Abstract
The sealing integrity of geological bodies is fundamental to the safe geological storage of CO₂ in oil and gas reservoirs. Conventional assessments of caprock and fault integrity mainly emphasize lithology, pore structure, and fault gouge characteristics, while often overlooking stress changes induced by reservoir injection and production. This study establishes criteria for caprock and fault failure and instability and conducts four-dimensional geomechanical simulations based on dynamic fluid–solid coupling. The evolution of geological integrity coefficients under injection and production conditions is obtained. The results indicate that during CO₂-based enhanced oil recovery and storage, pore pressure gradually increases while effective stress within the formation decreases. Under the combined influence of evolving pore pressure and changes in in situ stress, the sealing behavior of the caprock exhibits complex dynamics. Fault shear stress exhibits only minor variation, and the faults retain strong sealing performance throughout the simulation period. Both the caprock and fault geomechanical integrity coefficients remain greater than 1, suggesting a low leakage risk under the evaluated operating conditions. These results demonstrate that incorporating in situ stress evolution under dynamic injection–production conditions can significantly improve the assessment of mechanical integrity and sealing performance of geological bodies. This study provides a useful basis for the safe and efficient implementation of CO₂ storage in oil and gas reservoirs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Lü Weifeng, Z. et al. Progress in CO2 flooding and storage techniques for lacustrine oil reservoirsand development directions of their large-scale application in China. Pet. Explor. Dev. 52 (04), 959–972 (2025).
Mabashiri, K. Compaction and fluid migration (Petroleum Industry, 1982).
Liu Fanghuai. Role and evaluation methods of caprocks in gas reservoir preservation and destruction. Natl. Gas Geosci. (05), 220–227. (1991).
Zhang, Y. On principal factors for the formation of natural gas pools under a dynamic balance regime. Petrol. Exp. Geol. (03), 210–221. (1991).
Al-BazaliT M, Zhang, J., Chenevert, M. E. & Sharma, M. M. Measurement of the sealing capacity of shale caprocks. SPE Annual Tech. Conf. Exhib. Dallas. (2005).
Daniel, R. F. & Kaldi, J. G. Evaluating seal capacity of caprocks and intraformational barriers for the geosequestration of CO₂. PESA Eastern Australia Basins Symposium III (04), 14–17. (2008).
Cui Zhendong. Research on geomechanical evaluation method of co₂ geological storage caprock stability (Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2010).
Fu Xiaofei, L. et al. Quantitative simulation experiment and evaluation method of vertical seal of overthrust. Geol. Sci. (02): 223–233. (2004).
Fu Guang, L. et al. Physical simulation experiment of the evaluation standards of vertical gas seal ability of fault at motionless stage and its application. Natl. Gas Ind. (07): 20–22. (2005).
Shang Erjie, J. et al. Study on physical simulation experiment for the controlling of fault to oil-taking hongche fault in the northwestern of junggar basin as an example. Petrol. Exp. Geol. (04): 414–418. (2005).
Hubbert, M. K. & Rubey, W. W. Role of fluid pressure in mechanics of overthrust faulting I. mechanics of fluid-filled porous solids and its application to overthrust faulting. GSA Bull. 70 (2), 115–166 (1959).
Smith, D. A. Theoratical consideration of sealing and non-sealing faults. AAPG Bull. 50 (2), 363–371 (1966).
Engelder, J. T. Cataclasis and the generation of fault gouge. Bull. gevl soc. am. 85 (10), 1515–1522 (1974).
Weber, K. J. et al. The role of faults in hydrocarbon migration and trapping in Nigerian growth fault structures. Off-shore Tech. Conf. :2643–2653. (1978).
Robert, R. et al. Sealing properties of tertiary growth faults, Texas Gulf Coast. AAPG Bull. 79 (3), 375–393 (1995).
Lindsay, N. G., Murphy, F. C., Walsh, J. J. & Watterson, J. Outcrop studies of shale smears on fault surfaces. Special Publications Int. Association Sedimentologists. 15, 113–123 (1993).
Yielding, G., Freeman, B. & Needham, D. T. Quantitative fault seal prediction. AAPG Bull. 81 (6), 897–917 (1997).
Frash, L. P. et al. Caprock integrity susceptibility to permeable fracture creation. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control. 64, 60–72 (2017).
Liu Yunxin, Y., Yinghua, Y. & Hongqi Improvement of research method on comprehensive damage degree of reginonal mudston cap caused by faults. Chin. J. Geol. 59 (4), 1048–1056 (2024).
Zhang Guangquan, F. et al. Damage law of reservoirs and cap rock of gas storage under alternating loads. Fault Block Oil Gas Field. 28 (06), 769–774 (2021).
Bakhtiari, D. R. N. Coupled hydro-mechanical analysis of underground gas storage at Sarajeh field, Qom formation, Iran. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 92, 1–17 (2021).
Fang, Y., Elsworth, D., Wang, C., Ishibashi, T. & Fitts, J. P. Frictional stability-permeability relationships for fractures in shales. J. Geo-phys Res. Solid Earth. 123 (2), 1760–1776 (2018).
Lang, P. S., Paluszny, A. & Zimmerman, R. W. Evolution of fracture normal stiffness due to pressure dissolution and precipitation. International J. Rock. Mech. Min. Sciences. 16, 658–672 (2016).
Li, X., Li, Q., Bai, B., Wei, N. & Yuan, W. The geomechanics of Shenhua carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) demonstration project in Ordos Basin, China. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 8 (3), 362–379 (2016).
Shi, X. et al. A full-chain CCS demonstration project in northeast Ordos Basin, China. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control. 54, 239–251 (2016).
Rutqvist, J. The geomechanics of CO₂ storage in deep sedimentary formations. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 30 (3), 525–551 (2012).
Pengzhi Pan, Z., Wu, X. & Feng, F. Geomechanical modeling of CO₂ geological storage: A review. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 8 (6), 936–994 (2016).
Zoback, M. D. & Gorelick, S. M. Earthquake triggering and large-scale geologic storage of carbon dioxide. PNAS 109 (26), 10164–10168 (2012).
Bachman, R. C. et al. Examining the effects of stress dependent permeability on stimulated horizontal montney wells. In Paper CSUG/SPE 149331 presented at the Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, Alberta. (2011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.C.,Writing-original draft, Methodology; Z.Y., Data acquisition and supervision; X.G. Writing-original draft; J.C., Investigation; B.H., Formal analysis; H.H.,Writing-review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, S., Yu, Z., Gu, X. et al. Geomechanical integrity assessment of geological storage for carbon dioxide based on dynamic fluid–solid coupling. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-49755-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-49755-x
