Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Threat prioritization and fear of pain dynamics are associated with engagement in postoperative activities after thoracoscopic lung surgery
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 02 April 2026

Threat prioritization and fear of pain dynamics are associated with engagement in postoperative activities after thoracoscopic lung surgery

  • Yang Luo1,
  • Jiao Peng2,
  • Lijuan Feng1,
  • Lihong Bao3 &
  • …
  • Xiao Wu1 

Scientific Reports (2026) Cite this article

  • 848 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Pain
  • Patient education
  • Psychology

Abstract

Fear of pain (FOP) often leads to activity avoidance, hindering recovery after thoracic surgery. We proposed the concept of “Threat Prioritization”—the cognitive weighing of activity-induced pain against inactivity-induced complications. This study investigated whether prioritizing complication risks over pain is associated with greater engagement in postoperative activities and a subsequent reduction in FOP. In this prospective cohort study, 121 patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery were enrolled. FOP (Fear of Pain Questionnaire-9) and cough strength (Semi-Quantitative Cough Strength Score, SCSS) were assessed on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 3. Therapeutic ambulation episodes (POD1–3) were recorded. On POD3, patients were categorized as “Complication-Focused” or “Pain-Focused” based on their self-reported primary concern during recovery. Multiple linear regression was used to identify predictors of FOP reduction. Complication-Focused patients (n = 45) showed significantly stronger cough on POD3 (Median SCSS: 4.00 vs. 2.50, p < 0.001) and higher distribution of ambulation episodes (Median: 4.00 vs. 4.00, p = 0.003) compared to Pain-Focused patients (n = 76). Postoperative air leak rates were comparable between groups (20.0% vs. 19.7%, p = 1.000). Regression analysis (Adjusted R2 = 0.433) showed that greater FOP reduction was associated with higher ambulation counts (B = -1.25, p < 0.001). Conversely, activity-linked breakthrough pain was associated with attenuated fear reduction (B = 5.31, p < 0.001). Changes in physiological pain intensity were not significantly associated with FOP reduction (p = 0.964). Age, sex, and surgical extent were included in the model a priori but were not significant predictors (all p > 0.05). A mindset prioritizing complication risks over pain is associated with increased engagement in essential recovery activities without increasing observed air leak rates. Postoperative FOP reduction appears to be driven by behavioral engagement rather than physiological pain relief alone. These findings suggest that perioperative interventions targeting threat prioritization may facilitate functional recovery.

Similar content being viewed by others

A Comparison of effect of preemptive versus postoperative use of ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block on pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Article Open access 12 January 2022

The impact of pulmonary function tests on early postoperative complications in open lung resection surgery: an observational cohort study

Article Open access 24 January 2022

Predictors and predictive effects of acute pain trajectories after gastrointestinal surgery

Article Open access 20 April 2022

Data availability

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Ustunel, F. & Erden, S. Evaluation of fear of pain among surgical patients in the preoperative period. J. Perianesthesia Nurs. Off J. Am. Soc. Perianesthesia Nurses. 37, 188–193 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Luo, Y. et al. Fear of pain as a predictor for postoperative pain intensity among the patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery. Pain Res. Manag. 2201501 (2022). (2022).

  3. McIlroy, S., Bearne, L., Weinman, J. & Norton, S. Identifying modifiable factors that influence walking in patients undergoing surgery for neurogenic claudication: a prospective longitudinal study. Sci. Rep. 15, 4959 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rogers, A. H. & Farris, S. G. A meta-analysis of the associations of elements of the fear-avoidance model of chronic pain with negative affect, depression, anxiety, pain-related disability and pain intensity. Eur. J. Pain Lond. Engl. 26, 1611–1635 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kehl, C. et al. Associations between pain-related fear and lumbar movement variability during activities of daily living in patients with chronic low back pain and healthy controls. Sci. Rep. 14, 22889 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gao, C., Wang, R., Zhang, J., Han, L. & Zhou, H. Identifying patient profiles based on protection motivation theory to predict exercise adherence in patients with lumbar disc herniation: a latent profile analysis. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 27, 181 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hadjis, G. E. et al. Salience or value: what drives priority in pain-cognition interactions? Pain 166, 2851–2862 (2025).

  8. Kim, S., Song, I. A., Lee, B. & Oh, T. K. Risk factors for discontinuation of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after general surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Sci. Rep. 13, 18318 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yang, H., Yang, Q., Pu, M. & Liao, C. Efficacy of nursing interventions based on the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in patients with lumbar disc herniation. Sci. Rep. 15, 21947 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Luo, Y. et al. Translation and validation of fear of pain-9 items into simplified chinese version for mainland china. J. Pain Res. 14, 35–40 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibrahim, A. S. et al. Semi-quantitative cough strength score as a predictor for extubation outcome in traumatic brain injury: a prospective observational study. Neurocrit Care. 29, 273–279 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Balla, J. & Hagger, M. S. Protection motivation theory and health behaviour: conceptual review, discussion of limitations, and recommendations for best practice and future research. Health Psychol. Rev. 19, 145–171 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schrooten, M. G. S., Van Damme, S., Crombez, G., Kindermans, H. & Vlaeyen, J. W. S. Winning or not losing? The impact of non-pain goal focus on attentional bias to learned pain signals. Scand. J. Pain. 18, 675–686 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Holzapfel, S., Schemer, L., Riecke, J. & Glombiewski, J. A. Behavioral test (BAT-back): preliminary evidence for a successful predictor of treatment outcome after exposure treatment for chronic low back pain. Clin. J. Pain. 37, 265–269 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schemer, L., Vlaeyen, J. W. S. & Glombiewski, J. A. From the lab to the clinic: Advancing pain exposure using principles of functional analysis. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 62, 101982 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bingöl, E., Tiryaki, K., Tümtürk, İ. & Özden, F. Investigation of exercise-related leg pain, fear of pain, kinesiophobia, and injury anxiety in athletes. BMC Sports Sci. Med. Rehabil. 17, 40 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hruschak, V. J. et al. Pain appraisals in patients with physical injury: assessing the role of distress tolerance in the relationship between depression and pain catastrophizing. Health Soc. Work. 46, 187–198 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ong, W. Y., Stohler, C. S. & Herr, D. R. Role of the prefrontal cortex in pain processing. Mol. Neurobiol. 56, 1137–1166 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by general program of Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 2021CFB588).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

    Yang Luo, Lijuan Feng & Xiao Wu

  2. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Wuhan Fourth Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China

    Jiao Peng

  3. Department of Nursing, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

    Lihong Bao

Authors
  1. Yang Luo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jiao Peng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lijuan Feng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lihong Bao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiao Wu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

L.B. and X.W. conceptualized the study and provided supervision. X.W. was responsible for project administration. Y.L., J.P., L.B., and X.W. contributed to the methodology design. Y.L. and L.F. conducted the investigation. Y.L. was responsible for the retrospective collection of additional data and comprehensive data curation. Y.L. performed the final formal analysis, including statistical corrections and the generation of all revised figures. J.P. and Y.L. drafted the original manuscript. Y.L. primarily completed the revision of the manuscript and the responses to reviewers. Y.L. acquired the funding. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lihong Bao or Xiao Wu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was reviewed and approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Approval No. 20230987). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, Y., Peng, J., Feng, L. et al. Threat prioritization and fear of pain dynamics are associated with engagement in postoperative activities after thoracoscopic lung surgery. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46036-5

Download citation

  • Received: 13 March 2025

  • Accepted: 23 March 2026

  • Published: 02 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46036-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • postoperative fear of pain
  • threat prioritization
  • avoidance behaviors
  • lung surgery
  • postoperative recovery
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing