Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Prognostic determinants and predictive modeling in higher-grade glioma patients receiving radiotherapy: a retrospective SEER-based study
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 24 April 2026

Prognostic determinants and predictive modeling in higher-grade glioma patients receiving radiotherapy: a retrospective SEER-based study

  • Ruijinlin Hao1 na1,
  • Qi Jia2 na1,
  • Xuanxuan Mao3,
  • Tao Zhou4 &
  • …
  • Wenming Wang5 

Scientific Reports (2026) Cite this article

  • 519 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cancer
  • Oncology
  • Risk factors

Abstract

Higher-grade glioma has an extremely poor prognosis, and radiotherapy is an important component of its comprehensive treatment. However, survival outcomes following radiotherapy vary across demographic and socioeconomic subgroups, and these disparities remain incompletely characterized. This study seeks to evaluate the influence of factors including age, sex, surgical approach, income, and racial background on survival in radiotherapy-treated higher-grade glioma patients, and to develop a machine learning-based prognostic prediction model. The clinical data of higher-grade glioma patients who received radiotherapy from 2000 to 2019 in the SEER database were retrospectively analyzed. To assess the predictive value of multiple clinical factors for 6-, 12-, and 18-month disease-specific survival (DSS), we employed Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression, and six machine learning algorithms. Feature importance within the models was interpreted using SHAP analysis. A total of 35,765 patients were included. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed age, chemotherapy, surgical resection, income, and pathological type significantly affected DSS. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified that an age ≥ 71 years and the absence of chemotherapy were independent risk factors for poor prognosis, while high income and temporal lobe tumors were associated with better prognosis. Among the machine learning models, LightGBM performed the best in predicting patients’ DSS. SHAP analysis showed that the core features of model prediction would change over time. These findings provide exploratory evidence for risk stratification and prognostic assessment of higher-grade glioma patients receiving radiotherapy.

Similar content being viewed by others

Deep learning-assisted radiomics facilitates multimodal prognostication for personalized treatment strategies in low-grade glioma

Article Open access 11 June 2023

Prognosis Individualized: Survival predictions for WHO grade II and III gliomas with a machine learning-based web application

Article Open access 26 October 2023

A validated prognostic nomogram for patients with H3 K27M-mutant diffuse midline glioma

Article Open access 20 June 2023

Funding

This study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Author notes
  1. Ruijinlin Hao and Qi Jia contributed equally to this work and share the first authorship.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anaesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China

    Ruijinlin Hao

  2. Department of Nerve Intervention Center, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, China

    Qi Jia

  3. Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Molecular and Medical Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, 210023, China

    Xuanxuan Mao

  4. Departments of Geriatrics, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China

    Tao Zhou

  5. Department of Information Management, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China

    Wenming Wang

Authors
  1. Ruijinlin Hao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qi Jia
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xuanxuan Mao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tao Zhou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wenming Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenming Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download DOCX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hao, R., Jia, Q., Mao, X. et al. Prognostic determinants and predictive modeling in higher-grade glioma patients receiving radiotherapy: a retrospective SEER-based study. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-48752-4

Download citation

  • Received: 16 January 2026

  • Accepted: 09 April 2026

  • Published: 24 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-48752-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Higher-grade glioma
  • Radiotherapy
  • Machine learning algorithms
  • Disease-specific survival
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer