Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Research on the problem of spatial heterogeneity in row data and generalization capability for landslide susceptibility assessment using the physics-constrained U-net model
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 03 April 2026

Research on the problem of spatial heterogeneity in row data and generalization capability for landslide susceptibility assessment using the physics-constrained U-net model

  • Heli Zhang1 &
  • Hongyan Deng1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Environmental sciences
  • Natural hazards
  • Solid Earth sciences

Abstract

Landslide susceptibility research serves as the primary approach for analyzing the future development of landslides, and could provide the scientific reference for mountainous area development strategic decisions. The accuracy of landslide susceptibility assessment mainly depends on input data and evaluation methods. To address the issues of significant impacts from raw data defects and low spatial resolution in susceptibility assessment results within traditional deep learning evaluation models, this study establishes a physically constrained U-Net model (PCUM). This method selects ten landslide assessment factors, including slope gradient, profile curvature, slope aspect, landform, river distribution density, annual average precipitation, annual average temperature, fault distribution density, lithology, and seismic intensity. Through adjusting the weights of the model’s loss function by imposing explicit physical constraints, the model’s performance was ultimately enhanced. A comparison of the model evaluation results before and after applying the constraints is as follows: the AUC value increased from 0.871 to 0.877, the recall increased from 0.884 to 0.891, and the Kappa coefficient rose from 0.597 to 0.605. Meanwhile, the frequency ratio of the very high susceptibility zone increased from 5.64 to 5.80, while that of the very low susceptibility zone decreased from 4.77 × 10⁻² to 3.23 × 10⁻². Compared with other deep learning models, the evaluation results of PCUM demonstrate the advantage of maintaining spatial resolution consistent with the original input data, better revealing the spatial characteristics of landslide distribution, and higher accuracy. This study focuses on the southeastern region of Tibet and selects five typical regions to investigate the impact of spatial heterogeneity in raw data on the PCUM. The AUC values of the BP neural network model in the five typical regions are 0.905, 0.930, 0.871, 0.877, and 0.920, respectively, with relatively poor performance in typical regions 3 and 4. The AUC values of the residual neural network model are 0.874, 0.921, 0.915, 0.891, and 0.914, respectively, showing poor performance in typical region 1. In contrast, the PCUM achieves AUC values of 0.923, 0.940, 0.935, 0.915, and 0.899 across the five regions, demonstrating robust performance in all typical areas. The results indicate that the physically constrained U-Net model can effectively handle spatial heterogeneity in raw data and exhibits good generalization capabilities. This study may provide an effective reference for the generalizability research of landslide susceptibility assessment models.

Data availability

Hardware: CPU: 13th Gen Intel(R) Core (TM) i7-13700KF; RAM: 32 GB; GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080.Program language: PythonThe data used in this study are listed in Table 1. The evaluation results are available for downloading at the link: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30741809.

References

  1. Brabb, E. E. The world landslide problem. Episodes 14 (1), 52–61 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Duan, Y. et al. Global projections of future landslide susceptibility under climate change. Geoscience Frontiers 16, 102074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102074 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lin, Q. et al. Evaluation of potential changes in landslide susceptibility and landslide occurrence frequency in China under climate change. Sci. Total Environ. 850, 158049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158049 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Petley, D. Global patterns of loss of life from landslides. Geology 40 (10), 927–930. https://doi.org/10.1130/G33217.1 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Huang, Y. & Zhao, L. Review on landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machines. Catena 165, 520–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.03.003 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ciurleo, M., Cascini, L. & Calvello, M. A comparison of statistical and deterministic methods for shallow landslide susceptibility zoning in clayey soils. Engineering Geology 223, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.04.023 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Reichenbach, P., Rossi, M., Malamud, B. D., Mihir, M. & Guzzetti, F. A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models. Earth-Sci. Rev. 180, 60–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.03.001 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  8. He, R. et al. Application of artificial intelligence in three aspects of landslide risk assessment: A comprehensive review. Rock Mechanics Bulletin 3(4), 100144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rockmb.2024.100144 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, W., Li, X., Wang, Y., Hong, H. & Pham, B. T. Comparison of convolutional neural networks for landslide susceptibility mapping in Yanshan County, China. Sci. Total Environ. 666, 975–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.263 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huang, W. et al. Landslide susceptibility mapping and dynamic response along the Sichuan-Tibet transportation corridor using deep learning algorithms. CATENA 222, 106866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2022.106866 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tsangaratos, P. et al. Comparing the prediction performance of a Deep Learning Neural Network model with conventional machine learning models in landslide susceptibility assessment. CATENA, 104426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104426 (2020).

  12. Wang, H., Zhang, L., Luo, H., He, J. & Cheung, R. W. M. AI-powered landslide susceptibility assessment in Hong Kong. Engineering Geology, 288, 106103. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106103

  13. Wang, H., Wang, L. & Zhang, L. Transfer learning improves landslide susceptibility assessment. Gondwana Res. 123, 238–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2022.07.008 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, Y. et al. Cross-regional extrapolation of landslide susceptibility mapping via transfer learning. Geosci. Front. 102212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102212 (2025).

  15. Su, Y. et al. Complex cross-regional landslide susceptibility mapping by multi-source domain transfer learning. Geosci. Front. 102053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102053 (2025).

  16. Wei, X., Zhang, L., Luo, J. & Liu, D. A hybrid framework integrating physical model and convolutional neural network for regional landslide susceptibility mapping. Nat. Hazards 109(1), 471–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04844-0 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Huang, F. et al. Modelling landslide susceptibility prediction: A review and construction of semi-supervised imbalanced theory. Earth-Science Reviews 250, 104700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104700 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gupta, S. K. & Shukla, D. P. Handling data imbalance in machine learning based landslide susceptibility mapping: A case study of Mandakini River Basin, North-Western Himalayas. Landslides 20, 933–949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-022-01998-1 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, Y. et al. A physics-informed machine learning solution for landslide susceptibility mapping based on three-dimensional slope stability evaluation. J. Cent. South Univ. 31(11), 3838–3853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-024-5687-3 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Han, Y. & Semnani, S. J. Important considerations in machine learning-based landslide susceptibility assessment under future climate conditions. Acta Geotechnica 20(2), 475–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-024-02396-8 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jiang, Y., Wang, W., Zou, L., Cao, Y. & Xie, W. C. Investigating landslide data balancing for susceptibility mapping using generative and machine learning models. Landslides, 22, 189–204. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02352-3

  22. Sun, H. et al. Influence of spatial heterogeneity on landslide susceptibility in the transboundary area of the Himalayas. Geomorphology, 433, 108723. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2023.108723

  23. Zhao, Z., Xu, Z., Hu, C., Wang, Q. & Ding, X. Geographically weighted neural network considering spatial heterogeneity for landslide susceptibility mapping: A case study of Yichang City, China. CATENA 234, 107590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2023.107590 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hong, H. Assessing landslide susceptibility based on hybrid multilayer perceptron with ensemble learning. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 82(10), 382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-023-03409-8 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, Y. et al. Region similarity assessment for empowering physics-informed transfer learning-based landslide susceptibility mapping. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2025.06.030 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhong, L. et al. Landslide susceptibility evaluation and determination of critical influencing factors in eastern Sichuan mountainous area, China. Ecol. Indic. 169, 112911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112911 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hong, H., Wang, D., Zhu, A.-X. & Wang, Y. Landslide susceptibility mapping based on the reliability of landslide and non-landslide sample. Expert Systems with Applications 243, 122933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122933 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Qian, L., Ou, L., Li, G., Chen, Y. & Qian, B. Optimizing the application of machine learning models in predicting landslide susceptibility using the information value model in Junlian County of Sichuan Basin. Adv. Space Res. 76. (2), 699–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2025.05.020 (2025).

  29. Kong, L. et al. Enhanced landslide susceptibility mapping in data-scarce regions via unsupervised few-shot learning. Gondwana Research, 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2024.10.011 (2025).

  30. Li, J., Zhou, Z. & Ma, W. Assessment of landslide susceptibility along the Lanzhou-Xinjiang high-speed railway: A case study of Menyuan-Shandanmachang. Transportation Geotechnics, 50, 101473. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101473

  31. Shi, Q. et al. Spatiotemporal effect driven landslide susceptibility mapping at fine scales: a deep learning model based on multidimensional feature fusion and source data adaptation. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 156, 110924. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110924

  32. Emberson, R., Kirschbaum, D. & Stanley, T. New global characterisation of landslide exposure. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 20, 3413–3424. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3413-2020 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Guzzetti, F., Rossi, M. & Salvati, P. Geographical landslide early warning systems. Earth-Science Reviews 200, 102973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102973 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Piciullo, L., Calvello, M. & Cepeda, J. M. Territorial early warning systems for rainfall- induced landslides. Earth-Sci. Rev. 179, 228–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.02.001 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Frattini, P., Crosta, G. & Carrara, A. Techniques for evaluating the performance of landslide susceptibility models. Eng. Geol. 111(1–2), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.12.004 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hong, H. Landslide susceptibility assessment using locally weighted learning integrated with machine learning algorithms. Expert Systems with Applications 234, 121678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121678 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhao, B. & Su, L. Complex spatial and size distributions of landslides in the Yarlung Tsangpo River (YTR) basin. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 17(2), 897–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.01.021 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zhao, S. et al. Insights into landslide development and susceptibility in extremely complex alpine geoenvironments along the western Sichuan–Tibet Engineering Corridor, China. CATENA 227, 107105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2023.107105 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yang, Z., Pang, B., Dong, W., Li, D. & Huang, Z. Interaction of landslide spatial patterns and river canyon landforms: Insights into the Three Parallel Rivers Area, southeastern Tibetan Plateau. Science of The Total Environment 914, 169935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.169935 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (STEP), Grant No.2019QZKK0906-02.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China

    Heli Zhang & Hongyan Deng

Authors
  1. Heli Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hongyan Deng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.Z.: Theoretical analysis, Experiments, Writing - review & editing; H.D.: Conceptualization, Theoretical analysis, Experiments, Review.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongyan Deng.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Deng, H. Research on the problem of spatial heterogeneity in row data and generalization capability for landslide susceptibility assessment using the physics-constrained U-net model. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46873-4

Download citation

  • Received: 28 January 2026

  • Accepted: 27 March 2026

  • Published: 03 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46873-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Landslide susceptibility
  • Physical constrained U-Net model
  • Spatial heterogeneity in raw data
  • Generalization capability
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing