Table 1 Face Validity of the questionnaire, considering a scale from 1 to 5.

From: Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess the sports experimentation phase of young female football players (QEEF-FEM)

 

Mean (SD)

CV (%)

Aiken’s V

Qualitative

Item 1—Clear and understandable questions

4.29 (0.78)

18.18

0.82

Very high

Item 2—Evaluation of experiences

4.42 (0.71)

16.06

0.85

Very high

Item 3—Difficulty in understanding

1.89 (1.18)

62.43

0.78

High

Item 4—Confusion or ambiguity

1.91 (1.26)

65.97

0.77

High

Item 5—Appropriate language

4.31 (1.05)

24.36

0.82

Very high

Item 6—Enjoyed answering

4.62 (0.85)

18.40

0.90

Very high

Item 7—Willingness to answer again

4.42 (1.27)

28.73

0.85

Very high

  1. 1 = Do you think the questions in the questionnaire are clear and understandable? 2 = Do you think the questions assess the sporting experiences you have had in football and futsal? 3 = Did you find it difficult to understand the questionnaire? 4 = Did you find any questions confusing or ambiguous? 5 = Do the questions use language appropriate for your age? 6 = Did you enjoy answering the questionnaire? 7 = Would you answer this questionnaire again? With responses considered on a scale of 1 = not relevant; 5 = relevant. Responses were organized on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5 (1 = not relevant; 5 = relevant). SD = standard deviation; CV = coefficient of variation.
Back to article page