Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Association of immune-related adverse events with survival in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy for lung cancer
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 03 April 2026

Association of immune-related adverse events with survival in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy for lung cancer

  • Shinya Takada1 na1,
  • Izumi Nasu2 na1,
  • Ryuji Uozumi3,
  • Masahiro Kondo4,5,
  • Shuichi Nawata6,
  • Hirotoshi Iihara7,
  • Yohei Okumura8,
  • Hirokazu Hashishita1,
  • Masashi Takemoto9,
  • Takahiro Okada6,
  • Yu Kitamura10,
  • Satoshi Oizumi11,
  • Satoshi Fukuda12,
  • Sojiro Kusumoto13,
  • Junki Endo10,
  • Hitoshi Kawazoe  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0626-79088,14 &
  • …
  • Tomonori Nakamura2 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cancer
  • Lung cancer

Abstract

The association of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and baseline peripheral blood count ratios with the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. This multicenter, retrospective study analyzed data from 191 patients treated with pembrolizumab or atezolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy across five hospitals in Japan between December 2018 and March 2021. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed in relation to irAEs within a 6-week landmark analysis and baseline peripheral blood count ratios using Cox proportional hazards models. IrAEs occurred in 70 patients (36.6%) and showed no substantial association with survival (PFS: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70–1.53 and OS: HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.49–1.34). Conversely, baseline peripheral blood count ratios were considerably linked to survival. A higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio correlated with reduced PFS (adjusted HR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.10–2.40) and OS (adjusted HR = 2.50, 95% CI = 1.53–4.09), with similar trends for the lymphocyte-to-monocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios. Collectively, these findings suggest that although irAEs were not predictive of survival, baseline blood count ratios can serve as prognostic biomarkers in patients with NSCLC receiving chemoimmunotherapy.

Data availability

The data underlying this article cannot be shared publicly to protect the privacy of the individuals who participated in this study. The data will be shared upon a reasonable request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., Fuchs, H. E. & Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J. Clin. 72, 7–33 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bray, F. et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 74, 229–263 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gandhi, L. et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl. J. Med. 378, 2078–2092 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Paz-Ares, L. et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl. J. Med. 379, 2040–2051 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aso, M. et al. Association between skin reaction and clinical benefit in patients treated with anti-programmed cell death 1 monotherapy for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer. Oncologist 25, e536–e544 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Haratani, K. et al. Association of immune-related adverse events with nivolumab efficacy in non–small-cell lung cancer. JAMA Oncol. 4, 374–378 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Takada, S. et al. Identifying early predictive markers for immune-related adverse events in nivolumab-treated patients with renal cell carcinoma and gastric cancer. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 23, 695–701 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jiang, T. et al. Clinical value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Lung Cancer. 130, 76–83 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sun, Y. & Zhang, L. The clinical use of pretreatment NLR, PLR, and LMR in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: evidence from a meta-analysis. Cancer Manag Res. 10, 6167–6179 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tan, D., Fu, Y., Tong, W. & Li, F. Prognostic significance of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Int. J. Surg. 55, 128–138 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lu, C., Zhou, L., Ouyang, J. & Yang, H. Prognostic value of lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. Med. (Baltim). 98, e15876 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kano, S. et al. Pretreatment lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio as an independent prognostic factor for head and neck cancer. Head Neck. 39, 247–253 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  13. von Elm, E. et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370, 1453–1457 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Takahashi, K. et al. Proton pump inhibitors and cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in patients with breast cancer. Oncologist 29, e741–e749 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tashiro, R. et al. Clinical and biomarker factors affecting survival in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer receiving olaparib monotherapy: a multicenter retrospective study. Sci. Rep. 13, 11962 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ogiwara, T. et al. Prognostic value of baseline medications plus neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in the effectiveness of nivolumab and pembrolizumab in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective study. Front. Oncol. 11, 770268 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Eisenhauer, E. A. et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur. J. Cancer. 45, 228–247 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Freites-Martinez, A., Santana, N., Arias-Santiago, S. & Viera, A. Using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE - Version 5.0) to evaluate the severity of adverse events of anticancer therapies. Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed. 112, 90–92 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Korn, E. L. Censoring distributions as a measure of follow-up in survival analysis. Stat. Med. 5, 255–260 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yokoo, K. et al. Relationship between immune-related adverse events and treatment effectiveness in extensive disease small cell lung cancer. Thorac. Cancer. 14, 2251–2258 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bi, H. et al. Prognostic implications of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer receiving chemoimmunotherapy: a multicenter, real-world study. Thorac. Cancer. 15, 559–569 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Osa, A. et al. Clinical implications of monitoring nivolumab immunokinetics in non-small cell lung cancer patients. JCI Insight. 3, e59125 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jin, J., Yang, L., Liu, D. & Li, W. Association of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and clinical outcomes in patients with lung cancer receiving immunotherapy: a meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 10, e035031 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Li, X., Zhang, S., Lu, J., Li, C. & Li, N. The prognostic value of systemic immune-inflammation index in surgical esophageal cancer patients: an updated meta-analysis. Front. Surg. 9, 922595 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, N., Jiang, J., Tang, S. & Sun, G. Predictive value of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a meta-analysis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 85, 106677 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wilson, B. E., Routy, B., Nagrial, A. & Chin, V. T. The effect of antibiotics on clinical outcomes in immune-checkpoint blockade: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 69, 343–354 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lurienne, L. et al. NSCLC immunotherapy efficacy and antibiotic use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Thorac. Oncol. 15, 1147–1159 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Crespin, A. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the impact of antibiotic use on the clinical outcomes of cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Front. Oncol. 13, 1075593 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tamura, K. et al. Efficacy and safety of chemoimmunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with antibiotics-induced dysbiosis: a propensity-matched real-world analysis. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 150, 216 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cortellini, A. et al. Antibiotic-exposed patients with non-small-cell lung cancer preserve efficacy outcomes following first-line chemo-immunotherapy. Ann. Oncol. 32, 1391–1399 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Liu, J. et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio can predict clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 33, e22964 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nguyen, C. T. T., Van, T. N. K. & Huong, P. T. Predictability of neutrophile to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio on the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients: a meta-Analysis. Cancer Control. 31, 10732748241285474 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Platini, H. et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as prognostic markers for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with immunotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med. (Kaunas). 58, 1069 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Liu, N. et al. The relationship between NLR/PLR/LMR levels and survival prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Med. (Baltim). 101, e28617 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We extend our gratitude to all patients and multidisciplinary team staff at the National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center, Nagoya City University Hospital, Showa University Hospital, Gifu University Hospital, and Keio University Hospital for their participation in this study. We also thank Prof. Kazunori Kimura, Prof. Tadanori Sasaki, and the Effectiveness of Platinum Chemotherapy and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors by Concomitant Use (EPIC) investigators for their valuable support. Additionally, we are grateful to Editage (www.editage.com) for the English language editing.

Funding

This research was supported in part by the Research Foundation for Pharmaceutical Sciences in Japan and the JSPS KAKENHI (grant numbers 23K20374 and 25K15015 to R.U.and 22K06776 to H.K.). The funders had no role in the study’s design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Shinya Takada and Izumi Nasu.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmacy, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center, Hokkaido, Japan

    Shinya Takada & Hirokazu Hashishita

  2. Division of Pharmaceutical Care Sciences, Keio University Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tokyo, Japan

    Izumi Nasu & Tomonori Nakamura

  3. Department of Industrial Engineering and Economics, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

    Ryuji Uozumi

  4. Department of Pharmacy, Nagoya City University East Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan

    Masahiro Kondo

  5. Department of Clinical Pharmaceutics, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan

    Masahiro Kondo

  6. Department of Hospital Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan

    Shuichi Nawata & Takahiro Okada

  7. Department of Pharmacy, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan

    Hirotoshi Iihara

  8. Department of Pharmacy, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

    Yohei Okumura & Hitoshi Kawazoe

  9. Department of Pharmacy, Nagoya City University Midorimunicipal Hospital, Nagoya, Japan

    Masashi Takemoto

  10. Department of Cardiology and Respiratory Medicine, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan

    Yu Kitamura & Junki Endo

  11. Department of Respiratory Medicine, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center, Hokkaido, Japan

    Satoshi Oizumi

  12. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan

    Satoshi Fukuda

  13. Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

    Sojiro Kusumoto

  14. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan

    Hitoshi Kawazoe

Authors
  1. Shinya Takada
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Izumi Nasu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ryuji Uozumi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Masahiro Kondo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shuichi Nawata
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hirotoshi Iihara
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yohei Okumura
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hirokazu Hashishita
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Masashi Takemoto
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Takahiro Okada
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yu Kitamura
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Satoshi Oizumi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Satoshi Fukuda
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Sojiro Kusumoto
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Junki Endo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Hitoshi Kawazoe
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Tomonori Nakamura
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conception and design: H.K.Provision of study material or patients: Y.K., S.O., S.F., S.K., and J.E.Collection and/or assembly of data: S.T., M.K., S.N., H.I., Y.O., H.H., M.T., and T.O.Data analysis and interpretation: R.U. and H.K.Manuscript writing: S.T., I.N., and H.K.Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hitoshi Kawazoe.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

I.N. reports employment with Flatiron Health, Inc., an independent member of the Roche group, and stock ownership in Roche. R.U. has consulting/advisory relationships with Eisai, Sawai Pharmaceutical, SBI Pharmaceuticals, Daiichi Sankyo, Statcom, Toregem Biopharma, and EPSCorporation and has received honoraria from Janssen Pharmaceutical, SAS Institute Japan, and Nippon Kayaku outside the submitted work. H.I. received personal fees from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Nippon Kayaku, Ohara, Sawai, Taiho, and Yakult outside the submitted work. S.O. received research funding from Abbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Pfizer, MSD, Sanofi, Taiho, and Takeda and lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai, MSD, and Takeda outside the submitted work. S.K. received honoraria fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai, Taiho, Kyorin, Daiichi Sankyo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, and Amgen outside the submitted work. The remaining authors declare no competing and financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takada, S., Nasu, I., Uozumi, R. et al. Association of immune-related adverse events with survival in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy for lung cancer. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46185-7

Download citation

  • Received: 25 March 2025

  • Accepted: 24 March 2026

  • Published: 03 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46185-7

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Pembrolizumab
  • Atezolizumab
  • Immune checkpoint inhibitors
  • Immune-related adverse events
  • Non-small cell lung cancer
Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Immune-related adverse events

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer