Abstract
Understanding soil–metal adhesion under varying moisture and texture conditions is essential for predicting soil–tool interactions in agricultural machinery. However, despite its importance, research that directly quantifies soil adhesion and provides physically based parameters for modeling remains limited, particularly across the diverse conditions encountered in field operations. In this study, we experimentally measured soil–metal adhesion across multiple penetration speeds and integrated the results with discrete element method (DEM) simulations based on the Edinburgh Elasto-Plastic Adhesion (EEPA) model. Adhesion tests were conducted for three soil textures (sandy loam, sandy clay loam, and loam) and four water contents (10–25%) at penetration speeds of 50 and 500 mm·min⁻¹. Adhesive force increased with water content and peaked near the liquid limit (20–25%), while remaining nearly independent of penetration rate (< 5% variation). DEM calibration showed that surface energy (Δγ) is the dominant parameter governing compressive behavior, whereas the constant pull-off force (f₀) primarily controls adhesive strength. Two-way ANOVA confirmed that these mechanisms operate independently (p > 0.05). The calibrated model achieved R² ≥ 0.93 and RMSE ≤ 0.1 N across all textures, and validation at an intermediate speed of 250 mm·min⁻¹ demonstrated stable predictive performance (R² ≥ 0.93 for compression; R² ≥ 0.98 for adhesion). By linking multi-speed adhesion measurements with a physically based DEM contact model, this work establishes a robust and transferable Δγ–f₀ calibration framework for modeling soil adhesion in cohesive soils.
Similar content being viewed by others
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, supported by the Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry (IPET)’s Upland Agricultural Mechanization Promotion Technology Development Project (RS-2023-00236042).
Funding
This work was supported by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA), through the Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry (IPET), under the Upland Agricultural Mechanization Promotion Technology Development Project (RS-2023-00236042), the International Cooperation-based Export Agricultural Competitiveness Enhancement Technology Development Project (RS-2023-00233191), and the Offload Smart Agricultural Utilization Model Development Project (RS-2025-02313136).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Jeong, DW., Kim, MS., Choi, SO. et al. Effect analysis of soil texture and water content on soil adhesive force based on the discrete element method. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46139-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46139-z


