Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Associations between soil microbiomes and carbon stabilization under long-term no-till farming systems in the Argentine Pampas
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 12 April 2026

Associations between soil microbiomes and carbon stabilization under long-term no-till farming systems in the Argentine Pampas

  • Maximiliano Gortari  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2497-39931,2,
  • Vanina Giselle Maguire4,
  • Juan Pedro Ezquiaga5,
  • Mariano Cicchino6,
  • Matías Bailleres5,
  • Roberto Ulises Escaray1,3,
  • Oscar Adolfo Ruiz1,3 &
  • …
  • María Eugenia Llames  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6984-80161,3 

Scientific Reports (2026) Cite this article

  • 1156 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Ecology
  • Environmental sciences
  • Microbiology

Abstract

Soil microbial communities play a key role in carbon (C) cycling in agroecosystems; however, their long-term responses to contrasting management practices remain poorly understood in agricultural soils. In this study, we evaluated the effects of more than 20 years of no-till farming (NTF) and conventional tillage (CT) on soil physicochemical properties, bacterial and fungal community composition, and inferred functions related to C and nutrient cycling in the Argentine Pampas. We show that NTF increased total organic carbon (TOC) stocks in surface soils and promoted edaphic conditions associated with C stabilization, including higher cation exchange capacity and structural stability. Bacterial communities exhibited high functional redundancy and were primarily structured along sodium-related parameters, whereas fungal communities were more sensitive to management, with NTF favoring ligninolytic and symbiotic fungi that contribute to necromass formation and long-term carbon stabilization. In contrast, CT enriched opportunistic fungal guilds associated with disturbance and short-term nutrient turnover. Phylogenetic analyses revealed community assembly dominated by environmental filtering in both microbial domains. Overall, these results highlight the central role of fungi as mediators of soil C stabilization and suggest that conservation practices such as NTF enhance microbiome contributions to ecosystem services and climate change mitigation in intensively managed agroecosystems.

Similar content being viewed by others

Soil microbes are the tiny bioengineers running Earth’s underground factory

Article Open access 29 April 2026

Nitrogen addition restricts key soil ecological enzymes and nutrients by reducing microbial abundance and diversity

Article Open access 14 February 2025

Functional diversity of soil microbial communities increases with ecosystem development

Article Open access 22 November 2025

Data availability

The raw 16 S and 18 S rRNA gene sequence data and their associated metadata are publicly available in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under accession number PRJEB97327.Additional environmental metadata and R scripts used for data processing and analysis are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Wall, D. H., Nielsen, U. N. & Six, J. Soil biodiversity and human health. Nature 528, 69–76 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schimel, J. P. & Schaeffer, S. M. Microbial control over carbon cycling in soil. Front. Microbiol. 3, 348 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wieder, W. R., Bonan, G. B. & Allison, S. D. Global soil carbon projections are improved by modelling microbial processes. Nat. Clim. Chang. 3, 909–912 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cotrufo, M. F., Wallenstein, M. D., Boot, C. M., Denef, K. & Paul, E. The Microbial Efficiency-Matrix Stabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic matter stabilization: do labile plant inputs form stable soil organic matter? Glob Chang. Biol. 19, 988–995 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lal, R. Soil Carbon Sequestration Impacts on Global Climate Change and Food Security. Sci. (1979). 304, 1623–1627 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Haddaway, N. R. et al. How does tillage intensity affect soil organic carbon? A systematic review. Environ. Evid. 6, 30 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Domnariu, H., Trippe, K. M., Botez, F., Partal, E. & Postolache, C. Long-term impact of tillage on microbial communities of an Eastern European Chernozem. Sci. Rep. 15, 642 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mihelič, R., Pintarič, S., Eler, K. & Suhadolc, M. Effects of transitioning from conventional to organic farming on soil organic carbon and microbial community: a comparison of long-term non-inversion minimum tillage and conventional tillage. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 60, 341–355 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kallenbach, C. M., Frey, S. D. & Grandy, A. S. Direct evidence for microbial-derived soil organic matter formation and its ecophysiological controls. Nat. Commun. 7, 13630 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Six, J., Frey, S. D., Thiet, R. K. & Batten, K. M. Bacterial and fungal contributions to carbon sequestration in agroecosystems. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 70, 555–569 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Louisson, Z. et al. Land use modification causes slow, but predictable, change in soil microbial community composition and functional potential. Environ. Microbiome. 18, 30 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kraut-Cohen, J. et al. Effects of tillage practices on soil microbiome and agricultural parameters. Sci. Total Environ. 705, 135791 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Srour, A. Y. et al. Microbial communities associated with long-term tillage and fertility treatments in a corn-soybean cropping system. Front. Microbiol. 11, 1363 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mo, Y. et al. Agricultural practices influence soil microbiome assembly and interactions at different depths identified by machine learning. Commun. Biol. 7, 1349 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Allison, S. D. & Martiny, J. B. H. Resistance, resilience, and redundancy in microbial communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 11512–11519 (2008).

  16. Griffiths, B. S. & Philippot, L. Insights into the resistance and resilience of the soil microbial community. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 37, 112–129 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Figuerola, E. L. M., Guerrero, L. D., Türkowsky, D., Wall, L. G. & Erijman, L. Crop monoculture rather than agriculture reduces the spatial turnover of soil bacterial communities at a regional scale. Environ. Microbiol. 17, 678–688 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Barbero, F. M. et al. Impact of land use changes on soil chemical properties, enzyme activities and microbial communities in two contrasting localities of the Argentinian Pampas. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 206, 105836 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Civeira, G. & Rodríguez, B. Comparación de indicadores de la desertificación en la Región Pampeana y en la frontera de expansión agropecuaria en la República Argentina. Revista de la. Facultad de Agronomía 122,1-16 (2023).

  20. Alvarez, R. Increased soil organic carbon losses due to soybean monoculture in the argentine pampas: a meta-analysis. Commun. Soil. Sci. Plant. Anal. 54, 2939–2950 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fierer, N. & Walsh, C. M. Can we manipulate the soil microbiome to promote carbon sequestration in croplands? PLoS Biol. 21, e3002207 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Blanco-Canqui, H., Mikha, M. M., Presley, D. R. & Claassen, M. M. Addition of cover crops enhances no-till potential for improving soil physical properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 75, 1471–1482 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. Ecological drivers of soil microbial diversity and soil biological networks in the Southern Hemisphere. Ecology 99, 583–596 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fierer, N. Embracing the unknown: disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 15, 579–590 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Romdhane, S. et al. Land-use intensification differentially affects bacterial, fungal and protist communities and decreases microbiome network complexity. Environ. Microbiome. 17, 1 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bahram, M. et al. Structure and function of the global topsoil microbiome. Nature 560, 233–237 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hannula, S. E. et al. Time after time: temporal variation in the effects of grass and forb species on soil bacterial and fungal communities. mBio 10, 10–1128 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Li, Y. et al. Conservation tillage facilitates the accumulation of soil organic carbon fractions by affecting the microbial community in an eolian sandy soil. Front. Microbiol. 15, 1394179 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cotrufo, M. F., Ranalli, M. G., Haddix, M. L., Six, J. & Lugato, E. Soil carbon storage informed by particulate and mineral-associated organic matter. Nat. Geosci. 12, 989–994 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Van Der Heijden, M. G. A. & Hartmann, M. Networking in the plant microbiome. PLoS Biol. 14, e1002378 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Firth, A. G. et al. Soil bacterial community dynamics in plots managed with cover crops and no-till farming in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley, USA. J. Appl. Microbiol. 134, lxac051 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tyler, H. L. Bacterial community composition under long-term reduced tillage and no till management. J. Appl. Microbiol. 126, 1797–1807 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bünemann, E. K. et al. Soil quality—a critical review. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 120, 105–125 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  34. de Graaff, M. A., Hornslein, N., Throop, H. L., Kardol, P. & van Diepen L. T. A. Effects of agricultural intensification on soil biodiversity and implications for ecosystem functioning: a meta-analysis. Adv. Agron. 155, 1–44 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bardgett, R. D. & van der Putten, W. H. Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature 515, 505–511 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. Microbial diversity drives multifunctionality in terrestrial ecosystems. Nat. Commun. 7, 10541 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  37. FAO. La biodiversidad del Suelo, Conservación del Suelo y Agricultura. (2023). https://www.fao.org/soils-portal/soil-biodiversity/conservacion-del-suelo-y-agricultura/es/

  38. Assembly, U. N. G. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. (2015).

  39. INTA-MDA Bs.As. Soil map of Buenos Aires province (Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Argentina. 2013).

  40. Staff, S. S. Claves Para La Taxonomía de Suelos. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (2006).

  41. SAMLA. Recopilación de técnicas de laboratorio. Sistema de Apoyo Metodológico a Laboratorios de Análisis de Suelos, Aguas, Vegetales y Enmiendas Orgánicas. (2004). https://samla.magyp.gob.ar/Cuenta/IniciarSesion?ReturnUrl=%2f

  42. Schmidt, E. S. Modificaciones estructurales y funcionales de epipedones mólicos en suelos de la región pampeana semiárida bajo siembra directa continúa. (2015).

  43. Klindworth, A. et al. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e1–e1 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nilsson, R. H., Ryberg, M., Abarenkov, K., Sjökvist, E. & Kristiansson, E. The ITS region as a target for characterization of fungal communities using emerging sequencing technologies. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 296, 97–101 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wen, C. et al. Evaluation of the reproducibility of amplicon sequencing with Illumina MiSeq platform. PLoS One. 12, e0176716 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Bolyen, E. et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 852–857 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods. 13, 581–583 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Abarenkov, K. et al. Full UNITE+INSD dataset for eukaryotes. UNITE Community. https://doi.org/10.15156/BIO/1281567 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S. & Arkin, A. P. FastTree: computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26, 1641–1650 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  52. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. (2022).

  53. Anderson, M. J. & Walsh, D. C. I. PERMANOVA ANOSIM, and the Mantel test in the face of heterogeneous dispersions: What null hypothesis are you testing? Ecol. Monogr. 83, 557–574 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Gotelli, N. & Colwell, R. Estimating species richness. Front. Measuring Biodivers. 12, 39–54 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Faith, D. P. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol. Conserv. 61, 1–10 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Lin, H. & Peddada S. D. Analysis of compositions of microbiomes with bias correction. Nat. Commun. 11, 3514 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  57. McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. phyloseq: An R Package for Reproducible Interactive Analysis and Graphics of Microbiome Census Data. PLoS One. 8, e61217 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wemheuer, F. et al. Tax4Fun2: prediction of habitat-specific functional profiles and functional redundancy based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. Environ. Microbiome. 15, 11 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Nguyen, N. H. et al. FUNGuild: an open annotation tool for parsing fungal community datasets by ecological guild. Fungal Ecol. 20, 241–248 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Llames, M. E., Huber, P., Metz, S. & Unrein, F. Interplay between stochastic and deterministic processes in the maintenance of alternative community states in Verrucomicrobia-dominated shallow lakes. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 93, fix077 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Blanco-Canqui, H. & Lal, R. No-tillage and soil‐profile carbon sequestration: an on‐farm assessment. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 72, 693–701 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Six, J., Elliott, E. T. & Paustian, K. Soil macroaggregate turnover and microaggregate formation: a mechanism for C sequestration under no-tillage agriculture. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 32, 2099–2103 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Poeplau, C. & Don, A. Carbon sequestration in agricultural soils via cultivation of cover crops—a meta-analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 200, 33–41 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Six, J., Conant, R. T., Paul, E. A. & Paustian, K. Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: implications for C-saturation of soils. Plant. Soil. 241, 155–176 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Prakash, T. & Shimrah, T. A review on soil carbon sequestration in different land use and land cover. Ecol. Environ. Cons. 29, S332–S340 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Nunes, M. R., van Es, H. M., Schindelbeck, R., Ristow, A. J. & Ryan, M. No-till and cropping system diversification improve soil health and crop yield. Geoderma 328, 30–43 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Bernstein, H. & Rich, V. Analyzing how the agricultural microbiome impacts soil carbon stability under different management practices. (2025).

  68. Morrissey, E. M. et al. Phylogenetic organization of bacterial activity. ISME J. 10, 2336–2340 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Tedersoo, L., Bahram, M. & Zobel, M. How mycorrhizal associations drive plant population and community biology. Science (1979). 367, eaba1223 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Madegwa, Y. M. & Uchida, Y. Land use and season drive changes in soil microbial communities and related functions in agricultural soils. Environ. DNA. 3, 1214–1228 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Nthebere, K. et al. Cumulative impact of herbicides and tillage in conservation agriculture on soil microbiome, fungal diversity and crop productivity. Sci. Rep. 15, 24992 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Alhassan, R. & Józefowska, A. Soil Microbial Activities under Different Management Practices in Mountain Meadows: A Review. (2022).

  73. Lee, S. A. et al. Different types of agricultural land use drive distinct soil bacterial communities. Sci. Rep. 10, 17418 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Malik, A. A. et al. Defining trait-based microbial strategies with consequences for soil carbon cycling under climate change. ISME J. 14, 1–9 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Li, Z. & Qi, D. The response mechanism of soil microbial carbon use efficiency to land-use change: a review. Sustainability 17, 7023 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Powell, J. R., Welsh, A. & Hallin, S. Microbial functional diversity enhances predictive models linking environmental parameters to ecosystem properties. Ecology 96, 1985–1993 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Chen, X. et al. Impacts of land-use changes on the variability of microbiomes in soil profiles. J. Sci. Food Agric. 101, 5056–5066 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Bai, Y. & Cotrufo, M. F. Grassland soil carbon sequestration: current understanding, challenges, and solutions. Sci. (1979). 377, 603–608 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Ademola, E. A., Oyetunji, O. E., Adeeyo, A. O. & Oyetade, J. A. Soil microbial products: Specific roles in green vegetations. in Soil Microbiome in Green Technology Sustainability 37–68 Springer, (2024).

  80. Steidinger, B. S. et al. Climatic controls of decomposition drive the global biogeography of forest-tree symbioses. Nature 569, 404–408 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Edison, J. & Mejía, A. Grasslands of South America.

  82. Frey, S. D. Mycorrhizal fungi as mediators of soil organic matter dynamics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 50, 237–259 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Lehmann, J. & Kleber, M. The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature 528, 60–68 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Alberti, J., Daleo, P. & Iribarne, O. ¿ Blanco, negro o escala de grises? Determinación de la contribución relativa del nicho ecológico y la teoría neutral en los ensambles de especies. Ecología austral. 28, 104–112 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Dini-Andreote, F., Stegen, J. C., Van Elsas, J. D. & Salles, J. F. Disentangling mechanisms that mediate the balance between stochastic and deterministic processes in microbial succession. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, E1326–E1332 (2015).

  86. Díaz-Vallejo, E. J., Seeley, M., Smith, A. P. & Marín-Spiotta, E. A meta-analysis of tropical land-use change effects on the soil microbiome: Emerging patterns and knowledge gaps. Biotropica 53, 738–752 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Beattie, G. A. et al. Soil microbiome interventions for carbon sequestration and climate mitigation. mSystems 10, e01129–e01124 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Kovács, A. B. et al. Seasonal changes in the soil microbiome on chernozem soil in response to tillage, fertilization, and cropping system. Agronomy 15, 1887 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Xiang, X., Yao, T., Man, B., Lin, D. & Li, C. Global hotspots and trends in microbial-mediated grassland carbon cycling: a bibliometric analysis. Front. Microbiol. 15:1377338 (2024).

  90. Jacobo, E. & Rodríguez, A. Ecosystem services of grazed grasslands in the flooding Pampa. Phyton-Int. J. Exp. Bot. 93, 1179–1202 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was partially supported, by the project PICTs 2018-3723 and 2020-2023 from Agencia de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (Argentina), by PIP CONICET11220210100584CO 2022-2024; by CNR (Italy) - CONICET (Argentina) 2021-2023 Bilateral Agreement; by Margin Up project 2023-2026 European Union’s Horizon research. Views and opinion expressed are however those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union. Neither the European Union nor the granting authorities can be held responsible for them.

Funding

This study was partially supported by PICTs 2018–3723 and 2020–2023 from Agencia de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (Argentina), by PIP CONICET 11220210100584CO 2022–2024, by CNR (Italy) – CONICET (Argentina) 2021–2023 Bilateral Agreement, and by the Margin Up project 2023–2026 (European Union’s Horizon research). Views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union. Neither the European Union nor the granting authorities can be held responsible for them.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto Tecnológico de Chascomús (INTECH), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Av. Intendente Marino km 8.2, Chascomús, Buenos Aires, 7130, Argentina

    Maximiliano Gortari, Roberto Ulises Escaray, Oscar Adolfo Ruiz & María Eugenia Llames

  2. Escuela de Hábitat y Sostenibilidad (EHyS), Universidad Nacional de San Martín (UNSAM), Campus Miguelete, 25 de Mayo y Francia, San Martín, Buenos Aires, 1650, Argentina

    Maximiliano Gortari

  3. Escuela de Bio y Nanotecnología (EByN), Universidad Nacional de San Martín (UNSAM), Av. Intendente Marion km 8.2, Chascomús, 7130, Argentina

    Roberto Ulises Escaray, Oscar Adolfo Ruiz & María Eugenia Llames

  4. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Manfredi, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (EEA-INTA), Área Mejoramiento Genético Vegetal, Manfredi, Córdoba, 5988, Argentina

    Vanina Giselle Maguire

  5. Chacra Experimental Chascomús, Ministerio de Desarrollo Agrario (MDA-INTA), Chascomús, Buenos Aires, 7130, Argentina

    Juan Pedro Ezquiaga & Matías Bailleres

  6. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), EEA Cuenca del Salado, AER, Chascomús, 7130, Argentina

    Mariano Cicchino

Authors
  1. Maximiliano Gortari
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vanina Giselle Maguire
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Juan Pedro Ezquiaga
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mariano Cicchino
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Matías Bailleres
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Roberto Ulises Escaray
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Oscar Adolfo Ruiz
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. María Eugenia Llames
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Maximiliano Gortari: Data curation, formal analysis, research, writing – original draft. Vanina Giselle Maguire: Investigation, formal analysis, resources, writing – review & editing. Juan Pedro Ezquiaga: Investigation. Mariano Cicchino: Resources. Matías Bailleres: Resources, methodology, Supervision. Roberto Ulises Escaray: investigation. Oscar Adolfo Ruiz: Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Project administration. María Eugenia Llames: Conceptualization, Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Resources, Supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maximiliano Gortari.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Permissions

The authors confirm that they had full permission to conduct the study at the Chascomús Integrated Experimental Farm (CEICh)(Buenos Aires, Argentina). Institutional authorization was provided by the Director, Matías Andrés Bailleres, co-author of this study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gortari, M., Maguire, V.G., Ezquiaga, J.P. et al. Associations between soil microbiomes and carbon stabilization under long-term no-till farming systems in the Argentine Pampas. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47621-4

Download citation

  • Received: 15 September 2025

  • Accepted: 01 April 2026

  • Published: 12 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47621-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Soil microbial communities
  • Total organic carbon stocks
  • No-till farming
  • Conventional tillage
  • Fungal guilds
  • Agroecosystems
Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Soil microbiome in carbon sequestration

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology