Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Intelligent power underwater wireless sensor networks for marine environmental monitoring using a hybrid marine predator–Henry gas solubility optimization approach
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 25 March 2026

Intelligent power underwater wireless sensor networks for marine environmental monitoring using a hybrid marine predator–Henry gas solubility optimization approach

  • Wang Yanhao1,
  • Ayoub Alsarhan2,
  • Mohammad Aljaidi3,
  • Ahmad Abdullah Alshammari4,
  • Ali Fayez Alkoradees5 &
  • …
  • Mohammad Khishe6,7 

, Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 812 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Ecology
  • Engineering
  • Environmental sciences
  • Mathematics and computing
  • Ocean sciences

Abstract

Underwater wireless sensor networks (UWSNs) have an important role in ocean monitoring, environmental surveillance and disaster prevention; however, their practical deployment is severely limited by the limited battery capacity, high cost of acoustic communications and difficulty of node maintenance. In particular, inefficient clustering and routing strategies result in unbalanced energy consumption, premature failures of nodes and decreased network lifetime. To solve these problems, the purpose of this paper is to design an energy-efficient and scalable clustering and multi-hop routing framework for UWSNs that can extend the network lifetime while ensuring reliable data delivery. We propose a hybrid optimization approach that is named as MPA-HGSO, where Marine Predator Algorithm (MPA) is used for cluster head selection and cluster formation while Henry Gas Solubility Optimization (HGSO) is used to optimize the multi-hop routing paths. The proposed framework is tested with extensive simulations performed in the Matlab environment in three base station deployment scenarios with a network of 300 sensor nodes deployed in a 200 × 200 m2 area. Performance is measured in terms of network lifetime, energy consumption, and end-to-end transmission delay and compared with LEACH, TEEN, MPSO, and IPSO-GWO protocols. Simulation results show that MPA-HGSO is significantly better than benchmark methods. In the central base station scenario, the proposed approach gives a First Node Die (FND) at 2151 rounds and a Half Nodes Die (HND) at 2160 rounds, as compared to 1115 and 1290 rounds for LEACH, respectively. Moreover, the average transmission delay is reduced to 140 ms, which is a reduction of up to 44% compared to conventional approaches. These results validate that the proposed MPA-HGSO framework is an effective energy consumption and network lifetime and communication efficiency balance framework, which is a promising solution for the long-term and large-scale UWSN deployments.

Data availability

The datasets used and analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

UWSNs:

Underwater wireless sensor networks

MPA:

Marine predator algorithm

HGSO:

Henry gas solubility optimization

NFL:

No-free-lunch

HVR:

High-velocity ratio

UVR:

Unit-velocity ratio

LVR:

Low-velocity ratio

HND:

Half node die

FND:

First node die

References

  1. Hu, R. et al. Toward real-world applicability: Lightweight underwater acoustic localization model through knowledge distillation. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. (2025).

  2. Saemi, B. & Goodarzian, F. Energy-efficient routing protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks using a hybrid metaheuristic algorithm. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 133, 108132 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, J., Ju, C., Gao, Y., Sangaiah, A. K. & Kim, G. A PSO based energy efficient coverage control algorithm for wireless sensor networks. Comput. Mater. Contin. 56(3), 433–446 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ragavi, B., Baranidharan, V. & Kumar, K. R. A novel hybridized cluster‐based geographical opportunistic routing protocol for effective data routing in underwater wireless sensor networks. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 2023(1), 5567483 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guo, Z., Xia, Y., Li, J., Liu, J. & Xu, K. Hybrid optimization path planning method for AGV based on KGWO. Sensors 24(18), 5898 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yadav, L. & Sunitha, C. Low energy adaptive clustering hierarchy in wireless sensor network (LEACH). Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. 5(3), 4661–4664 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jalal, R. D. & Aliesawi, S. A. Enhancing TEEN protocol using the particle swarm optimization and BAT algorithms in underwater wireless sensor network. In 2023 15th International Conference on Developments in eSystems Engineering (DeSE). 504–510 (IEEE, 2023).

  8. Aruchamy, P., Balraj, L. & Sowndarya, K. K. D. An energy-aware link fault detection and recovery scheme for QoS enhancement in Internet of Things-enabled wireless sensor network. Comput. Electr. Eng. 123, 110092 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aruchamy, P., Gnanaselvi, S., Sowndarya, D. & Naveenkumar, P. An artificial intelligence approach for energy-aware intrusion detection and secure routing in Internet of Things-enabled wireless sensor networks. Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp. 35(23), e7818 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Padmanaban, P. I. V., Periasamy, M. S. & Aruchamy, P. An energy‐efficient auto clustering framework for enlarging quality of service in Internet of Things‐enabled wireless sensor networks using fuzzy logic system. Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp. 34(25), e7269 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Faramarzi, A., Heidarinejad, M., Mirjalili, S. & Gandomi, A. H. Marine predators algorithm: A nature-inspired metaheuristic. Expert Syst. Appl. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113377 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hashim, F. A., Houssein, E. H., Mabrouk, M. S., Al-Atabany, W. & Mirjalili, S. Henry gas solubility optimization: A novel physics-based algorithm. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.07.015 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Panchal, A. & Singh, R. K. EEHCHR: Energy efficient hybrid clustering and hierarchical routing for wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Netw. 123, 102692 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lin, D. & Wang, Q. An energy-efficient clustering algorithm combined game theory and dual-cluster-head mechanism for WSNs. IEEE Access 7, 49894–49905 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ghosh, S. & Dubey, S. K. Comparative analysis of k-means and fuzzy c-means algorithms. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 4(4) (2013).

  16. Ashraf, S., Gao, M., Chen, Z., Naeem, H. & Ahmed, T. CED-OR based opportunistic routing mechanism for underwater wireless sensor networks. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 125(1), 487–511 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ashraf, S., Saleem, S., Ahmed, T. & Arfeen, Z. A. Succulent link selection strategy for underwater sensor network. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Math. 15(3), 224–242 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Muruganathan, S. D., Ma, D. C. F., Bhasin, R. I. & Fapojuwo, A. O. A centralized energy-efficient routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 43(3), S8-13 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, Y. et al. Resolution enhancement for large-scale real beam mapping based on adaptive low-rank approximation. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 60, 1–21 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang, Y., Liu, S., Li, M., Zhao, N. & Wu, M. A new adaptive co-site broadband interference cancellation method with auxiliary channel. Digit. Commun. Netw. (2022).

  21. Jiang, Y. & Li, X. Broadband cancellation method in an adaptive co-site interference cancellation system. Int. J. Electron. 109(5), 854–874 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Durrani, M. Y. et al. Adaptive node clustering technique for smart ocean under water sensor network (SOSNET). Sensors 19(5), 1145 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Khan, W. et al. A multi-layer cluster based energy efficient routing scheme for UWSNs. IEEE Access 7, 77398–77410 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hong, Z. et al. A topology control with energy balance in underwater wireless sensor networks for IoT-based application. Sensors 18(7), 2306 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Taruna, S., Kumawat, R. & Purohit, G. N. Multi-hop clustering protocol using gateway nodes in wireless sensor network. Int. J. Wirel. Mob. Netw. 4(4), 169 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yu, W. et al. An energy optimization clustering scheme for multi-hop underwater acoustic cooperative sensor networks. IEEE Access 8, 89171–89184 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hou, R., He, L., Hu, S. & Luo, J. Energy-balanced unequal layering clustering in underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Access 6, 39685–39691 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Khan, M. T. R., Ahmed, S. H. & Kim, D. AUV-aided energy-efficient clustering in the internet of underwater things. IEEE Trans. Green Commun. Netw. 3(4), 1132–1141 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ibrahim, D. M., Eltobely, T. E., Fahmy, M. M. & Sallam, E. A. Enhancing the vector-based forwarding routing protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks: A clustering approach. In International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Communications. 98–104 (2014).

  30. Gopi, S., Kannan, G., Desai, U. B. & Merchant, S. N. Energy optimized path unaware layered routing protocol for underwater sensor networks. In IEEE GLOBECOM 2008–2008 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference. 1–6 (IEEE, 2008).

  31. Tarhani, M., Kavian, Y. S. & Siavoshi, S. SEECH: Scalable energy efficient clustering hierarchy protocol in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Sens. J. 14(11), 3944–3954 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yu, J., Feng, L., Jia, L., Gu, X. & Yu, D. A local energy consumption prediction-based clustering protocol for wireless sensor networks. Sensors 14(12), 23017–23040 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sedighimanesh, M. & Sedighimanesh, A. Reducing energy consumption of the SEECH algorithm in wireless sensor networks using a mobile sink and honey bee colony algorithm.. Law State Telecommun. Rev. https://doi.org/10.26512/lstr.v10i1.21506 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Elhoseny, M., Rajan, R. S., Hammoudeh, M., Shankar, K. & Aldabbas, O. Swarm intelligence-based energy efficient clustering with multihop routing protocol for sustainable wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 16(9), 1550147720949133 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Webb, G. I., Keogh, E., Miikkulainen, R., Miikkulainen, R. & Sebag, M. No-free-lunch theorem. In Encyclopedia of Machine Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30164-8_592 (2011).

  36. Yan, H., Shi, Z. J. & Cui, J.-H. DBR: Depth-based routing for underwater sensor networks. In NETWORKING 2008 Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks, Wireless Networks, Next Generation Internet: 7th International IFIP-TC6 Networking Conference Singapore, May 5–9, 2008 Proceedings 7. 72–86 (Springer, 2008).

  37. Khisa, S. & Moh, S. Survey on recent advancements in energy-efficient routing protocols for underwater wireless sensor networks. IEEE Access 9, 55045–55062 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Fattah, S., Gani, A., Ahmedy, I., Idris, M. Y. I. & Hashem, I. A. T. A survey on underwater wireless sensor networks: Requirements, taxonomy, recent advances, and open research challenges. Sensors 20(18), 5393 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Su, H. et al. A method for the multi-objective optimization of the operation of natural gas pipeline networks considering supply reliability and operation efficiency. Comput. Chem. Eng. 131, 106584 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Song, Q., Yang, J. & Mohajer, A. Multi-objective resource optimization in UAV-enabled heterogeneous cellular networks using serverless federated learning and power-domain NOMA. Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol. 36(8), e70210 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mohajer, A., Hajipour, J. & Leung, V. C. M. Dynamic offloading in mobile edge computing with traffic-aware network slicing and adaptive TD3 strategy. IEEE Commun. Lett. (2024).

  42. Wang, J., Liang, Q. & Mohajer, A. Adaptive offloading in multi-access edge networks via hierarchical federated learning and real-time system adaptation. Int. J. Sens. Netw. 49(1), 1–17 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Alotaibi, J., Oubbati, O. S., Atiquzzaman, M., Alromithy, F. & Altimania, M. R. Optimizing disaster response with UAV-mounted RIS and HAP-enabled edge computing in 6G networks. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 104213 (2025).

  44. Ameur, A. I., Oubbati, O. S., Rachedi, A., Arishi, A. & Atiquzzaman, M. Intelligent UAV caching and energy management in 6 G networks. IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng. (2025).

  45. Xiangning, F. & Yulin, S. Improvement on LEACH protocol of wireless sensor network. In 2007 International Conference on Sensor Technologies and Applications (SENSORCOMM 2007). 260–264 (IEEE, 2007).

  46. Wu, X., Lei, S., Jin, W., Cho, J. & Lee, S. Energy-efficient deployment of mobile sensor networks by PSO. In Asia-Pacific Web Conference. 373–382 (Springer, 2006).

  47. Manjeshwar, A. & Agrawal, D. P. TEEN: Arouting protocol for enhanced efficiency in wireless sensor networks. In IPDPS. 189 (2001).

  48. Oubbati, O. S., Alotaibi, J., Alromithy, F., Atiquzzaman, M. & Altimania, M. R. A UAV-UGV cooperative system: Patrolling and energy management for urban monitoring. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvt.2025.3563971 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their thanks and appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at Zarqa University, Jordan for the scientific support they provided for this work.

Funding

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at Northern Border University, Arar, KSA for funding this research work through the project number “NBU-FFR-2026-2990-04”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Advanced Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, 215123, Jiangsu, China

    Wang Yanhao

  2. Department of Information Technology, Faculty of Prince Al-Hussein Bin Abdallah II for Information Technology, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, 13116, Jordan

    Ayoub Alsarhan

  3. Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Information Technology, Zarqa University, Zarqa, 13110, Jordan

    Mohammad Aljaidi

  4. Department of Computer Sciences, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, Northern Border University, Rafha, 91911, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

    Ahmad Abdullah Alshammari

  5. Unit of Scientific Research, Applied College, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia

    Ali Fayez Alkoradees

  6. Applied Science Research Center, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan

    Mohammad Khishe

  7. Department of Electrical Engineering, Imam Khomeini Naval Science University of Nowshahr, Nowshahr, Iran

    Mohammad Khishe

Authors
  1. Wang Yanhao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ayoub Alsarhan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammad Aljaidi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ahmad Abdullah Alshammari
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ali Fayez Alkoradees
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mohammad Khishe
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.A. (Mohammad Aljaidi) and M.K. (Mohammad Khishe) contributed to the conceptualization, supervision, methodology, formal analysis, and review and editing of the manuscript. A.A. (Ayoub Alsarhan) and A.A.A. (Ahmad Abdullah Alshammari) contributed to the methodology. A.F.A. (Ali Fayez Alkoradees) contributed to software implementation and validation. W.Y. (Wang Yanhao) contributed to data curation and formal analysis, and prepared the original draft of the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Khishe.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yanhao, W., Alsarhan, A., Aljaidi, M. et al. Intelligent power underwater wireless sensor networks for marine environmental monitoring using a hybrid marine predator–Henry gas solubility optimization approach. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45139-3

Download citation

  • Received: 22 December 2025

  • Accepted: 17 March 2026

  • Published: 25 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45139-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Marine predator algorithm
  • Clustering
  • Henry gas solubility optimization
  • Routing
  • Energy efficiency

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene