Abstract
Landslide susceptibility research serves as the primary approach for analyzing the future development of landslides, and could provide the scientific reference for mountainous area development strategic decisions. The accuracy of landslide susceptibility assessment mainly depends on input data and evaluation methods. To address the issues of significant impacts from raw data defects and low spatial resolution in susceptibility assessment results within traditional deep learning evaluation models, this study establishes a physically constrained U-Net model (PCUM). This method selects ten landslide assessment factors, including slope gradient, profile curvature, slope aspect, landform, river distribution density, annual average precipitation, annual average temperature, fault distribution density, lithology, and seismic intensity. Through adjusting the weights of the model’s loss function by imposing explicit physical constraints, the model’s performance was ultimately enhanced. A comparison of the model evaluation results before and after applying the constraints is as follows: the AUC value increased from 0.871 to 0.877, the recall increased from 0.884 to 0.891, and the Kappa coefficient rose from 0.597 to 0.605. Meanwhile, the frequency ratio of the very high susceptibility zone increased from 5.64 to 5.80, while that of the very low susceptibility zone decreased from 4.77 × 10⁻² to 3.23 × 10⁻². Compared with other deep learning models, the evaluation results of PCUM demonstrate the advantage of maintaining spatial resolution consistent with the original input data, better revealing the spatial characteristics of landslide distribution, and higher accuracy. This study focuses on the southeastern region of Tibet and selects five typical regions to investigate the impact of spatial heterogeneity in raw data on the PCUM. The AUC values of the BP neural network model in the five typical regions are 0.905, 0.930, 0.871, 0.877, and 0.920, respectively, with relatively poor performance in typical regions 3 and 4. The AUC values of the residual neural network model are 0.874, 0.921, 0.915, 0.891, and 0.914, respectively, showing poor performance in typical region 1. In contrast, the PCUM achieves AUC values of 0.923, 0.940, 0.935, 0.915, and 0.899 across the five regions, demonstrating robust performance in all typical areas. The results indicate that the physically constrained U-Net model can effectively handle spatial heterogeneity in raw data and exhibits good generalization capabilities. This study may provide an effective reference for the generalizability research of landslide susceptibility assessment models.
Data availability
Hardware: CPU: 13th Gen Intel(R) Core (TM) i7-13700KF; RAM: 32 GB; GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080.Program language: PythonThe data used in this study are listed in Table 1. The evaluation results are available for downloading at the link: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30741809.
References
Brabb, E. E. The world landslide problem. Episodes 14 (1), 52–61 (1991).
Duan, Y. et al. Global projections of future landslide susceptibility under climate change. Geoscience Frontiers 16, 102074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102074 (2025).
Lin, Q. et al. Evaluation of potential changes in landslide susceptibility and landslide occurrence frequency in China under climate change. Sci. Total Environ. 850, 158049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158049 (2022).
Petley, D. Global patterns of loss of life from landslides. Geology 40 (10), 927–930. https://doi.org/10.1130/G33217.1 (2012).
Huang, Y. & Zhao, L. Review on landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machines. Catena 165, 520–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.03.003 (2018).
Ciurleo, M., Cascini, L. & Calvello, M. A comparison of statistical and deterministic methods for shallow landslide susceptibility zoning in clayey soils. Engineering Geology 223, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.04.023 (2017).
Reichenbach, P., Rossi, M., Malamud, B. D., Mihir, M. & Guzzetti, F. A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models. Earth-Sci. Rev. 180, 60–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.03.001 (2018).
He, R. et al. Application of artificial intelligence in three aspects of landslide risk assessment: A comprehensive review. Rock Mechanics Bulletin 3(4), 100144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rockmb.2024.100144 (2024).
Chen, W., Li, X., Wang, Y., Hong, H. & Pham, B. T. Comparison of convolutional neural networks for landslide susceptibility mapping in Yanshan County, China. Sci. Total Environ. 666, 975–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.263 (2019).
Huang, W. et al. Landslide susceptibility mapping and dynamic response along the Sichuan-Tibet transportation corridor using deep learning algorithms. CATENA 222, 106866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2022.106866 (2023).
Tsangaratos, P. et al. Comparing the prediction performance of a Deep Learning Neural Network model with conventional machine learning models in landslide susceptibility assessment. CATENA, 104426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104426 (2020).
Wang, H., Zhang, L., Luo, H., He, J. & Cheung, R. W. M. AI-powered landslide susceptibility assessment in Hong Kong. Engineering Geology, 288, 106103. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106103
Wang, H., Wang, L. & Zhang, L. Transfer learning improves landslide susceptibility assessment. Gondwana Res. 123, 238–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2022.07.008 (2022).
Wang, Y. et al. Cross-regional extrapolation of landslide susceptibility mapping via transfer learning. Geosci. Front. 102212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102212 (2025).
Su, Y. et al. Complex cross-regional landslide susceptibility mapping by multi-source domain transfer learning. Geosci. Front. 102053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102053 (2025).
Wei, X., Zhang, L., Luo, J. & Liu, D. A hybrid framework integrating physical model and convolutional neural network for regional landslide susceptibility mapping. Nat. Hazards 109(1), 471–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04844-0 (2021).
Huang, F. et al. Modelling landslide susceptibility prediction: A review and construction of semi-supervised imbalanced theory. Earth-Science Reviews 250, 104700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104700 (2024).
Gupta, S. K. & Shukla, D. P. Handling data imbalance in machine learning based landslide susceptibility mapping: A case study of Mandakini River Basin, North-Western Himalayas. Landslides 20, 933–949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-022-01998-1 (2023).
Wang, Y. et al. A physics-informed machine learning solution for landslide susceptibility mapping based on three-dimensional slope stability evaluation. J. Cent. South Univ. 31(11), 3838–3853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-024-5687-3 (2024).
Han, Y. & Semnani, S. J. Important considerations in machine learning-based landslide susceptibility assessment under future climate conditions. Acta Geotechnica 20(2), 475–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-024-02396-8 (2025).
Jiang, Y., Wang, W., Zou, L., Cao, Y. & Xie, W. C. Investigating landslide data balancing for susceptibility mapping using generative and machine learning models. Landslides, 22, 189–204. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02352-3
Sun, H. et al. Influence of spatial heterogeneity on landslide susceptibility in the transboundary area of the Himalayas. Geomorphology, 433, 108723. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2023.108723
Zhao, Z., Xu, Z., Hu, C., Wang, Q. & Ding, X. Geographically weighted neural network considering spatial heterogeneity for landslide susceptibility mapping: A case study of Yichang City, China. CATENA 234, 107590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2023.107590 (2024).
Hong, H. Assessing landslide susceptibility based on hybrid multilayer perceptron with ensemble learning. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 82(10), 382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-023-03409-8 (2023).
Wang, Y. et al. Region similarity assessment for empowering physics-informed transfer learning-based landslide susceptibility mapping. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2025.06.030 (2025).
Zhong, L. et al. Landslide susceptibility evaluation and determination of critical influencing factors in eastern Sichuan mountainous area, China. Ecol. Indic. 169, 112911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112911 (2024).
Hong, H., Wang, D., Zhu, A.-X. & Wang, Y. Landslide susceptibility mapping based on the reliability of landslide and non-landslide sample. Expert Systems with Applications 243, 122933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122933 (2024).
Qian, L., Ou, L., Li, G., Chen, Y. & Qian, B. Optimizing the application of machine learning models in predicting landslide susceptibility using the information value model in Junlian County of Sichuan Basin. Adv. Space Res. 76. (2), 699–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2025.05.020 (2025).
Kong, L. et al. Enhanced landslide susceptibility mapping in data-scarce regions via unsupervised few-shot learning. Gondwana Research, 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2024.10.011 (2025).
Li, J., Zhou, Z. & Ma, W. Assessment of landslide susceptibility along the Lanzhou-Xinjiang high-speed railway: A case study of Menyuan-Shandanmachang. Transportation Geotechnics, 50, 101473. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101473
Shi, Q. et al. Spatiotemporal effect driven landslide susceptibility mapping at fine scales: a deep learning model based on multidimensional feature fusion and source data adaptation. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 156, 110924. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110924
Emberson, R., Kirschbaum, D. & Stanley, T. New global characterisation of landslide exposure. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 20, 3413–3424. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3413-2020 (2020).
Guzzetti, F., Rossi, M. & Salvati, P. Geographical landslide early warning systems. Earth-Science Reviews 200, 102973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102973 (2020).
Piciullo, L., Calvello, M. & Cepeda, J. M. Territorial early warning systems for rainfall- induced landslides. Earth-Sci. Rev. 179, 228–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.02.001 (2018).
Frattini, P., Crosta, G. & Carrara, A. Techniques for evaluating the performance of landslide susceptibility models. Eng. Geol. 111(1–2), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.12.004 (2010).
Hong, H. Landslide susceptibility assessment using locally weighted learning integrated with machine learning algorithms. Expert Systems with Applications 234, 121678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121678 (2023).
Zhao, B. & Su, L. Complex spatial and size distributions of landslides in the Yarlung Tsangpo River (YTR) basin. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 17(2), 897–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.01.021 (2025).
Zhao, S. et al. Insights into landslide development and susceptibility in extremely complex alpine geoenvironments along the western Sichuan–Tibet Engineering Corridor, China. CATENA 227, 107105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2023.107105 (2023).
Yang, Z., Pang, B., Dong, W., Li, D. & Huang, Z. Interaction of landslide spatial patterns and river canyon landforms: Insights into the Three Parallel Rivers Area, southeastern Tibetan Plateau. Science of The Total Environment 914, 169935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.169935 (2024).
Funding
This research was supported by the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (STEP), Grant No.2019QZKK0906-02.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.Z.: Theoretical analysis, Experiments, Writing - review & editing; H.D.: Conceptualization, Theoretical analysis, Experiments, Review.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, H., Deng, H. Research on the problem of spatial heterogeneity in row data and generalization capability for landslide susceptibility assessment using the physics-constrained U-net model. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46873-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46873-4