Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Multiple dimension equity assessment of walking for visual and physical access to central parks across 27 Yangtze River Delta cities
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 13 April 2026

Multiple dimension equity assessment of walking for visual and physical access to central parks across 27 Yangtze River Delta cities

  • Ziqun Lin1,
  • Lifei Wang1 &
  • Xu Zhen1 

Scientific Reports (2026) Cite this article

  • 766 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Environmental social sciences
  • Environmental studies
  • Geography

Abstract

The Yangtze River Delta (YRD), as a globally significant megacity region, faces intense land constraints and growing demands for equitable access to high-quality urban parks. However, traditional planning often prioritizes physical proximity while overlooking the sensory experience, leading to a disconnect between where residents can “reach” and what they can “see.” To bridge this gap, this study develops an integrated framework that couples pedestrian potential with visual perception. By integrating GIS-based pedestrian network analysis and FCN-driven semantic segmentation of street-view image, we evaluated the central parks of 27 cities across the YRD. The results demonstrate that: (1) Urban scale is closely linked to service equity, with 37% of cities exhibiting a distinct accessibility disadvantage relative to the regional average. (2) Large cities tend to dominate in green perception (GVI), whereas small and medium-sized cities are characterized by stronger blue perception (BVI). (3) A significant spatial divergence exists between physical walkability and blue-green perception, manifesting into four distinct spatial typologies at the urban scale. (4) Areas theoretically expected to have high accessibility and perception—such as waterfronts or park edges—underperform in reality. These findings suggest that theoretical attractiveness does not naturally translate into functional accessibility without intentional street-level integration. Achieving park equity requires a dual focus on both sensory experience and physical access. Consequently, this study proposes a targeted urban renewal framework to assist managers in implementing type-specific micro-interventions, providing a scalable model for achieving sensory-physical synergy in land-constrained megacity regions.

Similar content being viewed by others

Measurement of spatial heterogeneity in street restorative perceptions and street refinement design

Article Open access 03 June 2025

Analysis of spatial variation of street landscape greening and influencing factors: an example from Fuzhou city, China

Article Open access 08 December 2023

Global urban visual perception varies across demographics and personalities

Article 22 October 2025

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Pearsall, H. & Eller, J. K. Locating the green space paradox: A study of gentrification and public green space accessibility in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Landsc. Urban Plan. 195, 103708 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Qin, X., Wei, Y. D., Wu, Y. & Huang, X. Regional development and inequality within city regions: A study of the Yangtze River Delta, China. Geogr. Rev. 113(3), 359–385 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mukherjee, M. & Takara, K. Urban green space as a countermeasure to increasing urban risk and the UGS-3CC resilience framework. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 28, 854–861 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rigolon, A. A complex landscape of inequity in access to urban parks: A literature review. Landsc. Urban Plan. 153, 160–169 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Peters, K. Being together in urban parks: Connecting public space, leisure, and diversity. Leis. Sci. 32(5), 418–433 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Whyte, W. H. City: Rediscovering the Center (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, J. & Tan, P. Y. Demand for parks and perceived accessibility as key determinants of urban park use behavior. Urban For. Urban Green. 44, 126420 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Biernacka, M., Łaszkiewicz, E. & Kronenberg, J. Park availability, accessibility, and attractiveness in relation to the least and most vulnerable inhabitants. Urban For. Urban Green. 73, 127585 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, L., Lu, Y., Ye, Y., Xiao, Y. & Yang, L. Examining the association between the built environment and pedestrian volume using street view images. Cities 127, 103734 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, J. et al. Rethinking urban park accessibility in the context of demographic change: A population structure perspective. Urban For. Urban Green. 96, 128334 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou, S., Chen, F. & Xu, Z. Evaluating the accessibility of urban parks and waterfronts through online map services: A case study of Shaoxing, China. Urban For. Urban Green. 77, 127731 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kenyon, G. E. et al. Intra-urban house prices in Madrid following the financial crisis: An exploration of spatial inequality. npj Urban Sustain. 4(1), 26 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yang, H., Jin, C. & Li, T. A paradox of economic benefit and social equity of green space in megacity: Evidence from Tianjin in China. Sustain. Cities Soc. 109, 105530 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, K. & Chen, M. Multi-method analysis of urban green space accessibility: Influences of land use, greenery types, and individual characteristics factors. Urban For. Urban Green. 96, 128366 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shelhamer, E., Long, J. & Darrell, T. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 39(4), 640–651 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ma, G. et al. Impact of land-use mixing on the vitality of urban parks: Evidence from big data analysis in Suzhou, Yangtze River Delta region, China. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 149(4), 04023045 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fuller, R. A., Irvine, K. N., & Gaston, K. J. Interactions between people and nature in urban environments. Urban Ecology. 134–171 (2010).

  18. Fan, P. et al. Walkability in urban landscapes: A comparative study of four large cities in China. Landscape Ecol. 33, 323–340 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Basu, S. & Nagendra, H. Perceptions of park visitors on access to urban parks and benefits of green spaces. Urban For. Urban Green. 57, 126959 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, Y. et al. Exploring recreational ecosystem services and influencing factors in megaparks using mobile phone data—Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta region. Ecol. Indic. 165, 112195 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Na, L., Huang, Y. & Chen, S. How different indicators of internal and external greenness impact street crime? A comparative study in high-density urban areas. Habitat Int. 171, 103759 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yu, P. et al. Capturing open space fragmentation in high–density cities: Towards sustainable open space planning. Appl. Geogr. 154, 102927 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Boakye-Dankwa, E. et al. Walking behaviour and patterns of perceived access to neighbourhood destinations in older adults from a low-density (Brisbane, Australia) and an ultra-dense city (Hong Kong, China). Cities 84, 23–33 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Li, M., Xue, F. & Yeh, A. G. Bi-objective analytics of 3D visual-physical nature exposures in high-rise high-density cities for landscape and urban planning. Landsc. Urban Plan. 233, 104714 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, L., Wong, C. & Duan, X. Urban growth and spatial restructuring patterns: The case of Yangtze River Delta Region, China. Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des. 43(3), 515–539 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Völker, S. & Kistemann, T. The impact of blue space on human health and well-being–Salutogenetic health effects of inland surface waters: A review. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 214(6), 449–460 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ruiz-Padillo, A. et al. Weighted assessment of barriers to walking in small cities: A Brazilian case. Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ. 109, 103392 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chen, Y., Zhu, M., Lu, J., Zhou, Q. & Ma, W. Evaluation of ecological city and analysis of obstacle factors under the background of high-quality development: Taking cities in the Yellow River Basin as examples. Ecol. Indic. 118, 106771 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ma, X. et al. Measuring human perceptions of streetscapes to better inform urban renewal: A perspective of scene semantic parsing. Cities 110, 103086 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Low, S., Taplin, D. & Scheld, S. Rethinking Urban Parks: Public Space and Cultural Diversity (University of Texas Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  31. De Chiara, J., & Koppelman, L. Urban planning and design criteria. (No Title). (1975).

  32. Xiao, Y., Wang, Z., Li, Z. & Tang, Z. An assessment of urban park access in Shanghai-implications for the social equity in urban China. Landsc. Urban Plan. 157, 383–393 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Larkin, A. & Hystad, P. Evaluating street view exposure measures of visible green space for health research. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 29(4), 447–456 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Long, Y. & Liu, L. How green are the streets? An analysis for central areas of Chinese cities using Tencent Street View. PLoS ONE 12(2), e0171110 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Luo, S., Xie, J. & Furuya, K. Assessing the preference and restorative potential of urban park blue space. Land 10(11), 1233 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hess, P. M. Measures of connectivity [Streets: Old paradigm, new investment]. Places. 11(2) (1997).

  37. Ewing, R. & Handy, S. Measuring the unmeasurable: Urban design qualities related to walkability. J. Urban Des. 14(1), 65–84 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Stangl, P. The US pedestrian plan: Linking practice and research. Plan. Pract. Res. 26(3), 289–305 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Dill, J. Measuring network connectivity for bicycling and walking. In 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, 11–15 (2004).

  40. Forman, R. T. T. Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions (Cambridge University Press, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wolch, J. R., Byrne, J. & Newell, J. P. Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landsc. Urban Plan. 125, 234–244 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Siegel, F. R. Cities and mega-cities: problems and solution strategies (Springer, 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tonkiss, F. Cities by Design: The Social Life of Urban Form (Wiley, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Baobeid, A., Koç, M. & Al-Ghamdi, S. G. Walkability and its relationships with health, sustainability, and livability: Elements of physical environment and evaluation frameworks. Front. Built Environ. 7, 721218 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Xu, J., Wang, J., Zuo, X. & Han, X. Spatial quality optimization analysis of streets in historical urban areas based on street view perception and multisource data. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 150(4), 05024036 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Li, W., Cai, Z. & Jin, L. Urban green land use efficiency of resource-based cities in China: Multidimensional measurements, spatial-temporal changes, and driving factors. Sustain. Cities Soc. 104, 105299 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the following projects: Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [Project No. KYCX25_1465], and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52078254).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China

    Ziqun Lin, Lifei Wang & Xu Zhen

Authors
  1. Ziqun Lin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lifei Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xu Zhen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Z.L. wrote the main manuscript text, carried out the technical implementation and formal analysis, and prepared all figures. L.W. contributed to data curation, investigation, and discussion of the results, and assisted with manuscript revision and proofreading. Z.X. conceived the study, developed the research framework and methodology, contributed to the sampling design and provided the preliminary data, and offered substantial guidance on the Introduction and Discussion. Z.X. also supervised the research, provided resources, and acquired funding. All authors reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xu Zhen.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, Z., Wang, L. & Zhen, X. Multiple dimension equity assessment of walking for visual and physical access to central parks across 27 Yangtze River Delta cities. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47920-w

Download citation

  • Received: 31 December 2025

  • Accepted: 03 April 2026

  • Published: 13 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47920-w

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Walkability
  • Visual perceptibility
  • Street view imagery (SVI)
  • Landscape analytics
  • Yangtze River Delta
  • Urban agglomeration
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene