Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Association between physical activity patterns and renal cell carcinoma risk: evidence from the UK biobank large-scale prospective cohort
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 13 April 2026

Association between physical activity patterns and renal cell carcinoma risk: evidence from the UK biobank large-scale prospective cohort

  • Fuchun Zheng1,2 na1,
  • Yuyang Yuan1,2 na1,
  • Jun Luo1,2 na1,
  • Sheng Li1,2,
  • Situ Xiong1,2,
  • Bin Fu1,2,
  • Lizhi Zhou1,2,3 &
  • …
  • Jin Zeng1,2 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cancer
  • Diseases
  • Oncology
  • Risk factors
  • Urology

Abstract

While physical inactivity is an established risk factor for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), prospective evidence comparing the efficacy of distinct physical activity (PA) patterns—specifically the “weekend warrior” (WW) versus regularly distributed activity—remains limited. This study analyzed data from 89,000 participants in the UK Biobank cohort who had no prior diagnosis of RCC. PA data were collected using the Axivity AX3 wrist-worn accelerometer. Participants were categorized into three subgroups: the inactive subgroup, the regularly active subgroup, and the subgroup adhering to the WW pattern. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the association between these PA patterns and the risk of RCC. Over a median follow-up period of 13.4 years, 286 individuals developed RCC. Using the WHO-recommended benchmark of 150 min of moderate-to-vigorous PA each week, results from the multivariate Cox model indicated that both the WW subgroup (HR  0.60, 95% CI  0.46–0.78; P < 0.001) and the regularly active subgroup (HR = 0.49, 95% CI  0.34–0.70; P < 0.001) had a significantly lower risk of incident RCC relative to the inactive subgroup. Furthermore, no statistically significant disparity was observed between the active WW subgroup and the regularly active subgroup (HR  1.23, 95% CI  0.85–1.81; P = 0.269). In the UK Biobank cohort, both WW and regularly distributed PA patterns were associated with a significantly lower risk of RCC compared to inactivity, with no significant difference between the two active patterns.

Data availability

The UK Biobank data are available on application to the UK Biobank.

References

  1. Capitanio, U. et al. Epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. Eur. Urol. 75, 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.036 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Palumbo, C. et al. Contemporary age-adjusted incidence and mortality rates of renal cell carcinoma: analysis according to gender, race, stage, grade, and histology. Eur. Urol. Focus. 7, 644–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2020.05.003 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alcala, K. et al. Kidney function and risk of renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 32, 1644–1650. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0558 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dutcher, J. P., Mourad, W. F. & Ennis, R. D. Integrating innovative therapeutic strategies into the management of renal cell carcinoma. Oncol. (willist Park NY). 26, 526–530 (2012). 532, 534.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Makhov, P. et al. Resistance to systemic therapies in clear cell renal cell carcinoma: mechanisms and management strategies. Mol. Cancer Ther. 17, 1355–1364. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-1299 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Feng, H. et al. Associations of timing of physical activity with all-cause and cause-specific mortality in a prospective cohort study. Nat. Commun. 14, 930. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36546-5 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Qian, J. et al. Association of objectively measured timing of physical activity bouts with cardiovascular health in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 44, 1046–1054. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-2178 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rey Lopez, J. P., Sabag, A., Martinez Juan, M., Rezende, L. F. M. & Pastor-Valero, M. Do vigorous-intensity and moderate-intensity physical activities reduce mortality to the same extent? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. Sport Exerc. Med. 6, e000775. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000775 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ross, R. et al. Importance of assessing cardiorespiratory fitness in clinical practice: a case for fitness as a clinical vital sign: a scientific statement from the american heart association. Circulation 134, e653–e699. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000461 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Matthews, C. E. et al. Amount and intensity of leisure-time physical activity and lower cancer risk. J. Clin. Oncol. 38, 686–697. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.02407 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. (World Health Organization, 2010).

  12. Khurshid, S., Al-Alusi, M. A., Churchill, T. W., Guseh, J. S. & Ellinor, P. T. Accelerometer-derived weekend warrior physical activity and incident cardiovascular disease. JAMA 330, 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.10875 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  13. O’Donovan, G., Lee, I-M., Hamer, M. & Stamatakis, E. Association of weekend warrior and other leisure time physical activity patterns with risks for all-cause, cardiovascular disease, and cancer mortality. JAMA Intern. Med. 177, 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8014 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Öztürk, Ç. Ç. et al. Weekend warrior exercise model for protection from chronic mild stress–induced depression and ongoing cognitive impairment. Acta Neurobiol. Exp. 83, 10–24. https://doi.org/10.55782/ane-2023-002 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  15. resource 131600. [cited 14 July 2025]. Available: https://biobank.ndph.ox.ac.uk/showcase/refer.cgi?id=131600

  16. Doherty, A. et al. Large scale population assessment of physical activity using wrist worn accelerometers: the UK biobank study. PLOS One. 12, e0169649. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169649 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  17. da Silva, I. C. et al. Physical activity levels in three brazilian birth cohorts as assessed with raw triaxial wrist accelerometry. Int. J. Epidemiol. 43, 1959–1968. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu203 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  18. van Hees, V. T. et al. Autocalibration of accelerometer data for free-living physical activity assessment using local gravity and temperature: an evaluation on four continents. J. Appl. Physiol. (bethesda Md. : 1985). 117, 738–744. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00421.2014 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Matthews, C. E., Hagströmer, M., Pober, D. M. & Bowles, H. R. Best practices for using physical activity monitors in population-based research. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 44, S68–76. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182399e5b (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  20. van Dijk, B. A. C., Schouten, L. J., Kiemeney, L. A. L. M., Goldbohm, R. A. & van den Brandt, P. A. Relation of height, body mass, energy intake, and physical activity to risk of renal cell carcinoma: results from the Netherlands cohort study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 160, 1159–1167. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwh344 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Scelo, G. & Larose, T. L. Epidemiology and risk factors for kidney cancer. J. Clin. Oncol: Off J. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 36, JCO2018791905. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2018.79.1905 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  22. de Onis, M. & Habicht, J. Anthropometric reference data for international use: recommendations from a World Health Organization Expert Committee. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 64, 650–658. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/64.4.650 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N. & Elphick, C. S. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2009.00001.x (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chiu, B. C. H. et al. Body mass index, physical activity, and risk of renal cell carcinoma. Int. J. Obes. 30, 940–947. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803231 (2005).

  25. Menezes, R. J., Tomlinson, G. & Kreiger, N. Physical activity and risk of renal cell carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer. 107, 642–646. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.11427 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lian, Y. & Luo, P. The association between different leisure-time physical activity patterns and the non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio in adults: national health and nutrition examination survey 2007–2018. Lipids Health Dis. 23, 336. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-024-02278-8 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Venkatesh, N., Martini, A., McQuade, J. L., Msaouel, P. & Hahn, A. W. Obesity and renal cell carcinoma: biological mechanisms and perspectives. Semin. Cancer Biol. 94, 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2023.06.001 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mahdavi, N. et al. Is physical activity related to renal cell carcinoma? A systematic review. J. Nephropathol. 9, e23–e23. https://doi.org/10.34172/jnp.2020.23 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Koivula, T. et al. The effect of exercise and disease status on mobilization of anti-tumorigenic and pro-tumorigenic immune cells in women with breast cancer. Front. Immunol. 15, 1394420. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1394420 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Quintana-Mendias, E. et al. The effect of acute physical exercise on natural killer cells populations and cytokine levels in healthy women. Sports (basel Switz). 11, 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports11100189 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mp, J. Q., Sh, W., Ph, C., Ds, B. & Pa, B. Association of objectively measured timing of physical activity bouts with cardiovascular health in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 44 https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-2178 (2021).

  32. Moore, S. C. et al. Association of leisure-time physical activity with risk of 26 types of cancer in 1.44 million adults. JAMA Intern. Med. 176, 816–825. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.1548 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Koolhaas, C. M. et al. Physical activity derived from questionnaires and wrist-worn accelerometers: comparability and the role of demographic, lifestyle, and health factors among a population-based sample of older adults. Clin. Epidemiol. 10, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S147613 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sudlow, C. et al. UK Biobank: An open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS Med. 12, e1001779. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Saint-Maurice, P. F. et al. Reproducibility of accelerometer and posture-derived measures of physical activity. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 52, 876–883. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002206 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The data used in this study were obtained from the UK Biobank (Application Number: 532564). The UK Biobank data were accessed and analyzed in accordance with the terms of the UK Biobank’s Access and Use Agreement. We are grateful to all the participants of UK Biobank and all the people involved in building the UK Biobank study.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no.82203365), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82400848) and Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation (20232BAB206090).

Author information

Author notes
  1. Fuchun Zheng, Yuyang Yuan and Jun Luo contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330000, China

    Fuchun Zheng, Yuyang Yuan, Jun Luo, Sheng Li, Situ Xiong, Bin Fu, Lizhi Zhou & Jin Zeng

  2. Key Laboratory of Urinary System Diseases of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang, China

    Fuchun Zheng, Yuyang Yuan, Jun Luo, Sheng Li, Situ Xiong, Bin Fu, Lizhi Zhou & Jin Zeng

  3. Postdoctoral Innovation Practice Base, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, People’s Republic of China

    Lizhi Zhou

Authors
  1. Fuchun Zheng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuyang Yuan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jun Luo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sheng Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Situ Xiong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Bin Fu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lizhi Zhou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jin Zeng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

F.Z.: Protocol, manuscript writing; Y.Y.: Protocol; J.L.: Data collection, data analysis; S.L.: Protocol, manuscript writing; S.X.: Manuscript writing; B.F.: Protocol; L.Z.: Protocol, data collection; J.Z.: Revision guidance, manuscript writing, data analysis, manuscript writing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin Zeng.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from the North West Research Ethics Committee (REC reference: 21/NW/0157), and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download DOCX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, F., Yuan, Y., Luo, J. et al. Association between physical activity patterns and renal cell carcinoma risk: evidence from the UK biobank large-scale prospective cohort. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47677-2

Download citation

  • Received: 29 September 2025

  • Accepted: 02 April 2026

  • Published: 13 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47677-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Physical activity
  • UK biobank
  • Renal cell carcinoma
  • Risk
  • Cancer
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer