Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Enhancing long-term comprehensive operation of cascade hydropower system using an improved multi-objective RIME optimization
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 18 April 2026

Enhancing long-term comprehensive operation of cascade hydropower system using an improved multi-objective RIME optimization

  • Aolin Gao1,
  • Hu Hu1,
  • He Li1,
  • Lyuwen Su2,
  • Zhe Yang3,
  • Kaixu Geng1 &
  • …
  • Cihang Shan1 

Scientific Reports (2026) Cite this article

  • 735 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Energy science and technology
  • Engineering
  • Mathematics and computing

Abstract

For cascade hydropower system (CHS), multi-objective long-term comprehensive operation (MOLTCO) is important for balancing the conflicting objectives of hydropower production and ecological sustainability. This paper proposes an Improved Multi-objective RIME algorithm (IMORIME) to address the MOLTCO problem, aiming to simultaneously maximize power generation and minimize ecological flow deviations. The presented IMORIME introduces Good Point Set method for uniform population initialization and incorporates a hybrid constraint handling strategy combining boundary clipping and penalty functions to effectively ensure solution feasibility. A crowding-weighted roulette selection strategy is adopted to determine guided solutions, adaptively balancing convergence and diversity. Moreover, IMORIME introduces an improved hard rime puncture mechanism inspired by Differential Evolution to mitigate stagnation at local optima and to maintain Pareto front diversity; a Whale Optimization Algorithm spiral enhancement strategy to reinforce local exploitation and accelerate convergence; and a Quasi-Opposition-Based Learning strategy to broaden the search space and preserve global diversity. The efficacy of the proposed algorithm is verified through benchmark tests and practical applications in the Three Gorges and Gezhouba cascades. Quantitative comparisons against five classical algorithms reveal that IMORIME consistently achieves the top average rank (1.0) in both Hypervolume and objective function values across all inflow scenarios. Specifically, in the highly constrained low-flow scenario, IMORIME reduces the ecological flow deviation by 10.5% and improves the Hypervolume metric by 3.1% compared to the second-best algorithm. Furthermore, IMORIME consistently maximizes total hydropower generation while maintaining the most well-distributed Pareto front (yielding the optimal average Spacing rank of 1.3). In the practical cascade system application, IMORIME demonstrates superior convergence stability and robustness, effectively balancing generation benefits and ecological protection in MOLTCO for CHS with coupled generation–ecology objectives.

Similar content being viewed by others

Many-objective optimization scheduling of cascade reservoirs in small watersheds based on an evolutionary multitasking framework

Article Open access 01 July 2025

Efficient workflow scheduling using an improved multi-objective memetic algorithm in cloud-edge-end collaborative framework

Article Open access 13 August 2025

Multilayer entropy-weighted TOPSIS method and its decision-making in ecological operation during the subsidence period of the Three Gorges Reservoir

Article Open access 23 January 2025

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

f 1 :

The objectives of maximizing total hydropower generation

f 2 :

The objectives of minimizing the squared relative ecological flow deviation

t :

The indices of the scheduling period

Δt :

The length of each scheduling period

m :

The indices of the reservoir

T :

The total numbers of scheduling periods

M :

The total numbers of reservoirs

P m,t :

The hydroelectric output of reservoir m at period t

C m :

The power output coefficient of reservoir m

\({Q}_{m,t}^{P}\) :

The power discharge rate of reservoir m at period t

\({Q}_{t}^{eco}\) :

The ecological flow requirements at period t

H m,t :

The hydraulic head of reservoir m at period t

V m,t :

The initial storage volumes of reservoir m at period t

V m,+1t :

The final storage volumes of reservoir m at period t

\({Q}_{m,t}^{\text{I}}\) :

The inflow rates of reservoir m at period t

\({Q}_{m,t}^{\text{O}}\) :

The total outflow of reservoir m at period t

\({Q}_{m,t}^{S}\) :

The spillage flow of reservoir m at period t

\({Q}_{m,t}^{O,min}\) :

The lower bounds of total outflow of reservoir m at period t

\({Q}_{m,t}^{\text{O},\text{max}}\) :

The upper bounds of total outflow of reservoir m at period t

vm(⋅):

The storage–capacity relationship of reservoir m

Z m,t :

The water level of reservoir m at period t

\({Z}_{m,t}^{down}\) :

The average tailwater level of reservoir m at period t corresponding to \({Q}_{m,t}^{\text{O}}\)

Zm(⋅):

The function between the tail water level and outflow of reservoir m

\({\text{V}}_{m}^{-1}(\cdot )\) :

The inverse function of the storage–capacity curve of reservoir m

\({Z}_{m}^{\text{begin}}\) :

The initial water levels of reservoir m

\({Z}_{m}^{\text{end}}\) :

The final water levels of reservoir m

\({Z}_{m,t}^{min}\) :

The minimum allowable water levels of reservoir m at period t

\({Z}_{m,t}^{\text{max}}\) :

The maximum allowable water levels of reservoir m at period t

\({P}_{m,t}^{min}\) :

The lower limits of hydroelectric output of reservoir m at period t

\({P}_{m,t}^{max}\) :

The upper limits of hydroelectric output of reservoir m at period t

q(⋅):

The functional relationship between water level and maximum discharge capacity

R :

The rime population

UB :

The lower bounds of the search space

LB :

The upper bounds of the search space

N :

The number of rime agents in the population

D :

The number of decision variables of the optimization problem

R ij :

The j th decision variable of the rime agent j

rand, r 2 , r 6 :

The random number in (0,1)

R best, j :

The position of the optimal individual in j th dimension

h :

The adhesion degree of rime agents, a random value within (0,1)

Factor :

The composite control coefficient that controls the rime agent movement

θ :

The iteration-dependent angle controlling the movement direction

β :

The environmental factor

r 1 ,r 3 :

The random number within the range (-1,1)

E :

The attachment coefficient

w :

The number of segments of the step function

K :

The maximum iteration number

k :

The current iteration number, where k=1,2,…,K

[⋅]:

The rounding operation

Fnorm (Ri):

The normalized fitness value of the rime agent i

GD :

The unit cube in D dimensional Euclidean space

{⋅}:

The fractional part of a number

u j :

The j th component of the generator point in the D dimensional unit cube GD

PN(i):

The Good Point Set

F 1 :

The first nondominated front

CD λ :

The raw crowding distance of a solution λ∈F1

CD max :

The maximum finite crowding distance within the front

P λ :

The normalized selection probability of the rime agent i

Ω:

The ordered guidance set

\({R}_{i}^{gui}\) :

The specific guided solution assigned to the rime agent i for the current iteration

r 4 , r 5 :

The mutually exclusive indices randomly selected from the population of size N

D′ :

The element-wise distance between the current individual and the guided solution

b :

The form of the logarithmic spiral

l :

The random number uniformly distributed in [-1,1]

R qopp :

The quasi-opposite population

A :

The maximum size of the external archive

References

  1. Xiao, L., Wang, J., Wang, B. & Jiang, H. China’s hydropower resources and development. Sustainability 15(5), 3940 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lai, V., Huang, Y. F., Koo, C. H., Ahmed, A. N. & El-Shafie, A. A review of reservoir operation optimisations: from traditional models to metaheuristic algorithms. Arch. Comput. Met. Eng. 29(5), 3435–3457 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, C., Zhou, J., Lu, P. & Yuan, L. Long-term scheduling of large cascade hydropower stations in Jinsha River, China. Energy Conver. Manag. 90, 476–487 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, Z., Dai, R., Wang, W., Jie, J. & Ye, Q. Many-objective optimization scheduling of cascade reservoirs in small watersheds based on an evolutionary multitasking framework. Sci. Rep. 15(1), 20523 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tan, Q. F. et al. Long-term optimal operation of cascade hydropower stations based on the utility function of the carryover potential energy. J. Hydrol. 580, 124359 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. ALBaaj, B. & Kaplan, O. Enhanced COVID-19 optimization algorithm for solving multi-objective optimal power flow problems with uncertain renewable energy sources: a case study of the Iraqi high-voltage Grid. Energies 18(3), 478 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gunantara, N. A review of multi-objective optimization: methods and its applications. Cogent Eng. 5(1), 1502242 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bazgan, C., Ruzika, S., Thielen, C. & Vanderpooten, D. The power of the weighted sum scalarization for approximating multiobjective optimization problems. Theory Comput. Syst. 66(1), 395–415 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bai, T., Kan, Y. B., Chang, J. X., Huang, Q. & Chang, F. J. Fusing feasible search space into PSO for multi-objective cascade reservoir optimization. Appl. Soft Comput. 51, 328–340 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yang, Z., Yang, K., Hu, H. & Su, L. The cascade reservoirs multi-objective ecological operation optimization considering different ecological flow demand. Water Resour. Manage. 33(1), 207–228 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lai, X., Li, C., Zhou, J., Zhang, Y. & Li, Y. A multi-objective optimization strategy for the optimal control scheme of pumped hydropower systems under successive load rejections. Appl. Energy 261, 114474 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ren, X., Wang, M., Dai, G. & Peng, L. Application of multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on transfer learning in sliding bearing. Appl. Soft Comput. 176, 113111 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Emmerich, M. T. & Deutz, A. H. A tutorial on multiobjective optimization: Fundamentals and evolutionary methods. Nat. Comput. 17(3), 585–609 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hu, Y. et al. Revisiting scalarization in multi-task learning: a theoretical perspective. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 36, 48510–48533 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vivek, Y., Ravi, V. & Krishna, P. R. Parallel chaotic bi-objective evolutionary algorithms for scalable feature subset selection via migration strategy. Appl. Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-022-03725-w (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sharifi, M. R., Akbarifard, S., Madadi, M. R., Qaderi, K. & Akbarifard, H. Application of MOMSA algorithm for optimal operation of Karun multi objective multi reservoir dams with the aim of increasing the energy generation. Energy Strateg. Rev. 42, 100883 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hao, H., Zhu, H. & Luo, Y. A multi-objective immune balancing algorithm for distributed heterogeneous batching-integrated assembly hybrid flowshop scheduling. Expert Syst. Appl. 259, 125288 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Torabi, A., Yosefvand, F., Shabanlou, S., Rajabi, A. & Yaghoubi, B. Optimization of integrated operation of surface and groundwater resources using multi-objective grey wolf optimizer (MOGWO) algorithm. Water Resour. Manage. 38(6), 2079–2099 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yue, X., Liao, Y., Peng, H., Kang, L. & Zeng, Y. A high-dimensional feature selection algorithm via fast dimensionality reduction and multi-objective differential evolution. Swarm Evol. Comput. 94, 101899 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, J., Tang, Q., Li, P., Deng, D. & Chen, Y. A modified MOEA/D approach to the solution of multi-objective optimal power flow problem. Appl. Soft Comput. 47, 494–514 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang, Q. & Li, H. MOEA/D: a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 11(6), 712–731 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Su, H. et al. RIME: a physics-based optimization. Neurocomputing 532, 183–214 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Aljaidi, M. et al. MORIME: a multi-objective RIME optimization framework for efficient truss design. Results. Eng. 25, 103933 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu, W., Fang, L., Ye, X., Medani, M. & Escorcia-Gutierrez, J. IDRM: Brain tumor image segmentation with boosted RIME optimization. Comput. Biol. Med. 166, 107551 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li, Y. et al. CDRIME-MTIS: an enhanced RIME optimization-driven multi-threshold segmentation for COVID-19 X-ray images. Comput. Biol. Med. 169, 107838 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hua, L. K. & Wang, Y. Applications of number theory to numerical analysis. (Springer Science & Business Media 2012).

  27. Lipowski, A. & Lipowska, D. Roulette-wheel selection via stochastic acceptance. Physica Stat. Mech. Appl. 391(6), 2193–2196 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Biswas, S. et al. Integrating differential evolution into gazelle optimization for advanced global optimization and engineering applications. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36425 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Makhadmeh, S. N. et al. Recent advances in multi-objective whale optimization algorithm, its versions and applications. J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci. 37(7), 1–38 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wang, H., Wu, Z., Rahnamayan, S., Liu, Y. & Ventresca, M. Enhancing particle swarm optimization using generalized opposition-based learning. Inf. Sci. 181(20), 4699–4714 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Xing, J., Zhao, H., Chen, H., Deng, R. & Xiao, L. Boosting whale optimizer with quasi-oppositional learning and Gaussian barebone for feature selection and COVID-19 image segmentation. J. Bionic Eng. 20(2), 797–818 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wang, S. et al. Multi-objective optimization operation of multiple water sources under inflow-water demand forecast dual uncertainties. J. Hydrol. 630, 130679 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang, H., Zhou, J., Fang, N., Zhang, R. & Zhang, Y. An efficient multi-objective adaptive differential evolution with chaotic neuron network and its application on long-term hydropower operation with considering ecological environment problem. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 45(1), 60–70 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S. & Meyarivan, T. A. M. T. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182–197 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Deb, K., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M. & Zitzler, E. Scalable multi-objective optimization test problems. In Proceedings of the 2002 congress on evolutionary computation. CEC’02 (Cat. No. 02TH8600) (Vol. 1, pp. 825-830). (IEEE, 2002).

  36. Huang, Y., He, Z., Qin, Y., Lu, Y. & Chen, K. Optimizing office building performance in the HSWW region of China using simulation with Hyperopt CatBoost and SPEA2. Sci. Rep. 15(1), 8193 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Beume, N., Naujoks, B. & Emmerich, M. SMS-EMOA: Multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 181(3), 1653–1669 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ye, Y. et al. Knowledge guided Bayesian classification for dynamic multi-objective optimization. Knowl. Based Syst. 250, 109173 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zitzler, E., Deb, K. & Thiele, L. Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: empirical results. Evol. Comput. 8(2), 173–195 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Huband, S., Hingston, P., Barone, L. & While, L. A review of multiobjective test problems and a scalable test problem toolkit. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 10(5), 477–506 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Schott, J. R. Fault tolerant design using single and multicriteria genetic algorithm optimization (No. AFITCICIA95039) (1995).

  42. Blank, J. & Deb, K. Pymoo: multi-objective optimization in python. IEEE Access 8, 89497–89509 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dey, A., Dey, S., Bhattacharyya, S., Platos, J. & Snasel, V. Novel quantum inspired approaches for automatic clustering of gray level images using particle swarm optimization, spider monkey optimization and ageist spider monkey optimization algorithms. Appl. Soft Comput. 88, 106040 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Qin, P. et al. Climate change impacts on three gorges reservoir impoundment and hydropower generation. J Hydrol. 580, 123922 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province (242300420309). Appreciation is extended to the Pymoo group for offering access to the computational codes applied in this research.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province (242300420309).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China

    Aolin Gao, Hu Hu, He Li, Kaixu Geng & Cihang Shan

  2. Jiangsu Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing, China

    Lyuwen Su

  3. College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China

    Zhe Yang

Authors
  1. Aolin Gao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hu Hu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. He Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lyuwen Su
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhe Yang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kaixu Geng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Cihang Shan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Aolin Gao: Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Investigation; Methodology; Resources; Software; Visualization; Writing - original draft; Writing - review & editing. Hu Hu: Supervision; Project administration; Funding acquisition. He Li: Data curation; Validation; Writing - review & editing. Lyuwen Su: Data curation; Writing - review & editing Zhe Yang: Investigation; Resources; Writing - review & editing. Kaixu Geng: Data curation; Writing - review & editing. Cihang Shan: Investigation; Validation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hu Hu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information. (download DOCX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, A., Hu, H., Li, H. et al. Enhancing long-term comprehensive operation of cascade hydropower system using an improved multi-objective RIME optimization. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45836-z

Download citation

  • Received: 07 December 2025

  • Accepted: 23 March 2026

  • Published: 18 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45836-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Long-term comprehensive operation
  • Multi-objective RIME algorithm
  • Cascade hydropower system
  • Ecological operation
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics