Table 2 MINORS scores of the studies.

From: Efficacy of focused ultrasound for HPV clearance and cervical LSIL treatment: a meta-analysis

study

I

II

III

IV

V

VI

VII

VIII

IX

X

XI

XII

1. Total

C-Z Li 2009

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

1

    

14

Zhenhua Fu 2020

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

1

    

14

Wenping Wang 2021

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

1

2

2

2

2

22

Hongmin Zeng 2022

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

    

15

Wenping Wang 2022

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

    

15

Miaomiao He 2023

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

1

    

14

Hua Tao 2023

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

1

    

14

Wenping Wang 2023

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

1

    

14

Wenping Wang 2023

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

    

15

Rong Tan 2009

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

    

15

  1. Note: I whether the study’s purpose is clear, II the consistency of patients included, III whether the expected data has been collected, IV whether the endpoint indicators appropriately reflect the purpose of the study, V the objectivity of the evaluation of the endpoint indicators, VI the adequacy of follow-up, VII whether the study dropout rate is less than 5%, VIII and whether the sample size has been estimated.
Back to article page