Abstract
Reading constitutes a fundamental component of learning, and understanding cognitive load during reading is important both for explaining how learners engage with text and for enhancing the effectiveness of learning. The primary aim of this study is to examine how manipulated text complexity conditions influence eye-movement behavior, in order to better understand how readers’ gaze patterns reflect increases or decreases in cognitive load. Specifically, the study investigates whether key metrics (fixations, regressions, pupil area) and the behavioral indicator of reading duration differ systematically between easy and hard texts. The study examines how textual complexity affects cognitive load during reading using eye-tracking. The study included 33 university students (18 female, 15 male; M age = 35.6, SD = 12.4), all native Czech speakers. Participants completed a counterbalanced repeated-measures reading task in Czech in which text complexity was experimentally manipulated across lexical, syntactic, and semantic dimensions. Eye-movement data were collected during reading to capture behavioral patterns typically linked to variations in cognitive load, and participants subsequently provided self-reports of perceived mental effort using the NASA-TLX. Results showed that texts with greater complexity led to more fixations, more regressions, and longer reading durations, indicating higher cognitive load. NASA-TLX ratings likewise indicated greater perceived effort for the higher-complexity condition. However, pupillary metrics showed no meaningful differences between conditions. Overall, the findings suggest that gaze-based eye-tracking metrics are sensitive indicators of cognitive demand, while pupillary responses depend on specific experimental conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Funding
This work was funded by the INTER-EXCELLENCE programme, sub-programme INTER-ACTION, project LUAUS25106: "Using New Technologies to Develop the Cognitive Potential of University Students and Teachers: Possibilities and Limits".
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Vaněček, D., Kursch, M., Şen, E. et al. Exploring how textual complexity affects cognitive load during reading: an eye-tracking study. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-51704-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-51704-7
