Filippa Addis, Valerio Bronzo, Paolo Moroni & Renata Piccinini

  3. Department of Animal Sciences, Food and Nutrition (DIANA), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy

    Matteo Mezzetti & Andrea Minuti

Authors
  1. Maria Filippa Addis
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Federica Santandrea
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sara Fusar Poli
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Matteo Mezzetti
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Martina Penati
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Laura Filippone Pavesi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Andrea Minuti
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Marta Maria Vignati
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Valerio Bronzo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Paolo Moroni
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Renata Piccinini
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: M.F.A.; Methodology: M.F.A., A.M., V.B., P.M., R.P.; Data curation: M.F.A, F.S., M.M.; Formal analysis: F.S., S.F.P., M.M., M.P., L.F.P.; M.M.V.; Visualization: M.F.A., M.M.; Resources: M.F.A, R.P; Writing—original draft preparation: M.F.A, F.S.; Writing—review and editing: all authors; Supervision: M.F.A.; Project administration: M.F.A, R.P.; All authors contributed to the manuscript and approved the submitted version of the manuscript for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Filippa Addis.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The milk used for this study was collected during regular milking procedures from dairy goats. No specific activities were carried out on the animals for the purposes of the study but collecting milk from each half-udder in separate tubes at the scheduled milking time. Animals were farmed and kept in respect of all the guidelines and regulations under the supervision of the farmers and the farm veterinarian. Milking procedures were conducted by trained personnel in accordance with best practices for animal welfare and veterinary care. No experimental interventions or invasive procedures were performed on the animals for the purpose of this research. Therefore, ethical committee authorization was not requested. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations and followed the Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines. The farmers provided their informed consent to collect the samples for the purposes of this study.

Consent to publish

The farmers agreed to use the data for publication without disclosure of the farm identification information.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Addis, M.F., Santandrea, F., Fusar Poli, S. et al. Comprehensive evaluation of milk biomarkers as indicators of intramammary infection in dairy goats across lactation. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45097-w

Download citation

  • Received: 17 April 2025

  • Accepted: 17 March 2026

  • Published: 19 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45097-w

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Mastitis
  • Biomarkers
  • Udder health
  • Small ruminants
  • Cathelicidin
  • Haptoglobin
  • NAGase
  • Milk serum amyloid A
  • Lysozyme
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology