Abstract
Serial dependence describes how prior and current stimuli interact, producing attractive biases toward previously seen inputs, particularly under uncertainty. Previous studies varied external stimulus noise; here we manipulated the quality of internal representations through an intermediate task during the retention interval. Participants viewed oriented Gabor patches and reproduced their orientation after a delay, during which they either performed a control task or judged circle size, line length/orientation, or tone frequency. These manipulations allowed for a detailed assessment of the role of working memory load and inter-item competition on the fidelity of the encoded Gabor orientation and subsequently, on the strength of serial dependence. Tasks requiring additional encoding increased serial dependence, even when the task was auditory. Increased working memory load is known to alter the quality and accessibility of maintained representations, which may enhance the influence of prior stimuli on current stimulus perception. However, the similarity of the feature dimension did not further increase serial dependence, though it did increase response variability. These findings offer novel evidence that increased working memory load, not just stimulus noise, enhances biases towards past input, shaping serial dependence through internal uncertainty.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data have been made publicly available via the Open Science Framework and can be accessed at https://osf.io/grzpv/.
References
Dong, D. W. & Atick, J. J. Statistics of natural time-varying images. Network Comput. Neural Syst. 6, 345–358 (1995).
Anstis, S., Verstraten, F. A. J. & Mather, G. The motion aftereffect. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2, 111–117 (1998).
Gekas, N., McDermott, K. C. & Mamassian, P. Disambiguating serial effects of multiple timescales. J. Vis. 19, 24 (2019).
Kiyonaga, A., Scimeca, J. M., Bliss, D. P. & Whitney, D. Serial dependence across perception, attention, and memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 21, 493–497 (2017).
Manassi, M., Murai, Y. & Whitney, D. Serial dependence in visual perception: A meta-analysis and review. J. Vis. 23, 18 (2023).
Pascucci, D. et al. Serial dependence in visual perception: A review. J. Vis. 23, 9 (2023).
Fischer, J. & Whitney, D. Serial dependence in visual perception. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 738–743 (2014).
Liberman, A., Zhang, K. & Whitney, D. Serial dependence promotes object stability during occlusion. J. Vis. 16, 16 (2016).
Fritsche, M., Mostert, P. & De Lange, F. P. Opposite effects of recent history on perception and decision. Curr. Biol. 27, 590–595 (2017).
Houborg, C., Kristjánsson, Á., Tanrıkulu, Ö. D. & Pascucci, D. The role of secondary features in serial dependence. J. Vis. 23, 21 (2023).
Tanrikulu, Ö. D., Pascucci, D. & Kristjánsson, Á. Stronger serial dependence in the depth plane than the fronto-parallel plane between realistic objects: Evidence from virtual reality. J. Vis. 23, 20 (2023).
Fischer, C. et al. Context information supports serial dependence of multiple visual objects across memory episodes. Nat. Commun. 11, 1932 (2020).
Bliss, D. P., Sun, J. J. & D’Esposito, M. Serial dependence is absent at the time of perception but increases in visual working memory. Sci. Rep. 7, 14739 (2017).
Manassi, M., Liberman, A., Kosovicheva, A., Zhang, K. & Whitney, D. Serial dependence in position occurs at the time of perception. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 25, 2245–2253 (2018).
Barbosa, J. & Compte, A. Build-up of serial dependence in color working memory. Sci. Rep. 10, 10959 (2020).
Collins, T. Serial dependence tracks objects and scenes in parallel and independently. J. Vis. 22, 4 (2022).
Collins, T. Serial dependence occurs at the level of both features and integrated object representations. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 151, 1821–1832 (2022).
Manassi, M., Kristjánsson, Á. & Whitney, D. Serial dependence in a simulated clinical visual search task. Sci. Rep. 9, 19937 (2019).
Liberman, A., Fischer, J. & Whitney, D. Serial Dependence in the Perception of Faces. Curr. Biol. 24, 2569–2574 (2014).
Liberman, A. & Whitney, D. The serial dependence of perceived emotional expression. J. Vis. 15, 929 (2015).
Taubert, J., Van Der Burg, E. & Alais, D. Love at second sight: Sequential dependence of facial attractiveness in an on-line dating paradigm. Sci. Rep. 6, 22740 (2016).
Manassi, M., Liberman, A., Chaney, W. & Whitney, D. The perceived stability of scenes: Serial dependence in ensemble representations. Sci. Rep. 7, 1971 (2017).
Suárez-Pinilla, M., Seth, A. K. & Roseboom, W. Serial dependence in the perception of visual variance. J. Vis. 18, 4 (2018).
Goettker, A. & Stewart, E. E. M. Serial dependence for oculomotor control depends on early sensory signals. Curr. Biol. 32, 2956-2961e.e3 (2022).
Kim, S., Burr, D. & Alais, D. Attraction to the recent past in aesthetic judgments: A positive serial dependence for rating artwork. J. Vis. 19, 19 (2019).
Fornaciai, M. & Park, J. Serial dependence in numerosity perception. J. Vis. 18, 15 (2018).
Fritsche, M. & De Lange, F. P. The role of feature-based attention in visual serial dependence. J. Vis. 19, 21 (2019).
Rafiei, M., Hansmann-Roth, S., Whitney, D., Kristjánsson, Á. & Chetverikov, A. Optimizing perception: Attended and ignored stimuli create opposing perceptual biases. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 83, 1230–1239 (2021).
Rafiei, M., Chetverikov, A., Hansmann-Roth, S. & Kristjánsson, Á. You see what you look for: Targets and distractors in visual search can cause opposing serial dependencies. J. Vis. 21, 3 (2021).
Rafiei, M., Chetverikov, A., Hansmann-Roth, S. & Kristjansson, Á. The influence of the tested item on serial dependence in perceptual decisions. Perception 52, 255–265 (2023).
Cicchini, G. M., Mikellidou, K. & Burr, D. C. The functional role of serial dependence.. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 285, 20181722 (2018).
Knill, D. C. Robust cue integration: A Bayesian model and evidence from cue-conflict studies with stereoscopic and figure cues to slant. J. Vis. 7, 5 (2007).
Körding, K. P. & Wolpert, D. M. Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 319–326 (2006).
Van Bergen, R. S., Ji Ma, W., Pratte, M. S. & Jehee, J. F. M. Sensory uncertainty decoded from visual cortex predicts behavior. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1728–1730 (2015).
Ceylan, G., Herzog, M. H. & Pascucci, D. Serial dependence does not originate from low-level visual processing. Cognition 212, 104709 (2021).
Gallagher, G. K. & Benton, C. P. Stimulus uncertainty predicts serial dependence in orientation judgements. J. Vis. 22, 6 (2022).
Czoschke, S., Fischer, C., Beitner, J., Kaiser, J. & Bledowski, C. Two types of serial dependence in visual working memory. Br. J. Psychol. 110, 256–267 (2019).
Fornaciai, M. & Park, J. Attractive Serial Dependence in the Absence of an Explicit Task. Psychol. Sci. 29, 437–446 (2018).
Lau, W. K. & Maus, G. W. Visual serial dependence in an audiovisual stimulus. J. Vis. 19, 20 (2019).
St. John-Saaltink, E., Kok, P., Lau, H. C. & De Lange, F. P. Serial dependence in perceptual decisions is reflected in activity patterns in primary visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 36, 6186–6192 (2016).
Xia, Y., Leib, A. Y. & Whitney, D. Serial dependence in the perception of attractiveness. J. Vis. 16, 28 (2016).
Ceylan, G. & Pascucci, D. Attractive and repulsive serial dependence: The role of task relevance, the passage of time, and the number of stimuli. J. Vis. 23, 8 (2023).
Cheng, S., Chen, S., Glasauer, S., Keeser, D. & Shi, Z. Neural mechanisms of sequential dependence in time perception: The impact of prior task and memory processing. Cereb. Cortex 34, bhad453 (2024).
Cheng, S., Chen, S., Yang, X. & Shi, Z. The impact of task measurements on sequential dependence: A comparison between temporal reproduction and discrimination tasks. Psychol. Res. 88, 2346–2359 (2024).
Cheng, S. et al. Arousal-Driven Serial Dependence: Internal States Modulate Perceived Duration. Preprint at (2025). https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.15.659791
Feigin, H., Baror, S., Bar, M. & Zaidel, A. Perceptual decisions are biased toward relevant prior choices. Sci. Rep. 11, 648 (2021).
Pascucci, D. et al. Laws of concatenated perception: Vision goes for novelty, decisions for perseverance. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000144 (2019).
Pascucci, D. & Plomp, G. Serial dependence and representational momentum in single-trial perceptual decisions. Sci. Rep. 11, 9910 (2021).
Sheehan, T. C. & Serences, J. T. Attractive serial dependence overcomes repulsive neuronal adaptation. PLoS Biology 20, e3001711 (2022).
Akrami, A., Kopec, C. D., Diamond, M. E. & Brody, C. D. Posterior parietal cortex represents sensory history and mediates its effects on behaviour. Nature 554, 368–372 (2018).
Barbosa, J. et al. Interplay between persistent activity and activity-silent dynamics in the prefrontal cortex underlies serial biases in working memory. Nat. Neurosci. 23, 1016–1024 (2020).
De Azevedo Neto, R. M. & Bartels, A. Disrupting short-term memory maintenance in premotor cortex affects serial dependence in visuomotor integration. J. Neurosci. 41, 9392–9402 (2021).
Markov, Y. A., Tiurina, N. A. & Pascucci, D. Serial dependence: A matter of memory load. Heliyon 10, e33977 (2024).
Bays, P. M. & Husain, M. Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision. Science 321, 851–854 (2008).
Fougnie, D., Suchow, J. W. & Alvarez, G. A. Variability in the quality of visual working memory. Nat. Commun. 3, 1229 (2012).
Ma, W. J., Husain, M. & Bays, P. M. Changing concepts of working memory. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 347–356 (2014).
Van Den Berg, R., Shin, H., Chou, W.-C., George, R. & Ma, W. J. Variability in encoding precision accounts for visual short-term memory limitations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109, 8780–8785 (2012).
Oberauer, K. & Lin, H.-Y. An interference model of visual working memory. Psychol. Rev. 124, 21–59 (2017).
Wennberg, J. W. & Serences, J. T. Mixing and mingling in visual working memory: Inter-item competition is feature-specific during encoding and feature-general during maintenance. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 86, 1846–1860 (2024).
Schurgin, M. W., Wixted, J. T. & Brady, T. F. Psychophysical scaling reveals a unified theory of visual memory strength. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 1156–1172 (2020).
Morey, R. D. Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorials Quant. Methods Psychol. 4, 61–64 (2008).
Bae, G.-Y. & Luck, S. J. Serial dependence in vision: Merely encoding the previous-trial target is not enough. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 27, 293–300 (2020).
Bansal, S. et al. Qualitatively different delay-dependent working memory distortions in people with schizophrenia and healthy control participants. Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging 8, 1218–1227 (2023).
Gold, J. M., Bansal, S., Robinson, B., Anticevic, A. & Luck, S. J. Opposite-direction spatial working memory biases in people with schizophrenia and healthy control participants. Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging 10, 167–174 (2025).
Gallagher, G. & Benton, C. Confidence determines the strength of visual serial dependence. J. Vis. 23, 5173 (2023).
Samaha, J., Switzky, M. & Postle, B. R. Confidence boosts serial dependence in orientation estimation. J. Vis. 19, 25 (2019).
Ozkirli, A. & Pascucci, D. It’s not the spoon that bends: Internal states of the observer determine serial dependence. Preprint at. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.19.563128 (2023).
Ozkirli, A., Chetverikov, A. & Pascucci, D. Large-scale mega-analysis indicates that serial dependence deteriorates perceptual decision-making. Nat. Hum. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02362-8 (2025).
Panichello, M. F., DePasquale, B., Pillow, J. W. & Buschman, T. J. Error-correcting dynamics in visual working memory. Nat. Commun. 10, 3366 (2019).
Oberauer, K. Access to information in working memory: Exploring the focus of attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 28, 411–421 (2002).
McElree, B. Working memory and focal attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 27, 817–835 (2001).
Oberauer, K. Chapter 2 Design for a Working Memory. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation Vol. 51 45–100 (Elsevier, 2009).
Oberauer, K. & Hein, L. Attention to information in working memory. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 21, 164–169 (2012).
Griffin, I. C. & Nobre, A. C. Orienting Attention to Locations in Internal Representations. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 15, 1176–1194 (2003).
Matsukura, M., Luck, S. J. & Vecera, S. P. Attention effects during visual short-term memory maintenance: Protection or prioritization?. Percept. Psychophys. 69, 1422–1434 (2007).
Rademaker, R. L., Bloem, I. M., De Weerd, P. & Sack, A. T. The impact of interference on short-term memory for visual orientation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 41, 1650–1665 (2015).
Bae, G.-Y. & Luck, S. J. Interactions between visual working memory representations. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 79, 2376–2395 (2017).
Cowan, N. The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behav. Brain Sci. 24, 87–114 (2001).
Klemen, J., Büchel, C., Bühler, M., Menz, M. M. & Rose, M. Auditory working memory load impairs visual ventral stream processing: Toward a unified model of attentional load. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 22, 437–446 (2010).
Konstantinou, N., Beal, E., King, J.-R. & Lavie, N. Working memory load and distraction: Dissociable effects of visual maintenance and cognitive control. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 76, 1985–1997 (2014).
Liu, P., Forte, J., Sewell, D. & Carter, O. Cognitive load effects on early visual perceptual processing. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 80, 929–950 (2018).
Saults, J. S. & Cowan, N. A central capacity limit to the simultaneous storage of visual and auditory arrays in working memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 136, 663–684 (2007).
Jeffreys, H. Theory of Probability (Oxford University PressOxford, 1998). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198503682.001.0001
Lee, M. D. & Wagenmakers, E.-J. Bayesian Cognitive Modeling: A Practical Course (Cambridge University Press, 2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139087759.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Birta Hinriksdóttir, María Kristín Árnadóttir and Sigríður Helga Kárdal Ásgeirsdóttir for their help with the data collection. This project was funded by a grant from the University of Iceland (grant number: 92361).
Funding
This project was funded by a grant awarded to SHR from the University of Iceland (grant number: 92361).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SHR designed and programmed the study. Testing and data collection were performed by BWR, ERG and RTH. BWR, ERG and RTH performed the data analysis under supervision of SHR. SHR wrote the manuscript, and BWR provided critical feedback. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Reynisdóttir, B.W., Gústafsdóttir, E.R., Þorsteinsdóttir, R. et al. Clashing memories in working memory modulate serial dependence. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-48863-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-48863-y
