Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Comparison of GRNN-MC and RF models for predicting soil hydrogeological and geotechnical profile using borehole data
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 27 April 2026

Comparison of GRNN-MC and RF models for predicting soil hydrogeological and geotechnical profile using borehole data

  • Ali Golaghaei Darzi1,
  • Hamed Sadeghi1 &
  • Seyed Mohammad Mahdi Moezzi1 

Scientific Reports (2026) Cite this article

  • 920 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Engineering
  • Environmental sciences
  • Hydrology
  • Natural hazards
  • Solid Earth sciences

Abstract

Soil stratification plays a critical role in geological and geotechnical engineering, motivating the development of algorithms capable of reconstructing reliable subsurface profiles. Among these, the General Regression Neural Network–Markov Chain (GRNN-MC) model offers a promising data-driven approach, although it is susceptible to noise and outliers. In contrast, the Random Forest (RF) algorithm is widely recognized for its resistance to overfitting and data variability. This study compares the performance of GRNN-MC and RF in predicting soil profiles using borehole data. Results show that the GRNN-MC model requires approximately 79% of the RF runtime, whereas the RF model attains an average error of about 60% of that of GRNN-MC. When information entropy is used as an indicator of prediction uncertainty, the comparative behavior of the two models is strongly influenced by spatial mesh resolution. Under the coarser mesh used in the baseline RF simulations, the average RF entropy was about 67% of the GRNN-MC value. However, when both models were evaluated on the same refined mesh, RF exhibited substantially higher entropy—approximately three times that of GRNN-MC. Overall, although RF consistently shows lower prediction error, the two models demonstrate similar sensitivity to thin-layer detection and to mesh-resolution effects.

Similar content being viewed by others

Predicting soil compaction parameters in expansive soils using advanced machine learning models: a comparative study

Article Open access 05 July 2025

Modeling of the effect of gradation and compaction characteristics on the california bearing ratio of granular materials for subbase and landfill liner construction

Article Open access 09 October 2024

Comprehensive input models and machine learning methods to improve permeability prediction

Article Open access 27 September 2024

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Sharif University of Technology for providing research facilities and institutional support.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Research Grant Office of Sharif University of Technology under Grant Nos. G4010902 and QB020105.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

    Ali Golaghaei Darzi, Hamed Sadeghi & Seyed Mohammad Mahdi Moezzi

Authors
  1. Ali Golaghaei Darzi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hamed Sadeghi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Seyed Mohammad Mahdi Moezzi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Golaghaei Darzi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Darzi, A.G., Sadeghi, H. & Moezzi, S.M.M. Comparison of GRNN-MC and RF models for predicting soil hydrogeological and geotechnical profile using borehole data. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-50568-1

Download citation

  • Received: 19 February 2026

  • Accepted: 22 April 2026

  • Published: 27 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-50568-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Soil stratification
  • GRNN
  • Markov Chain
  • Random Forest
  • Uncertainty
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing