Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
AI-driven optimization of hydrogen storage in porous carbon adsorbents
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 26 March 2026

AI-driven optimization of hydrogen storage in porous carbon adsorbents

  • Helder R. O. Rocha1,
  • Jimmy Romanos2,
  • Sara Abou Dargham3,
  • Roy Roukos2,
  • Jair A. L. Silva1,3 &
  • …
  • Heinrich Joh. Wörtche3,4 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 493 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Energy science and technology
  • Engineering
  • Materials science
  • Mathematics and computing

Abstract

Efficient hydrogen (H\(_2\)) storage remains a major challenge for clean energy applications. This study presents an AI-driven methodology to optimize H\(_2\) storage in porous carbon adsorbents. A comprehensive dataset of 917 literature-derived entries was used to develop two machine learning models: Random Forest (RF) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Both models accurately predicted hydrogen uptake based on material properties and experimental conditions. Within the range of the experimental dataset, the CNN demonstrated strong interpolation performance, accurately predicting hydrogen uptake with a high coefficient of determination (\(R^2\) = 0.9353) and a Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 0.0406. The CNN was integrated into a multi-objective optimization framework to maximize hydrogen uptake while minimizing average pore diameter (AVD). Through extrapolative optimization beyond the training data range, the AI-driven technique and optimization method (AiDO) identified theoretical Pareto-optimal solutions extending beyond the experimental dataset, predicting H\(_2\) uptake of up to 16.66 wt% at an AVD of 0.08 nm. While these extrapolated solutions are not directly validated by experiments, constrained optimization scenarios (e.g., realistic pore-size limits) provide physically meaningful design targets. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the methodology to different normalization techniques. This approach demonstrates the potential of combining predictive ML with optimization to accelerate the design of high-performance hydrogen adsorbents, reducing experimental costs and supporting sustainable energy systems.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Abbreviations

DT:

Decision tree

PR:

Poisson regression

SVM/SVR:

Support vector machine/regression

RF:

Random forest

LR:

Linear regression

RR:

Ridge regression

ANN:

Artificial neural network

XGBoost/XGBT:

Extreme gradient boosting

CatBoost:

Categorical boosting

LGB:

LightGBM

GBDT:

Gradient boosted decision trees

MGBR:

Multiple gradient boosting regressor

MLP/MLPNN:

Multi-layer perceptron

LSTM:

Long short-term memory

CNN:

Convolutional neural network

BDTR:

Bayesian decision tree regressor

BLR:

Bayesian linear regression

NNR:

Nearest neighbor regression

CFFNN:

Cascade feed-forward neural network

GRNN:

Generalized regression neural network

RNN:

Recurrent neural network

KNN:

k-Nearest neighbor

ET:

Extra tree

BRANN:

Bayesian regularized artificial neural network

AB:

AdaBoost

GB:

Gradient boosting

LSSVM:

Least squares support vector machine

ANFIS:

Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system

ELM:

Extreme learning machine

CMIS:

Convolutional mixed-integer system

References

  1. Züttel, A. Materials for hydrogen storage. Mater. today 6, 24–33 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sakintuna, B., Lamari-Darkrim, F. & Hirscher, M. Metal hydride materials for solid hydrogen storage: A review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 32, 1121–1140 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Firlej, L., Beckner, M., Romanos, J., Pfeifer, P. & Kuchta, B. Different approach to estimation of hydrogen-binding energy in nanospace-engineered activated carbons. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 955–961 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Romanos, J. et al. High surface area carbon and process for its production. US Patent 9, 445 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Romanos, J. et al. Cycling and regeneration of adsorbed natural gas in microporous materials. Energy Fuels 31, 14332–14337 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rash, T. A. et al. Microporous carbon monolith synthesis and production for methane storage. Fuel 200, 371–379 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kuchta, B. et al. Open carbon frameworks—A search for optimal geometry for hydrogen storage. J. Mol. Model. 19, 4079–4087 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Romanos, J., Barakat, F. & Dargham, S. A. Nanoporous graphene monolith for hydrogen storage. Mater. Today Proc. 5, 17478–17483 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bannenberg, L. et al. Metal (boro-) hydrides for high energy density storage and relevant emerging technologies. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 45, 33687–33730 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  10. DOE. Technical targets for onboard hydrogen storage for light-duty vehicles. energy.gov (2017).

  11. Chae, H. K. et al. A route to high surface area, porosity and inclusion of large molecules in crystals. Nature 427, 523 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kuchta, B. et al. Hypothetical high-surface-area carbons with exceptional hydrogen storage capacities: Open carbon frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 15130–15137 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Romanos, J. et al. Infrared study of boron–carbon chemical bonds in boron-doped activated carbon. Carbon 54, 208–214 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Romanos, J. et al. Nanospace engineering of KOH activated carbon. Nanotechnology 23, 015401 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jordá-Beneyto, M., Suárez-García, F., Lozano-Castelló, D., Cazorla-Amorós, D. & Linares-Solano, A. Hydrogen storage on chemically activated carbons and carbon nanomaterials at high pressures. Carbon 45, 293–303 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reyhani, A., Mortazavi, S. Z., Moshfegh, S. M. A. Z., Parvin, P. & Golikand, A. N. Hydrogen storage in decorated multiwalled carbon nanotubes by Ca, Co, Fe, Ni, and Pd nanoparticles under ambient conditions. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 6994–7001 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yang, R. T. Hydrogen storage by alkali-doped carbon nanotubes-revisited. Carbon 38, 623–641 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moussa, M. et al. Toward sustainable hydrogen storage and carbon dioxide capture in post-combustion conditions. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 5, 1628–1637 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hu, W. et al. Hierarchically porous carbon derived from neolamarckia cadamba for electrochemical capacitance and hydrogen storage. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 7, 15385–15393 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sevilla, M. & Mokaya, R. Energy storage applications of activated carbons: Supercapacitors and hydrogen storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 1250 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sevilla, M., Fuertes, A. B. & Mokaya, R. High density hydrogen storage in superactivated carbons from hydrothermally carbonized renewable organic materials. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 1400–1410 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Blankenship, L. S., Balahmar, N. & Mokaya, R. Oxygen-rich microporous carbons with exceptional hydrogen storage capacity. Nat. Commun. 8, 1545 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pardakhti, M., Moharreri, E., Wanik, D., Suib, S. L. & Srivastava, R. Machine learning using combined structural and chemical descriptors for prediction of methane adsorption performance of metal organic frameworks (mofs). ACS Comb. Sci. 19, 640–645 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kim, S.-Y., Kim, S.-I. & Bae, Y.-S. Machine-learning-based prediction of methane adsorption isotherms at varied temperatures for experimental adsorbents. J. Phys. Chem. C 124, 19538–19547 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Meng, M., Zhong, R. & Wei, Z. Prediction of methane adsorption in shale: Classical models and machine learning based models. Fuel 278, 118358 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Abdi, J., Hadavimoghaddam, F., Hadipoor, M. & Hemmati-Sarapardeh, A. Modeling of CO2 adsorption capacity by porous metal organic frameworks using advanced decision tree-based models. Sci. Rep. 11, 24468 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yuan, X., Suvarna, M., Low, S., Lee, P. D. D. B. & Yong Sik Ok, J. L. W. Applied machine learning for prediction of CO2 adsorption on biomass waste-derived porous carbons. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 11925–11936 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Maheri, M., Bazan, C., Zendehboudi, S. & Usefi, H. Machine learning to assess CO2 adsorption by biomass waste. J. CO2 Util. 76, 102590 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Alatefi, S., Agwu, O. E., Nait Amar, M. & Alkouh, A. Advancing hydrogen storage: Explainable machine learning models for predicting hydrogen uptake in metal-organic frameworks. Results Eng. 28, 107304 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rahnama, A., Zepon, G. & Sridhar, S. Machine learning based prediction of metal hydrides for hydrogen storage, part i: Prediction of hydrogen weight percent. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 44, 7337–7344 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rahnama, A., Zepon, G. & Sridhar, S. Machine learning based prediction of metal hydrides for hydrogen storage, part ii: Prediction of material class. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 44, 7345–7353 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Alizadeh, S. M. S., Parhizi, Z., Alibak, A. H., Vaferi, B. & Hosseini, S. Predicting the hydrogen uptake ability of a wide range of zeolites utilizing supervised machine learning methods. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 47, 21782–21793 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Salehi, K., Rahmani, M. & Atashrouz, S. Machine learning assisted predictions for hydrogen storage in metal-organic frameworks. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 48, 33260–33275 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Meduri, S. & Nandanavanam, J. Prediction of hydrogen uptake of metal organic frameworks using explainable machine learning. Energy AI 12, 100230 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kusdhany, M. I. M. & Lyth, S. M. New insights into hydrogen uptake on porous carbon materials via explainable machine learning. Carbon 179, 190–201 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Davoodi, S. et al. Machine-learning models to predict hydrogen uptake of porous carbon materials from influential variables. Sep. Purif. Technol. 316, 123807 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wang, C.-S. & Brinkerhoff, J. Predicting hydrogen adsorption and desorption rates in cylindrical metal hydride beds: Empirical correlations and machine learning. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 46, 24256–24270 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Anderson, G., Schweitzer, B., Anderson, R. & Gómez-Gualdrón, D. A. Attainable volumetric targets for adsorption-based hydrogen storage in porous crystals: Molecular simulation and machine learning. J. Phys. Chem. C 123, 120–130 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Batalović, K., Radaković, J., Kuzmanović, B., Ilić, M. M. & Mamula, B. P. Machine learning-based high-throughput screening of mg-containing alloys for hydrogen storage and energy conversion applications. J. Energy Storage 68, 107720 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rossetti, I., Ramis, G., Gallo, A. & Di Michele, A. Hydrogen storage over metal-doped activated carbon. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 40, 7609–7616 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rahimi, M., Abbaspour-Fard, M. H. & Rohani, A. Machine learning approaches to rediscovery and optimization of hydrogen storage on porous bio-derived carbon. J. Clean. Prod. 329, 129714 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Alatefi, S., Nait Amar, M., Agwu, O. E. & Alkouh, A. Accurate prediction of water activity in ionic liquid-based aqueous ternary solutions using advanced explainable artificial intelligence frameworks. Chem. Eng. Sci. 318, 122218 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Thanh, H. V. et al. Hydrogen storage on porous carbon adsorbents: rediscovery by nature-derived algorithms in random forest machine learning model. Energies 16, 2348 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Huang, C.-C., Chen, H.-M., Chen, C.-H. & Huang, J.-C. Effect of surface oxides on hydrogen storage of activated carbon. Sep. Purif. Technol. 70, 291–295 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sun, Y. & Webley, P. A. Preparation of activated carbons from corncob with large specific surface area by a variety of chemical activators and their application in gas storage. Chem. Eng. J. 162, 883–892 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Fierro, V., Zhao, W., Izquierdo, M., Aylon, E. & Celzard, A. Adsorption and compression contributions to hydrogen storage in activated anthracites. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 35, 9038–9045 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  47. González-Navarro, M. F., Giraldo, L. & Moreno-Piraján, J. C. Preparation and characterization of activated carbon for hydrogen storage from waste African oil-palm by microwave-induced lioh basic activation. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 107, 82–86 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hwang, S.-H., Choi, W. M. & Lim, S. K. Hydrogen storage characteristics of carbon fibers derived from rice straw and paper mulberry. Mater. Lett. 167, 18–21 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Bader, N. & Ouederni, A. Optimization of biomass-based carbon materials for hydrogen storage. J. Energy Storage 5, 77–84 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wang, D., Geng, Z., Zhang, C., Zhou, X. & Liu, X. Effects of thermal activation conditions on the microstructure regulation of corncob-derived activated carbon for hydrogen storage. J. Energy Chem. 23, 601–608 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Liu, X., Zhang, C., Geng, Z. & Cai, M. High-pressure hydrogen storage and optimizing fabrication of corncob-derived activated carbon. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 194, 60–65 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wang, H., Gao, Q. & Hu, J. High hydrogen storage capacity of porous carbons prepared by using activated carbon. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 7016–7022 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wang, J., Senkovska, I., Kaskel, S. & Liu, Q. Chemically activated fungi-based porous carbons for hydrogen storage. Carbon 75, 372–380 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Üner, O., Geçgel, Ü. & Avcu, T. Comparisons of activated carbons produced from sycamore balls, ripe black locust seed pods, and nerium oleander fruits and also their h2 storage studies. Carbon Lett. 31, 75–92 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Jin, H., Lee, Y. S. & Hong, I. Hydrogen adsorption characteristics of activated carbon. Catal. Today 120, 399–406 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Figueroa-Torres, M. Z., Robau-Sánchez, A., De la Torre-Sáenz, L. & Aguilar-Elguézabal, A. Hydrogen adsorption by nanostructured carbons synthesized by chemical activation. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 98, 89–93 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Minoda, A., Oshima, S., Iki, H. & Akiba, E. Synthesis of KOH-activated porous carbon materials and study of hydrogen adsorption. J. Alloy. Compd. 580, S301–S304 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Balathanigaimani, M. et al. Nanostructured biomass based carbon materials from beer lees for hydrogen storage. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 18, 2196–2199 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Bader, N. & Ouederni, A. Functionalized and metal-doped biomass-derived activated carbons for energy storage application. J. Energy Storage 13, 268–276 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Cheng, F., Liang, J., Zhao, J., Tao, Z. & Chen, J. Biomass waste-derived microporous carbons with controlled texture and enhanced hydrogen uptake. Chem. Mater. 20, 1889–1895 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Arshad, S. H. M. et al. Preparation of activated carbon from empty fruit bunch for hydrogen storage. J. Energy Storage 8, 257–261 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Zhang, C. et al. Microstructure regulation of super activated carbon from biomass source corncob with enhanced hydrogen uptake. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 38, 9243–9250 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Ramesh, T., Rajalakshmi, N. & Dhathathreyan, K. S. Synthesis and characterization of activated carbon from jute fibers for hydrogen storage. Renew. Energy Environ. Sustain. 2, 4 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Xiao, Y. et al. Melaleuca bark based porous carbons for hydrogen storage. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 39, 11661–11667 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Choi, Y.-K. & Park, S.-J. Hydrogen storage capacity of highly porous carbons synthesized from biomass-derived aerogels. Carbon Lett. 16, 127–131 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Lee, S.-Y. & Park, S.-J. Effect of platinum doping of activated carbon on hydrogen storage behaviors of metal-organic frameworks-5. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 36, 8381–8387 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Fierro, V. et al. Experimental evidence of an upper limit for hydrogen storage at 77 k on activated carbons. Carbon 48, 1902–1911 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Jordá-Beneyto, M., Lozano-Castelló, D., Suárez-García, F., Cazorla-Amorós, D. & Linares-Solano, Á. Advanced activated carbon monoliths and activated carbons for hydrogen storage. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 112, 235–242 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Kopac, T., Kırca, Y. & Toprak, A. Synthesis and characterization of KOH/boron modified activated carbons from coal and their hydrogen sorption characteristics. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42, 23606–23616 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Pedicini, R. et al. Posidonia oceanica and wood chips activated carbon as interesting materials for hydrogen storage. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 45, 14038–14047 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Doğan, M., Sabaz, P., Biıciıl, Z., Kizilduman, B. K. & Turhan, Y. Activated carbon synthesis from tangerine peel and its use in hydrogen storage. J. Energy Inst. 93, 2176–2185 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Rowlandson, J. L., Edler, K. J., Tian, M. & Ting, V. P. Toward process-resilient lignin-derived activated carbons for hydrogen storage applications. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 8, 2186–2195 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Rocha, H. R. O. et al. Optimizing a machine learning design of dielectric properties in lead-free piezoelectric ceramics. Mater. Des. 243, 113053 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Wang, H. et al. Superior hydrogen separation in nanofluidic membranes by synergistic effect of pore tailoring and host–guest interaction. Nano Lett. 25, 9353–9361. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5c01736 (2025) (PMID: 40434398).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Thommes, M. et al. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (iupac technical report). Pure Appl. Chem. 87, 1051–1069 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Gogotsi, Y. et al. Importance of pore size in high-pressure hydrogen storage by porous carbons. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 34, 6314–6319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.05.073 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Broom, D. et al. Concepts for improving hydrogen storage in nanoporous materials. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 44, 7768–7779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.224 (2019) (A special issue on hydrogen-based Energy storage.).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support of the Research Center Bio-based Economy (KCBBE) at Hanze University of Applied Sciences, The Netherlands, and the Laboratory of Telecommunications (LabTel) at the Federal University of Espírito Santo, Brazil.

Funding

This research was partially supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Espírito Santo, Brazil (Grant Nos. 891/2023-P:2023-BDKK7 and 1194/2024-P:2024-26C0T and 2022-BWBR2) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Brazil (Grant Nos. 311633/2025-0 and 301349/2025-8).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil

    Helder R. O. Rocha & Jair A. L. Silva

  2. Department of Natural Science, Lebanese American University (LAU), P.O.Box. 36, Byblos, Lebanon

    Jimmy Romanos & Roy Roukos

  3. Sensors and Smart Systems, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, 9747 AS, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Sara Abou Dargham, Jair A. L. Silva & Heinrich Joh. Wörtche

  4. Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AZ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    Heinrich Joh. Wörtche

Authors
  1. Helder R. O. Rocha
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jimmy Romanos
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sara Abou Dargham
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Roy Roukos
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jair A. L. Silva
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Heinrich Joh. Wörtche
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.R. designed the study, developed the methodology, wrote the software, and provided resources, while J.R., S.D., and J.S. contributed to the study design and investigations. J.R., S.D., J.S and H.W. validated the results. S.D., R.R., and J.R. conducted the formal analysis. H.R. and S.D. wrote the original draft. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Abou Dargham.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information. (download CSV )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rocha, H.R.O., Romanos, J., Abou Dargham, S. et al. AI-driven optimization of hydrogen storage in porous carbon adsorbents. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45915-1

Download citation

  • Received: 20 January 2026

  • Accepted: 23 March 2026

  • Published: 26 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45915-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Hydrogen storage
  • Porous carbon adsorbents
  • Random forest
  • Convolutional neural network
  • Optuna optimization algorithm
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics