Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
An actor-partner interdependence model for analyzing the association between dyadic coping and parenting concerns in young breast cancer couples in southwest China
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 20 April 2026

An actor-partner interdependence model for analyzing the association between dyadic coping and parenting concerns in young breast cancer couples in southwest China

  • Yingchun Li  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1224-135X1,
  • Meichan Chong2,
  • Pinglei Chui2,
  • Lin Mo3,
  • Yuman Yuan4,
  • Zili Wen5,
  • Hanyu Liao6,
  • Qiaoli Zhong4 &
  • …
  • Haosong Ling4 

Scientific Reports (2026) Cite this article

  • 686 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Breast cancer
  • Psychology

Abstract

Patients with cancer who are also parents of minor children often express significant concerns related to their parenting role. This cross-sectional study aimed to understand parenting concerns in young breast cancer patients and their spouses, focusing on the perspective of dyadic coping. A total of 296 Chinese young breast cancer couples were recruited via convenience sampling, from April 2023 to December 2023. Participants completed the general information questionnaire, Dyadic Coping Inventory, and Parenting Concerns Questionnaire. Dyadic data were analyzed using the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model. The parenting concern scores of young breast cancer patients and their spouses were (3.57 ± 0.56) and (3.26 ± 0.92) respectively, both indicating a moderate to high score; There were statistically differences in parenting concern between young breast cancer patients and their spouses (t = 4.810, p < 0.001). The dyadic coping scores of young breast cancer patients and their spouses were (118.23 ± 20.32) and (118.24 ± 19.47) respectively, and both were at a moderate score. Interdependence model analysis showed that the dyadic coping of both patients and their spouses negatively associated with their own parenting concerns (p < 0.05); Spouse’s supportive coping positively associated with the patient’s parenting concern (p < 0.05), while there was no statistical difference in the patient’s object effect (p > 0.05). The mean score of parenting concerns of young breast cancer patients and their spouses was affected by the score of dyadic coping. Health care workers should regard patients and their spouses as a whole and formulate mutually supportive coping strategies with family as the center, so as to increase positive coping behavior and enhance their family’s ability to cope with breast cancer while raising underage children.

Similar content being viewed by others

A qualitative study on the disease coping experiences of pancreatic cancer patients and their spouses

Article Open access 11 August 2024

Psychosocial experience of couples coping with prostate cancer: a qualitative study

Article Open access 05 February 2026

Dyadic effects of perceived burden and psychological distress on quality of life among Chinese advanced cancer patients and their caregivers

Article Open access 09 April 2025

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are not openly available due to reasons of privacy or ethical restrictions and are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Xia, C. et al. Cancer statistics in China and United States, 2022: profiles, trends, and determinants. Chin. Med. J. (Engl). 135 (5), 584–590 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang, D. et al. Epidemiological characteristics and trends of female breast cancer and cervical cancer in Sichuan Province from 2014 to 2018. J. Prev. Med. Inform. 39 (4), 8 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ruan, J. et al. A qualitative study on financial toxicity coping dilemmas in young female patients with breast cancer. J. Nurs. Train. 39 (19), 6 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lan, B. et al. Depression, anxiety, and their associated factors among Chinese early breast cancer in women under 35 years of age: A cross sectional study. Curr. Probl. Cancer. 44 (5), 100558 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ghofrani, M. et al. Levels of unmet needs among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) impacted by parental cancer. Support Care Cancer. 27 (1), 175–182 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tavares, R. et al. Psychological group intervention to support parenting: Qualitative study about needs and preferences of mothers with breast cancer. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. 61, 102197 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hymovich, D. P. Child-rearing concerns of parents with cancer. Oncol. Nurs. Forum. 20 (9), 1355–1360 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tingting, K. Development and Preliminary Application of the Chinese Version of the Parenting Concerns Questionnaire of Cancer Patients (ZhengZhou University, 2021).

  9. Wan, Z. & Zemei, X. Research progress on parenting concerns of cancer patients. Chin. Nurs. Manage. 22 (09), 5 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wan, Z. & Zemei, X. Research progress of cancer patients’ parenting concerns. Chin. Nurs. Manage. 22 (9), 5 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Inhestern, L. et al. Parenting Concerns and Psychological Burden in Cancer Patients with Minor and Young Adult Children. Psychother. Psychosom. Med. Psychol. 67 (7), 279–287 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Check, D. K. et al. Concerns underlying treatment preferences of advanced cancer patients with children. Psycho-Oncology 26 (10), 1491–1497 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  13. K, M. Patients with advanced cancer and their spouses parenting minor children: the role of the relationship context in parenting concerns. Psycho Oncol. 33 (3), 1 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bodenmann, G., Falconier, M. K. & Randall, A. K. Dyadic coping (editorial). Front. Psychol, : p. 1. (2019).

  15. Chen, M. et al. A literature review of the relationship between dyadic coping and dyadic outcomes in cancer couples. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. 54, 102035 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, W. et al. Common dyadic coping and its congruence in couples facing breast cancer: The impact on couples’ psychological distress. Psychooncology 33 (3), e6314 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stefanut, A. M., Vintila, M. & Tudorel, O. I. The Relationship of Dyadic Coping With Emotional Functioning and Quality of the Relationship in Couples Facing Cancer-A Meta-Analysis. Front. Psychol. 11, 594015 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cai, T., Qian, J. & Yuan, C. Dyadic Coping in Couples With Breast Cancer in China. Cancer Nurs. 44 (6), E458–E466 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cook, W. L. & Kenny, D. A. The Actor–Partner Interdependence Model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 29 (2), 101–109 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yue, S. & Wang, C. The Mann-Kendall Test Modified by Effective Sample Size to Detect Trend in Serially Correlated Hydrological Series. Water Resour. Manage. 18 (3), 201–218 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bodenmann, G. et al. Dyadic coping inventory, in Encyclopedia of couple and family therapy p. 813–818 (Springer, 2019).

  22. Hao, L. et al. Research on the current situation and influencing factors of parenting anxiety in 235 middle-aged and young ovarian cancer patients. J. Nurs. Adm. 30 (10), 63–68 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Park, E. M. et al. Parenting concerns, quality of life, and psychological distress in patients with advanced cancer. Psychooncology 25 (8), 942–948 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, Y. The Research on Confucius Family Educati (Lanzhou University, 2017).

  25. Borstelmann, N. A. et al. Psychosocial issues and quality of life of parenting partners of young women with breast cancer. Support. Care Cancer. 30 (5), 4265–4274 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Reczek, C. Conducting a multi family member interview study. Fam. Process. 53 (2), 318–335 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Xiaoyan, H., Jiajia, Q. & MIngdi, Z. Parenting Experience of breast cancer Patients Who Raise Minor Children: A Qualitative Study. J. Nurs. Sci. 35 (15), 27–30 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ruddy, K. J. et al. Prospective Study of Fertility Concerns and Preservation Strategies in Young Women With Breast Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 32 (11), 1151–1156 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yang, Z. et al. Meta integration of upper limb lymphedema in patients with breast cancer. Chin. J. Mod. Nurs. 29 (6), 755–761 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stiffler, D. et al. Parenting experiences with adolescent daughters when mothers have breast cancer. in Oncology nursing forum. (2008).

  31. Milbury, K. et al. Patients with advanced cancer and their spouses parenting minor children: The role of the relationship context in parenting concerns. Psychooncology 33 (3), e6310 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang, D. et al. Qualitative study on care experience of spouses of breast cancer patients. Chin. J. Nurs. Educ. 18 (04), 363–369 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Segrin, C. et al. Longitudinal dyadic interdependence in psychological distress among Latinas with breast cancer and their caregivers. Support. Care Cancer. 28, 2735–2743 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Miller, R. S. & Lefcourt, H. M. The assessment of social intimacy. J. Pers. Assess. 46 (5), 514–518 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Li, X. et al. Ren Qin and interpersonal trust: The moderating role of Guanxi type and tasks domain. Psychol. Explor. 36, 546–550 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yuan, Y. et al. The current situation and influencing factors of concerns about the upbringing of cancer patients. Chin. Nurs. Res. 38 (12), 2244–2249 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zietlow, A. L. et al. Dyadic coping and its underlying neuroendocrine mechanisms–implications for stress regulation. Front. Psychol. 9, 2600 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  38. van Roij, J. et al. Dyadic coping and its association with emotional functioning in couples confronted with advanced cancer: Results of the multicenter observational eQuiPe study. Psycho-Oncology 31 (9), 1545–1554 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Falconier, M. K. & Kuhn, R. Dyadic coping in couples: A conceptual integration and a review of the empirical literature. Front. Psychol. 10, 571 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ozdemir, D., Tas, F. & Arslan An investigation of the relationship between social support and coping with stress in women with breast cancer. Psycho-oncology 27 (9), 2214–2219 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Chen, W., Qin, N. & Li, H. Research progress on binary coping strategies for cancer patients and their spouses. J. Nurs. 29 (11), 31–35 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully thank all participants in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nursing, Yibin Second People’s Hospital, Yibin, China

    Yingchun Li

  2. Department of Nursing Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia

    Meichan Chong & Pinglei Chui

  3. Affiliated Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

    Lin Mo

  4. Department of Breast and Thyroid, Yibin Second People’s Hospital, Yibin, China

    Yuman Yuan, Qiaoli Zhong & Haosong Ling

  5. Department of Oncology, Chengdu Second People’s Hospital, Chengdu, China

    Zili Wen

  6. Department of Oncology, Xinan Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China

    Hanyu Liao

Authors
  1. Yingchun Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Meichan Chong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pinglei Chui
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lin Mo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yuman Yuan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zili Wen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hanyu Liao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Qiaoli Zhong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Haosong Ling
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: Yingchun Li, Meichan Chong, Pinglei Chui, Lin Mo. Methodology: Yingchun Li, Meichan Chong, Yuman Yuan, Zili Wen, Hanyu Liao. Data analyses: Yingchun Li, Meichan Chong, Qiaoli Zhong, Haosong Ling. Manuscript writing and visualization: Yingchun Li. Review and editing: Yingchun Li, Meichan Chong, Pinglei Chui, Lin Mo.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meichan Chong.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Patient and public involvement

Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

Provenance and peer review

Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Chong, M., Chui, P. et al. An actor-partner interdependence model for analyzing the association between dyadic coping and parenting concerns in young breast cancer couples in southwest China. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47968-8

Download citation

  • Received: 18 March 2025

  • Accepted: 06 April 2026

  • Published: 20 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47968-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • breast cancer
  • dyadic coping
  • parenting concerns
  • Actor-Partner Interdependence Model
  • psycho-oncology
  • spouse
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer