Table 1 The colorimetric changes in the paper samples and iron gall ink samples were treated with geraniol, CeO2NPs, and a geraniol-CeO2NPs mixture, both before and after artificial aging.

From: An eco-friendly evaluation of geraniol and CeO2NPs paper poultices for multifunctional paper manuscript conservation

Samples

(L)

(a)

(b)

∆E

Before aging

Control paper sample

90.74

0.45

2.00

-

Control ink sample

23.32

-6.74

9.54

-

Infected paper sample

89.55

0.70

3.81

2.18

Infected ink sample

17.63

0.38

1.00

12.49

Treated paper sample with geraniol

90.26

1.11

7.70

3.97

Treated ink sample with geraniol

18.35

-1.26

0.91

1.79

Treated paper sample with CeO2NPs

90.59

1.06

6.98

3.35

Treated ink sample with CeO2NPs

18.58

-2.72

2.43

3.5

Treated paper sample with geraniol and CeO2NPs

90.24

1.26

7.12

3.42

Treated ink sample with geraniol and CeO2NPs

18.15

0.25

0.82

0.56

After aging

Control paper sample

90.22

0.78

4.27

2.35

Control ink sample

24.31

-6.25

9.25

1.14

Infected paper sample

89.70

0.92

4.76

0.72

Infected ink sample

18.50

0.56

1.38

0.96

Treated paper sample with geraniol

91.24

0.92

5.95

1.94

Treated ink sample with geraniol

18.13

0.29

0.80

0.73

Treated paper sample with CeO2NPs

91.45

0.73

5.21

1.81

Treated ink sample with CeO2NPs

17.71

0.12

0.78

1.08

Treated paper sample with geraniol and CeO2NPs

90.56

0.88

5.37

1.05

Treated ink sample with geraniol and CeO2NPs

18.73

-1.37

2.17

2.09