Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Evaluating miscible gas injection patterns for enhanced oil recovery in fault controlled fractured vuggy volatile oil reservoirs
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 03 April 2026

Evaluating miscible gas injection patterns for enhanced oil recovery in fault controlled fractured vuggy volatile oil reservoirs

  • Xingliang Deng1,2,4,
  • Zhiliang Liu1,2,3,
  • Jie Zhang1,2,
  • Zhouhua Wang5,
  • Guohui Li1,
  • Hanmin Tu5,
  • Peng Wang1,2 &
  • …
  • Chao Zhang1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Crude oil
  • Natural gas

Abstract

The FM fault-controlled fractured-vuggy volatile oil reservoir is characterized by strong heterogeneity and insufficient natural energy, which limits the effectiveness of conventional water flooding due to early water breakthrough and significant attic oil retention. To optimize post-waterflood development strategies, this study conducted a series of full-diameter physical simulation experiments using multi-fractured-vuggy cores under reservoir conditions. Experiments with different gas injection media revealed that the stage recovery rates for N2, hydrocarbon gases, and CO2 are 78.85%, 64.36%, and 59.96%, with an identical gas injection volume of 0.77 HCPV. Based on these findings, along with the results from phase behavior experiments, N2 is recommended as the preferred gas injection medium. The cumulative oil recovery after continuous water flooding was about 75%. The subsequent water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection effectively increased oil recovery by approximately 6.6–8.8% relative to waterflooding alone by improving sweep efficiency and mobilizing residual oil in branch fractures. Finally, connectivity-controlled case studies demonstrate that gas injection in upper-connected fractured-vuggy unit provides an additional 11.68% incremental recovery compared with lower-connected unit due to delayed gas breakthrough and expanded sweep volume. Overall, direct continuous gas injection results in earlier gas breakthroughs, premature oil production at the core outlet, reduced gas consumption per ton of oil, and favorable extraction outcomes. Therefore, it is recommended to implement a direct continuous gas injection in the well group following water flooding to enhance crude oil recovery.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to confidentiality concerns but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Yao, J. et al. The construction of carbonate digital rock with hybrid superposition method. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 110, 263–267 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Manrique, E. J., Muci, V. E. & Gurfinkel, M. E. EOR field experiences in carbonate reservoirs in the United States. SPE Res. Eval Eng. 10, 667–686 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wu, Y. B. et al. Application status of CO₂ flooding in low permeability reservoir to enhance oil recovery. Xinjiang Oil Gas. 6, 36–54 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Li, F. & Yang, Y. C. Study of carbon dioxide drive in Pu 1–1 well and pilot experiment result analysis of Sha 1 reservoir in Pucheng Oilfield. Offshore Oil. 29, 56–60 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hu, R. R. et al. Study on EOR mechanism by gas injection replacing oil in fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoir of Tahe Oilfield. J. Xi’an Shiyou Univ. (Nat Sci. Ed). 30, 49–59 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Heidari, P. & Kordestany, A. Gas injection into fractured reservoirs above bubble point pressure. Petrol. Sci. Technol. 30, 534–543 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mohsenzadeh, A. et al. Non-hydrocarbon gas injection followed by steam–gas co-injection for heavy oil recovery enhancement from fractured carbonate reservoirs. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 144, 121–130 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lyu, X. R. et al. Mechanism and influencing factors of EOR by N2 injection in fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoirs. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 40, 226–235 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guo, W. J. et al. Experimental research on the mechanisms of improving water flooding in fractured-vuggy reservoirs. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 213, 110383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110383 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lyu, X. R. et al. Technical policy study of single well N₂ injection for EOR in complex fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoirs. J. Southwest. Petrol. Univ. (Sci Technol. Ed). 43, 101–109 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Parvizi, R. & Ghaseminejad, E. An experimental investigation of gravity drainage during immiscible gas injection in carbonate rocks under reservoir conditions. J. Petrol. Sci. Technol. 4, 63–71 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shi, F. G. et al. Experimental study on oil flooding by full diameter core gas injection in fractured-vuggy reservoir. Adv. Fine Petrochem. 17, 9–11 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Olabode, O. A. et al. Effect of foam and WAG (water alternating gas) injection on performance of thin oil rim reservoirs. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 171, 1443–1454 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Olabode, O. A. Effect of water and gas injection schemes on synthetic oil rim models. J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 10, 1343–1358 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wu, X. M. et al. Effect of bottom water on subsequent water flooding and gas drive in fractured-vuggy carbonate oil reservoir. Petrol. Geol. Recovery Eff. 23, 111–115 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kang, B. et al. A preferred method of gas injection unit in the fractured-vuggy reservoir. Sci. Technol. Eng. 13, 7629–7633 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shi, Y. Z. et al. Experiment on effect evaluation of nitrogen displacement of fractured-vuggy reservoir. Contemp. Chem. Ind. 49, 2194–2202 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hui, J. et al. Study on the mechanism of gas injection and oil substitution in fracture-vuggy reservoirs in Tahe Oilfield. Drill. Prod. Technol. 36, 55–57 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Allal, M. A. et al. Miscible water alternating gas injection WAG field scale application in Algeria: An effective way to improve oil recovery, rejuvenate mature field and develop opportunities to stream gas sales. Proc. ADIPEC Conf.; (2023). https://doi.org/10.2118/216168-MS

  20. Shedid, S. A. et al. Microscopic rock characterization and influence of slug size on oil recovery by CO2 miscible flooding in carbonate oil reservoir. Proc. SPE Int. Improved Oil Recovery Conf.; (2005). https://doi.org/10.2118/97635-MS

  21. Hou, R. J. et al. Influencing factors on EOR nitrogen flooding in fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoir. Petrol. Geol. Recovery Eff. 22, 64–68 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, Z. H. et al. Gas-water flowing characteristics under high temperature and high pressure in fractured cavity carbonate gas reservoir. Petrol. Reserv. Eval Dev. 7, 47–52 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, L. et al. Visual experiments on the occurrence characteristics of multi-type reservoir water in fracture-cavity carbonate gas reservoir. Acta Pet. Sin. 39, 686–696 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chen, X. J. Visualized gas drive EOR experiments in fractured-vuggy reservoirs after waterflooding in Tahe oilfield. Xinjiang Petrol. Geol. 39, 473–479 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Su, W. et al. Experimental investigation on continuous N₂ injection to improve light oil recovery in multi-wells fractured-cavity unit. Petroleum 3, 367–376 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Li, J. et al. Experimental study on the simulation of water flooding mechanism in fracture-vuggy carbonate reservoirs. Nat. Gas Explor. Dev. 31, 41–84 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Xiong, Y. et al. Physical simulation of the full diameter of different development methods of fracture-vuggy carbonate condensate gas reservoirs. Xinjiang Oil Gas. 8, 58–61 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zheng, Z. Y. et al. Visible research on remaining oil after nitrogen flooding in fractured-cavity carbonate reservoir. Petrol. Geol. Recovery Eff. 23, 93–97 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We extend our gratitude to Hanmin Tu and Zhouhua Wang for their intelligent discussions and support.

Funding

This work was supported by China National Petroleum Corporation Major Science and Technology Project: Research on the Scaled Reserve Increase and Production and Exploration and Development Technology of Marine Carbonate Oil and Gas (No.2023ZZ16); Research on the Efficient Development and Improved Recovery of Ultra-deep Fault-controlled Marine Carbonate Reservoirs (No.2023ZZ16YJ02).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. PetroChina Tarim Oilfield Company, Korla, Xinjiang, China

    Xingliang Deng, Zhiliang Liu, Jie Zhang, Guohui Li, Peng Wang & Chao Zhang

  2. R&D Center for Ultra Deep Complex Reservoir Exploration and Development, CNPC, Korla, China

    Xingliang Deng, Zhiliang Liu, Jie Zhang & Peng Wang

  3. Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Ultra-deep Oil and Gas, Korla, Xinjiang, China

    Zhiliang Liu

  4. State Energy Key Laboratory for Carbonate Oil and Gas, Korla, Xinjiang, China

    Xingliang Deng

  5. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, 610500, China

    Zhouhua Wang & Hanmin Tu

Authors
  1. Xingliang Deng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhiliang Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jie Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhouhua Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Guohui Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hanmin Tu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Peng Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Chao Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Investigation: X.D., Z.L., J.Z. Methodology: Z.W., H.T. Project administration: X.D., Z.L., G.L. Supervision: X.D., Z.L., P.W. Writing–original draft: Z.L., H.T., J.Z., C.Z. Writing–review & editing: X.D., Z.W., Z.L. Funding: X.D., Z.L.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhouhua Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deng, X., Liu, Z., Zhang, J. et al. Evaluating miscible gas injection patterns for enhanced oil recovery in fault controlled fractured vuggy volatile oil reservoirs. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45923-1

Download citation

  • Received: 11 March 2025

  • Accepted: 23 March 2026

  • Published: 03 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45923-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Fault-controlled fracture-vuggy volatile reservoirs
  • Gas injection flooding
  • Miscible flooding
  • Enhanced oil recovery
  • Physical simulation
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing