Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Baseline malaria burden and pyrethroid resistance in Muheza, Tanzania informing a cluster randomized trial of the 3D window screens
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 03 April 2026

Baseline malaria burden and pyrethroid resistance in Muheza, Tanzania informing a cluster randomized trial of the 3D window screens

  • Subam Kathet1,
  • Veneranda M. Bwana2,
  • Mwantumu Ally Fereji2,
  • Jenny B. Mhando2,
  • Frank S. Magogo2,
  • Victor Mwingira2,
  • William Kisinza2,
  • Seppo Meri1,3 na1 &
  • …
  • Ayman Khattab1,4 na1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Diseases
  • Medical research
  • Microbiology

Abstract

Insecticide resistance in malaria vectors has created an urgent need for alternative, non-insecticidal control tools. In response, a novel window screen, the Three-dimensional (3D) Screen, was developed. Before launching a cluster-randomized controlled trial to evaluate its impact, a baseline study was conducted in 20 hamlets (clusters) from 17 villages in Muheza District, northeastern Tanzania, to assess malaria burden, vector characteristics, and risk factors for infection. Structured questionnaires collected household information; malaria prevalence was measured among 778 children aged 6 months to 14 years using malaria rapid diagnostic tests (mRDTs), and haemoglobin was assessed by HemoCue. Indoor Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) light traps (LTs) were used for mosquito collections, yielding 14,263 mosquitoes morphologically identified, including 889 Anopheles gambiae sensu lato (s.l.) and 2,013 An. funestus senso lato (s.l.); 2,508 female Anopheles were further analysed by Polymerase chain reaction (PCR). World Health Organization (WHO) cylinder bioassays assessed pyrethroid resistance in An. gambiae s.l., and genotyping targeted the knockdown resistance (kdr)-East (L1014S) mutation. Malaria prevalence was 40.2%, and anaemia affected 55.2% of children. An. funestus s.l. (70.2%) and An. gambiae s.l. (29.8%) comprised the vector population. Mean daily entomological inoculation rates (EIRs) were 0.039 and 0.037 infectious bites per person per night, corresponding to annual EIRs of approximately 14.2 for An. funestus s.l., 13.5 for An. gambiae s.l., and 27.7 combined. Pyrethroid resistance was high, with 24-hour mortality of 56.5% to permethrin and 52.8% to deltamethrin; the kdr-East (L1014S) allele frequency in An. gambiae s.s. was 0.45. Multivariate analysis showed that children aged ≥ 5 years had approximately threefold higher odds of Plasmodium infection than those < 5 years (aOR = 3.03, 95% CI: 2.09–4.40), while sleeping under a bed net was protective (aOR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.18–0.70). Cluster-level variance accounted for 19.5% of infection risk, highlighting community-level factors. Persistent transmission, high anaemia prevalence, and widespread insecticide resistance underscore the limitations of current measures and the need for integrated interventions, including novel non-insecticidal tools such as the 3D-Screen.

Data availability

All datasets supporting the conclusions of this study are provided within the article and its supplementary material (Additional file 1: Supplementary_materials.pdf).

References

  1. Bhatt, S. et al. The effect of malaria control on Plasmodium falciparum in Africa between 2000 and 2015. Nature 526, 207–211 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization. World Malaria Report 2025 (World Health Organization, 2025).

  3. World Health Organization. Global Report on Insecticide Resistance in Malaria Vectors: 2010–2016 (World Health Organization, 2018).

  4. Liu, N. Insecticide resistance in mosquitoes: Impact, mechanisms, and research directions. Annu. Rev. Èntomol. 60, 537–559 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wilson, A. L. et al. The importance of vector control for the control and elimination of vector-borne diseases. PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis. 14, e0007831 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Okumu, F. et al. What Africa can do to accelerate and sustain progress against malaria. PLOS Glob Public. Heal. 2, e0000262 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lim, S. S. et al. Net benefits: A multicountry analysis of observational data examining associations between insecticide-treated mosquito nets and health outcomes. PLoS Med. 8, e1001091 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Khattab, A. et al. 3D mosquito screens to create window double screen traps for mosquito control. Parasite Vector. 10, 400 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kathet, S. et al. Efficacy of 3D screens for sustainable mosquito control: A semi-field experimental hut evaluation in northeastern Tanzania. Parasites Vectors. 16, 417 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kisinza, W. N. et al. Assessing the efficacy of 3D window double screens (3D-WDS) in reducing malaria transmission in northeastern Tanzania: Study protocol for a two-arm cluster-randomised controlled trial. Contemp. Clin. Trials Commun. 101503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101503 (2025).

  11. Hagenlocher, M. & Castro, M. C. Mapping malaria risk and vulnerability in the United Republic of Tanzania: A spatial explicit model. Popul. Heal Metr. 13, 2 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chacky, F. et al. Nationwide school malaria parasitaemia survey in public primary schools, the United Republic of Tanzania. Malar. J. 17, 452 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  13. National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) [Tanzania] & ICF. Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey and Malaria Indicator Survey 2022: Key Indicators Report. NBS and ICF. https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/PR144/PPR144.pdf (2022).

  14. Ishengoma, D. S. et al. Trends of Plasmodium falciparum prevalence in two communities of Muheza district North-eastern Tanzania: Correlation between parasite prevalence, malaria interventions and rainfall in the context of re-emergence of malaria after two decades of progressively declining transmission. Malar. J. 17, 252 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Winskill, P., Rowland, M., Mtove, G., Malima, R. C. & Kirby, M. J. Malaria risk factors in north-east Tanzania. Malar. J. 10, 98–98 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  16. White, N. J. Anaemia and malaria. Malar. J. 17, 371 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Iwashita, H. et al. Sleeping arrangement and house structure affect bed net use in villages along Lake Victoria. Malar. J. 9, 176 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Matowo, N. S. et al. An increasing role of pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles funestus in malaria transmission in the Lake Zone, Tanzania. Sci. Rep. 11, 13457 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kaindoa, E. W. et al. Interventions that effectively target Anopheles funestus mosquitoes could significantly improve control of persistent malaria transmission in south–eastern Tanzania. PLoS ONE. 12, e0177807 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Djamouko-Djonkam, L. et al. Implication of Anopheles funestus in malaria transmission in the city of Yaoundé. Cameroon Parasite. 27, 10 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tungu, P. et al. Trends of insecticide resistance monitoring in mainland Tanzania, 2004–2020. Malar. J. 22, 100 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ochomo, E. et al. Pyrethroid susceptibility of malaria vectors in four districts of western Kenya. Parasites Vectors. 7, 310 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ranson, H. & Lissenden, N. Insecticide resistance in African anopheles mosquitoes: A worsening situation that needs urgent action to maintain malaria control. Trends Parasitol. 32, 187–196 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Churcher, T. S., Lissenden, N., Griffin, J. T., Worrall, E. & Ranson, H. The impact of pyrethroid resistance on the efficacy and effectiveness of bednets for malaria control in Africa. Elife 5, e16090 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ranson, H. et al. Identification of a point mutation in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene of Kenyan Anopheles gambiae associated with resistance to DDT and pyrethroids. Insect Mol. Biol. 9, 491–497 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Matowo, J. et al. Expression of pyrethroid metabolizing P450 enzymes characterizes highly resistant Anopheles vector species targeted by successful deployment of PBO-treated bednets in Tanzania. Plos One. 17, e0249440 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mawejje, H. D. et al. Characterizing pyrethroid resistance and mechanisms in Anopheles gambiae (s.s.) and Anopheles arabiensis from 11 districts in Uganda. Curr. Res. Parasitol. Vector-Borne Dis. 3, 100106 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Muheza District Council. Muheza District Strategic Plan 2018–2023. Muheza District Council. https://muhezadc.go.tz/storage/app/uploads/public/5a8/079/062/5a8079062dca8620207114.pdf (2018).

  29. Kweka, E. J. et al. Vector species composition and malaria infectivity rates in Mkuzi, Muheza District, north-eastern Tanzania. Tanzan. J. Heal Res. 10, 46–49 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Derua, Y. A., Alifrangis, M., Magesa, S. M., Kisinza, W. N. & Simonsen, P. E. Sibling species of the Anopheles funestus group, and their infection with malaria and lymphatic filarial parasites, in archived and newly collected specimens from northeastern Tanzania. Malar. J. 14, 104 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kabula, B. et al. Co-occurrence and distribution of East (L1014S) and West (L1014F) African knock-down resistance in Anopheles gambiae sensu lato population of Tanzania. Trop. Med. Int. Heal. 19, 1–11 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Odero, J. O. et al. Genetic markers associated with the widespread insecticide resistance in malaria vector Anopheles funestus populations across Tanzania. Parasites Vectors. 17, 230 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  33. World Health Organization. Haemoglobin concentrations for the diagnosis of anaemia and assessment of severity. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-NMH-NHD-MNM-11.1 (World Health Organization, 2011).

  34. World Health Organization. Malaria microscopy standard operating procedure (MM-SOP-10). https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/HTM-GMP-MM-SOP-10 (World Health Organization, 2016).

  35. World Health Organization. Test Procedures for Insecticide Resistance Monitoring in Malaria Vector Mosquitoes. (World Health Organization, 2016).

  36. Abbott, W. S. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Econ. Èntomol. 18, 265–267 (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Finney, D. Probit Analysis (Cambridge University Press, 1971).

  38. Scott, J. A., Brogdon, W. G. & Collins, F. H. Identification of single specimens of the Anopheles gambiae complex by the polymerase chain reaction. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 49, 520–529 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kamau, L., Coetzee, M., Hunt, R. H. & Koekemoer, L. L. A cocktail polymerase chain reaction assay to identify members of the Anopheles funestus (Diptera: Culicidae) group. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 66, 804–811 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bass, C. et al. Detection of knockdown resistance (kdr) mutations in Anopheles gambiae: A comparison of two new high-throughput assays with existing methods. Malar. J. 6, 111 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Echeverry, D. F. et al. Fast and robust single PCR for Plasmodium sporozoite detection in mosquitoes using the cytochrome oxidase I gene. Malar. J. 16, 230 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kent, R. J. & Norris, D. E. Identification of mammalian blood meals in mosquitoes by a multiplexed polymerase chain reaction targeting cytochrome B. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 73, 336–342 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Vyas, S. & Kumaranayake, L. Constructing socio-economic status indices: How to use principal components analysis. Health Policy Plan. 21, 459–468 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their sincere acknowledgements and gratitude to the residents of Muheza district for participating in the study. The authors are equally grateful to the village chair, committee members, providing necessary arrangements during the study. The authors would also like to thank logistic and technical staff members, drivers, field technicians and insectary technicians from NIMR, Amani centre for providing great assistance during the study.

Funding

The study was funded through the financial support from Jane ja Aatos Erkon Säätiö (Grant no. 4244-67694). Open access funded by Helsinki University Library.

Author information

Author notes
  1. Seppo Meri and Ayman Khattab contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Translational Immunology Research Program, Department of Bacteriology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Biomedicum 1, Haartmaninkatu 8, 00014, Helsinki, Finland

    Subam Kathet, Seppo Meri & Ayman Khattab

  2. Amani Medical Research Centre, National Institute for Medical Research, Muheza, Tanzania

    Veneranda M. Bwana, Mwantumu Ally Fereji, Jenny B. Mhando, Frank S. Magogo, Victor Mwingira & William Kisinza

  3. HUSLAB Diagnostic Center, Helsinki University Central Hospital, 00029, Helsinki, Finland

    Seppo Meri

  4. Department of Nucleic Acid Research, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Institute, City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications, New Borg El-Arab, Alexandria, 21934, Egypt

    Ayman Khattab

Authors
  1. Subam Kathet
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Veneranda M. Bwana
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mwantumu Ally Fereji
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jenny B. Mhando
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Frank S. Magogo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Victor Mwingira
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. William Kisinza
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Seppo Meri
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ayman Khattab
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SK, WK, SM, and AK conceived and designed the study. SK supervised field activities and data collection. VM oversaw the epidemiological survey, and MF and JM supported the laboratory analyses. VM and FM facilitated community outreach and sensitization meetings. SK performed the data analysis and, together with AK, drafted the manuscript. WK, SM, and AK provided guidance and supervision throughout the study. AK oversaw the overall conduct of the study and, together with SM, secured funding. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayman Khattab.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Medical Research Coordinating Committee (MRCC) of the National Institute of Medical Research (NIMR) (Ref: NIMR/HQ/R.8a/Vol. IX/2399), Tanzania.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kathet, S., Bwana, V.M., Fereji, M.A. et al. Baseline malaria burden and pyrethroid resistance in Muheza, Tanzania informing a cluster randomized trial of the 3D window screens. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46221-6

Download citation

  • Received: 11 September 2025

  • Accepted: 24 March 2026

  • Published: 03 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46221-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Baseline survey
  • Malaria prevalence
  • Vector density
  • Malaria risk factors
  • Tanzania
  • Insecticide resistance
  • Anopheles mosquitoes
  • Entomological inoculation rate
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology