Table 2 Friedman ranking results under different terminal orientation scenarios.
From: A Lie group-based hybrid optimization framework for multi-objective UAV path planning using L-VGWO
Alg. | \(0^\circ\) | \(45^\circ\) | \(90^\circ\) | ALL | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Avg. | Final | Avg. | Final | Avg. | Final | Avg. | Cost | Final | |
Rank | Rank | Rank | Rank | Rank | Rank | Rank | Mean | Rank | |
VGWO | 1.80 | 1 | 2.10 | 1 | 2.30 | 1 | 2.07 | 6093.41 | 1 |
GWO | 3.55 | 2 | 3.65 | 3 | 2.80 | 2 | 3.33 | 6505.13 | 3 |
GVOA | 3.90 | 3 | 2.80 | 2 | 2.90 | 3 | 3.20 | 6468.64 | 2 |
PSO | 4.00 | 4 | 4.75 | 4 | 4.25 | 4 | 4.33 | 6899.53 | 4 |
SLOA | 5.00 | 5 | 5.20 | 5 | 5.20 | 5 | 5.13 | 7247.96 | 5 |
CCCA | 7.00 | 6 | 7.00 | 6 | 7.00 | 6 | 7.00 | 8789.10 | 6 |
