Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Germline organoids develop in vitro from embryonic Taeniopygia guttata (zebra finch) cultures
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 20 April 2026

Germline organoids develop in vitro from embryonic Taeniopygia guttata (zebra finch) cultures

  • Bianca Brown1,
  • Elizabeth Nagy1,
  • Ajuni K. Takkar1,
  • Naomi A. Greengold1,
  • Shreyas S. Gujar1,
  • Ali Amini  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0008-9603-57562,3,
  • Mary A. Collins1,
  • Javad Rajabi4,
  • Jenna Walls1,
  • Chenai Kaminski1,
  • Michael Sanchez1,
  • Elle McQuire-Guzman1,
  • Taraji Ellington1 &
  • …
  • John R. Bracht  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8042-76851 

Scientific Reports (2026) Cite this article

  • 955 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cell biology
  • Chromosomes

Abstract

Organoids are three-dimensional structures that develop in cultures of stem cells, and resemble multicellular organs. While performing long-term culture of Taeniopygia guttata (zebra finch) germline tissue, we observed the formation of germline organoids from cultures of both sexes. These macro-scale structures contain multiple cell types and retain Primordial Germ Cells (PGCs) and their descendant germ-cell lineages for two to four months of culture in vitro. We show that the PGC-specific germline-restricted chromosome (GRC) can be detected after three months of culture, and that the organoids exhibit DAZL- and DDX4-positive structures resembling germinal epithelia. Taken together our results open new possibilities for the study of key steps of avian reproductive development.

Similar content being viewed by others

Germline stem cells in human

Article Open access 02 October 2022

Efficient gene transfer into zebra finch germline-competent stem cells using an adenoviral vector system

Article Open access 20 July 2021

Strain-specific variations in the culture of chicken primordial germ cells

Article Open access 07 April 2025

Data availability

Data generated in this study is available by contacting the corresponding author, John Bracht (jbracht@american.edu).

Code availability

All code, documentation, and related genomic data are available in GitHub page of the Bracht lab, “PGC-Organoid-Tracking” https://github.com/brachtlab/PGC-Organoid-Tracking

References

  1. Yang, S. et al. Organoids: The current status and biomedical applications. MedComm 4, e274 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Estermann, M. A., Major, A. T. & Smith, C. A. Gonadal sex differentiation: supporting versus steroidogenic cell lineage specification in mammals and birds. Front. Cell Developmental Biol. 8, 616387 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bertocchini, F. & de Sousa Lopes, S. M. C. Germline development in amniotes: A paradigm shift in primordial germ cell specification. BioEssays 38, 791–800 https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201600025 (2016).

  4. Tagami, T., Miyahara, D. & Nakamura, Y. Avian primordial germ cells. Adv. Experimental Med. Biol. 1001, 1–18 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tam, P. P. L. & Snow, M. H. L. Proliferation and migration of primordial germ cells during compensatory growth in mouse embryos. Development 64, 133–147 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  6. McLaren, A. Meiosis and differentiation of mouse germ cells. Symposia Soc. Experimental Biol. 38, 7–23 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tingen, C., Kim, A. & Woodruff, T. K. The primordial pool of follicles and nest breakdown in mammalian ovaries. Molecular Human Reproduction 15, 795–803 (2009) .

    Google Scholar 

  8. Margolin, G., Khil, P. P. & Kim, J. e. a. Integrated transcriptome analysis of mouse spermatogenesis. BMC Genomics 15, 39 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-39 (2014).

  9. Torgasheva, A. et al. Germline-restricted chromosome (grc) is widespread among songbirds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. United States of America 116, 11845–11850. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817373116 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jung, K.-M. et al. Identification and characterization of primordial germ cells in a vocal learning neoaves species, the zebra finch. FASEB J. 33, 13825–13836 (2019) .

    Google Scholar 

  11. Larsson, K. et al. Protein epitope signature tags (prests) for antibody generation. Protein Sci. 9, 2000–2008 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, H.-H. et al. Dazl limits pluripotency, differentiation, and apoptosis in developing primordial germ cells. Stem Cell Rep. 3, 892–904 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tsunekawa, N., Naito, M., Sakai, Y., Nishida, T. & Noce, T. Isolation of chicken vasa homolog gene and tracing the origin of primordial germ cells. Development 127, 2741–2750 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Morris, K. R. et al. Gonadal and endocrine analysis of a gynandromorphic chicken. Endocrinology 159, 3492–3502 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hahnel, A. C. & Eddy, E. M. Cell surface markers of mouse primordial germ cells defined by two monoclonal antibodies. Gamete Res. 15, 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1120150104 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gessara, I. et al. Highly efficient genome modification of cultured primordial germ cells with lentiviral vectors to generate transgenic songbirds. Stem Cell Reports 16, 784–796 https://www.cell.com/stem-cell-reports/fulltext/S2213-6711(21)00095-3 (2021).

  17. Vining, B., Ming, Z., Bagheri-Fam, S. & Harley, V. Diverse regulation but conserved function: SOX9 in vertebrate sex determination. Genes (Basel) 12, 486 (2021).

  18. Kent, J., Wheatley, S. C., Andrews, J. E., Sinclair, A. H. & Koopman, P. A male-specific role for SOX9 in vertebrate sex determination. Development 122, 2813–2822 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Smith, C. A., Andrews, J. E. & Sinclair, A. H. Gonadal sex differentiation in chicken embryos: Expression of estrogen receptor and aromatase genes. J. Steroid Biochemistry Molecular Biol. 60, 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-0760(96)00196-3 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pei, Y. et al. Occasional paternal inheritance of the germline-restricted chromosome in songbirds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. United States of America 119, e2103960119 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kinsella, C. M. et al. Programmed dna elimination of germline development genes in songbirds. Nat. Commun. 10, 5468. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13427-4 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Asalone, K. C., Takkar, A. K., Saldanha, C. J. & Bracht, J. R. A transcriptomic pipeline adapted for genomic sequence discovery of germline-restricted sequence in zebra finch, taeniopygia guttata. Genome Biology Evolution 13, evab088 https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evab088 (2021).

  23. Lei, L. & Spradling, A. C. Mouse primordial germ cells produce cysts that partially fragment prior to meiosis. Development 140, 2075–2081 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Doitsidou, M. et al. Guidance of primordial germ cell migration by the chemokine sdf-1. Cell 111, 647–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01135-2 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Barton, L. J., Roa-de la Cruz, L., Lehmann, R. & Lin, B. The journey of a generation: advances and promises in the study of primordial germ cell migration. Development 151 https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.201102 (2024).

  26. Han, J. Y. & Park, Y.-H. Primordial germ cell-mediated transgenesis and genome editing in birds. J. Animal Sci. Biotechnol. 9, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-018-0234-4 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kang, S. et al. Germline pten genotype-dependent phenotypic divergence during the early neural developmental process of forebrain organoids. Molecular Psychiatry 29, 1767–1781. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-023-02325-3 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Anastasaki, C. et al. Human ipsc-derived neurons and cerebral organoids establish differential effects of germline NF1 gene mutations. Stem Cell Reports 14, 541–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2020.03.007 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Alves-Lopes, J. a. P., Wong, F. C. & Surani, M. A. Human primordial germ cell-like cells specified from resetting precursors develop in human hindgut organoids. Nature Protocols 19, 1149–1182 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-023-00945-1 (2024).

  30. Karthaus, W. R. et al. Identification of multipotent luminal progenitor cells in human prostate organoid cultures. Cell 159, 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.017 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Huch, M. et al. In vitro expansion of single lgr5+ liver stem cells induced by wnt-driven regeneration. Nature 494, 247–250. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11826 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kopper, O. et al. An organoid platform for ovarian cancer captures intra- and interpatient heterogeneity. Nature Med. 25, 838–849. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0422-6 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gao, D. et al. Organoid cultures derived from patients with advanced prostate cancer. Cell 159, 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.016 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Li, X. et al. Generation of offspring-producing 3d ovarian organoids derived from female germline stem cells and their application in toxicological detection. Biomaterials 279, 121213 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142961221005706 (2021).

  35. Kanatsu-Shinohara, M. et al. Regeneration of spermatogenesis by mouse germ cell transplantation into allogeneic and xenogeneic testis primordia or organoids. Stem Cell Rep. 17, 924–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2022.02.013 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Richer, G., Hobbs, R. M., Loveland, K. L., Goossens, E. & Baert, Y. Long-term maintenance and meiotic entry of early germ cells in murine testicular organoids functionalized by 3d printed scaffolds and air-medium interface cultivation. Front. Physiol. 12, 757565 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Luo, H. et al. Offspring production of ovarian organoids derived from spermatogonial stem cells by defined factors with chromatin reorganization. Journal of Advanced Research 33, 81–98 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090123221000539 (2021).

  38. Oliver, E. et al. Self-organising human gonads generated by a matrigel-based gradient system. BMC Biol. 19, 212 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pendergraft, S. S., Sadri-Ardekani, H., Atala, A. & Bishop, C. E. Three-dimensional testicular organoid: a novel tool for the study of human spermatogenesis and gonadotoxicity in vitro. Biol. Reproduction 96, 720–732 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Strange, D. P. et al. Human testicular organoid system as a novel tool to study zika virus pathogenesis. Emerg. Microbes Infections 7, 1–7 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Patrício, D., Santiago, J., Mano, J. F. & Fardilha, M. Organoids of the male reproductive system: Challenges, opportunities, and their potential use in fertility research. WIREs Mech. Disease 15, e1590 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lawrenson, K. et al. In vitro three-dimensional modelling of human ovarian surface epithelial cells. Cell Proliferation 42, 385–393 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kwong, J. et al. Inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor alpha confers precancerous phenotype in an organoid model of normal human ovarian surface epithelial cells. Neoplasia 11, 529–541 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Alzamil, L., Nikolakopoulou, K. & Turco, M. Y. Organoid systems to study the human female reproductive tract and pregnancy. Cell Death Diff. 28, 35–51 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tanimoto, R. et al. Insights into in vivo follicle formation: A review of in vitro systems. Histochemistry Cell Biol. 157, 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-021-02058-w (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ioannidis, J. et al. Primary sex determination in birds depends on dmrt1 dosage, but gonadal sex does not determine adult secondary sex characteristics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. United States of America 118, e2020909118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2020909118 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Agate, R. et al. Neural, not gonadal, origin of brain sex differences in a gynandromorphic finch. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. United States of America 100, 4873–4878. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0636925100 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Marlow, F. Primordial germ cell specification and migration [version 1; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 4, 1462 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6995.1 (2015).

  49. Seneviratne, A., Attia, E., Williams, R. J., Rodeo, S. A. & Hannafin, J. A. The effect of estrogen on ovine anterior cruciate ligament fibroblasts: Cell proliferation and collagen synthesis. Am. J. Sports Med. 32, 1613–1618 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Milo, G. E., Malarkey, W. B., Powell, J. E., Blakeslee, J. R. & Yohn, D. S. Effects of steroid hormones in fetal bovine serum on plating and cloning of human cells in vitro. In Vitro 12, 23–30 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Jang, S.-H., Paek, S. H., Kim, J.-K., Seong, J.-K. & Lim, W. A new culture model for enhancing estrogen responsiveness in hr+ breast cancer cells through medium replacement: Presumed involvement of autocrine factors in estrogen resistance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 9474 (2023). https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/24/11/9474.

  52. Berthois, Y., Katzenellenbogen, J. A. & Katzenellenbogen, B. S. Phenol red in tissue culture media is a weak estrogen: Implications concerning the study of estrogen-responsive cells in culture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. United States of America 83, 2496–2500. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.83.8.2496 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Maekawa, F., Tsukahara, S., Kawashima, T., Nohara, K. & Ohki-Hamazaki, H. The mechanisms underlying sexual differentiation of behavior and physiology in mammals and birds: Relative contributions of sex steroids and sex chromosomes. Front. Neurosci. 8, 242. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00242 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Renfree, M. B., Chew, K. Y. & Shaw, G. Hormone-independent pathways of sexual differentiation. Sexual Development 8, 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1159/000358447 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Fujimoto, T., Ukeshima, A., Miyayama, Y., Horio, F. & Ninomiya, E. Observations of primordial germ cells in the turtle embryo (caretta caretta): Light and electron microscopic studies. Development, Growth Diff. 21, 3–10 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Swift, C. H. Origin and early history of the primordial germ-cells in the chick. Am. J. Anatomy 15, 483–516. https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1000150404 (1914).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hall, G. B., Long, J. A., Wood, B. J. & Bedecarrats, G. Y. Germ cell dynamics during nest breakdown and formation of the primordial follicle pool in the domestic turkey (meleagris gallopavo). Poultry Sci. 99, 2746–2756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2019.12.050 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Dong, J. et al. Autophagy participates in germline cyst breakdown and follicular formation by modulating glycolysis switch via akt signaling in newly-hatched chicken ovaries. Developmental Biol. 487, 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2022.04.013 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Greenbaum, M. P. et al. Tex14 is essential for intercellular bridges and fertility in male mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. United States of America 103, 4982–4987. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0505123103 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Greenbaum, M. P., Iwamori, T., Buchold, G. M. & Matzuk, M. M. Germ cell intercellular bridges. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives Biol. 3, a005850. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a005850 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Grier, H. J., Uribe, M. C., Lo Nostro, F. L., Mims, S. D. & Parenti, L. R. Conserved form and function of the germinal epithelium through 500 million years of vertebrate evolution. J. Morphol. 277, 1014–1044 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.20554.

  62. Urven, L. E., Abbott, U. K., Erickson, C. A. & McCarrey, J. R. Analysis of germ line development in the chick embryo using an anti-mouse embryonal carcinoma cell antibody. Development 103, 299–304 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Biegler, M. T. et al. Pronounced early differentiation underlies zebra finch gonadal germ cell development. Developmental Biol. 517, 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2024.08.006 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Mazzoni, T. S., Grier, H. J. & Quagio-Grassiotto, I. Germline cysts and the formation of the germinal epithelium during the female gonadal morphogenesis in Cyprinus carpio (teleostei: Ostariophysi: Cypriniformes). Anatomical Record (Hoboken) 293, 1581–1606. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.21205 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Mazzoni, T. S., Grier, H. J. & Quagio-Grassiotto, I. The basement membrane and the sex establishment in the juvenile hermaphroditism during gonadal differentiation of the Gymnocorymbus ternetzi (teleostei: Characiformes: Characidae). Anatomical Record (Hoboken) 298, 1984–2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.23270 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Murray, J. R., Varian-Ramos, C. W., Welch, Z. S. & Saha, M. S. Embryological staging of the zebra finch, taeniopygia guttata. J. Morphol. 274, 1090–1110 (2013). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jmor.20165.

  67. Comancho, J. P. M., Cabrero, J., Lopez-Leon, M. D., Cabral-de Mello, D. C. & Ruiz-Ruano, F. J. in Chapter 11: Grasshoppers (orthoptera) (ed.Sharakhov, I.) Protocols Cytogenetic Mapping Arthropod Genomes Ch. 11, 381–438 (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2014).

  68. Wang, D. O. et al. A quick and simple fish protocol with hybridization-sensitive fluorescent linear oligodeoxynucleotide probes. RNA 18, 166–175 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge NIH grant 1R15GM146207 to J.R.B. and our anonymous reviewers for their feedback. We also acknowledge the technical help provided by Dr. Erich Jarvis and his laboratory especially including Dr. Anna Keyte who taught us how to dissect embryos, and Dr. Matthew Biegler. We also appreciate the Rockefeller group’s sharing of a PCR sex-determination protocol with optimized primers. We also acknowledge the generous donation of the anti-Aromatase antibody, AZAC, and finch testis tissue, from Dr. Colin Saldanha, as well as his financial support of the project.

Funding

The work was supported by NIH grant 1R15GM146207 to J.R.B. and NSF grant 2050260 to Colin Saldanha.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biology Department, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, 20016, USA

    Bianca Brown, Elizabeth Nagy, Ajuni K. Takkar, Naomi A. Greengold, Shreyas S. Gujar, Mary A. Collins, Jenna Walls, Chenai Kaminski, Michael Sanchez, Elle McQuire-Guzman, Taraji Ellington & John R. Bracht

  2. Center for Data Science, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington, DC, 20016, USA

    Ali Amini

  3. School of Public Affairs, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington, DC, USA

    Ali Amini

  4. Department of Computer Science, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, 20016, USA

    Javad Rajabi

Authors
  1. Bianca Brown
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elizabeth Nagy
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ajuni K. Takkar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Naomi A. Greengold
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shreyas S. Gujar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ali Amini
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mary A. Collins
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Javad Rajabi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jenna Walls
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Chenai Kaminski
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Michael Sanchez
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Elle McQuire-Guzman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Taraji Ellington
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. John R. Bracht
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Bianca Brown performed supervision, project administration, investigation, and writing-first draft. Elizabeth Nagy performed investigation, visualization, and writing-first draft. Ajuni Takkar performed investigation and writing-first draft. Naomi Greengold performed investigation. Shreyas Gujar performed investigation, methodology, data curation, writing-first draft and writing-editing. Ali Amini performed formal analysis, visualization, software, conceptualization, investigation, writing-first draft, and writing-editing. Mary Collins performed investigation, visualization, methodology, and writing-first draft. Javad Rajabi performed formal analysis, software, and methodology. Jenna Walls performed investigation. Chenai Kaminski performed investigation, visualization, and formal analysis. Michael Sanchez performed investigation and writing-first draft. Elle Guzman performed investigation and writing-first draft. Tarraji Ellington performed investigation and writing-first draft. John Bracht performed conceptualization, visualization, formal analysis, software, investigation, funding acquisition, supervision, project administration, and writing-review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John R. Bracht.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

All protocols were approved by American University IACUC.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information 1. (download PDF )

Supplementary Information 2. (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brown, B., Nagy, E., Takkar, A.K. et al. Germline organoids develop in vitro from embryonic Taeniopygia guttata (zebra finch) cultures. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46600-z

Download citation

  • Received: 06 December 2024

  • Accepted: 26 March 2026

  • Published: 20 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46600-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing